EG notes Flashcards
What are risk factors for falls and available interventions to reduce the risk?
Risk factors for falls:
Children: Bunk beds, play structures
Adolescents: Alcohol, risk-taking behaviour
Seniors (>65):
- Biological risk factors: Acute illness, balance and gait deficits, chronic conditions and disabilities (e.g., stroke, CVD), cognitive impairment, low vision, muscle weakness
- Behavioural risk factors: Malfunctioning or misused assistive devices, excessive alcohol, fear of calling, loose/smooth/thick footwear or clothing, inadequate diet, medications (e.g., sedatives), risk-taking behaviour
- Socioeconomic risk factors: Limited social networks, low SES
- Environmental risk factors: Community hazards (e.g., lack of handrails, lack of curb cuts), home hazards (e.g., rugs, poor lighting), weather (e.g., ice)
- *Interventions**
- Falls risk assessment in primary care
- Education (Canadian Falls Prevention Curriculum)
- Exercise programs (e.g., Tai Chi)
- Home modification (e.g., occupational therapist visit)
- Assistive devices and other protective equipment
- Clinical disease management, including chronic and acute illness (vision/cataract surgery, CV/pacer, hypotension, podiatry/footwear, nutrition).
- Medication review and deprescribing (psychotropics)
- *Canadian epidemiology**
- Between 20-30% of seniors fall each year
- Amongst seniors, falls are the leading cause of injury-related hospitalizations
- Absolute numbers of falls and deaths due to falls in seniors is rising
- Falls are the cause of 95% of hip fractures
Explain meta-leadership.
The person of the Meta-Leader (self-knowledge, awareness, and regulation): Meta-leaders develop high self-awareness, self-knowledge, and self-regulation. They build the capacity to confront fear and lead themselves and others out of the “emotional basement” to higher levels of thinking and functioning.
The situation (discerning the context for leadership): With often incomplete information, the meta-leader maps the situation to determine what is happening, who are the stakeholders, what is likely to happen next, and what are the critical choice points and options for action.
Connectivity (fostering positive, productive relationships): The meta-leader charts a course forward, making decisions, operationalizing those decisions, and communicating effectively to recruit wide engagement and support. The meta-leader navigates the distinct dynamics and complexities of leading four facets of connectivity.
- leading down the formal chain of command to subordinates (within one’s silo), creating a cohesive high-performance team with a unified mission;
- leading up to superiors, inspiring confidence and delivering on expectations; enabling and supporting good decisions and priority setting;
- leading across to peers and intra-organizational units (other silos) to foster collaboration and coordination;
- leading beyond by engaging external entities, including affected agencies, the general public and the media to create unity of purpose and effort in large-scale response to complex events.[8]

Describe the Dahlgren model of the social determinants of health

What is a biofilm in water distribution system, why can it be a problem and how can it be controlled?
Biofilms
- Definition: “Complex mixture of microbes, organic and inorganic material accumulated
amidst a microbially-produced organic polymer matrix attached to the inner surface of
the distribution system”
- Protect microbes from disinfection and environmental stress
- Increase pipe corrosion and adversely affect pipe hydraulics
- Can result in the generation of bad tastes and odours, proliferation of
macroinvertebrates, and allow subsequent contamination to become stuck in the biofilm
- Material in the biofilm can be released into the water, resulting in persistent
contamination
- Biofilms exist in all water distribution system; growth is enhanced by:
- Presence of nutrients (biodegradable organic material)
- Lack of competitive microbial interactions
- Distribution system materials (iron, silicon, PVC, and rubber support the growth
more than glass or steel) - System hydraulics (slow flow, shear due to backflow/water hammer, areas where
sediments accumulate) - Lack of residual in distribution system
- Sediment accumulation
- Examples of aquatic, pathogenic microbes well-adapted to biofilms include:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Legionella pneumophila, and the Mycobacterium avium
complex (MAC) - *- Control and prevention measures:**
- Nutrient control
- Reduce contamination
- Mitigate system hydraulic problems
- Prevent backflow and cross-connections
- Increase disinfectant residuals
- Corrosion control
- Infrastructure replacement and repair
Define leadership and management.
Name modes of influence.
Name leadership styles.
List the 5 components of emotional intelligence.
