elizabeth trouble at home and abroad Flashcards

1
Q

aims of religious settlement

A

Elizabeth’s contradictory personal views perhaps help to explain the compromise
religion she came up with. Elizabeth’s aims were, however, more political than
religious. One aim was to heal divisions between Catholics and Protestants before
they led to unrest and civil war. This had happened in both Germany and France.
The country was very divided. Protestantism was quite strong in the south east of
England, but Catholicism was still very strong in the North and the West Country.
Another aim was to maximise her personal power and wealth by taking as much
control over the Church as she could. Obviously, this did not fit in with remaining
loyal to the Pope in Rome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

act of supremacy

A

In May 1559, the Act of Supremacy was passed. This dealt with Elizabeth’s
political aims regarding the Church. It re-established the break from Rome and an
independent Church of England. However, as a compromise, Elizabeth chose the
less controversial title of Supreme Governor rather than Supreme Head, which had
been used by her father and brother. She hoped this would pacify the Catholics who
still regarded the Pope as the ‘head’ of the Church. Elizabeth did, however, require
all members of the CLERGY to swear an oath of loyalty to her. The Act also stated that
the Church would keep its existing, pre-Reformation EPISCOPAL structure, with two
archbishops (at Canterbury and York) and various bishops below them helping
Elizabeth to govern the Church. This was a concession to the Catholics, as all the
European Protestant churches had got rid of this sort of hierarchy. The Court of High
Commission monitored people, and prosecuted those who seemed to be disloyal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the act of uniformity

A

A second law was also passed in May 1559, the Act of Uniformity. This aimed to
end quarrels between Catholics and Protestants by making clear what the Anglican
Church believed in. It was followed by Royal Injunctions two months later, which
outlined 57 rules to be followed, and then the Thirty-Nine Articles in 1563.
The Church created was Protestant. A new Book of Common Prayer was issued,
which was moderately worded but contained radical Protestant ideas. Crucially, the
traditional Catholic Mass was abandoned. Also, the Bible was written in English,
services were held in English and the clergy were allowed to marry. Old Catholic
practices such as pilgrimages and saints’ images were banned.
However, the law did try to pacify English Catholics. For instance, although the
law declared that the altar should be replaced with a communion table, to please
the Catholics the law also stated that ornaments such as crosses and candles could
be placed on the table. Priests also had to wear traditional Catholic-style VESTMENTS
rather than the plain black ones worn by Protestants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

catholic opposition and elizabeth’s response

A

There were still plenty of Catholics in England. William Shakespeare, for example,
belonged to a Catholic family. Those Catholics unwilling to accept Elizabeth
as the Head of the Church who held public office (as MPs, IPs, judges, etc.) had
their positions taken away from them. Attendance at the Anglican Church was
made compulsory, but the Pope ordered English Catholics to not attend Anglican
services. RECUSANTS who followed the Pope’s orders were fined a shilling a week.
Attendance at Mass was also punished through fines, and anybody found guilty of
performing the ceremony of the Mass itself could face the death penalty.
In 1568, a school for training SEMINARY priests was founded by William Allen in
Douai in the Netherlands. The aim was to train English Catholics as missionaries
to go back to England and keep Catholicism alive. A year later, some leading
Catholic nobles, including the Dukes of Northumberland and Norfolk, led a
rebellion in the North, aiming to depose Elizabeth. The following year,
Pope Pius V EXCOMMUNICATED Elizabeth (see Source 4). This was very important, as
it said that Catholics no longer had to be loyal to the Queen and directly ordered
them to disobey her laws or be excommunicated themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

treason act

A
  1. As a result, Elizabeth was increasingly threatened by Catholic plots and
    assassination attempts. In response, a new Treason Act was introduced in 1571.
    This stated that denying Elizabeth’s supremacy and bringing the Pope’s BULL of
    excommunication into England could both be punished by death. Also, anyone
    who left the country for more than six months had their land confiscated. This was
    an attempt to prevent English Catholics from going abroad to train as missionaries.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the jesuits

