EG notes Flashcards
What are risk factors for falls and available interventions to reduce the risk?
Risk factors for falls:
Children: Bunk beds, play structures
Adolescents: Alcohol, risk-taking behaviour
Seniors (>65):
- Biological risk factors: Acute illness, balance and gait deficits, chronic conditions and disabilities (e.g., stroke, CVD), cognitive impairment, low vision, muscle weakness
- Behavioural risk factors: Malfunctioning or misused assistive devices, excessive alcohol, fear of calling, loose/smooth/thick footwear or clothing, inadequate diet, medications (e.g., sedatives), risk-taking behaviour
- Socioeconomic risk factors: Limited social networks, low SES
- Environmental risk factors: Community hazards (e.g., lack of handrails, lack of curb cuts), home hazards (e.g., rugs, poor lighting), weather (e.g., ice)
- *Interventions**
- Falls risk assessment in primary care
- Education (Canadian Falls Prevention Curriculum)
- Exercise programs (e.g., Tai Chi)
- Home modification (e.g., occupational therapist visit)
- Assistive devices and other protective equipment
- Clinical disease management, including chronic and acute illness (vision/cataract surgery, CV/pacer, hypotension, podiatry/footwear, nutrition).
- Medication review and deprescribing (psychotropics)
- *Canadian epidemiology**
- Between 20-30% of seniors fall each year
- Amongst seniors, falls are the leading cause of injury-related hospitalizations
- Absolute numbers of falls and deaths due to falls in seniors is rising
- Falls are the cause of 95% of hip fractures
Explain meta-leadership.
The person of the Meta-Leader (self-knowledge, awareness, and regulation): Meta-leaders develop high self-awareness, self-knowledge, and self-regulation. They build the capacity to confront fear and lead themselves and others out of the “emotional basement” to higher levels of thinking and functioning.
The situation (discerning the context for leadership): With often incomplete information, the meta-leader maps the situation to determine what is happening, who are the stakeholders, what is likely to happen next, and what are the critical choice points and options for action.
Connectivity (fostering positive, productive relationships): The meta-leader charts a course forward, making decisions, operationalizing those decisions, and communicating effectively to recruit wide engagement and support. The meta-leader navigates the distinct dynamics and complexities of leading four facets of connectivity.
- leading down the formal chain of command to subordinates (within one’s silo), creating a cohesive high-performance team with a unified mission;
- leading up to superiors, inspiring confidence and delivering on expectations; enabling and supporting good decisions and priority setting;
- leading across to peers and intra-organizational units (other silos) to foster collaboration and coordination;
- leading beyond by engaging external entities, including affected agencies, the general public and the media to create unity of purpose and effort in large-scale response to complex events.[8]
Describe the Dahlgren model of the social determinants of health
What is a biofilm in water distribution system, why can it be a problem and how can it be controlled?
Biofilms
- Definition: “Complex mixture of microbes, organic and inorganic material accumulated
amidst a microbially-produced organic polymer matrix attached to the inner surface of
the distribution system”
- Protect microbes from disinfection and environmental stress
- Increase pipe corrosion and adversely affect pipe hydraulics
- Can result in the generation of bad tastes and odours, proliferation of
macroinvertebrates, and allow subsequent contamination to become stuck in the biofilm
- Material in the biofilm can be released into the water, resulting in persistent
contamination
- Biofilms exist in all water distribution system; growth is enhanced by:
- Presence of nutrients (biodegradable organic material)
- Lack of competitive microbial interactions
- Distribution system materials (iron, silicon, PVC, and rubber support the growth
more than glass or steel) - System hydraulics (slow flow, shear due to backflow/water hammer, areas where
sediments accumulate) - Lack of residual in distribution system
- Sediment accumulation
- Examples of aquatic, pathogenic microbes well-adapted to biofilms include:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Legionella pneumophila, and the Mycobacterium avium
complex (MAC) - *- Control and prevention measures:**
- Nutrient control
- Reduce contamination
- Mitigate system hydraulic problems
- Prevent backflow and cross-connections
- Increase disinfectant residuals
- Corrosion control
- Infrastructure replacement and repair
Define leadership and management.
Name modes of influence.
Name leadership styles.
List the 5 components of emotional intelligence.
What are qualities of good leaders?
- *Leadership**: Skill of inspiring a group of individuals to work together to fulfill a shared vision
- Leaders vs. managers: Leaders articulate a vision and an execution plan to reach the vision; managers allocate resources in order to accomplish tasks and are responsible for the work of others; see diagram below
- Most people are motivated by autonomy, mastery, and purpose
Emotional intelligence (mnemonic MESS): motivation, empathy, self-awareness, self-regulation, and social skills
Reflective practice: Deliberate reflection on experiences, and the beliefs, emotions, and values that were part of those experiences, to further learning and improve future practice
Qualities of good leaders: capable, credible, charismatic, visionary, empowering, fair.
Effective communication:
Accept 100% of the accountability for the impact of your words on others. (“They don’t have to
listen better; you need to communicate more effectively.” - Malandro)
Effective listening:
1. Listen to what the speaker is saying. Do not plan your response.
2. Identify what is important to the speaker. Identifying the values and beliefs the speaker
is expressing?
3. Check in with the speaker to ensure you understand (e.g., “I think I heard you say … Is
that correct?”)
4. Identify what else you need to know. Ask clarifying questions.
5. Respond to the speaker.
How you know you are communicating effectively to your team:
1. People are inspired.
2. People recreate your message for others.
3. People know what is important.
4. People are emotionally and intellectually engaged.
Modes of influence:
- Authority: Formal power over another individual granted by the structure of the
organization
- Rapport: Relationship based on mutual understanding between two people (face to face)
- Assertiveness: Calm self-confidence; respectful
- Aggressiveness: Hostile behaviour; can be initially effective, but toxic over the long term
- Credibility: In public health, usually based on professionalism and expertise; “you know
your stuff” (or at least you are perceived to know your stuff)
- Team building: Rapport amongst a whole team created by working with people side-byside
over time
- Logic: Appealing to evidence
- Culture: Informal power over another individual granted by the culture of the organization
Leadership styles:
- Coercive/commanding: Demand compliance
- Authoritative/visionary: Mobilize towards a vision (concern for productivity trumps
concern for people)
- Affiliative: Create emotional bonds (aka “country club manager”: concern for people
trumps concern for productivity)
- Democratic: Consensus through participation
- Pacesetting: Expect excellence and self-direction
- Coaching: Focus on developing employees for the future
- Impoverished: Provides minimum amount of effort to sustain the organization
What are the minimal ages to be able to consent to sexual activity in Canada?
-
Age of consent: The age at which a person can legally consent to sexual activity, from
kissing to seual intercourse -
Canada’s age of consent: 16 years of age; sexual activity with a child under the age of
16 is sexual interference under the Criminal Code; caveats: -
Anal sex: 18 years (there is a current bill under consideration to reduce this to
the age of consent for any other sexual activity) - Position of authority: 18 years (e.g., teacher, coach, babysitter)
- Close-in-age exceptions: 12- and 13-year-olds may consent to sexual activity
with another person who is < 2 years older than them; 14- and 15-year-olds may
consent to sexual activity with another person who is < 5 years older than them;
exception: youth cannot consent to sexual exploitation (sexual activity with a
person in a position of authority, sex work, pornography)
Describe program planning models:
- APIE model
- PRECEDE/PROCEED model (8 phases)
Program planning cycle:
- *APIE model**
- *Assessment**
- Define: Define the issue or problem
- Search: Consider the evidence, assess needs
- Synthesize: Identify target and priority populations, assess options
- *Plan**
- Adapt: Develop a logic model, activity plan, and evaluation plan based on evidence, local needs, and context
- *Implementation**
- Implement: Act on the evidence, while documenting barriers and progress
- *Evaluation**
- Evaluate: Assess effectiveness
PRECEDE-PROCEED framework
The PRECEDE-PROCEED framework combines epidemiological; social, behavioural, and educational sciences; and health administration literature to describe the steps in designing and
evaluating health-behaviour change programs. It has 7 or 8 phases, depending on the version of the framework.
PRECEDE: Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling factors, and Causes in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation
PROCEED: Policy, Regulatory, Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development
Phase Description S - EBE - EE - AP
- Social diagnosis: What are the social issues concerning the community? (Sources might include community forums, interviews, surveys)
- Epidemiological, behavioural, and environmental diagnosis: What are the health impacts that result from the social issue defined by the community? What are the epidemiological, behavioural, and environmental risk factors for the health impacts? (Sources might include vital statistics, administrative records)
- Educational and ecological diagnosis: What are the causes of the behavioural risk factors identified in phase 2 (e.g., attitudes, beliefs, legislation, rewards, peer pressure)? Which factors are modifiable?
- Administrative and policy diagnosis: What resources and policies are required to address the modifiable factors identified in phase 3?
- Implementation Implement a program
- Process evaluation Evaluate the process of the implementation (i.e., outputs)
- Impact evaluation Evaluate the intermediate outcomes of the program
- Outcome evaluation Evaluate the long-term outcomes of the program
ROPE (regulatory, organizational, policy, educational factors) context leads to…
PRE (predisposing, reinforcing, enabling) factors determining…
Lifestyle/environment that ultimately affect…
Health status and quality of life
Name 4 human activites that release mercury in the environment.
Describe basic facts about the 3 types of mercury
Human activities that release mercury:
1) coal-fired power generation, 2) metal mining and 3) smelting and 4) waste incineration.
Metallic mercury (aka elemental Hg; liquid mercury)
Common sources: Thermometers, barometers, electrical switches, CFLs, dental fillings; exposure usually inhalational
Short-term effects: Delirium, hallucinations
Long-term effects: Erethrism (“mad hatter disease”): Behavioral changes (e.g., social phobia), tremor, memory loss, tremor
IARC 3
Inorganic mercury salts
Commone sources: Fungicide, disinfectant, antiseptic, thimerosal, skin-lightening cream
Short-term effects: Pneumonia, DIC, cerebral infarctions, renal cortical necrosis
Long-term effects: CNS effects
IARC 3
Organic mercury (methylmercury)
Common sources; Fish *Largest exposure globally occurred in 1970s in Iraq, when grain was
contaminated with fungicide, poisoning 6000 people
Short-term effects: Respiratory distress, nonspecific dermatitis
Long-term effects:
Minamata disease: Tremors, sensory loss, ataxia, visual field constriction, facial paresthesias.
Developmental effects: Developmental delay similar to lead, low birthweight
IARC 2B
What are principles of medical expert testimony?
Legal testimony as a medical expert
- Physicians do not have an obligation to act as medical expert
- Consent to review personal health information must usually be obtained
- Legal requirements for records retention and access may be different in a legal
proceeding than from usual medical care
- Principles of medical expert testimony:
- Objective: Opinions must be substantiated by fact, evidence, or experience
- Impartial: Must not advocate for any party
- Within scope of expertise
- Comprehensive: All relevant information has been considered
- Accurate: Information physician relied on to form opinion is accurate
-
Transparent: Be transparent about instructions you have been given and the
process used to form your opinion - Clear: Use lay language
- Timely
Regarding vitaming D intake,
what are recent epi trends?
health impacts?
available interventions?
Recommended amounts
RDI Infants = 400 IU
Children and adults = 600 IU
Adults > 70 years = 800 IU
Epidemiology - 1 in 3 Canadians has serum levels of vitamin D insufficient for bone
health (40% in winter and 25% in summer)
- 10% of Canadians are vitamin D-deficient
Health impacts
- Hormone function: Enhances absorption of serum and calcium from
the small intestine to maintain appropriate serum levels → deficiency
leads to hyperparathyroidism and secondary osteoporosis, rickets in
children and osteomalacia in adults - Also has antiproliferative, prodifferentiative, and immunomodulatory
effects → may reduce risk of breast CA, colorectal CA, and MS - Probably improves muscle strength and reduces risk of DMII
Interventions
Fortification of milk (mandatory in Canada), cereal, and orange juice
Supplementation, especially for breastfed infants (400 IU/day)
Describe basic facts about malaria
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Malaria (reportable)
- Organism: 5 Plasmodium spp. (protozoan parasites)
- Mode of transmission: Vector-borne (Anopheles spp. mosquitoes); contaminated blood
or blood products; congenital malaria
- Epidemiology: No longer endemic in most temperate countries and some subtropical
countries
- Presentation: Fever, chills, headache, myalgias, N/V/D that typically occur in a daily or
alternate day cycle for up to a month; severe malaria (usually due to P. falciparum) may
cause LOC, seizures, acidosis, acute pulmonary edema, shock, ARF, splenomegaly
- Testing: Microscopy (thick and thin films) or rapid diagnostic test (antigen detection
assays)
- Case management: Prompt treatment; in non-endemic areas, patients should stay in
mosquito-proof rooms; untreated or insufficiently treated cases may infect mosquitoes
for up to 1 year (falciparum), 5 years (vivax), or decades (malariae)
- Contact management: Personal protective measures to prevent mosquito bites +
community prevention measures +/- chemoprophylaxis based on risk, contraindications,
and resistance patterns
In the epidemiologic triangle,
what are the 3 different states for the host?
- Susceptible: Insufficient resistance against a particular pathogenic agent to prevent contracting the infection or disease when exposed to the agent
- Infectious
- Recoveved (immune)
Regarding iron intake,
what are recent epi trends?
health impacts?
and available interventions?
Iron
RDI Adults = 8 mg/day for males and non-menstruating females and 18 mg/day for menstruating females
Epidemiology
- Globally, 1 in 4 people are iron deficient
- Iron deficiency is rare in Canada: prevalence of 5%
- Iron-deficiency anemia is rare in Canada: prevalence of 3%
Health impacts
- Iron-deficiency anemia → reduced immune function, decreased exercise capacity
- Long-term impaired cognitive performance in iron-deficient children
- Iron deficiency in pregnant women can lead to maternal anemia,
premature delivery, low birth weight, and increased risk of perinatal
mortality
Interventions
- Iron-fortified pasta and cereal
-
Health education: maximize absorption of iron by eating it with vit C;
maximize absorption of non-heme iron by eating it with heme iron - Iron supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Because breast milk is low in iron and infants have iron stores that
only last up to 6 months, the first complementary foods should be
iron-rich
Describe basic facts about polio
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Poliomyelitis (all acute flaccid paralysis reportable)
- Organism: Poliovirus (RNA virus, Picornaviridae family, enterovirus subgroup)
- Wild poliovirus: Three types with different capsid proteins; immunity to one
serotype does not confer immunity to the other two types
- Type 1: Currently circulating
- Type 2: Last detected in 1999; declared eradicated globally in September
2015
- Type 3: Last detected in November 2012
- Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP): OPV usually causes an
attenuated polio infection, but in rare cases, it causes paralysis; 2-4 cases/1
million doses of vaccine (polio from the vaccine, acquired via OPV)
- Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV): In populations with large pools of
susceptibles, excreted, OPV vaccine-derived polioviruses can circulate in the
community; if circulation occurs for a prolonged period, the virus can mutate and
reacquire neurovirulence and cause paralysis (polio from the vaccine, acquired
via environment)
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Fecal-oral (rarely, respiratory droplets)
- Epidemiology:
- Endemic in 3 countries: Afghanistan, Nigeria, Pakistan
- Last indigenous case of wild polio virus in Canada = 1977
- Canada declared polio-free = 1994
- Children < 5 years are most susceptible to polio infection
- 90-95% of infections are asymptomatic
- <1% of cases result in paralysis
- Case-fatality rate of paralytic polio = 2-5% (children), 15-30% (adults)
- Presentation: Usually asymptomatic; when symptomatic, fever, fatigue, headache. N/V →
severe muscle pain, neck and back stiffness → acute onset, symmetrical, flaccid
paralysis +/- aseptic meningitis
- Incubation period: 6-20 days (range: 3-35 days)
- Infectious period: Usually begins at the onset of illness and can last 3-6 weeks post
convalescence; shedding may occur for much longer time periods in
immunocompromised persons
- Case management: Contact precautions; supportive care
- Contact management: For susceptible household or daycare contacts, receive IPV as
per immunization schedule; exclude susceptible food handlers
- Vaccine:
Oral polio vaccine (OPV) - live attenuated, easy to administer, cheap, provides intestinal immunity, can cause VAPP, cVDPV
Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) - inactivated, more expensive
- Canada switched from OPV to IPV in 1977
- IPV recommended for all infants and children, unimmunized adults, and
immunized adults at increased risk of contracting polio (single lifetime booster)
- As a result of the eradication of type 2 poliovirus, trivalent oral polio vaccine
(tOPV) was removed from global eradication programs in 2016 and replaced with
bOPV
What is a case-crossover?
What is the ecological and atomistic fallacy?