What are qualities of good leaders?
- *Leadership**: Skill of inspiring a group of individuals to work together to fulfill a shared vision
- Leaders vs. managers: Leaders articulate a vision and an execution plan to reach the vision; managers allocate resources in order to accomplish tasks and are responsible for the work of others; see diagram below
- Most people are motivated by autonomy, mastery, and purpose
Emotional intelligence (mnemonic MESS): motivation, empathy, self-awareness, self-regulation, and social skills
Reflective practice: Deliberate reflection on experiences, and the beliefs, emotions, and values that were part of those experiences, to further learning and improve future practice
Qualities of good leaders: capable, credible, charismatic, visionary, empowering, fair.
Effective communication:
Accept 100% of the accountability for the impact of your words on others. (“They don’t have to
listen better; you need to communicate more effectively.” - Malandro)
Effective listening:
1. Listen to what the speaker is saying. Do not plan your response.
2. Identify what is important to the speaker. Identifying the values and beliefs the speaker
is expressing?
3. Check in with the speaker to ensure you understand (e.g., “I think I heard you say … Is
that correct?”)
4. Identify what else you need to know. Ask clarifying questions.
5. Respond to the speaker.
How you know you are communicating effectively to your team:
1. People are inspired.
2. People recreate your message for others.
3. People know what is important.
4. People are emotionally and intellectually engaged.
Modes of influence:
- Authority: Formal power over another individual granted by the structure of the
organization
- Rapport: Relationship based on mutual understanding between two people (face to face)
- Assertiveness: Calm self-confidence; respectful
- Aggressiveness: Hostile behaviour; can be initially effective, but toxic over the long term
- Credibility: In public health, usually based on professionalism and expertise; “you know
your stuff” (or at least you are perceived to know your stuff)
- Team building: Rapport amongst a whole team created by working with people side-byside
over time
- Logic: Appealing to evidence
- Culture: Informal power over another individual granted by the culture of the organization
Leadership styles:
- Coercive/commanding: Demand compliance
- Authoritative/visionary: Mobilize towards a vision (concern for productivity trumps
concern for people)
- Affiliative: Create emotional bonds (aka “country club manager”: concern for people
trumps concern for productivity)
- Democratic: Consensus through participation
- Pacesetting: Expect excellence and self-direction
- Coaching: Focus on developing employees for the future
- Impoverished: Provides minimum amount of effort to sustain the organization
What are the minimal ages to be able to consent to sexual activity in Canada?
-
Age of consent: The age at which a person can legally consent to sexual activity, from
kissing to seual intercourse -
Canada’s age of consent: 16 years of age; sexual activity with a child under the age of
16 is sexual interference under the Criminal Code; caveats: -
Anal sex: 18 years (there is a current bill under consideration to reduce this to
the age of consent for any other sexual activity) - Position of authority: 18 years (e.g., teacher, coach, babysitter)
- Close-in-age exceptions: 12- and 13-year-olds may consent to sexual activity
with another person who is < 2 years older than them; 14- and 15-year-olds may
consent to sexual activity with another person who is < 5 years older than them;
exception: youth cannot consent to sexual exploitation (sexual activity with a
person in a position of authority, sex work, pornography)
Describe program planning models:
- APIE model
- PRECEDE/PROCEED model (8 phases)
Program planning cycle:
- *APIE model**
- *Assessment**
- Define: Define the issue or problem
- Search: Consider the evidence, assess needs
- Synthesize: Identify target and priority populations, assess options
- *Plan**
- Adapt: Develop a logic model, activity plan, and evaluation plan based on evidence, local needs, and context
- *Implementation**
- Implement: Act on the evidence, while documenting barriers and progress
- *Evaluation**
- Evaluate: Assess effectiveness
PRECEDE-PROCEED framework
The PRECEDE-PROCEED framework combines epidemiological; social, behavioural, and educational sciences; and health administration literature to describe the steps in designing and
evaluating health-behaviour change programs. It has 7 or 8 phases, depending on the version of the framework.
