ENG 312 Flashcards
Who was John Smith?
- (1580-1631)
- Explorer, leader, and a promoter.
- Wrote a Description of New England (1616)
- Propaganda ideas of settlers, economic motives + other motives?
Who was John Cotton?
- (1585-1652)
- Cambridge U educated theologian and minister
- Puritan
- Wrote “God’s Promise To His Plantations” 1630 before emigrating to NE 1633.
- Sig. relgious fig. in Mass. Bay C.
Who was John Winthrop?
- (1588-1649)
- English lawyer, led Puritans to Mass Bay
- Governor of Bay Col.
- “Model of Christian Charity” -Lay sermon written on the Arabella 1630
- “City on a Hill”
Who was Anne Bradstreet?
- (1612-1672)
- Puritan; Born in England; emigrated to America 1630
- daughter and wife of Mass Bay Col. Govenor
- educated (unusual for women)
- “Tenth Muse” published in London 1650 w/o her permission.
- Traditional forms, applied to domestic isses and her faith.
Who was Samuel Pepys?
- (1633-1703)
- Diary (1660-1669) published in 19th Century was an important record of daily life
- Account of Great Fire; images of chaos, loss, exhaution, and community.
Who was John Dryden?
- (1631-1700)
- dramatist, poest +critic; named poet luareate in 1668
- Probably Puritan upbringing but converted to catholicism
- loyal to Charles II + James II
- Annus Mirabilis: (“Year of Miracles” ie 1666)
- Plague, war, fire as trials to stengthen England
- London will arise like a phoenix from the ashes to become the center of world (via trade/empire)
How does Winthorp define “love” in his sermon “A Model of Christian Charity” and why is love so important to the success of the puritans mission in New England, in his words?
John Winthrop, a Puritan leader and the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, delivered his famous sermon “A Model of Christian Charity” in 1630 aboard the ship Arbella, which was bound for New England. In this sermon, Winthrop defines love as the bond that unites the members of a Christian community and as the foundation of a successful Puritan mission in the New World.
Winthrop begins by stating that God has commanded His people to love one another, and that this love is a duty that must be fulfilled in order to receive God’s blessings. He argues that the love that exists within the Christian community is not based on personal affection, but rather on the common goal of serving God and building a holy society. He refers to this love as “Christian charity” and emphasizes that it is not merely an emotional feeling, but a practical expression of commitment to God and to one’s fellow believers.
Winthrop then goes on to explain why this love is so important to the success of the Puritan mission in New England. He states that God has chosen the Puritans to be a “city upon a hill,” an example to the rest of the world of how a Christian community should live and function. He argues that this requires a high level of unity, cooperation, and self-sacrifice among the members of the community, and that without love, these qualities cannot be achieved. He warns that if the Puritans fail to live up to their calling and to love one another, they will lose God’s favor and be punished.
Anne Bradstreet’s Poems reflect the gender expectations of the seventeenth century. How does her poems, “The author to her book” “My dear loving husband” “As weary pilgrims now rest” challenges those expectations?
Anne Bradstreet was a poet who lived in the seventeenth century, a time when gender expectations were very different from today. Women were expected to be obedient, submissive, and focused on domestic duties, while men were seen as the leaders and providers of their households. Bradstreet’s poetry reflects some of these gender expectations, but also challenges them in a number of ways.
In her poem “The Author to Her Book,” Bradstreet challenges the gender expectation that women should be passive and submissive. The poem describes the poet’s frustration with a book she has written, which she compares to a child that has been taken away from her before it is fully formed. Bradstreet speaks with a strong and assertive voice, asserting her authority over her work and refusing to let others dictate how it should be presented to the world. This goes against the prevailing belief that women should be meek and deferential.
In “My Dear Loving Husband,” Bradstreet challenges the idea that women are less capable of expressing deep emotions than men. The poem is a love letter to her husband, in which she expresses her deep affection for him and her desire to be with him forever. This goes against the belief that women are incapable of deep emotional connections, and shows that women are just as capable of expressing love and devotion as men.