- *Study designs**
- *Descriptive studies**: No comparison group; describe disease occurrence
- Case report
- Case series
- Description of rates (e.g., surveys, registries)
- *Analytic studies**: Comparison group; assess associations; test hypotheses
- Experimental/interventional studies: Investigator assigned the exposure
-
Randomized trial: Randomization controls for unknown confounding, but at
higher cost and reduced external validity - Simple, two-arm RCT: Group A receives treatment and group B receives placebo
-
Cross-over RCT: Group A receives treatment and group B receives
placebo → washout period → Group A receives placebo and group B receives treatment -
Factorial: Group A receives treatment 1 + placebo, group B receives
treatment 2 + placebo, group C receives treatment 1 + 2, group D
receives placebo - Non-randomized trial
-
Quasi-experimental: Investigator does not assign the exposure, but conducts the
research as if s/he did (e.g., before-after study/interrupted time series) - Observational: Investigator did not assign the exposure; individual-level outcomes known
-
Cohort: Identify all individuals in a group and follow them forward in time to
assess outcome (temporal sequence known, but not feasible for rare outcomes) -
Prospective: No individual has developed the outcome of interest at the
time of study enrollment -
Retrospective: Some individuals have developed the outcome of interest
at the time of study enrollment and the investigator retrospectively
determines whether or not the individual was exposed -
Case-control: Cases are matched with controls without the outcome of interest,
and then each are assessed for the exposure (good for rare outcomes, but risk of
recall bias) - Cross-sectional: Data on exposure and outcome collected simultaneously
- Hybrid designs
-
Nested case-control: Cohort with a case-control within in it; cases and
controls are both drawn from a cohort -
Case-crossover: Case act as their own control; used for outcomes with
rapid onset (e.g., MI, MVC) -
Ecological: Investigator did not assign the exposure; individual-level outcomes
unknown - *Beware the ecological fallacy: Drawing inferences at the individual level
based on group-level data (the reverse is called the atomistic fallacy:
drawing inferences at the group level based on individual-level data)
Discuss the health impacts of fluoride and the benefits of water fluoridation
Fluoride (hot topic)
Guidelines
Optimal fluoride concentrations:
- Community water systems: 0.7 mg/L (=ppm)
- Toothpaste fluoride concentrations of 1000 ppm or higher have the greatest caries
prevention
- *Canadian Pediatric Society recommendations:**
- Community water fluoridation
- _Everyone older than 6 months: Fluoridated toothpaste 2x/day (minimal amount for
children) _
Canadian Dental Association recommendations:
- Community water fluoridation
- Everyone older than 3 years: Fluoridated toothpaste 2x/day
- Infants and toddlers 3 years and less: Brush teeth and gums without toothpaste; if at
high risk of tooth decay, brush teeth and gums with a minimal amount of fluoridated
toothpaste
Epidemiology
- Introduction of fluoride into a water supply reduces the frequency of dental caries by
50%
- Approximately 45% of Canadians drink fluoridated water; lowest in Quebec, where
approximately 3% of population drinks fluoridated water (Quebec also has the highest
rate of dental caries)
Health impacts
Mechanism of action:
- Before age six, ingested fluoride is incorporated into the tooth and can contribute to
fluorosis
- Beneficial actions of fluoride are primarily topical: it inhibits plaque formation, inhibits
demineralization, and enhances remineralization of enamel
Fluorosis: Disease of the teeth and bones caused by excess consumption of fluoride
- Dental fluorosis: _Changes in the appearance of the tooth enamel when children < 6-8
years old are exposed to high levels of fluoride (_teeth cannot develop fluorosis after
eruption); “So few children [in Canada] have moderate or severe fluorosis that, even
combined, the prevalence is too low to permit reporting” (PHAC)
- Very mild: Barely noticeable scattered white flecks, occasional white spots, frosty
edges, or fine, lacy chalk-like lines on teeth
- Mild: Scattered white flecks, occasional white spots, frosty edges, or fine, lacy
chalk-like lines on teeth
- Moderate: Noticeable white spots on teeth
- Severe: Rough, pitted surfaces
- Skeletal fluorosis: Joint pain and stiffness, ligament calcification; typically reported in
areas with naturally high levels of fluoride in water (e.g., areas of Jordan, Sudan,
Thailand, India)
- Acute fluorosis: Abdominal pain, excessive saliva production, N/V, seizures, muscle
spasms
Common criticisms and counterarguments:
Fluoride is a poison: Like any chemical, the dose makes the poison (“To get
fluoride poisoning from tap water, you would have to drink a
couple thousand litres of water without peeing”)
Fluoride in water = 0.7 ppm
Fluoride in toothpaste = 1,500 ppm
Water fluoridation treats people without their consent
Cost-effective prevention of one of the most common diseases
ROI: $1 spent on fluoridation = $50 saved in dental treatment costs
Greatest beneficiaries are low-income children
Fluoride can be obtained elsewhere:
In Calgary, savings from cutting fluoridation moved to dental
treatment for low-income children; cost = $250/child (“and only
after they had cavities and were in pain”)
Scientific “controversy”
No scientific controversy about fluoride
What are examples of passive immunization available in Canada?
Specific Ig available in Canada: Botulism antitoxin, botulism Ig, CMV Ig,
diphtheria antitoxin, HBIg, RabIg, RSV monoclonal antibody, tetanus Ig, VarIG
Compare and contrast provincial jails and federal penitenciaries.
Describe common health conditions among prisoners in Canada.
Prisoners
Provincial jails
- Sentences of two years less a day are served in provincial jails; individuals who have yet
to be sentenced (i.e., remanded before or during trial) or detained on immigration issues
are also held in provincial custody
- In Ontario, there are approximately 8-9,000 individuals in custody on any given day and
approximately 50,000 unique individuals released from Ontario jails per year
- ⅔ of individuals in Ontario are on remand (i.e., not yet sentenced)
- 1 in 10 drug toxicity deaths in Ontario occur within one year of release from
provincial jail
- On any given day, 6-8% of the Ontario provincial jail population is in segregation
(colloquially known as solitary confinement)
- Life expectancy for individuals who had been incarcerated in provincial jails is 4.2
years less for men and 10.6 years less for women than the general population
*Local public health agencies do have jurisdiction in provincial jails
*Health services in provincial jails are provided by the provincial health agency in Nova Scotia
and Alberta, by the provincial correctional agency in Ontario, and by private companies in BC
Federal penitentiaries
- Sentences of two years or more are served in federal penitentiaries
- Statutory release: Inmates are released into the community on parole once ⅔ of
the sentence has been served, unless there is an extraordinary reason not to;
inmates can request earlier parole through the National Parole Board
- Warrant expiry: Date at which (correctional services of Canada) CSC no longer has control over the offender (inmates who did not receive stat release must be released from prison on their
warrant expiry; offenders on parole are released from parole)
- Indeterminate sentence: No warrant expiry (life sentence), although inmates can
still apply for parole
- Long-term supervision order: Requires offenders to report to CSC for ten years
after their warrant expiry date; for dangerous offenders only
- Approximately 15,000 inmates in 43 institutions (+ 8,700 offenders on parole)
- 95% men
- 22% Indigenous
- 15-20% of Indigenous inmates attended a residential school
- 54% have not completed high school (compare to 13% in general population)
- 22% report injection drug use prior to incarceration
- 17% report injection drug use while incarcerated
- 40% are smokers (smoking banned in federal penitentiaries since 2008)
- Most common health conditions identified in incoming inmates: head injuries (34% of
incoming inmates), mental illness, back pain (19%), asthma (15%), and HCV
- 25-30% of inmates are HCV+
- 1-2% of male and 1-9% of female inmates are HIV+
- Inmates are excluded from the Canada Health Act while incarcerated; instead, they are
provided health care under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, which requires
penitentiaries to provide “essential health care” and “reasonable access to non-essential
mental health care”
*Local public health agencies do not have jurisdiction in federal penitentiaries
Describe the timeline of health promotion documents related to the Ottawa Charter
- In November 1986, the first Global Conference on Health Promotion was convened in
Ottawa by the WHO; the Ottawa Charter was adopted by the WHO, cosponsored by the
CPHA and Health and Welfare Canada (now Health Canada)
Timeline of health promotion documents related to the Ottawa Charter
- 1974: A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians (aka LaLonde Report), released
by the Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare, introduced “health fields”
concept (biology, environment, lifestyle, and health care); moves towards an
understanding of the social determinants of health and acknowledges that health care is
not the sole determinant of health, but still “blaming the victim” by not recognizing the
social, economic, and political drivers of lifestyle “choices”
- 1978: Declaration of Alma-Ata identified the primary care as essential to achieving
Health for All; identified economic and social development as a prerequisite to health
- 1986: The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
- 1986: Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion (aka Epp Report)
released by the Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare explicitly recognized
the social determinants of health and defined the three mechanisms of health promotion:
self-care, mutual aid, and healthy environments
- Other WHO statements flowing from the Ottawa Charter:
- 1988: Adelaide Recommendations on Healthy Public Policy
- 1991: Sundsvall Statement on Supportive Environments for Health
- 1997: Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century
- 2000: Mexico Ministerial Statement for the Promotion of Health: From Ideas to
Action - 2005: Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World
- 2009: Nairobi Call to Action
- Global Conferences on Health Promotion continue to occur every 3-5 years
Contrast stochastic versus deterministic models when modelling a dose-response curve
Modelling a dose-response curve:
- Stochastic/random model: Dose vs. risk of outcome; assumes no safe threshold;
increased dose increases risk of health outcome of interest (not higher dose therefore
bigger tumour) *Non-threshold relationship
-
Non-stochastic/deterministic model: Dose vs. severity of outcome; assumes a threshold;
increased dose increases severity of outcome of interest (higher dose results in bigger
tumour) *Threshold relationship - Consider: Additivity, synergy, linear vs. quadratic relationship, impacts (e.g., cellular)
outside the observable range
Explain situational leadership styles.
What are the stages of team development?
Team development
Evaluating team performance through the lens of team development allows managers to
understand why a team may be performing at a certain level; development is not a linear
process: “changes, such as members coming or going or large-scale changes in the external
environment, can lead a team to cycle back to an earlier stage”;
Stages of team development include:
Forming
- Feelings: Excited, eager, anxious
- Behaviours: Many questions
- Tasks: Create a team with a clear structure, goals, direction, and roles; task
accomplishment may be low
Storming
- Feelings: Frustration and anger at being unable to meet expectations (mismatch
between individual expectations and team performance); team members observe how
others express these negative emotions
- Behaviours: Disagreement between team members; criticism of team’s goals;
behaviours may be less polite than during the forming stage
- Tasks: Redefinition of structure, goals, and roles
Norming
- Feelings: Increased sense of comfort as individual expectations and team performance
become increasingly aligned; increased comfort to share ideas and ask for help
- Behaviours: Effective communication, establishing ground rules
- Tasks: Increased productivity; evaluation of team processes
Performing
- Feelings: Satisfaction in team progress, confidence
- Behaviours: Share personal insights, increased self-awareness, problem solving
- Tasks: Progress towards goals, continuing team development, celebrate achievements
Ending/Adjourning
- Feelings: Anxiety, sadness, sense of loss, satisfaction leading to rises and falls in team
morale
- Behaviours: Decreased focus on tasks, resulting in decreased productivity vs. increased
focus on tasks and increased productivity, depending on the person
- Tasks: Complete deliverables, evaluate team process and products, closing celebration
What are the incubation period and communicability periods for invasive meningitis?
Incubation: 2-10 days
Communicability: 7 days before onset of symptoms to 24 hours after initiation of abx
Define and contrast:
quality control,
quality assurance
and quality improvement
- Quality control: Activities to test or inspect a product or service to identify problems before the product or service reaches the customer; “find it, fix it” (retrospective)
- Quality assurance: Activities to identify problems in a process that might lead to problems with a product or service; “looking further up the line” (prospective) using quality standards
- Quality improvement: Activities to continually monitor and improve all processes within a system (prospective and retrospective)
Describe basic facts about the reportable disease chancroid
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Chancroid (reportable)
- Organism: Haemophilus ducreyi (Gram-negative rod)
- Reservoir: Human
- Mode of transmission: Direct contact with ulcer (no asymptomatic transmission)
Epidemiology:
- Attack rate > 50%
- Eliminated in many parts of the world (not endemic in Canada); cases often
associated with travel, with clustering around index case
- Associated with sex work
- Risk of HIV infection increases 10-50x if concomitant H. ducreyi infection
Presentation: Papule (usually on external genitalia) → pustule → rupture to form painful,
purulent, shallow ulcers that bleed easily +/- lymphadenitis
Incubation period: 3-7 days
Testing: Culture for H. ducreyi with special transport media (r/o syphilis and HSV)
Case management: Ciprofloxacin, 500 mg po x 1 OR Erythromycin, 500 mg po tid x 7
days
Contact management: Notify, assess/test, and empirically treat all sexual contacts of the
case for whom contact occurred in the two weeks prior to symptom onset
Describe the healthy immigrant effect in Canada.
-
Healthy immigrant effect: Phenomenon where foreign-born status is associated with
better health outcomes than Canadian-born status; attributed to an immigration process
that selects for healthy, well-educated adults + healthier diets; effect declines with time in
new country - Effect stronger in adults than children and elderly; effect stronger for mortality
than morbidity - Convergence: Over time, morbidity and mortality of immigrants approach (or
become worse than) those of the Canadian-born population due to adoption of
the the same physical, social, cultural, and environmental risk factors, combined
with socio-economic disadvantage - Health status post-arrival declines most rapidly in refugees, low-income immigrants, and
immigrants with low proficiency in English or French
Regarding obesity,
what are recent epi trends,
risk factors
and available public health interventions?
Population interventions in summary:
Personal skills:
- social marketing (nutrition, PA)
- Canada Food Guide
Clinical services:
- behavioral interventions (CTFPHC, nutrition, PA, meds/surg)
Community action:
- school/work/facility-based policy (nutrition, PA)
Supportive environments:
- menu/food labeling
- voluntary industry improvement in food quality (low salt/sugar)
- urban design for active transport + walkability
- zoning against fast food near schools,
Health public policy:
- tax unhealthy food (SSB)
- subsidy healthy foods
- marketing restriction (esp. children)
Epidemiology
- *YOUTH**
- Prevalence of overweight+obesity in Canadian children and youth (ages 5 to 17) = 30%
- Prevalence of obesity in Canadian children and youth (ages 6 to 17) = 10.6%
- Prevalence of obesity in Canadian children has tripled since 1979
- *ADULTS**
- _Prevalence of overweight+obesity in Canadian adults = 62% (55% women, 69% men in 2018)
- Prevalence of obesity in Canadian adults = 26.9%_
Modifiable risk factors
- Low physical activity (strongest predictor of obesity at the population level)
- Poor diet (low fruit and vegetable intake; high total energy consumption; 60% of family
food purchases in Canada comprise processed foods)
- Alcohol consumption
- Screen time (sedentary behaviour + exposure to advertising)
- Inadequate sleep
- For childhood obesity: maternal smoking, high birthweight, rapid infant weight gain after low birth weight
- *Non-modifiable risk factors**
- SES (increased income results in decrease risk of obesity in women, but not men)
- Ethnicity (minority status)
- Immigration status
- Environmental factors
- Education (inverse relationship between years of education attained and obesity)
- Income
- Rural residence
Protective factors for childhood obesity: breastfeeding, breakfast consumption
- *Health impacts**
- ENDO: DMII, insulin resistance
- CV: _CVD, h_ypertension
- GI: Gallbladder disease
- MSK: Osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, Chronic back pain, reduced balance
- Resp: Obstructive sleep apnea, asthma, breathing difficulty
- Cancer: Colorectal, kidney, breast, endometrial, ovarian, pancreatic
- PSYCH: Depression, Low self-esteem, Feeling judged, Being teased or bullied
Interventions
Individual-level health services/clinical interventions (effective at promoting weight loss,
but less effective at preventing weight re-gain)
- Behaviour modification/therapy/coaching
- Behavioral interventions that reduce recreational sedentary screen time among children
- Reduced-energy diet
- Physical activity
- Bariatric surgery
- Prescription medication
- Community-level interventions that influence individual and group behaviours*
- Social marketing (varied impact)
- School-based interventions for children (insufficient evidence)
- Menu and shelf labelling
- Work-based programs for adults (e.g., education, increased access to health food, increased opportunities for physical activity)
- Public policies*
- Subsidy programs to support healthy eating and/or physical activity
- Urban planning that promote physical activity
- Regulation of food advertising to children: Since 1980, Quebec has banned advertising to children; children in Quebec have the lowest obesity rate in Canada
- Taxation on specific foods (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverages)
- Zoning that prevents unhealthy food establishments from school areas
The food industry can play a significant role in promoting healthy diets by: reducing the fat, sugar and salt content of processed foods;
ensuring that healthy and nutritious choices are available and affordable to all consumers; restricting marketing of foods high in sugars, salt and fats, especially those foods aimed at children and teenagers; and ensuring the availability of healthy food choices and supporting regular physical activity practice in the workplace.
What are sources of ionizing radiation?
What is the annual radiation dose limit for workers in Canada?