PRECEDE: Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling factors, and Causes in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation
PROCEED: Policy, Regulatory, Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development
Phase Description S - EBE - EE - AP
- Social diagnosis: What are the social issues concerning the community? (Sources might include community forums, interviews, surveys)
- Epidemiological, behavioural, and environmental diagnosis: What are the health impacts that result from the social issue defined by the community? What are the epidemiological, behavioural, and environmental risk factors for the health impacts? (Sources might include vital statistics, administrative records)
- Educational and ecological diagnosis: What are the causes of the behavioural risk factors identified in phase 2 (e.g., attitudes, beliefs, legislation, rewards, peer pressure)? Which factors are modifiable?
- Administrative and policy diagnosis: What resources and policies are required to address the modifiable factors identified in phase 3?
- Implementation Implement a program
- Process evaluation Evaluate the process of the implementation (i.e., outputs)
- Impact evaluation Evaluate the intermediate outcomes of the program
- Outcome evaluation Evaluate the long-term outcomes of the program
ROPE (regulatory, organizational, policy, educational factors) context leads to…
PRE (predisposing, reinforcing, enabling) factors determining…
Lifestyle/environment that ultimately affect…
Health status and quality of life
Name 4 human activites that release mercury in the environment.
Describe basic facts about the 3 types of mercury
Human activities that release mercury:
1) coal-fired power generation, 2) metal mining and 3) smelting and 4) waste incineration.
Metallic mercury (aka elemental Hg; liquid mercury)
Common sources: Thermometers, barometers, electrical switches, CFLs, dental fillings; exposure usually inhalational
Short-term effects: Delirium, hallucinations
Long-term effects: Erethrism (“mad hatter disease”): Behavioral changes (e.g., social phobia), tremor, memory loss, tremor
IARC 3
Inorganic mercury salts
Commone sources: Fungicide, disinfectant, antiseptic, thimerosal, skin-lightening cream
Short-term effects: Pneumonia, DIC, cerebral infarctions, renal cortical necrosis
Long-term effects: CNS effects
IARC 3
Organic mercury (methylmercury)
Common sources; Fish *Largest exposure globally occurred in 1970s in Iraq, when grain was
contaminated with fungicide, poisoning 6000 people
Short-term effects: Respiratory distress, nonspecific dermatitis
Long-term effects:
Minamata disease: Tremors, sensory loss, ataxia, visual field constriction, facial paresthesias.
Developmental effects: Developmental delay similar to lead, low birthweight
IARC 2B
What are principles of medical expert testimony?
Legal testimony as a medical expert
- Physicians do not have an obligation to act as medical expert
- Consent to review personal health information must usually be obtained
- Legal requirements for records retention and access may be different in a legal
proceeding than from usual medical care
- Principles of medical expert testimony:
- Objective: Opinions must be substantiated by fact, evidence, or experience
- Impartial: Must not advocate for any party
- Within scope of expertise
- Comprehensive: All relevant information has been considered
- Accurate: Information physician relied on to form opinion is accurate
-
Transparent: Be transparent about instructions you have been given and the
process used to form your opinion - Clear: Use lay language
- Timely
Regarding vitaming D intake,
what are recent epi trends?
health impacts?
available interventions?
Recommended amounts
RDI Infants = 400 IU
Children and adults = 600 IU
Adults > 70 years = 800 IU
Epidemiology - 1 in 3 Canadians has serum levels of vitamin D insufficient for bone
health (40% in winter and 25% in summer)
- 10% of Canadians are vitamin D-deficient
Health impacts
- Hormone function: Enhances absorption of serum and calcium from
the small intestine to maintain appropriate serum levels → deficiency
leads to hyperparathyroidism and secondary osteoporosis, rickets in
children and osteomalacia in adults - Also has antiproliferative, prodifferentiative, and immunomodulatory
effects → may reduce risk of breast CA, colorectal CA, and MS - Probably improves muscle strength and reduces risk of DMII
Interventions
Fortification of milk (mandatory in Canada), cereal, and orange juice
Supplementation, especially for breastfed infants (400 IU/day)
Describe basic facts about malaria
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Malaria (reportable)
- Organism: 5 Plasmodium spp. (protozoan parasites)
- Mode of transmission: Vector-borne (Anopheles spp. mosquitoes); contaminated blood
or blood products; congenital malaria
- Epidemiology: No longer endemic in most temperate countries and some subtropical
countries
- Presentation: Fever, chills, headache, myalgias, N/V/D that typically occur in a daily or
alternate day cycle for up to a month; severe malaria (usually due to P. falciparum) may
cause LOC, seizures, acidosis, acute pulmonary edema, shock, ARF, splenomegaly
- Testing: Microscopy (thick and thin films) or rapid diagnostic test (antigen detection
assays)
- Case management: Prompt treatment; in non-endemic areas, patients should stay in
mosquito-proof rooms; untreated or insufficiently treated cases may infect mosquitoes
for up to 1 year (falciparum), 5 years (vivax), or decades (malariae)
- Contact management: Personal protective measures to prevent mosquito bites +
community prevention measures +/- chemoprophylaxis based on risk, contraindications,
and resistance patterns
In the epidemiologic triangle,
what are the 3 different states for the host?