In “As Weary Pilgrims Now Rest,” Bradstreet challenges the expectation that women should be solely focused on domestic duties. The poem describes the Christian concept of heaven as a place of rest for the faithful, and Bradstreet describes it in terms of a journey or pilgrimage. By using this metaphor, Bradstreet suggests that women’s lives are not limited to domestic tasks, but can also involve spiritual growth and exploration.
What is the relationship between Pepys’ account of the fire and Dryden’s predictions for London in the aftermath?
Samuel Pepys was a diarist who wrote about the Great Fire of London in 1666, while John Dryden was a poet who wrote a prophetic poem titled “Annus Mirabilis” in the same year. Although Pepys and Dryden were writing about the same historical event, their accounts and predictions are somewhat different.
Pepys’ account of the fire is a detailed and factual record of what he saw and experienced. He describes the flames, the destruction of buildings, and the panic and confusion of the people in London. Pepys’ primary concern is with the immediate effects of the fire, such as the loss of property and the disruption of daily life.
In contrast, Dryden’s poem “Annus Mirabilis” is a more prophetic account of the fire and its aftermath. He uses the fire as a symbol of a larger crisis in England, including the ongoing Anglo-Dutch Wars and the political and social instability of the time. Dryden predicts that the fire will be followed by other disasters, both natural and man-made, and that London will face a period of upheaval and transformation.
Despite these differences, there is some overlap between Pepys’ account and Dryden’s predictions. Both writers acknowledge the scale of the disaster and the profound impact it had on London and its people. Pepys’ account describes the fire as a “dreadful calamity,” while Dryden refers to it as a “dreadful comet.” Both writers also recognize the need for rebuilding and renewal in the wake of the fire. Pepys notes that plans are being made to rebuild the city, while Dryden suggests that the fire may be an opportunity for England to emerge stronger and more resilient.
Who was Mary Rowlandson
- (1637-1711)
- Born in England Puritan (Mass B. Col. ); Wife of minister
- Context: King Philip’s War (1675-1676) war b/w English settlers and wampanoag and Naragesett in SE New England (Mass)
- King Philip (Metacom) led attack after years of hostilies from colonists
- Rowlandson held captive for 11 weeks in 1676
- Why? Possibly for cultural reasons (a mourning was or ransom)
- Published narrative about her experiences in 1682
- Spiritual Autobiography: Idea of the “wilderness” as the “devil’s territory.” The first transatlantic “best-seller. “
Mary Rowlandson’s 2 Voices: Conflict
Patient Puritan Counterpart:
* “But the Lord renewed my strength and carries me along, that I might see more of his power” 2nd Remove
* “read the 1st and the 28th Deuteronomy, which I did (3rd remove)
Mary Rowlandson’s 2 Voices: Contradiction
Resourceful Surivor:
* There came an Indian to them at the time w/ a basket of horse liver, “ Can you eat liver?” and yet, a savory bit it was to me (7th remove)
* Philip spoke to me to make a shirt for his+ gave me a shilling (8th remove)
Why does Mary Rowlandson’s voice schism exist?
- an attempt to control her own narrative and responses to it? To explain why she subverts the norms of gender + her faith?
- Public vs private voices?
- Has trauma resulted in a subverted divide?
What is the most surprising about Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative? Why might she have wanted to surprise or shock her audience?
Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative is a personal account of her experience of being taken captive by Native Americans during King Philip’s War in 1676. The most surprising aspect of Rowlandson’s Narrative is perhaps her sympathetic portrayal of her captors, which challenges the prevailing stereotype of Native Americans as savages and barbarians. Rowlandson describes the kindness and generosity of some of her captors, and even refers to them as “friends.”
This sympathetic portrayal of Native Americans is surprising because it goes against the prevailing attitudes of the time. In the seventeenth century, Native Americans were often portrayed as savage and uncivilized, and were seen as a threat to European settlers. Rowlandson’s narrative challenges these stereotypes and presents a more nuanced and sympathetic view of Native Americans.
There are a number of reasons why Rowlandson might have wanted to surprise or shock her audience with this portrayal. One possibility is that she wanted to challenge the prevailing attitudes of her time and encourage greater understanding and tolerance between different groups. By presenting Native Americans as complex and multifaceted individuals, rather than as one-dimensional stereotypes, she may have hoped to promote greater understanding and empathy.