Sources of radiation (and percentage of total ionizing radiation of the average US individual)
- *Background radiation**
- Space sources (e.g., cosmic rays, cosmic microwave background radiation); air travel increases exposure to cosmic radiation (typical cross-Canada flight = 0.02 mSv) (5%)
- Terrestrial radiation (from radioactive constituents of Earth’s crust) (3%)
- Internal radiation (from radioactive isotopes incorporated into the body, e.g., K-40, C-14) (5%)
- Radon and thoron (products of naturally occurring radioactive decay) (37%)
- *Man-made**
- Industrial sources (<0.1%) (nuclear power, weapons, waste)
- Occupational exposure (<0.1%) Annual radiation dose limit for nuclear energy workers in Canada = 50 mSv
- _Medical procedures_ (48%) Conventional radiography (5%); typical CXR = 0.1 mSv Interventional fluoroscopy (7%) Nuclear medicine - isotopes (7%); average PET scan = 10 mSv CT scan (24%); typical CT chest = 7 mSv
What is a health needs assessment and how is it done?
What are data sources that can contribute to the situational assessment?
What are PEEST and SWOT analyses?
Health needs assessment
Definition: “systematic method of identifying unmet health and healthcare needs of a population and making changes to meet these unmet needs” (Wright et al., 1998)
- *Steps:**
1. Identify the research questions
a. What is the situation?
b. What is making the situation better and what is making it worse?
c. What possible actions can be taken to deal with the situation?
Stratify responses to the research questions according to intervention levels: Individuals, Networks, Organizations, Society
- Develop a data-gathering plan
- Gather the data (e.g., f_rom community health status indicators, research data, best practice guidelines, environmental scan, community surveys, community stories or testimonials_, etc.)
- Analyze, synthesize, and summarize the data (see tables below)
- Communicate the information
- Consider how to proceed
Examples of data sources using example of mental health:
- Sociodemographic profile - Develop a community profile (age, sex etc, pop #s) that is the focus of the HNA - statistics Canada
- Epidemiology - Describe epidemiology of mental health of the relevant population - P/T mental health surveys, hospitalisation database, physician billing, prescription database
- Comparative assessment - compare local provision against national norms - CCDSS
- Service user views - patient surveys, satisfaction
- Resources available - description of healthcare and allied health available for mental health (e.g. community psychologists, dedicated psychiatric facilities)
- Healthcare utilization - emergency department visits, EMS call outs
PEEST analysis
What are the political, economic, environmental, social, or technological trends that might
impact the program your organization would like to develop?
Factor Example
Political Local politicians consider the issue important
Economic High unemployment rate and poverty
Environmental High levels of TRAP near your organization’s building limit outdoor activities
Social High turnover in the community (i.e., people regularly moving in and out of
the community)
Technological Low level of internet access in the target group
SWOT analysis
What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for your organization related to
developing a program that addresses the situation of concern?
Internal:
- *Strength** Highly credible organization that is able to obtain funding
- *Weakness** Ongoing challenges working in partnership with community organizations
External:
- *Opportunity** New grant program available to fund programs addressing the situation of concern
- *Threat** Lack of interest in the situation of concern in the City Council
Regarding refined sugars in excess,
what are health impacts
and available public health interventions?
What are the principles of health impact assessments?
What are the process steps of health impact assessments?
Health impact assessment
Definition: An HIA is a “combination of methods whose aim is to assess the health consequences to a population of a policy, project, or programme that does not necessarily have health as its primary objective” (Lock, BMJ, 2000)
PRINCIPLES
Holistic approach
To inform a pending decision
For a non-health project or policy
Follows a standardized process (includes at least screening, scoping and appraisal)
Multidisciplinary approach (at least within the public health sector)
Concern for inequality (distribution of effects)
Based on an evidence search
Neutral, objective (without a priori solutions), transparent
Realistic recommendations
Process (SSARME)
- Screening: Could the proposed policy, program, or project impact health? Are these
impacts substantial enough to warrant an HIA?
- Scoping: What is the scope of the HIA? What information is required and who will
collect it? How much time is available?
- Appraising: What is the likely impact of the policy, program, or project on health, based
on the available evidence?
- Reporting: Are there modifications to the policy, program, or project based on the
findings of the evidence appraisal?
- Monitoring: What are the real impacts of the policy, program, or project on health?
- Evaluation: Was the HIA process successful?
Evaluation of the effectiveness of an HIA should examine:
- Context: Broader decision-making context; the values, purpose, and goals of the HIA;
HIA parameters (e.g., given the context, was it possible for the HIA to be effective?)
- Process: Transparency, organizational capacity and experience, adequacy of time and
resources
- Impacts: Proximal (e.g., informing or changing decisions or implementation) vs. distal
(e.g., development of partnerships, improved understanding of the SDOH outside the
health sector)
Regarding prostate cancer,
what are recent epi trends?
risk factors?
CTFPHC screening recommendations?
Prostate cancer
- *Epidemiology**
- Most commonly diagnosed cancer in men, other than skin cancer
- Third-leading cause of cancer-related death in men (lifetime risk of death due to prostate cancer = 3.6%)
- 1 in 7 Canadian men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetimes
- Prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy in men ages 70-79 years is 70%
- Prostate cancer has the highest 10-year survival rate of any cancer in men (95%)
Risk factors
- Known risk factors: Older age, family history, African-American race
- Possible risk factors: Diet high in fat, dairy, red meat, or processed meat; overweight and
obesity; prostatitis; high levels of testosterone; tall adult height; pesticide exposure
(unknown which specific pesticides); occupational exposures to cadmium or chemicals
used for rubber manufacturing
Screening recommendations
- European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) found a small
absolute reduction in prostate cancer mortality in the group randomized to receive PSA
screening (13 lives saved per 10,000 men invited for screening)
- Overdiagnosis: Cancer correctly detected, but cancer would not have caused
symptoms or death; 40-56% of men screened who received a diagnosis of
prostate cancer in the ERSPC study were estimated to be overdiagnosed
- Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) found no effect
of screening on prostate cancer mortality (0 lives saved per 10,000 men invited for
screening)
- Neither study found that screening had an impact on all-cause mortality
- No trials have examined the impact of DRE alone on mortality
- Harms of prostate biopsy: hematuria, infection, hospital admission, overdiagnosis, and
death
- Benefits of prostate biopsy: Diagnosis
CTFPH recommendations (2014)
1. For men aged less than 55 years, we recommend NOT screening for prostate cancer with
the prostate-specific antigen test. (Strong recommendation; low quality evidence)
2. For men aged 55–69 years, we recommend NOT screening for prostate cancer with the
prostate-specific antigen test. (Weak recommendation; moderate quality evidence)
3. For men 70 years of age and older, we recommend NOT screening for prostate cancer
with the prostate-specific antigen test.(Strong recommendation; low quality evidence)
Discuss homelessness in Canada
- Define it
- Recent epi trends
- Risk factors
- Impacts on health outcomes and health care utilization
- Available public health interventions
Persons experiencing homelessness
- *Homelessness:** Lack of stable, permanent, appropriate housing, or the immediate prospect, means, and ability of acquiring it
- Chronic homelessness: Individuals who are currently homeless and have been homeless for > 6 months in the last 12 months (i.e., 180 cumulative nights in a shelter or place not fit for human habitation)
- Episodic homelessness: Individuals who have experienced 3 or more episodes of homelessness in the last 12 months
- Transitional homelessness: Housed in supportive, but temporary, shelter
- Roofless: Homeless and living outside
Epidemiology:
- Timeline:
- Pre-1980s: Small number, mostly single men
- 1980s to 2000s: Increasing number of persons experiencing homelessness; attributed to closures of long-term psychiatric care facilities
- 2000s: Increased investments in shelters
- Now: Increasing system integration; Housing First
- 35,000 Canadians are homeless on a given night, of which 13,000-33,000 are chronically homeless
- 235,000 Canadians experience homelessness in a year, of which:
- 5,000 are unsheltered
- 180,000 are staying in emergency sheltered
- 50,000 are provisionally sheltered (e.g., motels, couch-surfing, jail, hospitals)
- Risk factors for homelessness (note that with appropriate structural supports, individual risk factors do not lead to homelessness):
Individual:
- Adverse childhood experiences
- Mental illness and substance use
- Indigenous (28-34% of the shelter pop is Indigenous)
- Criminal justice system experiences
- Marital breakdown / intimate partner violence
Community:
- Institutionalization (health care, child protection, jail)
- Housing unaffordability
- *Impact of homelessness on health care use**:
- Prioritizing seeking food and shelter above medical care
- Difficulty adhering to medication regimens (e.g., due to lack of storage space, unable to regularly take with food, limited access to clean water, limited access to toilets for GI side effects)
- Difficulty obtaining a health card without an address
- Difficulty accessing medical services without a health card
- Difficulty booking appointments (no address or return phone number)
- Difficulty receiving coordinated healthcare (medical records stored in several locations)
- Personal appearance and or personal hygiene that may be alarming to some working in or utilizing health care services
- _Difficulty paying for prescription_s and items not covered by the province
- Challenges to recuperation following treatment due to a lack of caregivers and space to recuperate
- *Health outcomes associated with homelessness:**
- Cardiovascular disease
- Mental illness and substance use
- Injuries, including traumatic brain injury (unintentional, intentional, and self-harm)
- Hypothermia / frostbite
- _Tuberculosis
- Hepatitis B and C
- HIV_
- _Scabies
- Body lice_
- Bartonella quintana (“urban trench fever”; documented in US and France)
Public health interventions:
- Monitoring and surveillance of health outcomes of individuals experiencing homelessness
- Case management (for psychiatric patients, assertive community treatment)
- Housing first: Strategy for addressing homelessness that provides housing without requiring individuals to engage with services or find a job first; improves health outcomes
and reduces involvement with justice and healthcare system
- Poverty reduction / income support
- Affordable housing
- Eviction prevention
- Institutional transition support (housing on discharge)
- Employment opportunities for low-skilled workers
- Primary prevention: Anti-violence interventions, early childhood interventions
Define liberalism, communitarism, utilitarianism and postmodernism.
Contrast libertarianism and egalitarian liberalism.
Philosophical paradigms
Philosophical paradigms are used to justify the choice of an ethical framework and the choice of
a particular intervention.
Liberalism: States should intervene to protect individual rights
- Libertarianism: Negative rights (i.e., freedom from…) should be protected, but
otherwise, there should be no state intervention
- Egalitarian liberalism: Both negative and positive rights (i.e., freedom from and
freedom to…) should be protected, and resources should be distributed in a way that
allows freedom of choice (“the right to choice is meaningless without resources”)
Communitarianism: States should intervene in order to create or maintain a good society (i.e.,
the good of society is prioritized over the good of individuals)
**Utilitarianism**: _Decisions should be judged by their consequences; most common approach in public health_ (e.g., contrasting two programs on the basis of _QALYs)_
Postmodernism: Rejects the idea that there is objective moral truth than exists, so there is no
deeper justification for state intervention
Describe 5 waste water treatment steps
Wastewater treatment
Screening: Large pieces of debris (“chunks”) are removed and disposed of in a landfill
Settling: Solids settle to the bottom of a tank; supernatant is removed
Aeration: Supernatant is aerated (or filtered) to allow aerobic microorganisms to consume
organic material
Clarifier: Solids settle to the bottom of the tank (again) and are sent to sludge processing (sludge from settling tank and clarifier is digested by microorganisms)
Disinfection: Aerated supernatant is disinfected (usually with chlorine) and then returned back
to the water cycle
Sludge disposal: Processed sludge can be used in agriculture, incinerated, or sent to landfill
Waste-to-energy: Methane is produced by the sludge processing, which can be captured and
burned for energy
List 3 categories of chlorine disinfection by-products.
What is the suspected cause of eye and respiratory tract irritation in swimmers?
- Health risks of swimming more likely to come from chlorination than microbiological
contamination - Disinfection by-products (DBPs): Produced when chlorine reacts with organic matter;
divided into three major groups: - Halogenic organics: E.g., Chloramines, trihalomethanes (including chloroform and bromodichloromethane), chloral hydrate
- Chloramines, rather than chlorine itself, are the suspected cause of eye and respiratory tract irritation of swimmers → may explain the increased risk of asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity, and airway inflammation in elite swimmers
- Two trihalomethanes (chloroform and bromodichloromethane) are IARC 2B
- Non-halogenic organics: E.g., aldehydes, benzene
- Inorganics: E.g., chlorate
- “at recommended swimming pool FAC (free available chlorine) levels (ranging from 0.8-5.0 ppm according to swimming pool guidelines and regulations across Canada), ingestion of pool water does not have adverse health effects on bathers” (NCCEH)
What factors need to be considered when calculating a sample size?
How can statistical power be increased?
Sample size calculations
How many people do we need to detect a statistically significant difference between the null and
alternative hypothesis?
Sample size determined by:
1. Hypotheses
2. Type I error rate
3. Power (1 - type II error rate)
4. A particular alternative value
5. An estimate of population variance
How can statistical power be increased?
Increase sample size
Increase alpha
Increase effect size
Decrease random error
Conduct one-tailed test
Describe the jurisprudence around HIV disclosure criminalization?
Criminalization (hot topic): In Canada, non-disclosure of HIV status prior to a sexual act may be punishable as a criminal offense (usually charged with aggravated sexual assault); neither intent to harm nor transmission are necessary for criminal charges; partner is not required to ask about status; although it has not been tested, people who might have HIV and ought to be aware of that possibility could be charged, even if they have not been tested; no evidence that criminalization reduces transmission or increases disclosure
- 1990s: Legal obligation to disclose HIV established by case law
- 2012: R. v. Mabior and R. v. DC established legal obligation to disclose HIV status if there is a “realistic possibility of transmission”; no duty to disclose from a criminal perspective when engaging in vaginal/oral sex with a condom and an undetectable viral load or when engaging in kissing or masturbation; rulings did not comment on anal sex
- 2014: Canadian consensus statement on HIV and its transmission in the context of criminal law
2019 update:
There is an obligation to disclose HIV-positive status to
a sexual partner before activity that poses a “realistic
possibility” of HIV transmission— and prosecutors and
courts effectively determine what this means.
• According to the Supreme Court of Canada, there
is no obligation in Canadian criminal law to disclose
HIV-positive status when having vaginal or anal sex if a
condom is used and the HIV-positive partner has a “low”
viral load (under 1500 copies/ml).
• Whether a person might be prosecuted and convicted
for not disclosing their HIV-positive status in other
circumstances is still evolving, and depends on court
decisions and on directives and guidelines governing
prosecutors (where they exist).
• A federal directive limits prosecutions in Canada’s
three territories. Formal policy for provincial Crown
prosecutors has been adopted in Ontario and British
Columbia. An advisory has been given to provincial
prosecutors in Alberta.
Compare and contrast direct vs indirect standardization.
Standardization
Direct standardization
“The process where the rate of disease (or mortality) in a population is calculated on the
assumption that the population had a standard age-sex distribution. If this is done for several
different study populations then the resulting standardized incidence (mortality) rates can be
directed compared because any differences in age/sex between the populations have been
removed. Direct standardization is most commonly performed for age and sex but can be
performed for other characteristics such as race, socioeconomic status.”
Your question: How many deaths per year would you expect in your study population if your
study population had the same age distribution as a reference population?
You need:
1. The age-specific disease rates in your study population; and
2. The age distribution of the standard population
You get: A standardized mortality rate (expected deaths/100,000/year)
Indirect standardization
“The process where the observed number of events in a study population is compared to the
number of events that would have been expected to occur if the study population had the same
incidence/mortality rate as a reference population. Indirect standardization is most commonly
performed for age and sex but it can be performed for other characteristics, such as race,
socioeconomic status.”
Your question: How many times greater (or less) is the mortality rate in your study population
than in the reference population?
You need:
1. The age distribution of your study population; and
2. The age-specific disease rates in the standard population
You get: A standardized mortality ratio (SMR)
**Cannot compare one SMR to another SMR**
Describe recent epi findings related to occupational illnesses.
-
Workers are most likely to be injured within the first month of work than any other time
(RR = 3) - Younger workers are more likely to be injured than older workers
- Almost 40% of back pain worldwide is due to occupational ergonomic stressors
-
Industries reporting the highest number of workplace injuries: #1. Healthcare, #2.
Manufacturing, #3. Construction (2015 totals) - Common occupational health issues:
- Sprains and strains (40% of Ontario WSIB claims)
- Traumatic injury (30% of Ontario WSIB claims)
- Probably under-reported:
- Noise-induced hearing loss: “Notch” in audiogram around 4000 Hz
- Silica-related lung disease
- Occupational dermatitis
*Health outcomes very rarely pathognomonic for exposure, so it is often challenging to link
disease to specific exposures
What are the leading causes of death in Canada?
Source: Statistics Canada, year = 2019.
Leading causes of death, both sexes:
- Cancer, 80k deaths
- Heart diseases, 53k
- Accidents, 14k
- Cerebrovascular disease, 14k
- Chronic lower respiratory diseass, 13k
- Diabetes mellitus
- Influenza and pneumonia
- Alzheimer’s disease
- Intentional self-harm (suicide)
- Kidney Disease
2011 distribution by sex held true in 2019, see image
Disease burden in DALY (as per GBD tool)
Cancers combined
Ischemic heart disease
Back pain
Lung cancer
Diabetes
Stroke
By age group per Statistics Canada
1-14: cancer, accidents,
What are potential health hazards of placentophagy?