- Susceptible: Insufficient resistance against a particular pathogenic agent to prevent contracting the infection or disease when exposed to the agent
- Infectious
- Recoveved (immune)
Regarding iron intake,
what are recent epi trends?
health impacts?
and available interventions?
Iron
RDI Adults = 8 mg/day for males and non-menstruating females and 18 mg/day for menstruating females
Epidemiology
- Globally, 1 in 4 people are iron deficient
- Iron deficiency is rare in Canada: prevalence of 5%
- Iron-deficiency anemia is rare in Canada: prevalence of 3%
Health impacts
- Iron-deficiency anemia → reduced immune function, decreased exercise capacity
- Long-term impaired cognitive performance in iron-deficient children
- Iron deficiency in pregnant women can lead to maternal anemia,
premature delivery, low birth weight, and increased risk of perinatal
mortality
Interventions
- Iron-fortified pasta and cereal
-
Health education: maximize absorption of iron by eating it with vit C;
maximize absorption of non-heme iron by eating it with heme iron - Iron supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Because breast milk is low in iron and infants have iron stores that
only last up to 6 months, the first complementary foods should be
iron-rich
Describe basic facts about polio
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Poliomyelitis (all acute flaccid paralysis reportable)
- Organism: Poliovirus (RNA virus, Picornaviridae family, enterovirus subgroup)
- Wild poliovirus: Three types with different capsid proteins; immunity to one
serotype does not confer immunity to the other two types
- Type 1: Currently circulating
- Type 2: Last detected in 1999; declared eradicated globally in September
2015
- Type 3: Last detected in November 2012
- Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP): OPV usually causes an
attenuated polio infection, but in rare cases, it causes paralysis; 2-4 cases/1
million doses of vaccine (polio from the vaccine, acquired via OPV)
- Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV): In populations with large pools of
susceptibles, excreted, OPV vaccine-derived polioviruses can circulate in the
community; if circulation occurs for a prolonged period, the virus can mutate and
reacquire neurovirulence and cause paralysis (polio from the vaccine, acquired
via environment)
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Fecal-oral (rarely, respiratory droplets)
- Epidemiology:
- Endemic in 3 countries: Afghanistan, Nigeria, Pakistan
- Last indigenous case of wild polio virus in Canada = 1977
- Canada declared polio-free = 1994
- Children < 5 years are most susceptible to polio infection
- 90-95% of infections are asymptomatic
- <1% of cases result in paralysis
- Case-fatality rate of paralytic polio = 2-5% (children), 15-30% (adults)
- Presentation: Usually asymptomatic; when symptomatic, fever, fatigue, headache. N/V →
severe muscle pain, neck and back stiffness → acute onset, symmetrical, flaccid
paralysis +/- aseptic meningitis
- Incubation period: 6-20 days (range: 3-35 days)
- Infectious period: Usually begins at the onset of illness and can last 3-6 weeks post
convalescence; shedding may occur for much longer time periods in
immunocompromised persons
- Case management: Contact precautions; supportive care
- Contact management: For susceptible household or daycare contacts, receive IPV as
per immunization schedule; exclude susceptible food handlers
- Vaccine:
Oral polio vaccine (OPV) - live attenuated, easy to administer, cheap, provides intestinal immunity, can cause VAPP, cVDPV
Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) - inactivated, more expensive
- Canada switched from OPV to IPV in 1977
- IPV recommended for all infants and children, unimmunized adults, and
immunized adults at increased risk of contracting polio (single lifetime booster)
- As a result of the eradication of type 2 poliovirus, trivalent oral polio vaccine
(tOPV) was removed from global eradication programs in 2016 and replaced with
bOPV
What is a case-crossover?
