electoral systems Flashcards

1
Q

What is FPTP and how does it work?

A

An electoral system where voters vote for one candedate to represent their constituency, voters put an x next to the candidate they would like to be represented by and the votes are counted. Whoever has the most votes - even if it just by a single vote - wins. It is a winner takes all or plurality system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where is fptp used?

A

elections to the houses of common, councils, london mayoral elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is AMS and how does it work?

A

AMS is a hybrid system that combines FPTP and a proporotional representation system. Voters get two votes - one for their constituency, where they vote for a candedate, and one for a regional closed party list. Constituencies races are decided using first past the post. The regional seats are then allocated using the D’hondt formula (regional votes / number of constituencies won in region +1), this is to assign seats in a more proportionate manner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where is AMS used? How many seats in the main one

A

Scotland - 76 constituency seats and 56 regional seats
Wales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Single transferable vote (STV) system and how does it work?

A

STV is a proportional representation system.
* There are usually 6 seats to be won in each constituency
* Parties can put up as many candedates in a consituency as there are seats to be won (though they usually don’t)
* Voters are given a ballot paper with all thhe candidates who are running in their constituency. They then rank the candidates in order of preference (1 next to their first choice, 2 next to their second choice etc…). They can rank as many or as little candidates as they want
* At the count, an electoral quota is calculated. This is the total number of votes cast divided by seats available plus one. One is added to the final aswer
* All the first choice votes are counted, and whoever reaches the quota is automatically elected
* The candidate that comes last is eliminated, and those who put them as their first choice now get their second choice assigned to candidates.
* If this gives a candidate enough votes to win, they are elected.
* This process continues untill all seats have been allocated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where is stv used?

A

Northern irish assembly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Supplementary vote (SV) and how does it work?

A

SV is a majoritarian system used to elect a single candidate in a constituency.
* Voters have two choices, their first choice candidate and their second choice
* all the first choice votes are counted, if a candidate wins a majority from these first choice votes they are automatically elected.
* If no candidate wins an absolute majority, than the two candidates with the most votes remain while all the other candidates are eliiminated. The second choice votes of the eliminaed candidates are then added to the totals of the two remaining candidates to declare a winner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where is SV used?

A

No where major, some local mayoral elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are 4 general advantages of fptp?

A
  • it is a simple system
  • In theory, it means representatives are closely tied to their consituency
  • reduces the threat of extremist parties
  • it produces an outright winner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are 6 general negatives of fptp

A
  • unproportional
  • gives an advantage to parties with geographically concentrated support, eg the SNP (and vice versa)
  • supports a two party system
  • wasted votes
  • It creates a system of safe and marginal seats
  • government usually wins much less than an overall majority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a safe seat?

A

A safe seat is a constituency where one party holds such a considerable lead over the runner up that the race is effectively a foregone conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a marginal seat?

A

Where the majority of the incumbent is small enough that the election is very contestable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What has happened to the number of marginal seats in the 2024 election?

A

Nearly one in every five seats – 115 in total – was won by a margin of 5% or less of total votes cast. There were 48 more seats in this marginal category than at the 2019 general election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are 5 general advantages of AMS

A
  • proportional
  • two votes so allows for split ticket voting
  • keeps a constituency - representative bond
  • gives a chance for smaller parties to influence the political system
  • government has a larger mandate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Whata are 3 drawbacks of ams

A
  • reduced strength of government
  • extremist parties
  • complicated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the general benefits of STV?

A

much the same as ams
* more choice

17
Q

What are the drawbacks of stv?

A
  • election of extremist candidates
  • very complicated and time consuming
  • extremist parties
  • as there are six candidates per constituency, who is accountable for decisions is more complex
18
Q

What are the advantages of SV

A
  • The winnning canidate has an absolute majority
  • simplelmore choice
19
Q

what are the drawbacks of sv

A
  • wasted votes
  • a candidate can win on secondary choices
  • entrenches two party system
  • not very proportional
20
Q

Evidence that fptp should be replaced because it is unfair and disproprtionately favours larger/more concentrated parties?