A

In 1572, the St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in France occurred. Thousands of
French Protestants were killed in mob violence that, it was believed, was brought
about by the Catholic government. Bloodshed in France and worsening relations
with Spain led to greater hatred and fear of Catholicism in England. From the
1580s, a new Catholic threat emerged that added to these feelings: the JEsUITS. This
was a religious group dedicated to serving the Pope. Jesuit priests had rigorous
training and were sent to England as educators. The idea was to gain influence
over rich and powerful families and to turn them against the Queen and the
Anglican Church. Once in England, they also helped to smuggle other priests into
the country. One of the first and most famous English Jesuit priests was Edmund
Campion. He was a brave and charismatic leader. When he arrived in 1580, he first
went to Lancashire, where Catholicism was strongest. Later he moved to London,
holding church services in the homes of important Catholic families.
All this had to be done secretly, with Campion wearing disguises and using ‘safe
houses’ to avoid arrest. The wealthy Anne Vaux and her sister Eleanor Brooksby
were both involved in renting houses across the country for the priests to use. Some
houses had so-called priest holes. These were cleverly concealed rooms and spaces
where priests could hide and where the illegal Mass could be celebrated. Nicholas
Owen, a Catholic carpenter, was particularly important in creating a network of
‘safe houses for priests to use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

repression of catholics

A

Increasingly worried by Catholic activity, the authorities introduced further
measures. In 1581 new laws were passed. The fine for recusancy was raised to £20
and any attempt to convert people to the Catholic faith was made a treasonable
offence. In 1585 Parliament passed another harsh law called the Act Against Jesuits
and Seminary Priests. This made becoming a priest TREASON, and all priests were
ordered to leave England within 40 days on pain of death.
The officials who raided the ‘safe houses’ were called PURSUIVANTS, and their
searches could last for up to a week and result in the houses being ripped apart.
The Jesuit Edmund Campion was caught within a year of his arrival. He was
successfully located by Walsingham’s spy network and taken to the Tower of
London. Campion was offered his freedom if he converted to Protestantism,
but he refused. Even when tortured on the rack, he denied any plotting against
Elizabeth, but was still executed for treason in 1581. Some were luckier. The priest-
hole builder Nicholas Owen helped to mastermind the escape of a Jesuit, John
Gerard, from the Tower of London in 1597.
Further force was used to control the Catholics in the 1590s. Large gatherings of
Catholics were made illegal in 1593 and Catholics’ freedom of movement was
restricted. They were allowed to travel no further than 5 miles from their homes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the threat of catholics subside

A

By 1603, the government campaign against the Catholics had been largely
successful at wiping them out as a serious force. It is estimated that perhaps 10 per
cent of the population were Catholic sympathisers by the end of Elizabeth’s reign,
but only 2 per cent were actual recusants.
Not all of the credit for this, though, should be given to Elizabeth and her
government. The Pope, himself, was partially to blame for the collapse of English
Catholicism. He had forbidden Catholics to attend Church services, but few
people were rich enough to become recusants because of the fines imposed by
the government. Years later, the Pope annoyed English Catholics by appointing
a Jesuit, George Blackwell, as the ‘Archpriest’ of England, even though he was an
unpopular choice. The Pope and Spain had also encouraged plots and rebellions
against Elizabeth. Although most English Catholics did not involve themselves
in such activities, a few English Catholics did commit treason by plotting with
England’s enemies. This helped to reinforce the idea that Catholicism was
dangerous, unpatriotic and ‘foreign’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

puritan opposition and elizabeth’s response

A

It was not only Catholics who were unhappy with Elizabeth’s religious settlement.
Puritans were also dissatisfied with the compromise. For them, the old Roman
Catholic Church was corrupt and too many of its traditions were based on
superstition, not the Bible. They found the Catholic parts of Elizabeth’s ‘Middle
Way offensive. In particular, they were angry about the continued existence of
bishops and about the vestments worn by the Anglican clergy.
Like the Catholics, they became a particular problem for Elizabeth from the 1570s
onwards. There were many senior people at Court, in the Church and in Parliament
who were sympathetic to the Puritans. Even Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Dudley,
was a Puritan. Influenced by CALVINIST ideas, which were becoming popular in
Scotland, Thomas Cartwright delivered a series of lectures at the University of
Cambridge in 1570. He called for the abolition of bishops. He also made no
mention of Elizabeth as ‘Supreme Governor. She was horrified at the suggestion
that the Church hierarchy should be removed, seeing the idea as being a dangerous
and revolutionary threat to her own authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