What is the ecological and atomistic fallacy?
- *Study designs**
- *Descriptive studies**: No comparison group; describe disease occurrence
- Case report
- Case series
- Description of rates (e.g., surveys, registries)
- *Analytic studies**: Comparison group; assess associations; test hypotheses
- Experimental/interventional studies: Investigator assigned the exposure
-
Randomized trial: Randomization controls for unknown confounding, but at
higher cost and reduced external validity - Simple, two-arm RCT: Group A receives treatment and group B receives placebo
-
Cross-over RCT: Group A receives treatment and group B receives
placebo → washout period → Group A receives placebo and group B receives treatment -
Factorial: Group A receives treatment 1 + placebo, group B receives
treatment 2 + placebo, group C receives treatment 1 + 2, group D
receives placebo - Non-randomized trial
-
Quasi-experimental: Investigator does not assign the exposure, but conducts the
research as if s/he did (e.g., before-after study/interrupted time series) - Observational: Investigator did not assign the exposure; individual-level outcomes known
-
Cohort: Identify all individuals in a group and follow them forward in time to
assess outcome (temporal sequence known, but not feasible for rare outcomes) -
Prospective: No individual has developed the outcome of interest at the
time of study enrollment -
Retrospective: Some individuals have developed the outcome of interest
at the time of study enrollment and the investigator retrospectively
determines whether or not the individual was exposed -
Case-control: Cases are matched with controls without the outcome of interest,
and then each are assessed for the exposure (good for rare outcomes, but risk of
recall bias) - Cross-sectional: Data on exposure and outcome collected simultaneously
- Hybrid designs
-
Nested case-control: Cohort with a case-control within in it; cases and
controls are both drawn from a cohort -
Case-crossover: Case act as their own control; used for outcomes with
rapid onset (e.g., MI, MVC) -
Ecological: Investigator did not assign the exposure; individual-level outcomes
unknown - *Beware the ecological fallacy: Drawing inferences at the individual level
based on group-level data (the reverse is called the atomistic fallacy:
drawing inferences at the group level based on individual-level data)
Discuss the health impacts of fluoride and the benefits of water fluoridation
Fluoride (hot topic)
Guidelines
Optimal fluoride concentrations:
- Community water systems: 0.7 mg/L (=ppm)
- Toothpaste fluoride concentrations of 1000 ppm or higher have the greatest caries
prevention
- *Canadian Pediatric Society recommendations:**
- Community water fluoridation
- _Everyone older than 6 months: Fluoridated toothpaste 2x/day (minimal amount for
children) _
Canadian Dental Association recommendations:
- Community water fluoridation
- Everyone older than 3 years: Fluoridated toothpaste 2x/day
- Infants and toddlers 3 years and less: Brush teeth and gums without toothpaste; if at
high risk of tooth decay, brush teeth and gums with a minimal amount of fluoridated
toothpaste
Epidemiology
- Introduction of fluoride into a water supply reduces the frequency of dental caries by
50%
- Approximately 45% of Canadians drink fluoridated water; lowest in Quebec, where
approximately 3% of population drinks fluoridated water (Quebec also has the highest
rate of dental caries)
Health impacts
Mechanism of action:
- Before age six, ingested fluoride is incorporated into the tooth and can contribute to
fluorosis
- Beneficial actions of fluoride are primarily topical: it inhibits plaque formation, inhibits
demineralization, and enhances remineralization of enamel
Fluorosis: Disease of the teeth and bones caused by excess consumption of fluoride
- Dental fluorosis: _Changes in the appearance of the tooth enamel when children < 6-8
years old are exposed to high levels of fluoride (_teeth cannot develop fluorosis after
eruption); “So few children [in Canada] have moderate or severe fluorosis that, even
combined, the prevalence is too low to permit reporting” (PHAC)
- Very mild: Barely noticeable scattered white flecks, occasional white spots, frosty
edges, or fine, lacy chalk-like lines on teeth
- Mild: Scattered white flecks, occasional white spots, frosty edges, or fine, lacy
chalk-like lines on teeth
- Moderate: Noticeable white spots on teeth
- Severe: Rough, pitted surfaces
- Skeletal fluorosis: Joint pain and stiffness, ligament calcification; typically reported in
areas with naturally high levels of fluoride in water (e.g., areas of Jordan, Sudan,
Thailand, India)
- Acute fluorosis: Abdominal pain, excessive saliva production, N/V, seizures, muscle
spasms
Common criticisms and counterarguments:
Fluoride is a poison: Like any chemical, the dose makes the poison (“To get
fluoride poisoning from tap water, you would have to drink a
couple thousand litres of water without peeing”)
Fluoride in water = 0.7 ppm
Fluoride in toothpaste = 1,500 ppm
Water fluoridation treats people without their consent
Cost-effective prevention of one of the most common diseases
ROI: $1 spent on fluoridation = $50 saved in dental treatment costs
Greatest beneficiaries are low-income children
Fluoride can be obtained elsewhere:
In Calgary, savings from cutting fluoridation moved to dental
treatment for low-income children; cost = $250/child (“and only
after they had cavities and were in pain”)
Scientific “controversy”
No scientific controversy about fluoride
What are examples of passive immunization available in Canada?