A

Labour - 33.7% of the vote and 63.2% of seatss
Reform - 14.3% of the vote yet only 0.8% of seats
- pluralistic, winner takes all approach - parties with dispersed support struggle to win any seat outright - democratic deficit - tyranny of the minority - limits the ability of smaller parties to represent the views of the electorate who voted for them.

21
Q

Evidence that AMS is more proportionate?

A

AMS - D’hondt formula - uses regional seats to address imbalances in constituency seats.
2021: SNP won 44.2% of the vote and won 49.1% of seats, Labour won 19.8% of the vote and won 17.1% of seats. Much more representative.

22
Q

Evidence that the lack of proportionately for smaller parties is a somewhat a good thing?

A

reduces the chaances of extremist parties gaining lots of seats - reform is a populist party that if given the chance to govern could harm democracy.

However, all voters must be represented whether people call their views extrme or not.

23
Q

Evidence that FPTP creates a system of safe and marginal seats

A

in 2019, 316 out of 650 seats were considred safe.
* MPs in these constituencies will be much less accountable
* in addition, it means voters in safe seats are not worth as much as those in marginal seats, meaning their votes are ‘wasted’. 70.8% of votes in 2019 were wasted.
* This could discourage turnout and make society less plural

25
Evidence that marginality has been improving?
Nearly one in every five seats – 115 in total – was won by a margin of 5% or less of total votes cast. There were 48 more seats in this marginal category than at the 2019 general election.
26
Why could an increase in marginality be a blip rather than a new norm?
the unpopularity of the tories ment that many safe seats were now up for contesting. However, this is unlikely to remain as the results in 2024 were significant.
27
What were the different levels of turnout in the different electoral systems?
* UK (FPTP) - 59.7% * AMS (scottish parliament) - 63.4% *STV (Northern Irish assembly) - 63.6%
28
What is a referendum
A vote in which qualified voters are asked a single question about a proposal, where there are only 2 choices (usually yes or no)
29
What was the 1997 referendum on? what was the outcome?
Should additional powers be desolved to scotland - 74.2% yes
30
What was the 2011referendum on? What was the result?
Should the uk adopt an alternative voting system? No 67.9%
31
What was the 2014 referendum on? What was the result?
Whether Scotland should become a completely independent country, 55.3% no
32
What was the 2016 referendum on? What was the result?
Whether Britain should leave the EU, 51.9% leave
33
What are the general arguments for referendums?
* Purest form of democracy - important when direct will of the people is required * Referendums can decisively resolve conflicts in society * People are becoming more informed due to the media
34
What are the general arguments against referendums?
* The electorate may be ignorant over the complexities of certain topics, meaning they cannot possibly make a rational decision. This is exacerbated by the rise in populism * Referendumcs can create rifts in society * referendums encourage 'tyranny of the majority' * Some questions cannot be answered by a simple yes or no question
35
What is evidence that referendums are the purest form of democracy?
2016 brexit referendum - 51.9% of the population voted to leave the EU, despite 80% of MPs wanting to remain * Demonstrate the pure will of the people, there is a possibility that the representatives do not vote the way the people believe and this causes a democratic defecit. Referendums are important when an electoral mandate is important to give decisions greater legitamacy
36
Why could it be said that referendums encourage tyranny of the majority?
48.1% voted to remain in Europe * Tyranny of the majority is the significant minority is practically ignored and their views marginilised. This encourages rifts in society and means many are not represented by the decision they supposedly voted for.
37
Evidence electorate does not understand complexities of an issue?
2011 AV referendum Electorate may be ignorant of the ins and outs of a specific issue. They may lack the necessery information to make an informed judgement and are unaware of the raamifications (explains the low turnout of 42%)
38
Evidence that the electorate is educated to make an informed decisons
Increased access to social media and the internet (68% use online news sources) -more able to make rational decisions for themselves rather than relyin on representatives
39