Another possibility is that Rowlandson wanted to shock her audience in order to gain attention and sympathy. As a captive, she would have been a figure of interest to many people, and her narrative may have been an attempt to gain support and assistance from others. By presenting a sympathetic portrayal of her captors, she may have been hoping to win over potential allies and supporters.
How is Mary Rowlandson’s split narrative voice reflected in the way that she describes the Native Americans? Give examples.
Mary Rowlandson’s split narrative voice is reflected in the way that she describes the Native Americans in her Narrative. On the one hand, Rowlandson portrays the Native Americans as brutal and cruel, responsible for the deaths of many settlers and for the destruction of towns and villages. On the other hand, she also describes the Native Americans with a sense of sympathy and even admiration, highlighting their kindness, generosity, and hospitality towards her and her fellow captives.
For example, early in the narrative, Rowlandson describes the Native Americans as “barbarous creatures” who “had murdered many of our English” and who were “as savage as the wildest beasts of the wilderness.” However, as her captivity progresses, Rowlandson’s portrayal becomes more nuanced. She describes the kindness of her captors, who provide her with food, shelter, and clothing, and who try to make her feel as comfortable as possible. She also notes the cultural differences between her own Puritan background and the Native American culture, and seems to be fascinated by the Native Americans’ way of life.
This split narrative voice reflects Rowlandson’s own conflicted feelings towards the Native Americans. As a Puritan, she would have been taught to view Native Americans as uncivilized heathens who needed to be converted to Christianity. At the same time, her experience of being taken captive and her interactions with her captors seem to have challenged her preconceptions and opened her mind to the possibility of a more nuanced and sympathetic view of Native Americans.
The narrator of Oroonoko describes both Native Americans and Coramentians (West Africans) in detail. What similarities and differences does she observe?
In terms of similarities, the narrator notes that both Native Americans and West Africans are skilled hunters and warriors. She describes the Coramentians as “the most warlike and the bravest people of all that part of Africa,” and notes their use of bows and arrows as well as other weapons. Similarly, the narrator notes that the Native Americans are skilled in using the bow and arrow, and describes them as “mighty hunters.”
Both groups are also described as having strong familial ties and a deep respect for their elders. The narrator notes that the Coramentians have a complex system of hierarchy and respect for their elders, and describes the importance of family and kinship in their society. Similarly, the narrator notes that the Native Americans have a strong sense of family and community, and describes their communal living arrangements and social organization.
In terms of differences, the narrator notes that the Coramentians have a complex system of slavery, in which individuals can be enslaved as a punishment for crimes or as a result of war. The narrator notes that the Coramentians are known for their skill in capturing and enslaving other Africans, and describes the brutal treatment of enslaved individuals.
The Native Americans, on the other hand, do not have a system of slavery in the way that the Coramentians do. However, the narrator notes that the Native Americans have a complex system of tribal alliances and rivalries, which can lead to conflict and violence between different groups.
Who was Aphra Behn?
- (1640-1689)
- authorship, cultural memory
- A “True History” read as a: historical text, memior, travel narrative, and biography.
- “the Royal Slave”: “noble savage”, race, disourses of slavery, oroonoko and abolition.
How does Aphra Behn represent herself as narrator of Oroonoko’s tale? (Is she reliable? A neutral observer? How is her role influenced by her gender?)
As the narrator of “Oroonoko,” Aphra Behn represents herself as a reliable observer who presents the events of the story objectively. However, her reliability as a narrator has been a subject of much debate among literary critics. Some argue that she presents a biased and one-sided view of the events, while others argue that her narration is more complex than it appears at first glance.
In terms of her gender, Behn’s role as narrator is certainly influenced by the fact that she is a woman writing in a male-dominated literary tradition. Some critics have suggested that Behn’s portrayal of Oroonoko and his tragic fate can be read as a critique of patriarchal power structures and the ways in which women are excluded from political and social power.
At the same time, Behn’s portrayal of Oroonoko and other African characters in the novel has been criticized for perpetuating racist stereotypes and exoticizing African culture. This has led some scholars to question Behn’s reliability as a narrator and to question whether her portrayal of African characters is accurate or fair.