Placentophagy (hot topic)
Consumption of the human placenta after birth is become increasingly common based on the
belief that it contains vitamins, minerals, or hormones that may help the mother recover after
birth.
Forms: Encapsulated, raw (e.g., in a smoothie), cooked (e.g., in pasta sauce)
Methods:
- Patient or her family prepares the placenta: Only eaten by patient or her family; or Sold
or given to other people
- Person hired by patient or her family prepares the placenta: Prepared in the patient’s
home; or Prepared in another location
Potential hazards:
- No case reports of communicable disease transmission as a result of placentophagy
- No conclusive evidence of risks or benefits
- The placenta is not sterile (its microbiome is similar to that of the human mouth) and it is
reasonable to consider it a potential vector for disease, including sexually transmitted
infections, yeasts, and bacterial contamination from the mother or the environment,
including hospital-acquired infections. Other hazards might include:
- Blood-borne diseases (e.g., through cross-contamination between one person’s
capsules and another person’s uncooked placenta);
- Prion diseases (note that iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease has only been
associated with “exposure to infectious brain, pituitary, or eye tissue”); and
- Organisms that reach high concentrations in placental tissues (e.g, Coxiella
burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever; “The organism has unusual stability, can
reach high concentrations in animal tissues, particularly the placenta, and is
highly resistant to many disinfectants.”).
Legal status
- Status of placenta capsules or placenta-preparation businesses in Ontario is unclear;
products may fit into one of three categories:
- Natural health product: If so, the manufacturer must comply with the licensing
requirements of the Natural Health Products Regulations (Health Canada),
including good manufacturing practices and evidence of safety and efficacy.
However, products compounded by a healthcare provider for an individual patient
are exempted from these regulations.
- Biomedical waste: Guideline C-4: The Management of Biomedical Waste in
Ontario recommends incinerating human anatomical waste. The Guideline also
recommends extensive special handling procedures.
- Food: If placenta-preparation businesses are considered food premises, then
they must comply with the Health Protection and Promotion Act, Regulation 562:
Food Premises.
What are 10 types of risks for an organization?
What type of activity can risk management action plans contain?
Risk management
Basic concepts
- Risk: Chance of an occurrence that will have an impact on the achievement of
objectives (positive or negative)
- Residual risk: Level of risk remaining after mitigation strategy employed
- Risk increases as you move from project/operational decisions to program
decisions to strategic decision
- Risk management: Systematic approach to preparing for risk through identification,assessing, understanding, acting on, and communicating risk issues
- Examples of risks: Financial (e.g., fraud, funding), operational, organizational (e.g., staff morale, succession, retention, surge capacity), privacy, security, technology, equity, governance, environment, and legal issues
- Risk intelligence: Organizational ability to think about risk and uncertainty and
effectively use forward-looking risk concepts
- Risk oversight: Systematic approach to determining whether or not an organization has
a robust risk management process (risk oversight = what boards do; risk management =
what organization does)
- Risk management process:
- Objectives: What are the outcomes of interest?
-
Identify: Use a structured approach to ensure that all risks threatening the
objectives are identified and documented -
Assess: Consider probability, impact, and timing; build a HIRA of the identified
risks (probability x impact) -
Plan and take action: For acceptable risk exposures, document rationale for
acceptability; for unacceptable risk exposures, document and communicate
action plans;
Action plan may be:
- Preventive: Reduce probability of risk
- Detective: Detect early, intervene early, and reduce impact
- Recovery: Improve response strategies to reduce impact
- Monitor and report: Monitor status of risks, effectiveness of action, and revise
assessments and action plans as required; share risk-related information via
regular reporting mechanisms
-
Key risk indicators: Indicator of the probability that a risk will occur (e.g.,
average time to fill vacant positions, audit findings, number of reporting
deadlines missed)
When is smallpox vaccine recommended?
What are possible adverse events related to smallpox vaccination?
What would be the PEP and type of precautions for smallpox?
Smallpox (Variola)
- Two strains of the smallpox virus, Variola major and Variola minor
- Eradicated in 1977
- Canadians born after 1972 have not been routinely immunized against smallpox;
individuals born in 1972 or earlier may have partial immunity
- PHAC maintains stockpiles of smallpox vaccine and VIG
- Remaining variola virus stocks are kept in 2 WHO reference labs
Route of exposure: Droplet or aerosol (i.e., airborne precautions required)
Incubation period: 10-14 days
Presentation:
- Prodrome (1-4 days): Fever, fatigue, malaise, headache
- Rash (weeks): Progression from macules → papules → umbilicated vesicles → scabs
(infectious while rash is present)
Fatality rate:
- Variola major: 25%
- Variola minor: 1%
Treatment: Supportive
Vaccination and PEP:
- Vaccine administered via scarification into the epidermis; results in the development of a
papule surrounded by erythema (if no papule or vesicle forms, individual should be
vaccinated again)
- Touching the vaccine site before the area heals can lead to auto-inoculation of other
sites or inoculation of other people
- Vaccination currently recommended only for laboratory workers working with
orthopoxviruses
- PEP (vaccination only, not VIG) given within 2-3 days of exposure protects against
development of smallpox and PEP given within 4-5 days reduces risk of death
- Adverse events related to vaccination include:
-
Generalized vaccinia: Vaccine-associated viremia results in lesions developing in
unimmunized skin; usually benign -
Progressive vaccinia: In individuals with immune defects (esp. T-cell
deficiencies), progressive skin and organ necrosis develops; often fatal -
Eczema vaccinatum: Vaccinial skin lesions develop in eczematous areas; usually
self-limited, but can be fatal - Vaccinia keratitis
- Post-vaccinial encephalitis
- Acute myopericarditis
- Most adverse events (with the exception of vaccinia keratitis) can be treated with VIG
Describe basic facts about lyme disease
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Lyme disease (reportable)
- Organism: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (“borrelia in the widest sense”): a spirochete
bacteria; this includes B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (“borrelia in the strictest sense”), B.
afzelii, B. bavariensis, B. garinii, and B. spielmanii; only the first occurs in North America;
the others occur in Europe and Asia
- Mode of transmission: Vector-borne; in eastern Canada, by Ixodes scapularis
(blacklegged ticks); in western Canada, by Ixodes pacificus and Ixodes angustus (the
latter two are less capable of carrying Borrelia); tick must be attached for > 24h (usually
> 36-48 h) to transfer the spirochete; Lyme disease cannot be transmitted directly from
an animal to a human or by person-to-person contact (although transmission via blood
transfusion is possible)
- Reservoir: Black-legged ticks are most commonly carried by white-footed mice and
white-tailed deer; other small mammals and birds can also carry ticks. Deer cannot be
infected with Lyme disease, but they can transport ticks that can then pick up B.
burgdorferi when they feed on small animals and birds
- Epidemiology: Incidence highest when nymphal ticks are most active (because they are
small and more likely to remain attached long enough to transmit disease); incidence
increasing in Canada due to warmer temperatures
- Presentation:
Stage Clinical presentation Incubation period
Early localized disease: Erythema migrans, or a “bull’s eye” rash, occurs in 60-80 percent of people; “bull’s eye” must be >5cm Flu-like symptoms (fatigue, headache, myalgias, fever) , inbuation of 1-2 weeks
Early disseminated disease:
Neurological: aseptic meningitis, cerebellar ataxia, seventh nerve palsies (in Lyme-endemic
areas, up to 1 in 4 patients presenting with seventh nerve palsy (Bell’s palsy) have Lyme
disease), incubation is weeks to months
CVS: Bradycardia, AV block, cardiomegaly
Derm: Multiple erythema migrans lesions
Late disease: Arthritis of the hips or knees, rare neurological problems, incubation is Months to years
Post-Lyme disease syndrome (PLDS):
Patients who have had well-documented Lyme disease who report subjective MSK pain, cognitive impairment, and fatigue despite appropriate treatment
- Testing: PHAC and CDC recommend a two-tiered approach, a_n enzyme immunoassay
(e.g., ELISA), then a Western blot test for IgM/IgG if the enzyme immunoassay is
positive or indeterminate_; early localized disease is a clinical diagnosis based on S/S
and exposure history (IgM ab do not develop for several weeks after infection)
- PEP: Single dose of doxycycline for patients > 8 years old if:
- Lyme-endemic area AND
- Patient has removed a tick within the last 72 h AND
- Tick is engorged or has been attached for > 24 hours AND
- Patient has no allergy to doxycycline and is not pregnant
PEP is not recommended for children < 8 years because “the of absence of data on an
effective short-course regimen for prophylaxis, the likely need for a multiday regimen
(and its associated adverse effects) [14-day course of amoxicillin], the excellent efficacy
of antibiotic treatment of Lyme disease if infection were to develop, and the extremely
low risk that a person with a recognized bite will develop a serious complication of Lyme
disease” (IDSA guidelines) -
Case management/treatment: First-line treatment in adults is amoxicillin, 500 mg PO TID
x 14-21 days OR doxycycline, 100 mg PO BID x 14-21 days; first-line treatment for
children is amoxicillin, 50 mg/kg/day divided q8h x 14-21 days - Other: Integrated tick management: The use of several methods to reduce the number of
ticks; includes personal protective measures (light-coloured, long-sleeved pants; closedtoed
shoes; DEET; and performing a tick check after spending time in long grass or
wooded areas) + landscaping methods (restrict use of ground cover plants; plant deer resistant
plants; relocate high-use areas away from woodland edges; isolate high-use
areas from woodland edges with wood chip, mulch, or gravel borders; discourage rodent
activity, cut grasses short; remove leaf litter and brush)
Compare and contrast the different E. Coli strains
E. coli consists of a diverse group of bacteria. Pathogenic E. coli strains are categorized into pathotypes. Six pathotypes are associated with diarrhea and collectively are referred to as diarrheagenic E. coli.
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)—STEC may also be referred to as Verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). This pathotype is the one most commonly heard about in the news in association with foodborne outbreaks (0157). TTP-HUS (e.g. O157); abx may
increase risk of HUS; HUS is leading cause of renal failure in children in Canada
Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) Common cause of travellers’ diarrhea and <5 mortality in LMICs
Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) Most commonly occurs in nonbreastfed infants (rare in HICs)
Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC)
Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) When you think someone has bacillary dysentery (bloody stool, fever), they probably actually have EIEC; endemic in LMICs
Diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC)
List determinants of health according to PHAC (12)
Determinants of health according to PHAC:
-
Income and social status: As income and social status increase, individual health status increases; as income and social inequality decrease, population health status increases (evidence: Whitehall study)
a. Health gradients: At every income level, people in higher strata have better outcomes than people in lower strata - Social support networks: Increased social contact and emotional support reduces mortality; social networks influence risk factor exposure (e.g., physical activity, obesity)
- Education and literacy: Education level predicts SES, improves job security, and increases job satisfaction; literacy allows individuals to access knowledge required for problem-solving
- Employment/working conditions: Unemployment, unemployment, stressful work environments, and unsafe work environments are associated with poorer health outcomes
- Social environment: Cohesive, diverse, and stable institutions, organizations, and informal networks reduce the risk of crime and violence
- Physical environment: Air, water, soil, and food contaminants can adversely affect health; the built environment can influence both physical and psychological well-being
- Personal health practices and coping skills: The actions individuals perform to selfcare, problem-solve, and cope can enhance or detract from health (e.g., smoking, alcohol use, drug use, unsafe sex, dietary choices)
- Healthy child development: Health outcomes are affected by birth weight, parental attachment, childhood housing, family income, parental education, access to nutritious foods and physical recreation, and access to dental and medical care
- Biology and genetic endowment
- Health services
- Gender: Culturally-determined values and roles ascribed to the sexes
-
Culture: Marginalization, stigmatization, and devaluation of language of minority cultures by the majority culture can lead to additional health risks (e.g., through lack of culturally appropriate
health care services, through socio-economic exclusion)
Define risk assessment, risk management and risk communication
- Hazard: A potential danger to health
- Risk: Probability of hazard x impact of hazard (see also: HIRA)
-
Risk assessment: “A systematic process for describing and quantifying the risk
associated with hazardous substances, processes, action, or events”; descriptive -
Risk management: Steps taken to alter (i.e., reduce) the levels of risk to which an
individual or population is subject”; the active process of controlling hazards for which a
risk assessment has indicated an unacceptably high level of risk -
Risk communication: Communicating the nature of the risk and the responses to the
risk; two-way process -
Acceptable risk: Level of risk to which a target population considers acceptable; a
social judgment, not a scientific one -
As low as reasonably achieveable (ALARA): When an acceptable risk level is unknown or
cannot be achieved, regulations may use the ALARA limit based on the best available
control technology
Describe the air quality index and its limitations in communicating risks to at-risk populations
Air quality index:
- Scale 0-100 (very good to very poor air quality)
- Pollutants included CO, NO2, PM2.5, SO2, O3, TRS (but only the value for the highest
pollutant is used at any one time) NO2, PM2.5, O3 (weighted)
- Basis for scale Regulatory standards for air quality
- Standardized across provinces
- Results Primarily driven by ozone in the summer and PM2.5 in the winter
Criticism of using AQ indices to drive public health messaging:
- Most (2/3) of the effects of air pollution on health occur secondary to long-term exposure (i.e., annual AQ levels are more important to health than real-time indicators)
- Most people spend most of their time indoors, so most exposures to outdoor air pollutants occur indoors; this is particularly true of those at highest risk of harm from air pollutants (the elderly, those with pre-existing CV and resp conditions); i.e., the messaging associated with AQ indices (stay indoors, reduce strenuous exercise) is often
irrelevant to those at highest risk
- Messaging associated with AQ indices emphasizes that some days, everyone is at a higher risk of harm from air pollutants; the messaging does not acknowledge that on all days, some people are at higher risk (e.g., those who live near major traffic arteries)
- Not validated for non-urban areas
- Range of RR from study that the AQHI is based on = 1 to 1.1
Describe basic facts about prion diseases
Agent, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Prion diseases / transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
- Agent: Prion protein (abnormally-folded form of a host-encoded cellular protein)
- Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (85% of CJD cases): Sporadic development
of abnormal protein folding
- Iatrogenic CJD (<1% of CJD cases): Exogenously acquired due to an iatrogenic
exposure
- Familial CJD (15% of CJD cases): Inherited CJD, due to a mutation
- Variant CJD: Exogenously acquired; CJD caused by exposure to bovine
spongiform encephalopathy
- Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease: Inherited, due to a mutation
- Fatal familial insomnia: Inherited, due to a mutation
- Kuru: Exogenously acquired via funerary cannibalism
- Reservoir: Humans (except vCJD)
-
Mode of transmission: All types of prion disease, even those that are inherited or
spontaneously arise, are transmissible - Epidemiology:
- Worldwide incidence of CJD is 1-2 cases/1 million persons; Canadian incidence
is the same as worldwide incidence - Usually affects the middle-aged and elderly, except vCJD (mean age = 28 years)
- 226 vCJD cases identified worldwide as of 2012; incidence decreasing as animal
feeding practices improve -
Presentation: Progressive neurodegenerative disease (dementia, confusion, myoclonus)
resulting from tissue deposition of prions; FFI results in intractable insomnia - Incubation period: Decades (although may be months in vCJD)
- Testing: Clinical features + MRI + EEG + CSF +/- postmortem brain biopsy
- Case management: Supportive care
- Contact management:
IPC implications:
- Exposure routes for iatrogenic CJD: Growth hormone, gonadotropin, dura mater
graft, corneal graft, instrument exposure (risk of transmission from asymptomatic
patients is negligibly low) - Institutions should track their reused equipment; otherwise, all equipment that
may have come into contact with an infectious patient must be discarded - Stainless steel can tolerate CJD decontamination; plastic and electronic devices
cannot (decontamination requires NaOH or NaOCl + autoclaving) - Instruments that may have contacted a CJD patient must be quarantined until the
diagnosis is excluded
Discuss the public health implications of supervised injections sites:
- its objectives?
- its public health impact?
What services are usually provided at SIS?
What are ETHICAL pros/cons values for SIS?
