Different Electoral Systems Flashcards

1
Q

The main functions and importance of elections…

A

> Elections are used to choose representatives. In a democracy, legislators and decision-makers have to be elected.

> Elections are the most important way in which citizens become involved in politics. For many it is their only form of political participation.

> Elections are a time when government and elected representatives can be called to account. During an election campaign, the candidates must justify what they and their party have done.

> Democracy demands that the people have choice over who represents their ideas and interests. Elections should provide that choice.

> Elections have an educative function. During election campaigns, the public can become better informed about the key political issues that face their locality, region, or nation.

> Elections provide a mandate. The winners in an election are granted democratic legitimacy, the political authority to carry out the political programme that they are proposing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Positive aspects of UK elections…

A

> The secrecy of the ballot is a key principle of UK elections, though this is not guaranteed.

> There is relatively little corruption and malpractice is punishable by law.

> The conduct of elections is safeguarded by the Electoral Commission, which is independent of the govt.

> The constituency system ensures clear representation for citizens.

> The counting of votes is carefully and thoroughly regulated.

> Elections are held on a regular basis by law.

> Any citizen can register to stand to be an MP. A required £500 deposit means many can afford to stand.

> Virtually all adults are permitted to vote.

> There is freedom of information and of the media.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of electoral system - First-Past-The-Post (FPTP)

A

Electoral system: FPTP

Type of system: Plurality

Definition: To win a seat, a candidate only requires one more vote than any other candidate, meaning they do not need to secure an absolute majority.

Where used in the UK?: General elections; Local council elections in England and Wales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of electoral system - Supplementary Vote (SV)

A

Electoral system: SV

Type of system: Majoritarian

Definition: Used to elect a single candidate, these systems are designed to attempt to secure an absolute majority for the winning candidate.

Where used in the UK?: London major; Other metro mayors; By-elections for STV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of electoral system - Single Transferable Vote (STV)

A

Electoral system: STV

Type of system: Proportional

Definition: A system that attempts to allocate seats in direct proportion to votes cast. As such, they are multi-member constituencies.

Where used in the UK?: Northern Ireland Parliament; Scottish local govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of electoral system - Additional Member System (AMS)

A

Electoral system: AMS

Type of system: Hybrid

Definition: A system that mixes two other types of system, such as plurality and proportional.

Where used in the UK?: Scottish Parliament; Welsh Senedd; Greater London Assembly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Key features of FPTP…

A

> Small, single-member constituencies

> Winner-takes-all based on a plurality

> Voting is simple: place an X next to your chosen candidate

> Voters get one vote for one candidate

> Voters choose a candidate, not a party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Constituency sizes…

A

> FPTP operates by dividing the country into 650 constituencies of roughly equal size.

> The average adult population of a constituency is 75,000, though there is some variation, and the geographical sizes of constituencies vary considerably, for example, tightly-populated London constituencies are much smaller in size than sparsely-populated constituencies in rural areas.

> Ideally, constituency populations should be relatively homogeneous to allow for effective representation by their single representative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FPTP election results…

A

> In 2019, 421 of the 650 seats were won by an absolute majority, with 207 seats won by between 40% and 50%, and 22 seats won by less than 40%.

> In 2015, 319 out of 650 seats were won by an absolute majority. 50 MPs secured a seat with less than 40% of the popular vote in their constituency, so most elected MPs in 2015 had to admit that more people voted against them rather than for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Advantages of FPTP…

A

> It is a simple system and voters can understand exactly what they are voting for.

> It helps to ensure representatives are closely bound to the needs and concerns of their constituency.

> It helps to ensure small extremist parties find it difficult to gain representation.

> It tends to produce an outright winner, that is, a party that has an overall majority in the HoC and therefore produces a clear mandate.

> It is traditional, having been used as the main voting system throughout British electoral history, and is part of British political tradition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disadvantages of FPTP…

A

> It gives an advantage to parties that have concentrated support in certain regions.

> It is disadvantageous to parties whose support is dispersed widely.

> It favours the large parties and prevents serious challenges from small parties.

> There is a ‘winner’s bonus’, where the biggest party tends to win more than its proportionate share of the vote. In 2019, the Conservatives won 43% of the votes, which was converted into 56% of the seats.

> In some recent general elections (2010, 2015, and 2017), the system failed to produce a decisive govt majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where is party support dispersed?…

A

> Conservative support is concentrated in south and central England and across anti-EU areas of the north.

> Labour support is concentrated in industrial, urban northern England and Wales, and across London.