rival for the throne- mary queen of scott’s

A

England had always had a difficult relationship with Scotland, but the situation
was further complicated because of Elizabeth’s refusal to marry. Elizabeth’s
childlessness meant that Mary was a potential heir to the English throne (see
Figure 11 on page 29 to understand Mary’s claim to the throne). Mary was keen
to assert her claim and therefore Elizabeth was deeply suspicious of her cousin.
Elizabeth had suggested that Mary marry her own favourite, Robert Dudley,
as a way of controlling the Scottish Queen. Mary instead took her own cousin
Lord Darnley as her second husband. Like Mary and Elizabeth, Darnley was also
descended from King Henry VI, and this marriage was designed to strengthen
Mary’s claims to the English throne. It infuriated Elizabeth.
Mary’s marriage to the violent and drunken Darnley was not a success. When he
was murdered, after less than two years, there was gossip that Mary had had a hand
in the crime. The rumours were strengthened still further when she promptly took
a third husband, Earl Bothwell. Bothwell was widely suspected of having arranged
Darnley’s murder. Civil war broke out in Scotland. Mary was forced to ABDICATE in
favour of her infant son.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mary queen of scot’s comes to england

A

She quickly escaped captivity at Loch Leven in Scotland and fled to England,
arriving, disguised, in a fishing boat at Workington in Cumberland in May 1568.
Mary might have been Elizabeth’s cousin, but her arrival on English soil was
unwelcome news to Elizabeth. Mary was pro-French, a Catholic and a potential
heir. Those who questioned Elizabeth’s legitimacy even considered Mary to be the
rightful Queen of England. Elizabeth certainly did not want such a threat at her
Court. She was afraid that Mary could act as a focus for Catholic resistance. She was
quickly moved, firstly to Carlisle Castle and then Bolton Castle. Elizabeth chose to
keep Mary under HOUSE ARREST far away in the North and the Midlands, in isolated
locations far from the coast, and from London and Scotland. In this way she hoped
to limit any threat that Mary might pose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the northern rebellion

A
  1. Mary, Queen of Scots’ arrival in England triggered a Catholic rebellion. This plot
    started as a Court CONSPIRACY. The Duke of Norfolk played a central role. He was the
    most senior English noble, the wealthiest landowner in the country, and a cousin
    of the Queen. He resented William Cecil’s power as Elizabeth’s chief minister
    and was frustrated, feeling that his political talents were under-rated by Elizabeth
    and her regime. He was also a Catholic sympathiser and disapproved of Cecil’s
    unfriendly policies towards Spain. Norfolk planned to marry Mary and set her up
    as Elizabeth’s heir as a way of gaining greater influence himself and weakening
    Cecil’s position. At this stage, there was no plan to actually remove Elizabeth as
    Queen. He enlisted the help of a number of courtiers, including two of Elizabeth’s
    councillors. One of these was Sir Nicholas Throckmorton. Surprisingly, the other was Elizabeth’s favourite, the Puritan Robert Dudley (the
    Earl of Leicester). Dudley was also keen to reduce Cecil’s power. However, the guilt-
    stricken Dudley soon confessed all to the Queen and Cecil. Once Dudley had ‘let
    the cat out of the bag, Norfolk fled Court. When he was captured and imprisoned,
    Norfolk begged for Elizabeth’s forgiveness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

northern rebellion- rebel success

A

Although Norfolk had ordered his fellow conspirators not to carry out a rebellion
once the plot was uncovered, there were still rumours that an uprising was
planned. Elizabeth therefore decided to summon the Earl of Northumberland and
the Earl of Westmorland to Court. They were both Catholics and she suspected
them of disloyalty. Elizabeth’s action was miscalculated, actually pushing the earls
into rebellion. On 9 November 1569, the two earls joined forces at Brancepeth
Castle and church bells rang out to call people to rebel. The rising involved nearly
5000 rebels who moved through the north of England. They illegally heard Mass
in Durham Cathedral on 14 November. They then headed further south, and soon
most of the land east of the Pennines was in rebel hands. The Earl of Sussex, the
President of the Council of the North, struggled to raise an army on Elizabeth’s
behalf to deal with the rebellion. By December, the rebels had captured Barnard
Castle. They also captured the port of Hartlepool on the east coast, where they
were expecting help to arrive from Spain as promised by the Spanish AMBASSADOR,
de Spes. The situation seemed very serious indeed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the northern rebellion collapses