Specific Ig available in Canada: Botulism antitoxin, botulism Ig, CMV Ig,
diphtheria antitoxin, HBIg, RabIg, RSV monoclonal antibody, tetanus Ig, VarIG
Compare and contrast provincial jails and federal penitenciaries.
Describe common health conditions among prisoners in Canada.
Prisoners
Provincial jails
- Sentences of two years less a day are served in provincial jails; individuals who have yet
to be sentenced (i.e., remanded before or during trial) or detained on immigration issues
are also held in provincial custody
- In Ontario, there are approximately 8-9,000 individuals in custody on any given day and
approximately 50,000 unique individuals released from Ontario jails per year
- ⅔ of individuals in Ontario are on remand (i.e., not yet sentenced)
- 1 in 10 drug toxicity deaths in Ontario occur within one year of release from
provincial jail
- On any given day, 6-8% of the Ontario provincial jail population is in segregation
(colloquially known as solitary confinement)
- Life expectancy for individuals who had been incarcerated in provincial jails is 4.2
years less for men and 10.6 years less for women than the general population
*Local public health agencies do have jurisdiction in provincial jails
*Health services in provincial jails are provided by the provincial health agency in Nova Scotia
and Alberta, by the provincial correctional agency in Ontario, and by private companies in BC
Federal penitentiaries
- Sentences of two years or more are served in federal penitentiaries
- Statutory release: Inmates are released into the community on parole once ⅔ of
the sentence has been served, unless there is an extraordinary reason not to;
inmates can request earlier parole through the National Parole Board
- Warrant expiry: Date at which (correctional services of Canada) CSC no longer has control over the offender (inmates who did not receive stat release must be released from prison on their
warrant expiry; offenders on parole are released from parole)
- Indeterminate sentence: No warrant expiry (life sentence), although inmates can
still apply for parole
- Long-term supervision order: Requires offenders to report to CSC for ten years
after their warrant expiry date; for dangerous offenders only
- Approximately 15,000 inmates in 43 institutions (+ 8,700 offenders on parole)
- 95% men
- 22% Indigenous
- 15-20% of Indigenous inmates attended a residential school
- 54% have not completed high school (compare to 13% in general population)
- 22% report injection drug use prior to incarceration
- 17% report injection drug use while incarcerated
- 40% are smokers (smoking banned in federal penitentiaries since 2008)
- Most common health conditions identified in incoming inmates: head injuries (34% of
incoming inmates), mental illness, back pain (19%), asthma (15%), and HCV
- 25-30% of inmates are HCV+
- 1-2% of male and 1-9% of female inmates are HIV+
- Inmates are excluded from the Canada Health Act while incarcerated; instead, they are
provided health care under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, which requires
penitentiaries to provide “essential health care” and “reasonable access to non-essential
mental health care”
*Local public health agencies do not have jurisdiction in federal penitentiaries
Describe the timeline of health promotion documents related to the Ottawa Charter
- In November 1986, the first Global Conference on Health Promotion was convened in
Ottawa by the WHO; the Ottawa Charter was adopted by the WHO, cosponsored by the
CPHA and Health and Welfare Canada (now Health Canada)
Timeline of health promotion documents related to the Ottawa Charter
- 1974: A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians (aka LaLonde Report), released
by the Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare, introduced “health fields”
concept (biology, environment, lifestyle, and health care); moves towards an
understanding of the social determinants of health and acknowledges that health care is
not the sole determinant of health, but still “blaming the victim” by not recognizing the
social, economic, and political drivers of lifestyle “choices”
- 1978: Declaration of Alma-Ata identified the primary care as essential to achieving
Health for All; identified economic and social development as a prerequisite to health
- 1986: The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