> The SNP only contests the 59 seats in Scotland.

> Lib Dem support is widely dispersed across the whole UK.

> The DUP only contests seats in Northern Ireland.

> Sinn Fein only contests seats in Northern Ireland.

> Plaid Cymru only contests seats in Wales.

> Brexit Party support was thinly spread across England and Wales.

> Green Party support is widely dispersed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Safe seats…

A

A safe seat is a seat in which the incumbent has a considerable majority over their closest rival and is largely immune to swings in voting choice. The same political party retains the seat from election to election.

The implications of safe seats include:

> Parties will pay little attention to safe seats in the election campaigns, so voters will receive less information.

> MPs sitting for such safe constituencies are less accountable for their actions because they have virtually no chance of losing their seat at the next election.

> Voters in safe seats may feel their votes are ‘wasted’ because they have no realistic chance of influencing the outcome. This may be the case whether they support the winning party or one of the losing parties.

> It means that votes are, effectively, not of equal value. Votes in safe seats are worth less than votes in seats that are keenly contested, where voters may have more of an impact.

> The Electoral Reform Society estimated that in the 2019 GE, 70.8% of the voters (22.6 million) were effectively casting ‘wasted’ votes because they had no role in influencing the outcome in their constituencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Marginal seats…

A

A marginal seat is a seat held by the incumbent with a small majority/plurality of the vote.

The implications of marginal seats include:

> Parties concentrate their efforts on marginal seats, so voters there receive much more information and attention.

> Votes in marginal seats are more valuable than votes in safe seats as the voters in marginal seats are more likely to influence the result.

> The individual candidates become more important in marginal seats. In safe seats, the qualities of individual candidates matter little, but in marginals they can be crucial.

> Marginal seats may result in ‘tactical voting’. This is when a voter who supports a party that is unlikely to win a constituency switches allegiance to one of the other parties in the hopes of influencing the outcome, usually by blocking the less-favoured party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Additional Member System (AMS)…

A

AMS is a hybrid system that combines FPTP with a proportional representative system, in this case, one called a ‘closed party list’.

A proportion of the seats is awarded through FPTP and the rest are awarded by a regional closed party list system, meaning every voter has two votes - one for a constituency and one for a party.

In Scotland, 73 seats are elected by FPTP, while 56 are elected via the list system. In Wales, 40 seats are constituency-based and 20 decided by the list system.

No real distinction is made between the two members, though the senior party members tend to be elected from lists rather than in constituencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Closed party list…

A

A proportional electoral system where voters vote for a list of candidates provided by a party. Based on the proportion of the votes a party receives it will be awarded a number of seats from across large multi-member constituencies. The order of the candidates is determined by the party, with the higher preferences being the ones most likely to secure seats.

17
Q

How AMS works in Scotland and Wales…

A

> A proportion of the seats are elected using FPTP as for UK general elections.

> The remaining proportion of seats are elected on a proportional system based on several regions of the country. This is known as the regional closed party list part of the system.

> There is an important variation in the regional list part of the vote. The variable top-up system adjusts the proportions of votes cast on the list system based on the over- or under-representation parties have experienced in the FPTP seats. This is a complex calculation, but, in essence, what happens is that the seats awarded from the list system are adjusted to give a more proportional result.

> Parties that do less well in the constituencies (typically Conservatives or Greens) have their proportion of list votes adjusted upwards. Those that do proportionally well under FPTP (typically Labour in Wales and SNP in Scotland) have their list votes adjusted downwards.

> The overall effect of variable top-up is to make the total result in seats close to proportional to the total votes cast in both systems.

18
Q

Advantages of AMS…

A

> It produces a broadly proportional outcome and so is fair to all parties.

> It gives voters two votes and so more choice.

> It combines preserving constituency representation with a proportional outcome.

> It helps small parties that cannot win constituency contests.

19
Q

Drawbacks of AMS…

A

> It produces two classes of representative - those with a constituency and those elected through the lists. The latter tend to be superior.

> It is more complex than FPTP. Having two votes can confuse some voters.

> It can result in the election of extremist candidates.

20
Q

Example of AMS providing a more proportional outcome…

A

In the 2016 Scottish Parliament elections, the SNP won 59 out of 73 constituency seats available. Had this election been conducted under the FPTP system, the SNP would have won 104 out of 129 seats (81%)!

However, under AMS, the SNP won 48.8% of the seats on 41.7% of the popular vote.

21
Q

Single Transferable Vote (STV)…

A

STV is the system used in Northern Ireland for its Assembly elections and for local council elections. It is an example of a proportional system.

