elections Flashcards

1
Q

invisible primary

A

12-8 before election day, candidates from the same party campaign to establish themselves as visible candidates for presidential nominee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

primaries + caucuses

A

between Feb + June, candidates from the same party compete against each other in a public vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

national party conventions

A

July, confirm each partys nominee for president + VP and agree on the policies which a party is campaigning. also a chance to rally support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the campaign

A

July-November the candidates campaign for presidency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

election day

A

Tuesday following the 1st Monday in November, voters are nominating the electors from their state to the electoral college, to whom their states electoral college votes will go

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

electoral college

A

Monday following the 2nd Wednesday in December

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

inaguration

A

20th January, president is sworn in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the president must be:

A

-at least 35
-a natural born US citizen
-a resident of the US for 14 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

primaires

A

an intra party election

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

caucuses

A

local party meeting - open voting takes place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

rogue voter

A

an elector who doesn’t cast their ECV for the candidate their state vote for. illegal in 30 state. 7 rouge voters in 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the number of ECV a state gets depened on

A

the population of each state (total of 538)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how are Maine + Nebraska different from the other states in the way they distribute ECV

A

-in 58 states the party with the most votes get all of the states ECV
-in Maine + Nebraska ECVs are allocated by district

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

advantages of the electoral process (invisible primaries)

A

-identifies candidates able to gain enough support/money
-allows for a range of candidates
-candidates are well scrutinised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

disadvantages of the electoral process (invisible primaries)

A

-those able to raise the money are not necessarily the best candidates
-the length of the process can cause apathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantages of the electoral process (primaries + caucuses)

A

-maintains federalism
-allows intra party choice
-caucuses allow for genuine party involvement
-more participation in ‘open’ primaries/caucuses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

disadvantages of the electoral process (primaries + caucuses)

A

-can be sabotaged
-low turnout
-calendar effects the importance of a primary - led to front loading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

advantages of the electoral process (national party conventions)

A

-formally announce the party candidate
-engage the party faithful
-a poll ‘bounce’
-TV coverage - national involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

disadvantages of the electoral process (national party conventions)

A

-increasingly candidates are already known
-TV coverage increasingly reduced to acceptance speeches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

advantages of the electoral process (electoral college)

A

-states with a small population are still important
-decisive outcome
-usually this results in the winner gaining a majority of the popular vote
-promotes a 2 party system
-it works as the founding fathers intended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

disadvantages of the electoral process (electoral college)

A

-complex + recent problems have caused more apathy
-the winner may not have a majority of all votes
-the winner-takes-all nature of state elections means the population isn’t adequately represented
-swing states are overly powerful
-disadvantages 3rd parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

incumbent advantages - fundraising

A

face few challengers, so don’t have to worry about fundraising as much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

incumbent advantages - gov control

A

the incumbent president is able to undertake vote winning behaviour in the run up to the election

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

incumbent advantages - campaign experience

A

have already been through and won a campaign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

incumbent advantages - name recognition

A

already well know to voters, gain more media attention, good if they were popular in their first term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

incumbent advantages - single candidate

A

usually unchallenged from their own party, but the unity can be destroyed within the opposing party after primary season

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

incumbent advantages - risk aversion

A

American voters can be seen as unwilling to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

incumbent advantages - presumed success

A

given the history of incumbent success, there is a good degree of belief that the incumbent will be successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

how have campaign donations increased

A

the first billion dollar presidential election campaign took place in 2008. increasingly these vast electoral sums have some under scrutiny

30
Q

what are the main fundraising groups

A

-527 groups raise unlimited money for political activities, but not specifically for a candidate
-political action committees raise hard money to elect or defeat a specific candidate - limited to $5000 per candidate
-super PACs raise unlimited money for political activities

31
Q

legislation on campaign finance

A

-1974 federal election act - limited campaign contributions
-2002 bipartisan campaign reform act - banned soft money
-2010 citizens united v FEC - resulted in the development of super PACs

32
Q

why is campaign reform so hard

A

-politicians= benefit from the current system so reluctant to change it
-loopholes found= the various groups are tactics to get around spending limits
-federal election commission= is continuously gridlocked + fails to work in a bipartisan matter

33
Q

potential campaign finance reforms

A

-a ‘democracy voucher programme’ each voter has 4 $25 tax payer funded vouchers to give to candidates
-small donor matching funds
-make donor donations more timely, some figures not released until after the election
-remove campaign finance limits

34
Q

reasons for electoral reform

A

-swing states are given too much importance
-the electoral college is outdated
-small states are overrepresented
-3rd parties are ignored
-winner-takes-all states distort the will of the voters
-rogue voters
-the person who wins might not have a majority of the vote, undermining their mandate

35
Q

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

A

an agreement between these states and the district of Columbia, stating that they will give their 165 ECV to which ever presidential candidate wins the popular vote nationally

