Electoral systems Flashcards
YES - National Party Conventions
- Maintain party unity
- Enthusing ordinary voters to make decisions
- Enthusing party faithful
- Celebrates the glorious past
- Chance to identify rising stars in the parties.
NO- National Party Conventions
- Few significant decisions made
- Reduced TV coverage
- Unimportant impression of a pre-planned process
- Promoting balloons (compromises) rather than policies
How many electoral college voters and how many to win?
Electoral College (538 electoral college electors, 270 to win)
Electoral college votes allocation
Electoral College votes = state representation in Congress (No. of Senators (2) + No. of Representatives (1-53))
**Except for Nebraska and Maine which use a District system, the winner of the popular vote gets all the electoral college votes (winner takes all) and the result will be announced by the vice president in Congress in January.
Fairness of the Electoral College
- Over-representation of small states
- No room for 3rd parties
- System campaigns only focus on small number of key states
- Allow potentials for minority
y-vote winners:
Over-representation of small states
- Maine has a higher population than Wyoming (1.4 million vs 500K) yet they only have 1 vote difference in numbers of electoral college vote
What does it mean by no room for 3rd parties?
It is only bonus votes when the majority parties win the election in the FPTP system
Example of EC allowing potentials for minority
y-vote winners
2016: Trump won the election with only winning the electoral college votes (304 vs 227) and lost in popular votes (46.1% vs 48.2%)
Important current legislation on campaign finance
- McCain-Feingold reforms 2002 (Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act 2002) and Citizens United vs FEC 2010.
Why did the SC overturn the BICRA 2002 by Citizens Utd v. FEC (2010)?
SO companies can donate to preferred presidential candidates like individuals (through super PACs and 501(c)4) -> judicial review is unconstitutional as it is not a power mentioned in the Constitution
Key aspects of the Bipartisan Reform Act 2002
- Restrictions on “soft money” contributions in federal elections.
- Regulation of issue advocacy and political advertising
- Increased limits on “hard money” contributions by individuals
- Prohibition of electioneering communications (broadcast ads (TV or radio) that mention a federal candidate) by corporations and unions within certain timeframes before elections (Within 30 days of a primary election or within 60 days of a general election)
What did the Bipartisan Reform Act 2002 aim to do?
Aimed to reduce the influence of special interests in political campaigns and address campaign financing issues that had arisen in previous elections
What are super PACs?
Independent expenditure-only political committees that can receive unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and unions
After which court case did super PACs emerge from?
SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission
What can super PACs collect?
- Collect unlimited donations to support candidates or attack rivals with adverts, without directly fund the candidates (but they can fund it covertly anyways)