Connect locke’s position about slavery to oroonoko’s
John Locke, in his writing “Two Treatises of Government,” argued that all men have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. He also argued that the government’s role was to protect these natural rights, and that it was the right of the people to overthrow a government that failed to do so.
In “Oroonoko,” Aphra Behn presents a similar argument against slavery. Oroonoko, the titular character, is a West African prince who is captured and enslaved by English colonizers. Throughout the novel, Behn portrays slavery as a violation of Oroonoko’s natural rights and a form of oppression that is unjust and cruel.
This is evident in the way that Oroonoko is treated by his captors, who view him as nothing more than a piece of property to be bought and sold. They ignore his humanity and dignity, and subject him to physical and emotional abuse.
Behn also uses Oroonoko’s story to critique the broader system of slavery and colonialism, arguing that it is immoral and unjust. By portraying Oroonoko as a sympathetic and noble character, Behn challenges the racist and dehumanizing stereotypes that were common in European representations of African people.
How does the speaker of ,”A Modest Proposal” persuade the reader to agree with his proposal before he explains what’s involved?
In “A Modest Proposal,” the speaker uses several rhetorical strategies to persuade the reader to agree with his proposal before he explains what it involves. One of the most effective strategies he employs is satire, which involves using humor, irony, and exaggeration to expose and criticize the flaws in society.
The speaker begins by presenting himself as a reasonable and compassionate individual who is concerned about the welfare of Ireland and its people. He then proceeds to outline the problem of overpopulation and poverty in Ireland, which he claims is due to the incompetence of the Irish government and the greed of the English landlords.
The speaker then suggests that the solution to this problem is to sell the children of the poor as food for the wealthy. He presents this proposal as a logical and rational solution to the problem of poverty, arguing that it would reduce the population, provide income for the poor, and satisfy the appetites of the rich.
Throughout the essay, the speaker uses humor and irony to make his proposal seem reasonable and logical, while at the same time exposing the greed and callousness of the wealthy and the indifference of the government to the suffering of the poor. By adopting a serious and rational tone, he also creates the impression that he is a credible and authoritative source of information.
Why was stanza 2 important in a “Modest Proposal?”
The second stanza of “A Modest Proposal” is important because it sets the tone for the entire essay and introduces the satirical and ironic approach that the speaker will use throughout the rest of the text.
In this stanza, the speaker establishes the problem that he claims to be addressing, which is the poverty and overpopulation of Ireland. He then proposes a solution that seems at first to be a reasonable and rational one, namely, to “devise a method for making these children sound and useful members of the commonwealth.”
However, in the next sentence, the speaker reveals the true nature of his proposal by stating that the children of the poor should be “bred for sale” and that they should be “served in stews at one year old.” This shocking and grotesque image immediately establishes the satirical and ironic tone of the essay, as the reader realizes that the speaker is not actually proposing a serious solution to the problem, but rather exposing the greed and indifference of the wealthy and powerful.
The second stanza also introduces the idea of treating people as commodities, which is a central theme of the essay. By suggesting that children should be bred and sold as if they were livestock, the speaker highlights the dehumanizing effects of poverty and the callousness of those who profit from it.
Define dissenters:
Dissenters are people who say that they do not agree with something that other people agree with or that is official policy
Neoclassical Art and Literature valued:
- Greek and Roman (“The Augustans”)
- Imitation
- learning
- tradition
- control/order (as seen in Pope’s garden @ Twickenham
Define satire:
reform through ridicule
Define heroic couplet:
Rhymed pairs of lines in iambic pentameter.
Who was Johnathan Swift?
- (1667-1745)
- Born in Dublin to English parents
- commented on religion/politics; shifted alligience from Whig (industrialist change) to Tory (conservatives)
- Church of England (Ireland) clergyman; Dean of St. Patrick’s cathedral, Dublin; opposed England’s oppression of Ireland.
- Mostly prose Gulliver’s travels, 1726), noted satirist
- Characterized himself as a “misanthrope” in a letter to Alexandar Pope.
Difference b/w Whigs and Torys
- Whig (industrialist change)
- Tory (conservatives)