36
Q

types of reform

A

-abolish the electoral college + replace it with a national vote
-expand the NPVIC
-apportion electors by district rather than state

37
Q

reform is necessary for the states

A

-larger states are underrepresented

38
Q

reform isn’t necessary for the states

A

-the electoral college retains state power
-it protects the voices of the smaller states
-it ensures all areas of the state have a role

39
Q

reform is necessary for the people

A

-in 2/5 of the last elections, the popular vote has not been respected

40
Q

reform is not necessary for the people

A

-electoral college is arguably in line with the constitutional principle of ‘tyranny of the majority’
2 party system encouraged by electoral college gives people a choice

41
Q

reform is necessary for thepresident

A

-it encourages him to pay more attention to only swing states

42
Q

reform is not necessary for the president

A

-a decisive + accepted outcome is usually the result. even in 2000, the transition was relatively smooth in the circumstances

43
Q

reform is necessary for the constitution

A

-it makes the constitution look outdated

44
Q

reform is not necessary for the constitution

A

-electoral college works as the founding fathers intended, keeping the presidency away from the popular vote

45
Q

similarities between the UK and US electoral systems

A

-both countries operate nationally with a 2 party system
-FPTP means the winner may not have a majority
-both executives are in place through indirect elections
-the changes of the incumbent are high
-2 party system is sustained by policy cooperation

46
Q

differences between the UK and US electoral systems

A

-UK direct election for the PM, US direct election for president + congress
-the elections at local/devolved levels in the UK, 3rd parties are limited at all levels in the US
-campaign finance is far greater in the US
-greater number of electoral systems used in the UK

47
Q

arguments for state funding

A

-would encourage pluralism over elitism
-would be fairer to 3rd parties
-could reduce public apathy

48
Q

arguments against state funding

A

-make parties less reliant on/less responsive to voters
-could challenge party independence

49
Q

democrats party principles

A

-more progressive attitude
-in favour of tax cuts for lower/middle classes
-accept gov regulation as needed
-support healthcare as a right

50
Q

republicans party principles

A

-more conservative attitude
-in favour of tax cuts across the board
-favour minimal gov intervention
-preference for personal responsibility

51
Q

democratic factions- conservatives

A

-socially conservative but more fiscally liberal
-sometimes known as blue dogs

52
Q

democratic factions -moderates

A

-willing to compromise on welfare + fiscal policy
-supported by minorities + blue collar workers
-accept capitalism

53
Q

democratic factions- liberals

A

-aim for gov intervention to achieve social justice
-favour provision of welfare
-support more socialist policies

54
Q

republican factions- fiscal conservatives

A

-favour limited gov intervention in the economy
-low tax + free trade

55
Q

republican factions- moderates

A

-fiscally conservative, socially liberal
-known as ‘republicans in name only’

56
Q

republican factions- social conservatives

A

-favour traditional views on social issues
-anti abortion, gay rights, immigration
-emphasises law + order
-includes members of the religious right

57
Q

congressional leaders

A

held by partisan congressmen - the speaker, the minority leader in the house, the majority + minority leaders in the senate

58
Q

the whips

A

try to control discipline within their party- more powerful in the house

59
Q

congressional committees

A

oversees the policies it advances within congress

60
Q

caucuses

A

groups within congress containing members that have shared interests

61
Q

parties being in decline

A

-president/VP candidates are largely chosen without the national party
-issue voting has grown in importance (growth of interest groups)
-factions within parties wield considerable power (parties aren’t united)
-party has little control over its candidate (due to primaries/caucuses)

62
Q

party renewal

A

-nationalised election campaigns
-increased polarisation has made parties more important
-increased partisan voting
-national parties still hold a nomination role

63
Q

in what ways is the US not a 2 party system

A

-each party is organised on a state basis
-the breadth of the parties
-some states are solidly democrat or republican (effectively 1 party)
-3rd parties have had increasing impact

64
Q

in what ways is the US a 2 party system

A

-FPTP encourages a 2 party system
-the winner takes all nature of most states allocation of ECV
-when a 3rd party has a promotable policy, it’s adopted by a major party

65
Q

how could the UK be a multi party system

A

-the rise of UKIP had a huge effect on the 2015 conservative manifesto
-opposition days + urgent questions gives 3rd parties a say

66
Q

why could the US not be a multi party system

A

-the size + breadth of republicans and democrats means 3rd parties have little impact

67
Q

how are labour and the democrats similar

A

-favours minimum wage + workers rights
-favour high gov intervention in the economy + welfare

68
Q

how are labour and the democrats different

A

-labour under Corbyn more left than democrats
-labour more willing to increase taxes

69
Q

how are the conservatives and republicans similar

A

-both dislike gov intervention
-favour high levels of defence spending

70
Q

how are the conservatives and republicans different

A

-conservatives have a more liberal view of social issues
-republican party has greater affiliation to religion