Elections and Referendums Flashcards
What are the main functions of elections?
Elections are a fundamental part of the democratic process.
They provide a means for eligible citizens to:
> Express political preferences
> Pass judgements on a party or government in office
> Vote for candidates to represent them in the decision-making process.
What are the main functions of elections?
The 4 main functions of elections are:
1) Participation
2) Legitimisation
3) Accountability
4) Representation
1) Participation
Elections provide the single most important opportunity for individuals to engage in the democratic process and influence the political agenda.
2) Legitimisation
Successful candidates and parties can claim an electoral mandate to pursue their policies and enact their manifesto commitments. Mandates can be personal (for an individual MP within a constituency) or for a party (winning enough seats to secure control of Parliament).
3) Accountability
Elections offer citizens the chance to hold individual MPs to account and pass a verdict on the performance of government.
4) Representation
In elections, citizens vote for people to act on their behalf in the decision-making process.
MPs as trustees…
Some stress that MPs should be seen as trustees - rather than delegates, faithfully serving the wishes of their electors - who act on behalf of their constituents with a responsibility to use their experience and expertise when making judgements.
However, the advent of party loyalty, whipped votes and the extension of collective responsibility has severely diminished the Burkean trustee model in recent decades.
What is an electoral mandate?
An electoral mandate implies that the winning political party at a general election has obtained popular authority from the electorate and therefore the ‘right’ to govern in accordance with its electoral commitments, particularly through the passage of legislation and the action detailed in its manifesto.
An electoral mandate can be regarded as a contractual relationship between the winning party and the electorate as it contains elements of obligation on the part of the governing party.
Strength of electoral mandates…
The strength of an electoral mandate claimed by the UK’s government is questionable since a winning party has never achieved over 50% of the popular vote in any post-war election.
> In 2005, Labour polled 35.2% of the votes cast - the lowest share of the vote ever recorded by a single-party majority government - even with a majority of 66 MPs.
> In 2015, the Conservative Party’s share of the vote rose just 0.8% from 2010 (from 36.1% to 36.9%), and yet it was able to exchange a coalition government for a single-party government with a working majority of 12 MPs.
> In 2017, Labour received 12.8 million votes. In securing 40% of the popular vote, it gained a third more votes that it had received at the previous election. However, it won only 30 more seats, moving from 232 to 262.
What types of electoral systems are used in the UK? - Majoritarian System
MAJORITARIAN SYSTEM
> Requires constituency winners to secure either the most votes (the plurality system of FPTP where the largest amounts of votes is required) OR an absolute majority (AV or SV).
> FPTP is still used for elections to Westminster Parliament, however, another majoritarian system - SV - is used to elect the London mayor.
What types of electoral systems are used in the UK? - Proportional Representation
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
> Secures the closest relationship between the votes won and the seats gained as possible.
> Some proportional systems (e.g. list systems) use large regional constituencies with multiple representatives to guarantee this.
> In Northern Ireland, elections to local government, the Northern Ireland Assembly and the European Parliament take place under a single transferable vote (STV) - a highly proportional electoral system.
> Since 1999, UK elections to the European Parliament have taken place under a closed regional party list system.
What types of electoral systems are used in the UK? - Hybrid Systems
HYBRID SYSTEMS
> Combine aspects of majoritarian and proportional systems.
> Some hybrid systems (AMS), give voters two votes - one for a constituency representative who requires a simple majority, and another for regional representation from a party list.
> Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections take place under a hybrid AMS system.
> The Greater London Assembly’s 25 members are also elected under an AMS system.
How does First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) work?
Under FPTP, voters are given a single vote that is not transferable.
Votes within each constituency are then counted, and the candidate who secures the largest number of votes wins.
A candidate only needs to secure one more vote than their nearest rival (a simple majority).
> In the UK, FPTP normally operates on the basis of single-member constituencies (where one individual is elected to represent one geographical area).
> In the June 2017 elections, there were 650 single-member constituencies.
> By-elections occur when a vacancy occurs as a result of death or resignation, and is held in the affected constituency under the FPTP electoral system.
Advantages of FPTP
> Representation - despite the adverse votes-to-seats ratio, the FPTP system is representative in a geographical sense. Each constituency within the UK is roughly the same size (containing approx. 70,000 voters), and has a single representative. Every winning candidate pledges to represent all constituents - rather than just those who have voted for them.
> Equality of suffrage - voters have one vote. They do not cast votes for a party and do not rank candidates according to preference. They vote only for single constituency candidates who may or may not represent one of the main parties.
> Accountability - the single-member nature of the system allows constituents to make clear statements in support or opposition of their constituency MPs and ‘hold to account’ those who seem unacceptable. A 6% swing away from Labour from 2005 to 2010 saw it lose its majority with nearly 100 seats. The Lib Dem vote share declined from 7.9% to 7.4% between 2015 and 2017, but its number of seats rose from 8 to 12.
> Decisive results and stable governments - the system delivers decisive, single-party majority governments.
> Marginalising ‘extremists’ - the system sidelines extremist parties. UKIP polled over 3.8 million votes in the 2015 election but only won one seat. Without a strong parliamentary platform to demonstrate post-referendum relevance, UKIP has practically ‘melted away’.