A

However, such international help never appeared. The Spanish were fellow
Catholics but were not too keen on the pro-French Mary Stuart. In fact, the whole
affair was poorly planned by the earls, who never reached the South. They had
not properly mobilised their forces and they had no coherent strategy. The vast
majority of English Catholics and most of the nobility remained loyal to Elizabeth.
Crucially, the Pope had not yet issued the BULL excommunicating Elizabeth. Had
this already happened, English Catholics might have been more willing to get
involved in the Rebellion. Key northern towns - Berwick, Pontefract and York
- were held by the government. As the royal army moved north, rumours of its
strength encouraged the rebels to retreat. After a short battle, the earls crossed the
border into Scotland on 19 December.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the ridolfi plot

A
  1. Roberto di Ridolfi was a Catholic Italian banker from Florence who lived in
    London. This plot was again an attempt to restore Catholicism in England. It
    involved the Queen of Scots, the Pope, Philip Il of Spain and the Duke of Norfolk.
    This time, the plan was far more dangerous. Elizabeth had been excommunicated
    by the Pope in 1570, so the English Catholics were now free to rebel against their
    Queen. The plan was simple: for Elizabeth to be assassinated and replaced as
    monarch by Mary, Queen of Scots. The idea was for around 6000 Spanish troops to
    land at Harwich in Essex, led by the Duke of Alba. Their arrival, it was hoped, would prompt a rebellion. Ridolfi optimistically
    calculated that about half of the English nobles were Catholic and that when they
    rebelled they would be able to assemble nearly 40,000 men. Once Elizabeth had
    been murdered, the plan was for Mary to marry the Duke of Norfolk. In prison,
    Mary was desperate for her freedom, and had lost all hope of Elizabeth helping her
    to return to either France or Scotland. Norfolk, recently released from prison, was
    keen to regain power after his disgrace. Both Mary and Norfolk therefore agreed to
    the plot.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

consequences of the ridolfi plot

A

Elizabeth’s intelligence network discovered the conspiracy. As Ridolfi was abroad
when the plot was discovered, he escaped prosecution. De Spes, the Spanish
Ambassador, was expelled from England. Norfolk was arrested and found guilty of
treason. Parliament passed a law directed against Mary that declared that anyone
making a claim to the throne and knowing of a plan to assassinate the monarch
should be removed from the succession. Parliament also pushed for both Norfolk
and Mary to be executed. Not for the first or the last time, Elizabeth was indecisive.
Norfolk was England’s only duke and also her cousin. She had forgiven him once
before. She changed her mind three times, but with great reluctance eventually
decided to sign Norfolk’s DEATH WARRANT. He was beheaded on Tower Hill in June
1572. However, Elizabeth’s other cousin, the Queen of Scots, survived the plot.
Elizabeth absolutely refused to consider having her executed.

17
Q

the throckmorton plot

A
  1. In 1583 a plan was hatched for a French Catholic force, backed by Spanish and
    Papal money, to invade England. Again, the Queen of Scots was central to the
    scheme. Mary was to be freed from house arrest and there was to be a Catholic
    uprising involving the Jesuits, seminary priests and English Catholic population.
    Elizabeth would be captured and, following her murder, Mary was to be installed
    as Queen. Francis Throckmorton, after whom the plot is named, acted as the
    intermediary between Mary and the Spanish Ambassador, Bernardino de
    Mendoza. Before the plan could be put into action, Walsingham discovered what
    was happening. Throckmorton was placed under surveillance for six months. Once
    arrested, he was tortured on the rack and made a confession.
    Following this plot, the Bond of Association was established, which meant that
    anybody associated with an assassination plot against Elizabeth would not be
    allowed to benefit from the Queen’s death in any way. Throckmorton himself
    was convicted of high treason, and was executed in July 1584. De Mendoza was
    expelled from England, and no more Spanish ambassadors lived in England for the
    rest of Elizabeth’s reign. Once again, a lack of evidence meant that Mary escaped
    relatively unscathed. However, Walsingham now became determined to find some
    hard evidence of Mary’s treasonous activity so that she could be dealt with once
    and for all.
18
Q