- 1986: Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion (aka Epp Report)
released by the Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare explicitly recognized
the social determinants of health and defined the three mechanisms of health promotion:
self-care, mutual aid, and healthy environments
- Other WHO statements flowing from the Ottawa Charter:
- 1988: Adelaide Recommendations on Healthy Public Policy
- 1991: Sundsvall Statement on Supportive Environments for Health
- 1997: Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century
- 2000: Mexico Ministerial Statement for the Promotion of Health: From Ideas to
Action - 2005: Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World
- 2009: Nairobi Call to Action
- Global Conferences on Health Promotion continue to occur every 3-5 years
Contrast stochastic versus deterministic models when modelling a dose-response curve
Modelling a dose-response curve:
- Stochastic/random model: Dose vs. risk of outcome; assumes no safe threshold;
increased dose increases risk of health outcome of interest (not higher dose therefore
bigger tumour) *Non-threshold relationship
-
Non-stochastic/deterministic model: Dose vs. severity of outcome; assumes a threshold;
increased dose increases severity of outcome of interest (higher dose results in bigger
tumour) *Threshold relationship - Consider: Additivity, synergy, linear vs. quadratic relationship, impacts (e.g., cellular)
outside the observable range
Explain situational leadership styles.
What are the stages of team development?
Team development
Evaluating team performance through the lens of team development allows managers to
understand why a team may be performing at a certain level; development is not a linear
process: “changes, such as members coming or going or large-scale changes in the external
environment, can lead a team to cycle back to an earlier stage”;
Stages of team development include:
Forming
- Feelings: Excited, eager, anxious
- Behaviours: Many questions
- Tasks: Create a team with a clear structure, goals, direction, and roles; task
accomplishment may be low
Storming
- Feelings: Frustration and anger at being unable to meet expectations (mismatch
between individual expectations and team performance); team members observe how
others express these negative emotions
- Behaviours: Disagreement between team members; criticism of team’s goals;
behaviours may be less polite than during the forming stage
- Tasks: Redefinition of structure, goals, and roles
Norming
- Feelings: Increased sense of comfort as individual expectations and team performance
become increasingly aligned; increased comfort to share ideas and ask for help
- Behaviours: Effective communication, establishing ground rules
- Tasks: Increased productivity; evaluation of team processes
Performing
- Feelings: Satisfaction in team progress, confidence
- Behaviours: Share personal insights, increased self-awareness, problem solving
- Tasks: Progress towards goals, continuing team development, celebrate achievements
Ending/Adjourning
- Feelings: Anxiety, sadness, sense of loss, satisfaction leading to rises and falls in team
morale
- Behaviours: Decreased focus on tasks, resulting in decreased productivity vs. increased
focus on tasks and increased productivity, depending on the person
- Tasks: Complete deliverables, evaluate team process and products, closing celebration
What are the incubation period and communicability periods for invasive meningitis?
Incubation: 2-10 days
Communicability: 7 days before onset of symptoms to 24 hours after initiation of abx
Define and contrast:
quality control,
quality assurance
and quality improvement
- Quality control: Activities to test or inspect a product or service to identify problems before the product or service reaches the customer; “find it, fix it” (retrospective)
- Quality assurance: Activities to identify problems in a process that might lead to problems with a product or service; “looking further up the line” (prospective) using quality standards
- Quality improvement: Activities to continually monitor and improve all processes within a system (prospective and retrospective)






Guidelines focusing on five components: _Awareness, prevention, detection, management, surveillance_ \*Note that while _helmets reduce direct head trauma (cuts, fractures), they do not reduce the incidence of concussion_