It is a complex system, especially when it comes to the counting and establishment of the result. It was designed to ensure that voters’ preferences are aggregated to make sure that the six most popular candidates overall are elected.

22
Q

Features of STV…

A

> There are typically six seats available in each constituency.

> Each party is permitted to put up as many candidates as there are seats, i.e. up to six. In practice, parties do not adopt six candidates as they have little chance of winning all six seats available. Four is the normal maximum number from each party.

> Voters place the candidates in their order of preference for all possible candidates, or only those candidates they support.

> Voters can vote for candidates from different parties or even all the parties, though few do.

> At the count, an electoral quota is calculated. This is established by taking the total number of votes cast and dividing it by the number of seats available plus 1. So, if 50,000 votes were cast and six seats are available, the quota is: 50,000 / (6+1=7) - this works out as 7143. One is then added, giving a final figure of 7144.

> Initially, all the first preferences are counted for each candidate. Any candidates who achieve the quota are elected automatically.

> After this stage the counting is complex. Essentially, the candidate that came last is eliminated and the second and subsequent preferences from their ballot papers are added to the other candidates. If this results in an individual achieving the quota, they are elected.

> This process continues until six candidates have achieved the quota and are elected.

23
Q

Advantages of STV…

A

> It produces a broadly proportional outcome.

> It gives voters a very wide choice of candidates. The second and subsequent choices of the voters are taken into consideration in the counting.

> Voters can vote for candidates from different parties and show a preference between candidates of the same party.

> As there are six representatives per constituency, each voter has a choice of those to represent them and usually can be represented by someone from the party they support.

> It helps small parties and independent candidates to be elected.

24
Q

Drawbacks of STV…

A

> It is quite a complex system that some voters do not understand.

> The vote counting is complicated and can take a long time.

> It can help candidates with extremist views to be elected.

> With six representatives per constituency, the lines of accountability are not clear.

25
Q

The Supplementary Vote (SV)…

A

SV is a system used to elect a single candidate in a constituency. It is designed to produce a winner who can claim to be supported overall by a majority of the voters. In the UK, its main use is to elect city mayors. It could be used to elect MPs but there is little support for this kind of reform. Most reformers prefer the idea of proportional representation rather than the supplementary vote.

26
Q

How SV works…

A

Voters have two choices, a first and second choice. If any candidate achieves an overall majority, i.e. 50%+, of the first choice or round, they are automatically elected. If this does not happen, the top two candidates go into a second round of counting. All the others drop out. The second-choice votes of the eliminated candidates are added to the first choices for the top two candidates. As there are only two candidates left, one of them is almost certain to achieve an absolute majority. So, the winner has an overall majority of a combination of first- and second-choice votes.

27
Q

Advantages of SV…

A

> The winning candidate can claim an overall majority.

> It is relatively simple for voters to understand.

> Voters have a great opportunity to express their support for more than one party.

28
Q

Disadvantages of SV…

A

> The winning candidate may be chosen as a second-choice candidate.

> It will probably entrench and promote the two-party system.

> Third parties will be more excluded from winning seats than under FPTP.

29
Q

FPTP summarised…

A

> A clear, winning candidate

> Usually secures a clear winning party and mandate

> It is easy to understand

> Stops extremist parties and other small parties winning seats

> Lack of proportionality

> Strong constituency link

30
Q

STV summarised…

A

> Weaker owing to multi-member constituencies

> Much less likely to achieve this, and more likely to rely on coalitions

> Much more complicated and time-consuming but has generally worked where used

> Much more likely that smaller or extremist parties will gain some form of representation

> Far more proportional representation of parties

> Much weaker constituency link

31
Q

AMS summarised…

A

> Mixed; still has a clear winning candidate, but also top-up candidates

> Less likely to secure single-party govt, but Wales and Scotland have consistently had single-party dominance and Scotland did have a majority following 2011

> A mixture of two systems operating on different principles makes it slightly more complicated, but it has worked where used

> More likely that smaller parties will gain some form of representation, but limited

> The worst aspects of proportionality are tempered by the top-up seats, though not eliminated

> Strong for the FPTP part, but weaker for the top-up seats

32
Q

SV summarised…

A

> Much the same, possibly stronger as it will secure a majority of final votes

> Possibly more likely to achieve this as it promotes the two main parties

> Slightly more complicated, but not much and has worked where used

> Would actually make it harder for smaller and more extremist parties to gain a seat

> Possibly even less proportional than FPTP