Emotions and Stress Flashcards
This theory proposes that exposure to an emotionally salient stimulus causes a physiological reaction which, in turn, is perceived as an emotion – e.g., when a person is faced with a growling bear while hiking in the woods, her heart begins to beat faster and she starts breathing more deeply, and she then feels afraid.
James-Lange theory
A more recent explanation for emotion related to the James-Lange theory predicts that facial expressions associated with specific emotions initiate physiological changes that are consistent with those emotions.
facial feedback hypothesis
This theory of emotion proposes that the experience of an emotion and physiological arousal occur together when an environmental stimulus causes the thalamus (which receives input from the senses) to simultaneously send signals to the cerebral cortex and the sympathetic nervous system.
Cannon-Bard theory
This theory is also known as cognitive arousal theory and describes the experience of emotion as the result of physiological arousal followed by an attribution (“cognitive label”) for that arousal.
Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory
According to Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory, this is the tendency to mislabel arousal when its cause is unknown or ambiguous.
Misattribution of arousal
Excitation transfer theory, which is often erroneously described as being synonymous with misattribution of arousal, is based on three assumptions:
(a) Physical arousal associated with emotions (e.g., elevated heart rate and blood pressure) decays slowly and can continue for some time following the event that elicited the arousal.
(b) Residual arousal caused by one event can intensify arousal caused by a subsequent unrelated event.
(c) People often have limited insight into the causes of their physical arousal and, consequently, can misattribute their intense arousal solely to the subsequent unrelated event.
This theory proposes that differences in emotional reactions to events are due to different appraisals of those events. In other words, two people can experience the same event but respond with different emotions because they appraise the situation differently. It also assumes, in contrast to other theories, that physiological arousal follows cognitive appraisal.
Lazarus’s cognitive appraisal theory
In Lazarus’s cognitive appraisal theory, this type of appraisal involves evaluating the event to determine if it’s irrelevant, benign-positive, or stressful. When the person decides the event is stressful, he/she then determines if it involves a threat, a challenge, or harm/loss.
Primary appraisal
In Lazarus’s cognitive appraisal theory, this type of appraisal occurs when the person determines that the event is stressful and involves identifying his/her coping options and the likelihood that the options will adequately deal with the event.
Secondary appraisal
In Lazarus’s cognitive appraisal theory, this type of appraisal occurs when the person monitors the situation and, as appropriate, changes his/her primary and/or secondary appraisal.
Reappraisal
This reconceptualization of the stress response is based on the assumption that “the brain is the key organ of stress … because it determines what is threatening and therefore stressful, and also determines the physiological and behavioral responses [to stress]” (McEwen, 2006, p. 367).
Allostatic load model
Selye’s (1976) general adaptation syndrome proposes that the body’s response to all types of stress is the same and involves three stages:
Alarm
Resistance
Exhaustion
Selye’s (1976) general adaptation syndrome proposes that, in this stage, increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system provides the body with the energy it needs to respond to the stressor with a fight-or-flight reaction.
Alarm
Selye’s (1976) general adaptation syndrome proposes that, in this stage, some physiological functions return to normal while cortisol (a stress hormone) continues to circulate at an elevated level to help the body maintain a high energy level and cope with the stressor.
Resistance
Selye’s (1976) general adaptation syndrome proposes that, in this stage, physiological processes begin to break down due to stress continuing.
Exhaustion