Elements Of A Crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does actus Reus mean?

A

Guilty Act
Conduct part of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must D actions be for them to be found guilty?

A

Voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When did lord denning say an act would not be voluntary?

A

An act which is done by the muscles without any control by the mind

Eg reflex action, spasm, seizure, sneezing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What 3 hypothetical examples of involuntary conduct were given in Hill v Baxter?

A

All whilst driving and loosing control:
1. Being stung by bees
2. Being hit on the head with a stone
3. Having a heart attack or epileptic fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an omission?

A

Not acting or failing to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the general rule for omissions?

A

You are not legally responsible for a failure to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an exception to the general rule for omissions?

A

A person is only liable for an omission if they have a duty to act and they fail to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the types of duty?

A
  1. Contractual
  2. Relationship
  3. Assuming responsibility voluntarily
  4. Public office
  5. Creating a dangerous situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give a case example of contractual duty.

A

Pittwood 1902:
D worked on railway. A man was killed on the railway line when D did not close the gate.
D omitted to close the gate.
D had a duty to do so as he was a railway crossing keeper (it was his job by contract).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give an example of relationship duty.

A

Gibbins and Proctor 1918:
A father and his partner killed his child by starving her.
D omitted to feed the child.
D had a duty to do so as he was the legal guardian of the child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an example of assuming responsibility voluntarily.

A

Stone and Dobinson 1977:
D and his girlfriend chose to take care of his elderly sister rather than sending her to a home. The sister died of poor treatment/ neglect.
D omitted to take care of his sister.
D had a duty to do so as he voluntarily assumed responsibility for her.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give an example of the duty of public office.

A

Dytham 1979:
A police officer watched a fight break out and a man died.
D omitted to intervene.
D had a duty to do so as it was his job in the public office.
This would also relate to contractual duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give 2 examples of the duty of creating a dangerous situation.

A
  1. Miller 1983:
    A man dropped a lit cigarette and started a fire. He woke up and simply moved to another room. The house burned down.
    D omitted to put out the fire or call emergency services.
    D had a duty to do so as he had created a dangerous situation.
  2. DPP v Santana-Bermudez 2003:
    D stopped for stop and search. D knew he had a needle in his pocket. D let officer pat him down without disclosing the needle. Officer was hurt.
    D omitted to tell the officer about the needle.
    D had a duty to do so as he had created a dangerous situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case relates to the Continuing Act

A

Fagan v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What case relates to the Single Transaction Theory

A

R v Thabo- Meli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 2 types of causation?

A

Factual
Legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the test for Factual Causation?

A

But for - according to R v Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain the But for test

A

It must be proven that ‘but for’ D’s conduct the consequence to V would not have happened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain R v Pagett

A

D kidnapped pregnant girlfriend
Stand off with police
D used v as human shield
D fired at police
Police fire back shoot v and kills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explain Rv White then apply the but for test.

A

D poisons mother for inheritance
V has a sip then heart attack
Dies unconnected to poison

But for the defendant poisoning the victim, she would have died anyway.
Therefore the defendant was not the factual cause of the victims death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the test for legal causation?

A

The ‘operative and substantial cause’ test meaning the defendant’s actions are a significant cause of the consequence.

22
Q

Which case made the test for legal causation? Explain

A

R v Smith

D stabbed v in lung
Medics perform CPR
Lung tears and v died

23
Q

What are the three types of intervening acts?

A

Acts of a third party
Acts of the victim
Acts of god

24
Q

What must the intervening acts be to break the chain of causation?

A

Unreasonable and unforeseeable

And in a medical sense- palpably wrong.

25
Q

Give an example case for acts of a third party

A

R v Jordan
R v Smith

26
Q

Give an example case of acts of the victim

A

R v Roberts
R v Williams

27
Q

Give a case example of acts of god

A

R v White

28
Q

Explain R v Jordan

A

D shot v in stomach
V almost recovered
Given antibiotics
Allergic reaction
Given more antibiotics
Went into cardiac arrest
Body pumped with six times more fluid any human should have in body
V got pneumonia and died

29
Q

Explain R v Roberts

A

D picked up female hitchhiker
D made sexual advances on v
V jumped out of moving car and broke her leg

30
Q

Explain R v Williams

A

D picked up male hitchhiker
D asked v if he could see his wallet
V thought D was trying to rob him
V jumps out of moving car
V hit head and died

31
Q

Give an example of an act of god

A

Volcanic eruption
Flood
Hurricane
Tornado
Falling tree
Heart attack

32
Q

Explain the Thin Skull Rule

A

Any hidden characteristic which makes V more vulnerable will not break the chain of causation.

33
Q

Give an example of a characteristic covered under the thin skull rule.

A

Haemophilia
Osteoporosis
Allergies
Psychiatric conditions
Religious beliefs

34
Q

Give a case example for the thin skull rule and explain

A

R v Blaue
D stabbed v who was a Jehovahs Witness
V told would die if no blood transfusion
Refused blood due to religious beliefs
V died

35
Q

What does mens rea mean?

A

Guilty mind

36
Q

What are the two types of mens rea?

A

Intention
Recklessness

37
Q

What are the two types of intention?

A

Direct
Oblique

38
Q

Which case is used to prove direct intention?

A

R v Mohan
Police told car to stop
Car accelerates towards police
Police move out of way but injured in process

39
Q

Explain direct intention

A

When D sets out/ aims/ decides to bring about a consequence.

40
Q

What is the type of test for direct intention? (S or O)

A

Subjective
What was the defendant thinking?

41
Q

What would be good evidence that D had direct intention to murder?

A

Use of a weapon
Sustained attack
Premeditated
Where attack is on body

42
Q

Which case relates to Oblique intention?

A

R v Woollin
D’s baby crying
D lost temper
Threw baby towards pram
Baby hit head on wall and died

43
Q

What are the two tests for oblique intention?

A
  1. Objective- was the consequence of D’s conduct a virtual certainty to the reasonable man?
  2. Subjective- did D realise it was a virtual certainty?
44
Q

Which case relates to recklessness?

A

R v Cunningham
D ripped gas meter off to steal money behind
Unknown to D this caused gas leak
Gas harmed v

45
Q

What is the test for recklessness?

A

Subjective- Did the defendant realise the risk and carry on regardless?

46
Q

What is transferred malice?

A

When D intends to commit a crime on one person but actually does it to another.

The mens rea is transferred from the intended victim to the actual victim meaning D is still guilty.

47
Q

Which case relates to transferred malice?

A

R v Latimer
D in pub
Argument with X
Tried to hit X with belt
Ends up hitting V as well

48
Q

When can malice not be transferred?

A

People to property and vice versa

49
Q

What do we mean by coincide?

A

Both the actus reus and mens rea must happen at the same time for a defendant to be convicted.

50
Q

What do we use when the actus reus and mens rea don’t naturally coincide?

A
  1. Single Transaction theory- extend mens rea to meet actus reus (treated as a single transaction)
  2. Continuing Act- extend actus reus to meet mens rea (treated as a continuing act)
51
Q

Which case relates to the Single Transaction Theory?

A

R v Thabo- Meli
D kidnapped v
Took v to cliff
Beat him with bat until thought was dead
Disposed of ‘body’ over cliff
V died due to the elements

52
Q

Which case relates to the Continuing Act?

A

Fagan v MPC
D accidentally ran over v foot
V told him to move off
D stayed on foot and refused to move.