Case study: Supervised injection sites (hot topic)
- *Supervised injection sites**: “Legally sanctioned and supervised facilities designed to reduce the health and public order problems associated with illegal injection drug use”
- *- Objectives:**
1) Reduce public disorder, increase public safety,
2) reduce overdose morbidity and mortality,
3) increase access to health and social services
- *Impacts of SISs:**
- Reduction in harmful injection behaviour
- Reduction in the spread of bloodborne infections, resulting in savings to the health care system
- Reduction in violence, victimization/sexual assault, public disorder, and arrest while intoxicated
- Reduction in overdose fatalities
- Increased access to healthcare (e.g., for abscesses, psychosocial support, foot care, pregnancy tests) and social services (like housing, employment assistance and food banks)
- reduce public drug use and discarded drug equipment
- reduce strain on emergency medical services, so they can focus on other emergencies
- provides space for people to connect with staff and peers, which can help a person moderate their drug use and decide to pursue treatment
Services typically provided at SISs include sterile injecting equipment, emergency medical care, basic health services, BBSTI testing, needle exchange, counselling/MH, referrals to other agencies and supports, education on drugs and injection techniques, drug checks, treatment/referral for drug treatment
ETHICAL AGAINST
Beneficence, non-maleficence - injecting drugs is inherently dangerous
Duty to provide care, deontologic consideration - participating and witnessing inherently dangerous clinical process of injecting drugs
Resource stewardship
Trust - unintended consequences on community hosting site
ETHICAL FOR
Utilitarianism - practical approach to save lives
Solidarity
Respect for autonomy
Timeline:
- 2003: Insite opened in Vancouver, operated under an exemption from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
- 2011: Supreme Court of Canada required the federal government to maintain Insite’s exemption from the CDSA
- 2013: Federal government introduced the a bill that would become Respect for Communities Act; on the surface, it allows the creation of new SISs, in line with the 2011 Supreme Court decision, but in practice, creates multiple barriers to implementing new
SISs
- 2015: Respect for Communities Act receives royal assent, requiring extensive consultation before implementing SISs
Describe basic facts about amebiasis
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Amebiasis
Organism: Entameba histolytica
Reservoir: Humans
Transmission: Person-to-person or fecal-oral
Presentation: Usually asymptomatic, but can cause amebic dysentery
Case management: Cases require enteric precautions
Tx = Systemically-active amebicide + luminal amebicide
Public health measures: Personal hygiene, sanitation systems, water treatment, safer sex
Compare and contrast treponemal and non-treponemal syphilis tests?
Testing: Blood test; test individuals with risk factors, symptoms, or contact with a case; perform routine prenatal screening (repeat at 28-32 weeks and at birth if high risk)
-
Non-treponemal tests: Detect non-specific antibodies formed by host response to syphilis infection; may be falsely negative in early primary syphilis and late syphilis and may be f_alsely positive due to other infections_ (esp treponemal infections, yaws, bejel, pinta), lupus, and very high antibody levels (hook effect) (in Ontario, rapid plasma reagin (RPR), which detects anti-cardiolipin antibodies,
and T. pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) are used); will decline with treatment - Treponemal tests: Detect anti-treponemal IgG and IgM, but may be falsely negative early primary infection; usually positive for life after infection (in Ontario, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) is the treponemal test +/- fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbance (FTA-Abs) if RPR and TPPA are non-reactive or indeterminate)
What are notifiable diseases under IHR?
What are nationally notifiable diseases in Canada?
What are sections 22, 35 and 102 in Ontario?
Communicable disease legislations
Global:
Always Notifiable under IHR: Smallpox, Poliomyelitis due to wild-type poliovirus, Human influenza caused by a new subtype, Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
Other Potentially Notifiable Events may include cholera, pneumonic plague, yellow fever, viral hemorrhagic fever, and West Nile fever, as well as other biological, radiological, or chemical events that meet IHR criteria.
Federal:
- Nationally notifiable diseases: “Communicable disease that have been identified by the
federal government and all provinces and territories as priorities for monitoring and
control efforts”
- Criteria used to identify diseases that are nationally notifiable: International
regulations, incidence in Canada, severity, communicability, potential for
outbreaks, socioeconomic burden, preventability, risk perception, necessity for
public health response, changing incidence patterns
- P/Ts voluntarily submit notifiable disease data to PHAC on an annual basis
- Nationally notifiable diseases differ from provincially reportable diseases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notifiable_diseases_in_Canada
Provincial (Ontario):
- Reportable diseases: Diseases for which public health agencies must be notified by
law; facilitates surveillance and disease control; all reportable diseases are infectious,
but not all reportable diseases are communicable (e.g., botulism, some types of
encephalitis and food poisoning, hantavirus, legionellosis, Lyme, malaria)
- Communicable diseases: Diseases that spread from person to person (general) or list
of diseases contained in O.Reg 558/91 (Ontario-specific); an MOH can issue a section
22 for a communicable disease listed under O.Reg 558/91; if an individual breaches a
section 22 order for a virulent disease, an MOH can apply to a judge for a section 102
order
- Virulent diseases: A sub-set of communicable diseases in the HPPA; the HPPA lists
cholera, diphtheria, Ebola, gonorrhea, hemorrhagic fevers, Lassa, leprosy, Marburg,
plague, syphilis, smallpox, tuberculosis, SARS as virulent; an MOH can issue a section
22 order for a virulent disease; if an individual breaches a section 22 order for a virulent
disease, an MOH can apply to a judge for a section 35 order
-
Section 22 orders: Under the HPPA, an MOH may issue a section 22 order to an
individual with a communicable disease if: - “that a communicable disease exists or may exist or that there is an immediate
risk of an outbreak of a communicable disease in the health unit served by the
medical officer of health; - “that the communicable disease presents a risk to the health of persons in the
health unit served by the medical officer of health; and - “that the requirements specified in the order are necessary in order to decrease
or eliminate the risk to health presented by the communicable disease.” - Discretionary power = MOH is not obliged to issue a s.22 order, but must
consider issuing a s.22 order
The section 22 orders may “require a person to take or to refrain from taking any action
that is specified in the order in respect of a communicable disease”. Section 22 orders
should follow the principle of minimal intrusion (i.e., you have followed a graduated
approach to reducing the risk of disease spread prior to issuing the section 22).
Individuals can be fined up to $5,000/day for contravening a section 22 order. - Section 22 issues specific to TB: Strict interpretation of the HPPA would not allow
an MOH to (a) order treatment after a person is no longer infectious (i.e., after 3-
4 weeks of treatment; BUT if individual stops treatment, this increases the risk of
resistant TB and risks relapse to infectious TB) and (b) order treatment if the
person remains in a negative-pressure room, because the individual is not posing
a risk to the community -
Section 35 orders: Under the HPPA and at the request of an MOH, a justice of the
peace may issue a section 35 order to an individual with a virulent disease who has
failed to comply with a section 22 order. A section 35 order requires an individual with a
virulent disease to be treated. -
Section 102 orders: Under the HPPA and at the request of an MOH, a judge may issue
a section 102 order to any individual who has failed to comply with any orders
associated with the HPPA (e.g., section 13, 22, 35 orders, as well as SDWS directives);
a section 102 order ratifies the previous order and allows additional enforcement
mechanisms; Justice Archie Campbell says this is “unclear and confusing” (glad I’m not
the only one)
Describe acute exposure guideline levels
AEGL (acute exposure guideline levels): Threshold exposure limits for the general
public; applicable to emergency exposure periods; based on acute exposure data, not
chronic exposure data; AEGL-1, 2, and 3 values identified for exposure periods of 10
min, 30 min, 1h, 4h, and 8h
- AEGL-1: Exposure above this level could result in discomfort, but effects are
transient and not disabling
- AEGL-2: Exposure above this level could result in long-lasting health effects
- AEGL-3: Exposure above this level could result in death
Regarding cervical cancer,
what are recent epi trends?
What are risk factors (5)?
what are the CTFPHC recommendations?
Cervical cancer
- *Epidemiology**
- Incidence of cervical cancer has declined substantially over the last 50 years, from 1.5% lifetime incidence to 0.7%; attributed to Pap screening
- 50% of cancers occurs in women who were never screened or were not recently screened
- 70% of cervical cancers are caused by HPV types 16 and 18
- *Risk factors**
- Known risk factors:
1) HPV, sexual activity
2) smoking (decreases HPV clearance),
3) multiparity,
4) immunosuppression,
5) maternal use of diethylstilbestrol
6) Possible risk factors: Family history, history of STIs
- *Screening recommendations**
- Screening reduces incidence of invasive disease and cervical cancer-specific mortality
- Prevalence of abnormal Paps is highest in young women, but incidence of cancer is highest in older women
CTFPHC recommends screening with cytology alone for sexually active women (2013):
- For women aged less than 20 years, we recommend not routinely screening for cervical
cancer. (Strong recommendation; high-quality evidence)
- For women aged 20–24 years, we recommend not routinely screening for cervical
cancer. (Weak recommendation; moderate-quality evidence)
- For women aged 25–29 years, we recommend routine screening for cervical cancer every 3 years. (Weak recommendation; moderate-quality evidence)
- For women aged 30–69 years, we recommend routine screening for cervical cancer every 3 years. (Strong recommendation; high-quality evidence)
- For women 70 years of age or older who have undergone adequate screening (i.e., 3 successive negative Pap test results in the last 10 yr), we recommend that routine screening may stop. For all other women 70 years of age or older, we recommend continued screening until 3 negative test results have been obtained. (Weak recommendation; low-quality evidence)
*CTFPHC does not recommend for or against HPV testing, citing a lack of evidence
SOGC recommends:
- Starting screening at 21, rather than 25 years of age
- Use of HPV testing in line with provincial guidelines; in Ontario, HPV DNA testing is recommended for women ages 30-65 years, with cytology if the result is positive (HPV testing is not covered by OHIP)
What are examples of common distributions?
Describe biological contaminants in pools and spas.
What is the most common infection associated with pools?
How are fecal incidents in pools managed?
Pool and spa microbiological contaminants
- Common microbiological contaminants of pools include Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
E. coli, Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium spp., non-TB mycobacteria, and Legionella
- Fecal material can be introduced when washed off swimmers’ bodies, fecal leakage, or
formed stool (e.g., young children prior to toilet training).
- _Organisms that can survive in biofilms include P. aeruginosa, non-TB mycobacteria, and
Legionella._Diseases associated with biofilms are more common in spas than pools because
they are aerosolized by water jets in spas. Removing biofilms requires scrubbing, application of high heat, or chlorine residuals > 50 ppm (the latter may lead to corrosion). Prevent biofilms by backwashing and superchlorinating regularly
Crypto the most common pool-associated infection:
- Chlorine resistance: Cryptosporidium spp. are extremely resistant to chlorination;
Giardia are somewhat resistant - Children are more likely to ingest pool water and have the highest risk of infection
- Oocysts are resistant to chlorine disinfection - destroying crypto oocysts requires a contact time of 1 ppm x 10 days or 20 ppm x 12h
- Transmitted via fecal-oral route
- Released in high amounts in feces
- Low infectious dose
- Managing fecal incidents:
- Formed stool: Close pool for 1-2 h and increase chlorine residual to ~3 ppm
- Unformed stool: Assume crypto contamination; close pool overnight and
superchlorinate
Define food insecurity
How prevalent is it in Canada?
Nutrition
Definitions
Malnutrition: Any form of poor nutrition
- Undernutrition: Underweight for age, stunting, wasting, or deficient in micronutrients as
a result of dietary inadequacy; results in increased mortality due to gastroenteritis,
pneumonia, and malaria, especially in children, and impaired physical and mental
development; maternal and child undernutrition accounts for 10% of global burden of
disease
- Protein-energy undernutrition:
- Kwashiorkor: Severe protein deficiency (even in the setting of sufficient
calorie intake) resulting in edema, ulcers, and liver enlargement
- Marasmus: Severe energy deficiency, including protein, resulting in
severe emaciation
- Micronutrient undernutrition: Dietary deficiency of vitamins or minerals (aka
“hidden hunger”); globally, common deficiencies include iron, iodine, and vitamin A
- Noma: A polymicrobial infection of the mouth or genitals that occurs in severely
undernourished individuals that leads to a rapidly expanding necrotic ulcer that,
without treatment, is lethal in 80-90% of cases
- Overnutrition: Overweight or obesity as a result of dietary excess; results in increased
mortality secondary to cancer, CVD, and diabetes
Food insecurity: Inability to access sufficient nutritious food (i.e., sufficient quantity and quality)
- Prevalence in Canada = 5% of children and 8% of adults
- Nunavut has the highest prevalence of food insecurity, 36.7%
- Food insecurity highest in low-income Canadian households, especially those that
received government benefits as their main source of income
Name factors that support optimal early childhood development.
What is the early development instrument?
Early childhood development: The biological, psychological, and social development that occurs in the first 5 years of life; early neurocognitive development affects learning, behaviour,
and health throughout life
Early development instrument: 103-item questionnaire completed by kindergarten teachers in the second half of the school year; used across Canada; measures children’s ability to meet
developmental goals in five domains:
1. Physical health and well-being
2. Social competence
3. Emotional maturity
4. Language and cognitive development
5. Communication skills and general knowledge
Requirements for optimal early childhood development:
- *Foundational prerequisites:**
- Stable and responsive environment of relationships: Young children need consistent, nurturing interactions with adults in order to develop secure attachments
- Safe and supportive physical, chemical, and built environments: Young children need to actively explore their environment without significant risk of harm, including harms associated with toxic exposures (e.g., lead) and the built environment
- Sound and appropriate nutrition: Beginning with preconception nutrition and extending through early childhood
- *Caregiver and community capacities** to promote health and prevent disease and disability:
- Time and commitment: Both the quality and length of time spent with children is important
- Financial, psychological, and institutional resources: Includes both the individual and community capacity
- Skills and knowledge: For child-related professionals, high-quality training is essential to providing excellent childcare
Public and private sector policies and programs that support the later steps in the pathway to healthy development (e.g., child care, employment, housing, parental leave)
What prompted the establishment of PHAC?
- May 24, 2003: A new cluster of SARS identified in Toronto, requiring more than
5000 people to be quarantined - October 2003: Learning from SARS (Naylor report) released; commented on
public health in Canada; resulted in the establishment of PHAC in 2004 - April 2004: For the Public’s Health (Walker report) released; commented on IPAC
in Ontario and resulted in the establishment of PHO and the PIDACs - December 2006: Report of the SARS Commission (Campbell report) completed;
commented on public health in Ontario; resulted to changes in the HPPA
What are different types of public health organizational governance in Canada?
Public health governance in Canada
Types of public health organizational governance in Canada:
- Regional health authorities: Elected or appointed boards are responsible for the
provision of public and clinical health services for a defined geographical area (e.g., BC)
- Regional public health boards: Elected or appointed boards are responsible for the
provision of public health services, but NOT clinical health services, for a defined
geographical area (e.g., Newfoundland)
- Municipal/county boards: Primarily elected boards are responsible for the provision of
public health services +/- other community services for a defined geographical area that
aligns with one or more municipal borders (Ontario)
- Provincial/territorial: Public health services are delivered at the provincial/territorial
level (PEI, all the territories)
Structures of Boards of Health in Ontario
- Autonomous: Municipal council reps from multiple municipalities + provincial
appointees + citizen rep (22) (E.g., KFLA)
- Autonomous/integrated: Municipal council reps from one municipality + provincial
appointees + citizen rep (3) (E.g., Huron)
- Regional: All municipal councillors from multiple municipalities (7) (E.g., Peel, Halton,
Durham)
- Single-tier: All municipal councillors from one municipality (2) (Ottawa, Hamilton)
- Semi-autonomous: Some municipal councillors from one municipality + citizen rep (2)
(E.g., Toronto)
What are stages of program implementation (6)?
What are different roles in program implementation (RASCI)?
Program implementation
Roles in program implementation (RASCI)
- Responsible: Person who is responsible for delivering on the task (e.g., AMOH is
responsible for managing an outbreak)
- Accountable: Person who is ultimately accountable for a task; may or not be the same
person who is responsible (e.g., MOH is accountable to the Board for AMOH’s
management of an outbreak)
- Supportive: Person(s) who perform the task (e.g., PHNs who investigate an outbreak)
- Consulted: Person(s) who must be consulted for the task to proceed (e.g., physician who
reported the initial case in the outbreak)
- Informed: Person(s) who should be notified of results, but are not involved in the
decision-making (e.g., PHO in the context of an influenza outbreak in LTC in a single
public health unit in Ontario)
- Every task must have a responsible and accountable individual
- Best practice is to have only one individual responsible for a task
- Consider formally drawing out a RASCI chart and assigning responsibility,
accountability, support, consult, and informed roles for complex tasks
Stages of program implementation
Take one: Degrees of implementation
1. Paper implementation: New policies and procedures put in place without necessarily
resulting in changes in practice
2. Process implementation: New training processes put in place to support change in
practice (e.g., orientations) without necessarily changing organizational culture
3. Performance implementation: Paper and process implementation has successfully
occurred, along with organizational change and changes in practice that are resulting in
successful outputs
Take two: Stages of implementation
1. Exploration: Identify an issue that needs to be addressed or an improvement that could
be made (e.g.your health unit learns of an evidence-based program that could improve
outcomes in your community through “diffusion of innovation”); assess readiness for
implementation; identify resources required for the program
2. Program installation: Acquire resources for program (e.g., staff, funding, policies,
procedures, technology)
3. Initial implementation: First use of the program; staff need to learn new skills and new
ways of doing work → training sessions, orientation
a. Most sensitive stage of implementation: “the awkwardness associated with trying
new things and the difficulties associated with new ways of work are strong
motivations for giving up and going back to comfortable routines”
4. Full operation: Full implementation is considered to be reached when more than half of
the team is using the new methods with good outcomes; program becomes “the way we
do things”/”accepted practice”
5. Innovation: Full operation of the program provides opportunities for improvement (e.g.,
refinements, expansion); for evidence-based programs, innovations may be seen as
challenges to fidelity
6. Sustainability: Maintenance of the program through changes in staff, partnership,
external problems, etc.