Disadvantages of FPTP
> It is unrepresentative - the FPTP system does not translate voters’ wishes into a representative assembly in a democratic way. Wasted votes are the reason for this, and under a winner-takes-all system, the size of a candidate’s majority is ignored - as are all votes for a losing candidate. Wasted votes can lead to serious electoral anomalies - in 1951 Labour polled 48.8% of the votes and won 295 seats, while the Conservatives polled 48% of the votes and won 321 seats.
> It creates ‘safe seats’ and uncompetitive elections - voters become disinclined to vote. In safe seats, odds are stacked up against any voters looking for change. Even sizeable swings of 10% from one candidate or party to another will not affect the outcome in an estimated 65% of constituencies in any given general election. This results in tactical voting where voters vote for a less preferred candidate who has a better chance of winning. The aim of tactical voting is to keep out the candidate of a party that the voter dislikes, and they do this to make them feel as though they are casting a more effective vote for an alternative candidate rather than their favourite one.
> A lack of representation among MPs themselves - FPTP requires that candidates are selected by local constituency associations, usually from approved lists. The 2017 House of Commons is being trumpeted as the most diverse ever - yet while the number of female and ethnic minority MPs are at their highest level, just 1% of the House of Commons are physically disabled, compared to 16% of the adult working-age population.
> Single-member constituencies - supporters of other parties may not feel that they have a sympathetic representative to turn to.
> Unrewarding of ‘minor’ parties - traditionally, Lib Dem support is spread evenly across the country. The Conservatives and Labour enjoy support in specific areas. The Lib Dems come second in over a 1/3 of constituencies but any votes placed second are wasted.
Alternative Electoral Systems - Supplementary Vote (SV)
It has directly elected English mayors and all police and crime commissioners are elected using the supplementary vote (SV) electoral system.
SV is a majoritarian electoral system that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference.
Each voter has two votes - a first and a second choice. If no candidate wins over 50% of the first-choice vote, all but the top two candidates are eliminated with the second choices on their ballot papers added to the first-choice voters already won by the two leaders.
The final totals for the two leading candidates now must produce an outright winner.
The system was used to elect London mayor, and in May 2016 winning candidate Sadiq Khan’s 56.8% of the vote was based on first and second preferences as his vote share of 44.2% of first choices was not enough to win on the first round vote alone.
Advantages of SV
> It is easy to understand.
> Voters have more choice than under FPTP and there are fewer ‘wasted’ votes than under FPTP.
> It avoids third-placed candidates emerging victorious with lots of second-preference ballots.
Disadvantages of SV
> It is not proportional due to the presence of significant numbers of wasted votes.
> There is no need for an absolute majority - candidates may win without over 50% of first or second preferences.
> It encourages tactical voting with voters considering how best to deploy their votes in the event that their first choice gets eliminated.
Alternative Electoral Systems - Single Transferable Vote (STV)
The single-transferable vote (STV) is a fully proportional voting system.
It is favoured due to its fairness and the amount of choice it gives to voters.
It is used in local and assembly elections in Northern Ireland, and is the system operating in the Republic of Ireland and the local government for Scotland since 2007.
STV works in the following way:
> Constituencies return more than one member each. Northern Ireland has six.
> In order to be elected, a candidate must achieve a ‘quota’. The quota is calculated by taking the total votes cast and dividing it by the number of seats plus one.
> Voters may vote for all the candidates in order of their own preference.
> Candidates who achieve the quota on their first preference are elected.
> When the required number of candidates has achieved the quota, the counting can end.
Advantages of STV
> Multi-member constituencies means that constituents have a better choice, and representatives are likely to be more reflective of the voting population.
> A broadly proportional result is gained with few votes wasted.
> Greater voter choice and ‘power to the people’.
> Likelihood of a coalition government to unite divided governments.
Disadvantages of STV
> The single MP constituency link is removed.
> It is complicated for voters and involves a lengthy process of counting.
> Parties still retain much power in choosing which candidates stand in which seats.
> It can lead to weak coalitions and issues with accountability when considering how to pass electoral judgements on the performance of individual representatives.
Alternative Electoral Systems - Closed Regional Party List
The UK currently operates under a closed regional list system to elect Members of the European Parliament.
Voters are offered a choice of political parties and the chance to vote for one of the party lists. The seats are awarded in proportion to the votes cast for each party.
Using a closed list system, voters have no influence over which individuals are elected from the list and the order of the list is determined by the party leaderships.
An open list permits voters to see candidates within the list and indicate a preference for a certain candidate.
Advantages of Closed Regional Party List
> The result is proportionate, allowing smaller parties to benefit.
> By-elections do not occur - if a seat becomes vacant, a party fills the vacancy with whoever is on its list.
> Coalitions are often formed, meaning the politics is more consensual.
Disadvantages of Closed Regional Party List
> Regional representation breaks the close links between constituents and their representatives, creating a ‘democratic deficit’ as voters do not choose or hold any candidates to account.
> It can produce weak coalition governments.