the babington plot

A
  1. After the discovery of the Throckmorton Plot, Mary was moved to the ruined
    TutoutY Castle in Staffordshire and then to a moated manor house called Charly,
    Hall in late 1585. Here, she was not allowed any visitors and all her letters were
    checked. Her jailer was a strict Puritan called Amyas Paulet, carefully chosen by
    Elizabeth because of his hatred of the Catholic faith. Her harsher treatment was
    norsimply a security measure. The idea was to push Mary into another plot. By this
    time, Mary had become deeply resentful of her situation. She had been imprisone;
    for almost twenty vears. Cut off from the outside world, she had lost her throne, he-
    status, her social life and her son. There seemed little hope of escape, and she was
    also in failing health, had lost her looks and had become obese.
    Mary inevitably became depressed and more resentful of Elizabeth. She began a
    secret correspondence with the French Ambassador and Sir Anthony Babington.
    Babington was a Catholic recusant from Derbyshire who had been recruited by a
    Jesuit priest called John Ballard to help organise a new plot. Letters between the
    conspirators were written in code and were smuggled in and out of Chartley. By
    mid-1586, a plot to kill Elizabeth and free Mary had been devised. The plan was to
    place Mary on the throne and re-establish Catholicism as England’s religion, with
    the help of a Spanish invasion force.
    Unknown to Mary, Elizabeth’s
    ‘spymaster’ Walsingham knew all about
    the letters. Walsingham had placed a
    double-agent named Gilbert Gifford
    M
    inside Chartley. He intercepted the
    letters, which were then deciphered
    by Thomas Phelippes, who then sent
    the details to Walsingham himself.
    I
    Walsingham allowed the letters to be
    It wateSe worl
    Jilligently or fausfully
    133
    sent on to their intended recipients
    in order to allow the plot to unfold in
    the hope of finally entrapping Mary.
    It worked. On 17 July 1586, Mary
    wrote a coded letter approving of the
    plot and, crucially, consenting to the
    assassination of Elizabeth. The following month, Babington was arrested, and in
    September 1586 he and six other conspirators were hung, drawn and quartered.
19
Q

the trial and execution of mary queen of scot’s

A

Walsingham now had proof of Mary’s guilt. In October, Mary was placed on trial
for treason at Fotheringhay Castle in Northamptonshire. She had to manage her
own defence, which she did eloquently. She was found guilty. Parliament and the
Privy Council insisted that Mary should be executed

20
Q

death warrant of mary queen of scot’s

A

As in her dealings with Norfolk’s treachery fifteen years earlier, Elizabeth was
indecisive and angered her advisors with the delays. A letter sent to Elizabeth from
Mary was said to have reduced Elizabeth to tears. Eventually, in December 1586,
Cecil prepared a death warrant, but Blizabeth refused to sign it. Only in February
of the following year, amid rumours of Spanish landings in Wales and Mary’s
escape, did Elizabeth finally sign the warrant. However, she said that this was a precautionary measure, giving her secretary
instructions not to have the warrant sealed. The Council met without Elizabeth’s
knowledge and took a drastic course of action. The Queen’s instructions were
ignored. The death warrant was sealed and sent to Fotheringhay. On & February
1587, in a bloody and botched execution, Mary, Queen of Scots was beheaded.

21
Q

elizabeth’s response to the death of mary queen of scot’s

A

When news of Mary’s death was brought to Elizabeth, she reacted with fury.
she was appalled at the idea that she had given permission for the murder or a
fellow monarch and she appeared to be wracked with guilt over this REGICIDE. She
banished Cecil, refusing to see him for six months. Her secretary, William Davison,
was imprisoned in the Tower of London. Elizabeth was aware of the dangerous
consequences that could result from Mary’s death. In killing Mary, Elizabeth had
made her into a MARTYR for the Catholic cause. However, English Catholics did
not rise up in protest. Appalled at yet another plot against their Queen, they were
evidently more loyal to their monarch than Elizabeth thought.
Although the problem of Mary had been permanently removed, her death caused
displeasure abroad. England was already at war with Spain, and Mary’s death
maddened Philip I still further. The King of Scots, unsurprisingly, also protested
at his mother’s execution and so too did Mary’s brother-in-law, the Catholic King
of France. However, their protests came to nothing. Elizabeth deflected their anger
by claiming her innocence in the whole affair, instead blaming her secretary for
not following her instructions about the death warrant. Historians have since
questioned whether Elizabeth’s outpouring of grief over her cousin’s death was
genuine. Many have suggested that it was all an act and that Davison was simply
a scapegoat used to cover Elizabeth’s own ruthlessness in getting rid of Mary once
and for all.

22
Q

spanish armada

A

1588