Election Systems/Voting Flashcards
What are the advantages of FPTP?
- It is quick and speedy
- It mostly creates single party majority governments
- It excludes fringe extremist parties
- It creates a strong link between MPs and constituents as there is one MP per constituency
What are the disadvantages of FPTP?
- MPs and governments can be elected with a minority of votes e.g. in 2005 labour was re-elected with 35.2% of the vote
- Loss of proportionality of votes. FPTP favours larger parties with more concentrated votes and smaller parties often have the vote spread out across the country
- Limited voter choice. People are often forced to vote tactically as they know that the party they want to vote for will not win the seat
- Votes are of unequal value. In smaller constituencies votes count for more than those in larger constituencies
What are the effects on elections that use proportional representation?
- Coalition and minority governments have become more common in the devolved governments across the U.K.
- Coalition governments in the assemblies tend to be strong and stable and last their full terms
- Parties often have to negotiate with each other and compromise more frequently than in Westminster
- In Northern Ireland STV means that Unionist and Nationalist communities are given equal representation
What are some arguments for Referendums?
- They are a form of direct democracy
- They increase political participation and voter turnout
- Referendums can be a check on the ‘elected dictatorship’ during w governments term
- Referendums provide a clear answer to a question
- Referendums deal with the flaw in the mandate theory, as voters are given a clear voice
- The can provide a mandate for controversial policies
- Referendums legitimise importante constitutional issues such as devolution
What are some arguments against Referendums?
- Referendums are inconsistent with the belief in parliamentary sovereignty
- Issues might be too complex for a more yes/no vote or for the public to understand
- The regular use of Referendums can result in ‘voter fatigue’
- There are effective alternatives: opinion polls and by-elections
- Low turnouts could distort results. Only 34% of voters voted in the London Mayoral referendum
- The results of a referendum may be too close and so not decisive enough
- Funding differences can affect results as they might not be an equal fight between the two sides
- Referendums May result in the ‘tyranny of the majority’
What was Britain like in the run up to the 1979 general election?
- Britain’s economy was very weak and inflation was high
- 60% of workers were in the public sector and many industries were nationalised
- Strikes were frequent as public workers demanded higher pay, and Britain became the ‘sick man of Europe’
- Britain has just been through the 1978 winter of discontent
- The Government lost a vote of no confidence in 1979
What were the parties policies and manifestoes in the 1979 general election?
- Both Labour and the Conservatives focused mainly on bringing down inflation
- Thatcher’s main proposal was to privatise some national industries and to remove some trade union powers. The Conservative manifesto was very vague
- Callahan was on the right of the Labour Party and so resisted the policies put forward by his parties left wing
What were the parties like on the election campaign in 1979?
- Thatcher and the Torres were very media savvy and jumped on many photo opportunities. They employed the PR firm Sachii and Sachii to run the media side of their campaign
- Labour did not employ any media companies or tactics but were still 20 points ahead in the polls
What was the result of the 1979 general election?
- Big swing to the Conservatives from the skilled working class C2 voters
- Swing to the tories most pronounced in London and the South East
- Swing to Labour in Scotland due to fall in SNP support
- Support for the National Front did not materialise as May were contempt with Thatcher
- Liberals held on to their seats even after the Thorpe Scandal
- The main reason for the Tories success was the winter of discontent
What was the background to the 1997 general election?
- The Conservatives Had won in 1992 but were terrorised by the recession and black Wednesday
- Labour was led by John Smith in 1992 but after his death in 1994 Tony Blair became the leader
- Blair brought the party closer to the centre and got rid of clause IV
- The events of Black Friday allowed Labour to be seen as fiscally responsible
- The incumbent Conservative Government was in turmoil and very unpopular
What were Labour’s 5 key pledges at the 1997 general election?
- Class sizes to be reduced to under 30 or under for 5, 6 and 7 year olds
- Fast track sentencing for persistent young offenders
- Cut NHS waiting times by investing another £100m
- Get 250,000 under 25s off benefits and into work
- No rise in income tax, keep inflation and interest rates low
What were the outcomes of the 1997 general election?
- Largest majority since 1945 for any party
- Most seats ever won by Labour
- Lowest Tory share of the vote since 1832
- No Tory MPs in Wales or Scotland
- Highest Lib Dem / Liberal seat total since the 1920s
- All social groups saw big swings to Labour
- Most newspapers were behind Labour
What was the background to the 2010 General election?
- Labour sought to gain a fourth consecutive term in office and regain lost support
- The Conservatives sought to regain a dominant position in British Politics after there losses in the 1990s
- The election was the first to have TV leaders debates
- The polls predicted nearly an equal share of the vote for all three major parties
- The prospect of a Coalition was also being considered by Gordon Brown and Labour civil Cervantes
What was the outcome of the 2010 general election?
- Hung parliament
- Labour vote fell to 29%, their second lowest sing 1918
- The Conservatives couldn’t win a majority
- The greens won their first MP, Caroline Lucas in Brighton
- It was clear that the only viable option was a Conservative Lib-Dem Coalition
- It was the first peace time Coalition since the 1920s
- It was the first election where social media played a part