Describe the medical exam that immigrants undergo prior to to departure from their country of origin
Medical exam completed by an approved physician (usually in the country of origin prior to
departure); includes:
- Urinalysis for all persons 5 years of age and over
-
Chest X-ray for all persons ≥ 11 years old and for some children (e.g. if indicated based
on history or physical examination) (only the report, not the images, are provided); - Active TB is treated prior to arrival in Canada
- Individuals with previously treated TB or inactive pulmonary TB are referred to
local public health agencies for follow-up - Syphilis test for all persons ≥15 years old and for some children
- Positive syphilis tests are treated prior to arrival in Canada and are not reported
to public health -
HIV test for all persons ≥15 years old and for some children (e.g., born to infected
mothers or received a blood transfusion) - Individuals who are HIV + are referred to local public health agencies for followup
Compare and contrast water treatment methods for their effectiveness in removing protozoa, bacteria, viruses and particulates
- *Boiling**: removes protozoa, bacteria and virus but NOT particulates
- *Iodine or chlorine**: removes protozoa (most), bacteria and virus but NOT particulates
- *Filtering**: removes protoza, bacteria (most), and particulates (NOT viruses)
Describe basic facts about typhoid fever
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Typhoid fever (reportable)
- Organism: Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica, serovar Typhi (also sometimes
called S. typhi); encapsulated bacteria
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Fecal-oral
- Epidemiology:
- 21 million cases of typhoid/year globally; most cases occur in children living in
South Asia
- 2-5% of untreated typhoid cases become chronic carriers (can shed bacteria for
years)
- Case fatality rate = 10% (untreated case in LMIC); <1% (treated case in HIC)
- Risk of contracting typhoid during travel to a typhoid-endemic country is low
- Most cases in Canada occur in returning VFR travellers
- Presentation: Ranges from low-grade fever to severe systemic disease
- Incubation period: 8-14 days (range, 3-60 days)
- Case management: Abx treatment, guided by sensitivity testing; exclude from food
handling, healthcare, and daycare until 3 consecutive negative stool samples + 48h
post-cipro tx OR 2 weeks post-ceftriaxone or azithromycin tx
- Contact management: No role for vaccination; exclude asymptomatic contacts who
travelled with a case and symptomatic contacts until 2 consecutive negative stool
samples
- Vaccines: Efficacy ~50%; adverse effects include abdo pain, N/V, diarrhea, headache,
rash; recommended for individuals travelling to South Asia
- Parenteral (Typh-I): Provides up to 3 years of protection
- Parenteral + Hepatitis A (HA-Typh-I): Provides up to 3 years of protection
- Oral (Typh-O): Live vaccine; provides up to 7 years of protection
What are risk assessment considerations when preparing for mass gatherings?
Mass gatherings
Mass gatherings: Temporal and spatial concentration of people for a specific reason over a set
period of time; have the potential to strain the planning and response resources of the
community or country; “planned emergencies”
Examples of mass gatherings
- Hajj pilgrimage (Saudi Arabia): 3 million people annually
- Kumbh Mela pilgrimage (India): 40 million people every 12 years
- FIFA World Cup: 3 million people every 4 years
Types of mass gatherings
Risk assessment considerations
Type of event:
- Sporting event (e.g., may have increased risk of injury and violence)
- Religious event (e.g., may have more participants with preexisting medical conditions)
- Cultural/music event (e.g., may have increased risk of drug/alcohol use)
- Political event (e.g., may have increased risk of riots and injuries)
Duration:
- <1 week (participants and host location may not perceive themselves to be vulnerable to
health events so may not take precautions)
- > 1 month (increased risk of communicable disease; increased strain on healthcare
system)
Season:
- Summer (consider risk of heat-related illnesses)
- Winter (consider risk of cold-related illnesses)
- Wet (consider risk of waterborne diseases, flooding, drowning)
- Dry (consider risk of dehydration, fire, poor air quality)
Country of origin of participants:
- National (lower risk of disease importation)
- International (higher risk of disease importation)
Density of participants:
- Low density
- High density (higher risk of communicable disease spread and mass casualty event)
Venue characteristics:
- Outdoor (challenges to sanitation, food preparation)
- Fenced venue (risk of overcrowding)
- Uncontained venue (difficult to locate services)
- Rural (are health services accessible?)
- Temporary (challenges to sanitation, food preparation, onsite medical services)
- Permanent (does infrastructure need upgrading? Does it meet fire codes?)
How does ricin work and what are its different presentation forms (3)?
Ricin
- Ricin is a tasteless, odorless, and stable toxin produced from the plant castor beans; unintentional
exposure is unlikely
- Ricin is a toxalbumin (i.e., it inhibits protein synthesis), resulting in cell death
- Presentation:
- Inhalation: Respiratory distress, fever, cough, nausea, pulmonary edema, hypotension
- Ingestion: Bloody vomiting and diarrhea, hypotension, seizures, liver, spleen, and kidney failure
- Skin and eye exposure: Redness, pain
- Treatment: Supportive (no antidote)
Describe basic facts about HPV
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Organism: Human papillomaviruses are a group of >100 viruses that cause warts (>40 types
infect the anogenital tract);
- Type 6, 11: Genital warts
- Type 1, 2, 4, 63: Plantar warts
- Type 2, 7, 22: Verrucal warts
- Type 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59: Oncogenic
Reservoir: Humans
Mode of transmission: Direct contact (skin-to-skin); indirect contact via fomites (e.g., razors);
can be transmitted without visible lesions
Epidemiology:
- >75% of sexually active Canadians have been infected with a sexually-transmitted HPV
- >90% of anogenital warts are attributable to HPV-6 and 11
- Almost all cervical cancer is attributable to HPV infection (70% of cervical cancers are
caused by HPV-16 and 18)
- HPV also causes anal (80-90% of all cases), vaginal and vulvar (40%), and penile (40-
50%) cancers
- Modelling suggests that HPV causes 23-35% of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers,
but no evidence (yet?) that HPV vaccination will prevent oropharyngeal CA; most costeffectiveness
models include oropharyngeal CA
- Oncogenic effect of HPV synergistic with smoking
- *Presentation**: Most infections are asymptomatic
- *Incubation period**: 1-20 months (mean: 2-3 months)
- *Testing**: Diagnosis usually based on clinical exam
Case management/treatment:
- Genital warts will eventually resolve on their own, but treatment accelerates resolution
and can prevent recurrence
- Genital wart treatments include liquid nitrogen, podofilox, imiquimod, and surgery
Contact management: None
Other: Prevention: Most effective prevention strategy is to limit the number of sexual partners
(condoms and dental dams reduce, but do not eliminate, exposure, because skin-to-skin contact
occurs during protected sex)
Vaccination:
- HPV-2 (Cervarix): Type 16, 18; approved only for females, 9-45 years
- HPV-4 (Gardasil): Type 6, 11, 16, 18; approved for males and females, NACI
recommends for everyone between 9-26 years of age
- HPV-9 (Gardasil-9): Type 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58; approved for males and
females, NACI recommends for everyone between 9-26 years of age (as of 2016, not
publicly funded in Ontario)
- Vaccination for males: Most provinces now have vaccination for boys; adding males to a
female-only program unlikely cost-effective; vaccine most effective when provided prior
to sexual debut; challenging to provide at most effective time for MSM if there is not a
universal program for boys
- Public acceptance is poor (lower coverage than other programs); initially refused in
some Catholic school boards in Ontario, but now accepted in all publicly-funded school
boards
- Two-dose v three-dose schedule: A 2-dose schedule is as effective as a 3-dose
schedule for immunocompetent individuals between 9-14 years of age, when the second
dose is given 6 months or more after the first dose
- Vaccine is most effective when received before becoming sexually active, but can be
given at any time; if recipient has already been sexually active, advise them that they
may have already been infected with HPV and that the vaccine will not affect the course
of pre-existing HPV infection
NACI recommendations (published 7/2016)
HPV2, HPV4 or HPV9 vaccine is recommended for routine vaccination of females aged 9 to 26 years and may be used in females over 26 years of age who have not been vaccinated previously or who have not completed the series.
HPV4 or HPV9 vaccine is recommended for routine vaccination of males aged 9 to 26 years, and may be used in males over 26 years of age who have not been vaccinated previously or who have not completed the series.
HPV2 (in immunocompetent females 9-14 years of age) or HPV4 (in immunocompetent females or males 9-14 years of age) vaccine may be administered using either a 2-dose or 3-dose schedule. For a two-dose schedule, two separate 0.5 mL doses should be administered at months 0 and 6-12. There is insufficient evidence at this time to recommend a 2-dose schedule for HPV9 vaccine. However, studies are ongoing and new evidence will be assessed as it becomes available.
Any immunocompromised individual, immunocompetent HIV infected individuals, and individuals who have not received any dose of HPV vaccine by 15 years of age should continue to receive three doses of HPV vaccine.
Efforts should be made to administer HPV vaccines at the recommended intervals. When an abbreviated schedule is required, minimum intervals between vaccine doses should be met. In a 3-dose schedule, the minimum interval between the first and second doses of vaccine is 4 weeks, the minimum interval between the second and third doses of vaccine is 12 weeks and the minimum interval between the first and last doses in either a 2-dose or 3-dose schedule is 24 weeks.
There is insufficient evidence at this time to recommend, at a population level, re-immunization with HPV9 vaccine in individuals who have completed an immunization series with another HPV vaccine.
Name encapsulated bacterias preventable by vaccination
Strep pneumo, neisseria meningitidis, h. flu
What is the purpose of accounting?
Name example of internal controls in accounting.
Define revenue, expense, deficit, assets and liabilities/obligations.
What are public accounts?
Accounting
Accounting: Process of keeping financial records or running tally of assets, liabilities, revenue,
expenses, and equity
- Cash accounting: T_ransactions are documented as they occur_; does not track events
that are not transactions (e.g., assets accruing interest; assets depreciating)
- Accrual accounting: Revenue and expenses are recorded as they are earned (as
opposed to when they are received)
Internal controls: Accounting processes, checks, and balances that safeguard assets; prevent
errors, duplications, omissions, and fraud
- Preventative controls: Limits access to business assets; examples:
- Segregation of duties: Asset custody, authorization of use of assets, and
recordkeeping are performed by different employees (this provides oversight and
prevents fraud)
- Payroll monitoring: Review timesheets, monitor for non-employees
- Detective controls: Identifies errors in accounting for assets
- E.g., Reconciling inventory counts
Glossary of public sector accounting terms
- Assets: Resources such as land and buildings, and financial property like cash and
loans receivable that are controlled by the government.
- Cost centre: Fixed budget; expenditure only (as opposed to a profit centre or
investment centre)
- Deficit: the amount by which government expenses exceed revenues in any given year.
- Expense: The decrease in economic resources in the period, typically through
expenditures or increases in liabilities.
- Expected Average Remaining Service Life: total number of years of future services
expected to be rendered by that group of employees divided by the number of
employees in the group.
- Financial Assets: Property used to discharge liabilities or finance future operations,
such as cash, accounts receivable and loans receivable.
- Liabilities: Future sacrifices of economic benefits that the entity is presently obliged to
make to other entities, typically paid for with cash in the future.
- Obligations: another term for Liabilities.
- Public Accounts: the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Province along with
supporting statements and schedules as required by the Financial Administration Act.
- Revenue: The increase in economic resources in the period, typically through the influx
of cash or other assets such as receivables (e.g. tax revenue) or decreases in liabilities.
Name 3 vaccines contraindicated in pregnancy?
MMRV, OPV, BCG, +/-YF
Regarding opioids, discuss the:
- recent epi,
- health effects and
- available population-level interventions
Prescription opioids
- *Epidemiology**
- 1 in 6 Canadians report using an opioid in the last year; of those, 5% report misuse
- Canada and the US have the highest levels of prescription opioid consumption in the world; use is continuing to rise
- The rate of dispensing high-dose prescription opioid formulations increased 23% between 2006 and 2011
- 4000 deaths due to opioid use in 2017
- *Health effects**
- Increased risk of fractures, road-trauma
- Reduced RR → Opioid-related mortality
- Constipation and nausea
- Tolerance, addiction, and withdrawal
- *Interventions**
- Harm reduction
- Naloxone
- Opioid substitution therapy
- Clinical practice guidelines (e.g., maximum daily dose): Per capita rate of high-dose opioid dispensing plateaued when guidelines were released
- Prescription monitoring programs
- Restricted reimbursement of opioids from publicly-funded drug plans: PEI, NFL, and BC restrict long-acting hydromorphone on their public drug formularies and have the lowest rates of dispensing in Canada
- Physician education/detailing
Describe basic facts about TB
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Organism: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
- M. tuberculosis complex includes: M. tuberculosis, M. bovis (causes TB via unpasteurized milk), M. africanum, and M. canettii (the latter two cause a small number of cases in Africa)
- Multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB): Resistance to at least INH + RMP
- Extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB): Resistance to INH + RMP + any fluoroquinolone + one of the injectables (amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin)
Reservoir: Primarily humans; rarely primates; cattle and some other animals are the reservoir
for M. bovis
Mode of transmission: Airborne; foodborne (milk and milk products; M. bovis)
Epidemiology:
- Estimated to infect almost one-third of the global population; highest rates per capita
occur in sub-Saharan Africa, but the majority of cases occur in Asia
- 4-5% of all active pulmonary TB is caused by MDR-TB
- <10% of individuals with latent TB will develop active TB; of those with latent TB who
develop active TB, 50% will develop active infection within 18 mos of infection
- Exception: 50% of children < 1 year will develop active disease
- Overall rate of TB in Canada is declining; foreign-born and Indigenous Canadians are
disproportionately affected by TB
4.9 per 100000, FN on reserve 30-40/100000, Inuit 150-300/100000
- TB isolates in N. Saskatchewan have very little genetic diversity→ attributed to spread in
the residential school system - TB isolates in Quebec have the most genetic diversity→ believed to be the source
population for many TB strains in Canada (spread through Canada via fur trade)
Presentation: Primarily a pulmonary pathogen, but can cause disease anywhere in the body;
active TB commonly causes fever, night sweats, and weight loss
- Active pulmonary TB (contagious): Cough, hemoptysis; can be sub-clinical
- Active extra-pulmonary TB (not contagious)
- Latent TB (not contagious): Bacteria isolated within granulomas; asymptomatic
Incubation period: 2-10 weeks
Period of communicability: From first discharge of viable tubercle bacilli into sputum (active
pulmonary disease) until receipt of 2-4 weeks of antibiotics
- Extra-pulmonary TB is not usually contagious, except in the case of draining sinuses
- Laryngeal TB is highly contagious
Testing:
- Latent: TST or IGRA
- BCG vaccine may result in a false-positive TST; false positives are more
common in individuals who received BCG at an older age (false positives rare in
individuals who received the vaccine in the neonatal period)
- BCG vaccine does not result in false-positive IGRA
- TST ≥10 is considered positive in most people
- TST ≥5 mm of induration is considered positive if HIV+, if contact with active
contagious case, in children with suspected TB disease, or in
immunosuppressed individuals
- Active pulmonary TB: AFB on microscopy of 2+ sputum samples + CXR; culture for
drug-susceptibility testing; smear-negative but culture-positive TB is contagious
Case management:Treatment with RIPE (pyrazinamide, rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol) until
susceptibility determined; if fully susceptible, then pyrazinamide + rifampin + isoniazid x 2
months, then rifampin + isoniazid x 4-9 months
Adverse events of first-line drugs
Drug Common adverse events Uncommon adverse events
INH Rash, hepatitis, neuropathy CNS toxicity, anemia
RMP Drug interactions, rash Hepatitis, flu-like illness, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia
PZA Hepatitis, rash, arthralgia Gout
EMB Eye toxicity Rash
Contact management:
- TST or IGRA to identify LTBI (two-step TST not recommended in contact tracing)
- Household and high-risk contacts: TST at initial exposure, second TST 8 weeks
after the end of exposure
- Non-household contacts: TST 8 weeks after the end of exposure
- LTC contacts: TST not reliable in the elderly and benefits LTBI tx may not
outweigh risks; LTC contact tracing should focus on early detection of secondary
cases
- Considerations for homeless contacts: Testing that can be carried out in a single
session (sputum collection, portable CXR, IGRA) may be more successful than
TST; improving shelter ventilation and UV air disinfection may prevent further
transmission
- If latent infection suspected, rule out active disease before providing treatment for latent
infection (treating active disease with a 1- or 2-drug regimen risks drug resistance)
- Contacts at high risk of developing active disease (HIV+, < 5 years old) should receive
presumptive treatment until 8+ week post-exposure TST or IGRA has been completed
- Treatment for latent TB is most commonly INH x 9 months, but INH x 6 months or INH +
RMP x 3-4 months are acceptable alternatives
Other:
- Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine: Developed from a strain from WWII army
recruits → strain evolution reduces efficacy? Protective against extrapulmonary disease
in children < 5 years, but not against initial infection; only recommended in high incidence
areas
- Medical surveillance: “Most foreign-born groups undergo a mandatory medical
examination prior to arrival in Canada, which includes chest radiography to detect active
TB. Those found to have active TB must be treated prior to arrival to ensure that they
are no longer infectious. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) requires that
individuals with previously treated TB and those with abnormal chest radiographs but
without active TB detected in this program undergo TB surveillance after arrival” (TB
Standards); universal screening is highly inefficient and could be improved by surveilling
only individuals from high-incidence countries
Describe the precautionay principle.
What are 4 principles underlying it?
Competing definitions
- “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation” (Rio
Declaration, 1992)
-
When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically (duty to prevent harm). In this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof. The process of applying the
Precautionary Principle must be open/transparent, informed, and democratic, and must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action. (Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle, 1998)
Beloin and Gagnon framework:
- *1. Alleged risk is sufficiently severe
2. Relationship between cause and effect is somewhat likely
3. Precautionary measures are acceptable**
Weir, Schabas, Wilson, and Mackie framework:
- Is there sufficient evidence to support a reasonable suspicion that the exposure of interest causes the proposed harm? (Apply the Bradford-Hill criteria)
- Is the harm associated with the suspected exposure serious?
- Is the suspected exposure widespread?
- Is there an observed increase in the incidence of the suspected harm that is temporally associated with increased exposure?
- Is the harm associated with the suspected exposure difficult to treat or reverse?
- What are the economic and non-economic costs and benefits of action and non-action?
- Are the proposed control measures proportional to the level of risk? Are the economic costs of removing the exposure minimal? Are the health and societal costs of removing the exposure minimal?
- Are comparable situations being treated similarly according to a standard of practice?
- Is the level of the protective measures consistent with equivalent areas in which scientific data are available?
- If precautionary measures are adopted, is there any new ev
What is Employee performance management?
What are the steps/cycle to employee performance management?
What are SMART objectives?
Describe different coaching strategies based on stages of employee development.
What are 5 categories of performance problems?
When assessing an employee’s performance, what are potential sources of bias?
Managing employee performance
Employee performance management = Process for establishing a shared understanding about what is to be achieved and how it is to be achieved (align individual goals with organizational goals), and an a_pproach to managing people that increases the probability of
achieving success_
- Formal = Goal setting, development planning, mid-year review, end-of-year appraisal
Formal performance evaluation types:
- Objective: Employee assessed based on previously-agreed upon objectives/targets
- Narrative: Written description of performance
- Competency: Employee assessed based on list of competencies associated with a particular position/type of work
- Multi-rater: Employee assessed by multiple individuals (e.g., 360 evaluation)
- Should also occur informally throughout the year
- Understand the employee’s strengths and weaknesses; capitalize on the strengths (no
employee is perfectly well-rounded)
- “What was the best day you’ve had at work in the past three months? What was
the worst day?”
Employee performance management cycle =
In summary:
Set goals - SMART
Coaching
Check in - feedback, adjust goals
Performance assessment
Coaching
Set new goals
Performance planning (set performance and development goals) → coaching → check-in (feedback on performance, adjust goals) →
performance assessment (formal documentation, recognition, improvement planning) → coaching → performance planning
- Coaching = Helping people find the way forward on their own
- Performance goals = What are the results or outputs I want to accomplish? (Not routine parts of a job that must be accomplished, not the activities that produce results);
should be SMART:
- Specific (e.g., deliver educational sessions)
- Measureable (e.g., increase by 10%)
- Attainable
- Realistic
- Time-bound (e.g., by the end of Q1)
- Development goals = What are the skills or knowledge I want to acquire?
Coaching strategies based on stages of employee development
“Disillusioned learner” → Motivating, explaining, two-way dialogue
“Capable but cautious performer” → Supporting, encouraging, empowering
“Enthusiastic beginner” → Directing, highly structured, incremental, frequent instructions
“Self-reliant achiever” → Delegating
- *Coaching based on where an employee values recognition from:**
- Peers: Public praise
- Manager: Private praise
- Others with similar expertise: Professional/technical award
- Customers: Photo posted of employee and best customer
Coaching based on an employee’s learning style:
- Analyzer: Classroom-style teaching, role play, time for preparation
- Doer: Assign simple tasks so employee can learn by trial and error; gradually increase
complexity
- Watcher: Allow for employee to shadow top performers
Engaging high performers:
- Providing feedback: High performers may not be used to constructive criticism, but you
should still look for opportunities for them to improve; recognize them for their hard work,
focus on future performance
- Is the high performer happy in their current role ( → set challenging goals that will
continue to engage), or do they aspire to advancement ( → set development goals that
will build leadership potential)?
Most poor performance problems fit into 5 categories; identify the category in order to identify
potential improvement approaches:
1. Knowledge or skills gap (e.g., poor communication skills)
2. Workplace constraints (e.g., lack of necessary resources to complete job) *Important to
consider organizational explanations for an employee’s poor performance that may be
beyond their control
3. Interpersonal/behaviour issues (e.g., low emotional intelligence, lack of confidence)
4. Personal challenges (e.g., ill family member)
5. Serious issues (e.g., violence, theft, fraud)
When assessing an employee’s performance, consider potential sources of bias:
- Personal bias (e.g., assessment influenced by ethnicity or accent)
- Halo effect (i.e., employee’s strong performance in one domain falsely increases
impression of overall performance; or the reverse, with weak performance)
- Recency effect (i.e., most recent performance influences entire assessment)
- High performer bias (e.g., highly rating a person who shows great potential, but has not
yet met many of his/her goals)
- Past performance bias (i.e., outcomes of previous assessment influence current
assessment)
- Status effect (i.e., rating a person based on their status within an organization, rather
than their performance)
What are benefits of immunization registries?
Benefits
- Automated reminders
- Provides proof of immunization
- Decreased repeat immunization (with concomitant reduction in immunization costs)
- Identify unimmunized individuals in the event of an outbreak
- Easy transfer of records to other regions
- Manage vaccine inventories more effectively
- Identify at-risk populations and develop targeted education programs
What are different random sampling methods?
Random sampling methods
- Simple random sample: Each individual in the population has an equal chance of being
selected
- Stratified sample: Population first divided into strata, then simple random sampling is
performed within each strata (allows you to say something about smaller strata)
- Cluster sampling: Each group or cluster has an equal chance of being selected;
examine all units within the chosen cluster (done because it’s easier and simpler; e.g.,
we don’t have a list of all students in Canada, but we do have a list of all schools)
- Multi-stage sampling: Each group or cluster has an equal chance of being selected,
then each individual within the selected clusters has an equal chance of being selected
What are the steps of a Root Cause Analysis?
What is a pareto chart?
What is a fishbone diagram?
Name 7 QI tools.
Quality improvement tools
- *Fishbone diagram (cause and effect,** Ishikawa diagram)
- Definition: Visual diagram of a problem and its root causes
- Components:
- Backbone: The problem you would like to address
- Ribs: The major inputs into the process that contribute to the problem (e.g., staff, computer programs, budget)
- Branches: The “causes of causes”; the reasons the “ribs” contribute to the problem
Root-cause analysis
Definition: “A structured method used to analyze serious adverse events”
- Why? For every adverse event, “There are underlying organizational causes that are
more difficult to see, however, they may contribute significantly to the undesired
outcome and, if not corrected, they will continue to create similar types of problems”
RCA divides causes of serious adverse events into:
- Proximate causes: The events or conditions that existed immediately before the
undesired outcome; if eliminated, the adverse event would not have occurred
- Root causes: One of multiple factors that contributed to or created the proximate
causes; if eliminated, the adverse event would not have occurred
- Organizational factors: Any operational or management system that results in root causes
Steps:
1. Clearly define the adverse event
2. Gather data: When and where did the adverse event occur? What were the conditions present and what controls could have prevented the adverse occurrence but did not?
3. Create an event and causal factor tree: Like a fishbone diagram that includes all possible causes and conditions that could have lead to the adverse event
4. Review each potential cause: Eliminate causes and conditions from the tree only when you have sufficient information to confirm they did not contribute to the event or it is not logically possible for the cause/condition to have contributed
5. Generate recommendations: Propose corrective actions that will eliminate the proximate causes and will eliminate or mitigate the root causes
Pareto chart
Definition: A graph that shows the proximate causes of a problem along the x-axis and the frequency at which those proximate causes lead to the problem along the y-axis; used to focus quality improvement efforts on the most commonly occurring proximate causes
- Concept that a few proximate causes are responsible the majority of the problem is based on the Pareto principle (20% of inputs result in 80% of outputs)
Other tools:
- Flow Chart
- Histogram
- Scatter Plot
- Check Sheet
- Control Chart
What are volatile organic compounds and 3 different categories of VOCs?
What are common sources and health effects for benzene?
What are common sources and health effects for TCE?
Volatile organic compounds
Definitions
- WHO definition: Melting point below room temperature and a boiling point between 50 and 260 C
- US EPA definition: C_arbon-containing compound that participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions_
Types of VOCs
- Chlorinated hydrocarbons (e.g., methylene chloride, a solvent used in industrial processes, TRI/TETRAchloroethylene)
- Fluorinated hydrocarbons
- Aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., toluene, xylene, benzene)
Benzene (aromatic hydrocarbon)
Common sources:
- Used extensively to make other chemical and products (e.g., Styrofoam, nylon, synthetic fibres, glues, paints, wax, detergents, solvents),
- volcanoes, forest fires,
- crude oil, gasoline combustion, industry emissions,
- cigarette smoke → inhalation,
- attached garages
Short-term effects: At very high levels, death; at lower levels, drowsiness, dizziness, tachycardia, headaches, LOC
Long-term effects: Bone marrow suppression → Anemia, thrombocytopenia, Acute myeloid leukemia (IARC, group 1)
Trichloroethylene (chlorinated hydrocarbon)
Common sources: Metal degreaser, dry cleaning
Long-term effects: IARC, class 1 for non-Hodgkin’s, kidney; ?fetal heart malformations; ?immune effects
*water contamination events in Canada - Valcartier
Tetrachloroethylene (aka perchlorethylene, PERC, ECE) (chlorinated hydrocarbon)
Common sources: Dry cleaning ( → air), _metal degrease_r (water, soil → usually evaporates quickly into air)
Short-term effects: Dizziness, fatigue, headaches, unconsciousness, death
Long-term effects: Neurotoxic effects (changes in mood, memory, attention, reaction time); teratogenicity; ?bladder CA, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (IARC, group 2A)
What is vaccine efficacy and how is it calculated?
Vaccine efficacy: Percent reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group
compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions
- Efficacy = (Attack rate in unvaccinated - attack rate in vaccinated) / Attack rate in
unvaccinated
Describe integrated tick management steps to reduce exposure to Lyme disease
Integrated tick management: The use of several methods to reduce the number of ticks;
- personal protective measures (light-coloured, long-sleeved pants; closed toed shoes; DEET; and performing a tick check after spending time in long grass or wooded areas)
- landscaping methods (restrict use of ground cover plants; plant deer resistant plants; relocate high-use areas away from woodland edges; isolate high-use areas from woodland edges with wood chip, mulch, or gravel borders; discourage rodent activity, cut grasses short; remove leaf litter and brush)
Describe chronic disease screening recommendations for immigrants arriving to Canada
Describe the demographic transition using population pyramids,
from youthful, transitional and mature distribution.
Expain the concepts of rectangularization of mortality and the compression of morbidity.
What is the epidemiologic transition?
Age, morbidity, and mortality distributions
- Population pyramid: Visual representation of age and sex structure of a country’s
population, with population along the x-axis divided into 5-year age groups and male
population on the left and female population of the right
-
Youthful distribution: Pyramid-shaped pyramid, with a broad base and narrow
peak (high fertility, high mortality, low life expectancy, high population growth) -
Transitional distribution: Barrel-shaped pyramid, with a larger working-aged
population and smaller child and elderly population (declining fertility and
mortality rates, increasing life expectancy, slowing population growth) -
Mature distribution: Inverted pyramid-shaped pyramid, with a larger elderly
population and smaller children and working-aged populations (low fertility, low
mortality, high life expectancy) -
Rectangularization of mortality: Increasingly rectangular shape of a population
survival curve due to decreases in health inequities (i.e., everyone dies at approximately
the same age) -
Compression of morbidity: “if the age of onset of the first chronic infirmity can be
postponed more rapidly than the age of death, then the lifetime illness burden may be
compression into a shorter period of time nearer to the age of death” (Swartz, 2008,
summarizing James Fries’ hypothesis) -
Demographic transition: Increasing development → increased standards of living →
fewer children and longer life expectancy; shift from “triangle” distribution of populations
to “rectangle” age distributions of populations -
Epidemiological transition: Shift from mortality primarily caused by infectious disease
to mortality primarily caused by chronic disease
Define cases, carriers, contacts
- Case: A person who meets the case definition for a given disease or syndrome - Index case: First individual identified in an outbreak; usually not the first case
- Carrier: A person or animal without apparent disease who harbours a specific infectious agent and serves as a potential source of infection; types:
- Colonisation: Individual carries an organism without mounting an immune response (e.g., staph) - Inapparent infection: Individual carries an organism and mounts a sub-clinical immune response (e.g. polio, HAV)
- Incubatory: Individual is infectious during the incubation period (e.g., measles, varicella)
- Convalescent: Individual has recovered from clinical disease, but is still infectious for a short period (e.g., diphtheria)
- Chronic: Individual has recovered from clinical disease, but is infectious for a long period (e.g., typhoid, HBV)
- Contact: A person who has been exposed to a communicable disease in such a way there is the potential for transmission
Describe the IARC classification system.
What are the 3 types of data considered?
IARC classification system
- IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer; cancer agency of the WHO
- Weight-of-evidence approach: Used by the IARC Monographs Programme, which
evaluates environmental causes of cancer in humans
- 3 types of data: Situations in which people are exposed to the agent;
1 ) scientific evidence of carcinogenicity in humans (epi);
2) scientific evidence of carcinogenicity in animals (lab);
3) scientific evidence on cancer mechanisms
- Resulting classification indicates the weight of the evidence as to whether an
agent is capable of causing cancer (i.e., indicates the hazard) - Does not indicate risk (i.e., does not indicate the probability that cancer will
occur) - Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans (e.g., air pollution, tobacco smoke, formaldehyde, diethylstilbestrol, benzene, alcoholic beverages, asbestos, cadmium, deli meat, EBV virus)
[sufficient evidence of carcinogenecity in humans]
- Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans (e.g., DDT, chloramphenicol, anabolic steroids, hot beverages [>65C], red meat, night shift work)
[limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans + sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals + strong mechanistic evidence in human cells or tissues]
-
Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans (e.g., digoxin, EMF, aloe vera, occupational exposure to dry cleaning; note that coffee was previously classified as a 2B, but
reclassified as a 3 in 2016)
[only one of those 3: limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans • sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals • strong mechanistic evidence, showing that the agent exhibits key characteristics of human carcinogens]
- Group 3: Not classifiable (e.g., spironolactone, coffee, acetaminophen)
[inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans + inadequate/limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals]
- Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans (caprolactam)
[lack of carcinogenicity in humans and in experimental animals]
What are possible stages of a collective bargaining?
Labour relations and collective agreements
In summary collective bargaining: (mnemonic N C MAL)
Negotiation - Conciliation (MoLabour) - (+/- strike/lockout) - Mediation (non-binding) - Arbitration (binding) - Back-to-work legislation
- Collective agreement: Contract between a group of employees represented by a trade union and an employer; outlines the rights, privileges, and duties of the employees, union, and employer
- Grievance: Written complaint alleging a contravention of the collective agreement; grievance process is defined by the collective agreement
Collective bargaining: Process through which the collective agreement is negotiated;
bargaining processes often focus on wages, working conditions, grievances, and
benefits; generally moves through the following list
-
Negotiation: Dialogue between the union and employer representatives to reach
a new collective agreement; consider BATNA/WATNA/MLATNA to decide
whether to continue negotiating or move to another stage - Best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA)
- Worst alternative to a negotiated agreement (WATNA)
- Most likely alternative to a negotiated agreement (MLATNA)
-
Conciliation: In Ontario, a conciliation process is one in which a Ministry of
Labour conciliation officer assists the union and employer in reaching a collective
agreement; conciliation is required before the parties proceed to a strike or lockout -
Mediation: Process through which a neutral third party assists the union and
employer in reaching a collective agreement, usually by developing
recommendations that either party may accept or reject -
Arbitration: Quasi-judicial process in which an arbitrator or arbitration board
hears from the union and employer and then makes a binding decision - Rights arbitration: Arbitration about grievances (the interpretation and
application of an existing collective agreement) - Interest arbitration: Arbitration to renew an existing or establish a new
collective agreement -
Strike: Collective action by employees to stop or curtail work (cessation, refusal, or
slow-down in work) during a labour dispute; strikes are legal in Ontario if the collective
agreement has expired + a strike vote has been held + conciliation was not successful;
employees of hospitals, nursing homes, and the TTC, and firefighters and police do not
have the right to strike (see also: strike contingency planning in COOP) - Note that a strong strike contingency plan demonstrates that an organization is
able to manage work stoppage and is unwilling/unable to meet the union’s
requests; this reduces the probability of a strike -
Lock-out: Employer closes a workplace or suspends work during a labour dispute; a
lock-out is legal in Ontario if the collective agreement has expired + conciliation was not
successful; firefighters and police cannot be locked out - Essential services: Service that is necessary for the safety and security of the public;
cannot strike or be locked out - Federal essential services include border security, correctional services, food
inspection, accident safety investigations, income and social security, marine
security, law enforcement, and search and rescue - Ontario essential services include hospital and nursing home workers, TTC,
firefighters, and police -
Back-to-work legislation: Law passed that ends a strike or lock-out by imposing
binding arbitration or by defining a new collective agreement; usually used to end a
strike or lock-out in an industry that the government determines is essential to the
economy
Describe basic facts about HSV
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Mode of transmission: Direct contact with saliva, skin, or mucous membranes
- HSV-1: Mainly transmitted by oral-to-oral contact; can also be transmitted via oral-genital
contact
- HSV-2: Almost exclusively via sexual contact; 70% of cases are attributed to
asymptomatic transmission
- Risk of transmission of both is greatest when lesion is present, but either can be
transmitted asymptomatically
Epidemiology: Not reportable, so epidemiology in Canada is poorly described
- HSV-1: Usually acquired in childhood; infection is lifelong; globally, prevalence of 67%;
prevalence of HSV-1 genital infection increasing
- HSV-2: Canadian prevalence approximately 17-19% (increases with age)
Presentation: Tingling or burning sensation followed by the development of painful blisters or
ulcers at the site of infection
- HSV-1: Usually asymptomatic; when symptomatic, primarily causes oral lesions, “cold
sores” (although can also cause genital herpes, which typically recurs less frequently
than HSV-2 genital herpes)
- HSV-2: 60% of cases are asymptomatic; when symptomatic, primarily causes genital
lesions (can also cause genital pain, aseptic meningitis, and cervicitis without lesions)
- Complications: Encephalitis, keratitis, neonatal herpes
Incubation period: 6 days
Testing: Viral culture is most common, but PCR is more sensitive and specific (although often
unavailable in most labs); serology (type-specific)
- IgM: Presence is an indirect indication of recent (< few months) infection, although may
inconsistently increase in recurrent outbreaks
- Seroconversion indicates a primary infection (no HSV antibody in acute-phase sample
and HSV antibody in convalescent sample)
Case management: Antivirals (acyclovir, famciclovir, valacyclovir) can reduce severity of
symptoms and frequency of recurrence, but will not cure the disease; treatment is
recommended for clinically important symptoms
- Abstain from sex when sores are present
- Condom use will decrease, but not entirely prevent, HSV transmission
- Children with severe, first episodes of HSV-1 who cannot control oral secretions should
be excluded from daycare until lesions crust over
Contact management: Reportable in some provinces (not Ontario); cases should inform their
sex partners from the previous 60 days, although partner notification is not required as a public
health measure; consider testing partners to determine if they are serodiscordant and counsel
accordingly
- Risk of neonatal herpes is greatest in women late in pregnancy with newly-acquired
infections
Define disability and recent epi trends in Canada.
Provide examples of how public health program can accomodate disabilities
Persons with disabilities
Definition of disability
- Abridged AODA, 2005 definition: Any degree of physical disability, infirmity,
malformation, or disfigurement; mental impairment of developmental disability; learning
disability; or mental disorder (*broad definition that would include most illnesses)
- WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
definition:“an interaction between features of the person and features of the overall
context in which the person lives”
- I.e., Disability is, in part, extrinsic to a person (e.g., in a building that
accommodates wheelchairs, a person using a wheelchair is no longer disabled;
i.e., he/she is able to do all of the same activities as anyone else in that building)
Epidemiology
- Prevalence of disability in Canada increases with age, but Canada’s elderly population is
increasingly active and has good access to health care, so prevalence in the elderly
population is expected to decrease
- Canadians with disabilities make, on average, $10,000 less per year than Canadians
without disabilities
- About a third of Canadians with disabilities rely on non-employment income.
- People with disabilities have poorer health outcomes and are more likely to be obese,
smoke, and be physically inactive than people without disabilities
- Disability prevalence: average 10%, ranges about 4 to 43% in age groups.
Public health interventions
- Traditionally, public health has viewed disability as a morbidity to be reduced
- Campaigns based on this view signals that the lives of people with disabilities are
undesirable
- Public health, for the most part, has moved from trying to prevent disability to trying to
improve health-related quality of life for people with disabilities
- Accommodating disabilities within public health programs can enhance accessibility, for
example:
- Providing telephone teletype lines for individuals who are Deaf or hard-of-hearing
- Ensuring space is physically accessible (e.g., ramps, snow removal, curb cuts)
- Waiving fees for support persons
- Following web accessibility guidelines
- Posting disruptions to elevator service as far in advance as possible
Describe the different presentations for syphilis
Presentation:
- Primary syphilis (infectious): Chancre, regional lymphadenopathy
- Secondary syphilis (infectious): Rash, fever, malaise, lymphadenopathy, mucous
lesions, condyloma lata, alopecia, neurological involvement, uveitis, retinitis - Early latent syphilis (infectious): Asymptomatic, <1 year; considered infectious
due to risk of relapse to secondary state - Late latent syphilis (non-infectious): Asymptomatic, >1 year
- Tertiary syphilis (non-infectious): CV syphilis (AA, aortic regurg), neurosyphilis
(dementia, Argyll Robertson pupil, headache), gummatous disease - Congenital syphilis: Disseminated infection, hepatosplenomegaly,
lymphadenopathy, Hutchinson’s teeth
What are 3 tools to monitor organizational performance?
What are the performance indicators on balanced scorecard?
How can public health agencies demonstrate accountability to stakeholders?
- Organizational/system performance management: Basically, quality improvement for organizations and systems, often based on performance indicators
- PH agenices can demonstrate accountability to stakeholders with: Accountability agreements, Organizational standards, Reporting indicators & targets, Annual reports, Accreditation
- Performance indicators: “a single measure that is reported on regularly and that provides _relevant and actionable informatio_n about population health and/or health system performance and characteristics. An indicator can provide comparable information, as well as track progress and performance over time” (from CIHI); see also: Population health indicators
- Dashboard: A summary of performance indicators presented to the Board; usually colour-coded to indicate performance against an outcome metric (e.g., red means below the standard) and includes trends (improving, diminishing)
- Balanced scorecard:
MNEMONIC= “FLIC” financial - learning - internal - customer
An alternative method for presenting performance indicators to the Board; a measurement framework that includes performance indicators in 4 quadrants; initially developed for the private sector to ensure corporations considered non-financial performance; used for organizational performance management; quadrants for public health include (according to ICES):
F. Health determinants and status (financial)
L. Integration and responsiveness (learning)
I. Resources and services (internal)
C. Community engagement (customers)
Quadrants according to Robert Kaplan and David Norton (the Harvard Business School guys who originally came up with the term): How do we look re outcomes? What can we improve? What do we excel at? What do customers think?
- *1. Financial stewardship and performance (financial)
2. Efficiency (internal)
3. Organizational capacity (learning)
4. Customer or stakeholder satisfaction (customer)** -
Results-based accountability: “A disciplined way of thinking and taking action that can
be used to improve the quality of life in communities and the performance of programs,
agencies, and service systems”; made up of population accountability (cannot be
assigned to any one individual organization) and performance accountability
(accountability of the organization to its clients for the performance of the program); uses
the desired community endpoints as the starting point for making decisions
1. Define success at the population
2. Define performance indicators for success:
How much did we do? (reach/scope)
How well did we do it? (quality/efficiency)
Is anyone better off? (effectiveness)
(Note that “we must use measures we do not completely control”)
- Describe the baseline performance indicators and the reasons for the current performance
- Compare performance to baseline and determine what works to improve performance
-
Accountability agreement: Outlines the performance obligations an organization is
responsible for achieving - In Ontario, the MOHLTC currently uses 34 indicators as part of its public health
accountability agreement (as of 2016); the indicators are divided into two groups,
population health indicators (e.g., breastfeeding duration, chlamydia incidence,
hep B immunization coverage) and governance and accountability indicators
(e.g., staff length of service, board member orientation, strategic plan) -
Accreditation: Obtaining a certification or credentials from a third-party body (e.g.,
Accreditation Canada) that demonstrates key processes are in practice; common for
LHINs and hospitals to attain, and mandatory for CHCs; not mandatory for PH in
Ontario; obtaining and maintaining accreditation often supports continuous quality
improvement, but requires significant time and effort to comply and may duplicate or
take resources away from meeting other performance targets or accountability
agreements
What are population-level interventions to increase physical activity?
Compare and contrast physical activity and physical fitness.
What are recommended amounts of physical activity?
Population-level interventions
- *Neighborhood/society:**
1) Community-wide campaigns (e.g., advertising campaigns); moderately effective
2) Active transportation
3) U__rban planning to increase walkability
School/organizations:
1) Point-of-decision prompts (e.g., signs that recommend using stairs); moderately effective
2) School interventions
3) Classroom-based health education; insufficient evidence
4) School-based PE; effective
- *Individual;**
1) Health behaviour change programs; effective
Physical activity comprises:
- Leisure-time physical activity: Recreational exercise; usually what is measured as
physical activity
- Aerobic activity is the most beneficial form of physical activity in terms of impact
on health outcomes
- Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT): Energy expended during activities of
daily living
Physical fitness: Measure of body composition, BMI, or aerobic capacity
- Different from the ability to engage in physical activity; both physical fitness and physical
activity independently result in health benefits
Sedentary behaviour: Time spent watching screens, reading, sitting, or participating in
sedentary hobbies; sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for poor health outcomes, even in
individuals who are physically fit
Physical literacy: Ability to move with competence and confidence in a wide variety of physical
activities in multiple environments that benefit the healthy development of the whole person
(PHE Canada)
Daily physical activity recommendations (Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology)
- Children and youth: 60 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity/day,
including muscle- and bone-strengthening activities 3 days/week and <2 h/day of
recreational screen time
- Adults: 150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity/week (equivalent
to 10,000 steps/day), including muscle- and bone-strengthening activities 2 days/week
Epidemiology
- 7% of Canadian children and youth accumulate at least 60 minutes of moderate- to
vigorous-intensity physical activity at least 6 days a week
- Girls are significantly less active than boys
- 15% of Canadian adults accumulate 150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity
physical activity/week
What is social marketing?
What are the 4Ps of marketing?
Compare and contrast commercial and social marketing.
Social marketing
Definition: “The application of commercial marketing technologies to the analysis, planning,
execution, and evaluation of programs designed to influence voluntary behaviour of target
audiences in order to improve their personal welfare and that of society”
Appeals to the target audience through the 4Ps:
- Product: Physical product, service, practice, or idea
- Price: What the consumer must do to obtain the product (e.g., financial cost, risk of
embarrassment, time)
- Place: The way in which the product reaches the consumer (e.g., mass media, physician
office)
- Promotion: Integrated use of advertising, public relations, advocacy, personal selling,
and entertainment
Types of social marketing:
Upstream v. midstream v. downstream;
community-based v. largescale
Social marketing position statement: “We want [target audience] to see [desired behaviour]
as [descriptive phrase] as more beneficial than [competing behaviour].”
What are the canadian structures for monitoring and surveillance of adverse events following immunizations?
- Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive (IMPACT): Pediatric hospital-based
national, active surveillance system for AEFIs, vaccine failures, and VPDs; includes 12
Canadian pediatric hospitals - Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System
(CAEFISS): Post-market vaccine safety monitoring system; in most cases, the pathway
occurs event → nurse, physician, pharmacist → local public health → P/T public health
authorities (IMPACT, DND, and FNIHB report directly to CAEFISS; pharmaceutical
companies report to Health Canada) - Brighton Collaboration: Group that establishes international case definitions for AEFIs
Describe the hierarchy of controls
Hierarchy of controls
Definition: Mechanisms of controlling occupational hazards, listed from most to least effective
Elimination: Physically remove the hazard; most difficult to implement once a process has
been implemented
Substitution: Replace the hazard; easiest to implement during the design or development
stage of a process (e.g., switch to a non-toxic cleaner)
Engineering controls: Isolate people from the hazard; usually highly effective and provide
protection independent of worker behaviour; usually initially higher cost than administrative
controls of PPE, but may cost less in the long term (e.g., improve ventilation system to reduce
amount of hazard exposure)
Administrative or work place controls: Change the way people work; relatively inexpensive to
establish, but less effective and requires significant effort on the part of workers (e.g., reduce
number of hours spent in loud environments)
Personal protective equipment: Also relatively inexpensive to establish, but may be relatively
costly over the long-term; least-effective measure (e.g., respirators)
Define climate change and describe its expected health impact and the role of public health.
What are 4 greenhouse gases?
In summary, health impacts are:
Temperature related morbidity and mortality (heat waves, fire, drought)
Weather related natural hazards (hurricanes)
Sea-level rise (flooding)
Vector borne and zoonotic diseases
Water and food borne contamination
Climate migration, food insecurity, unequal impact on vulnerable
Air quality (pollen, ozone, fires)
- *Public health roles in climate change**:
- Mitigation: Actions that stabilize or reduce the production of GHGs (e.g., cap and trade, carbon tax)
- Advocacy (e.g., for active transportation, for energy efficiency)
- Adaptation: Systems-level changes in response to observed or expected impacts of climate change
- Education and capacity building
- Research and surveillance (e.g., vector-borne diseases, identification of vulnerable populations)
- Empowering or protecting vulnerable populations (e.g., vaccination, case management for individuals experiencing homelessness)
- Emergency preparation and management
Climate change: Significant, long-term variations in temperature, precipitation, extreme weather events, snow cover, or sea level; caused by humans release of greenhouse gases, which absorb solar radiation and trap heat in the lower atmosphere
- key GHGs include CO2,methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated compounds
- Over the last 50 years, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 C; it is expected to increase an additional 1.8-4 C by 2100
- Canada contributes 2% of total global CO2 emissions, but Canada is the third-highest country in terms of per capita greenhouse gas emissions
- Don’t blame climate and geography: per capita emissions in Finland, Russia, and Sweden are lower than Canada’s
- Impacts in many Canadian cities will be:
- Increased number of tornadoes, wildfires, and thunderstorms
- Increased mixed precipitation in winter
- Increased number of freeze-thaw cycles
- Increased number of days > 30 C in summer (increased AC and electricity demand)
- Increased CO2 levels (resulting, for example, decreased concrete lifespan)
- Most infrastructure is built based on average of extremes that have occurred over the last 30-50 years; past extremes are not predictive of the future extremes that will occur with climate change
- *Health impacts of climate change** (verbatim from IPCC):
- Greater risk of injury, disease, and death due to more intense heat waves and fires (very high confidence) (note: some parts of the world already exceed the international standard for safe work activity during the hottest months of the year)
- Increased risk of undernutrition resulting from diminished food production in poor regions (high confidence)
- Consequences for health of lost work capacity and reduced labor productivity in vulnerable populations (high confidence)
- Increased risks of food- and water-borne diseases (very high confidence) and vectorborne diseases (medium confidence)
- Modest reductions in cold-related mortality and morbidity in some areas due to fewer cold extremes (low confidence), geographical shifts in food production, and reduced capacity of disease-carrying vectors due to exceedance of thermal thresholds (medium
confidence) . These positive effects will be increasingly outweighed, worldwide, by the magnitude and severity of the negative effects of climate change (high confidence).
What are adverse childhood events?
How do they lead to poor health outcomes?
Adverse childhood experiences (ACE)
- Adverse childhood experiences are linked to poor health outcomes in adults; graded,
dose-response relationship between ACE and poor health outcomes, including
increased risk of smoking, BMI > 35, suicide attempts, drug use, STIs, and COPD, early
mortality
- ACE include:
- Abuse: Emotional, physical, sexual
-
Household challenges: Intimate partner violence, household substance abuse,
mental illness in the household, parental separation or divorce, criminal
household member, incarceration, homelessness - Neglect: Emotional, physical
-
Mechanisms through which ACEs impact health: Nutritional deficiencies, epigenetics,
prolonged HPA activation, low level of language exposure, maladaptive neurocognitive
development
Image: CDC-Kaiser ACE study
Child protective services: In Canada, allegations of maltreatment are substantiated in 36% of
child maltreatment investigations; after investigation, 92% of children remain in their previous
residence; the remaining 8% of children move to informal placement with a relative, group
homes or residential treatment programs, or formal foster care/kinship placements
Describe basic facts about pertussis
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Pertussis (reportable)
- Organism: Bordetella pertussis (note that Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella
holmesii can cause similar disease, but are not reportable)
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Respiratory droplets
- Epidemiology:
- Infants who are too young to have completed their vaccine series are at highest
risk of infection and complications (<4 months)
- Source of infection is most often the parents
- Mortality rate in Canada = 1% in hospitalized infants (1-3 deaths in Canada/year)
- Duration of protection from natural disease is unknown
- Correlation of disease protection with titres is unknown; no correlate of protection
- Presentation: Infants present with atypical symptoms (apnea, seizures, sneezing,
gagging, choking, vomiting)
- Catarrhal stage: Rhinorrhea, sneezing, low-grade fever, mild cough x 1-2 weeks
- Paroxysmal stage: Severe cough, inspiratory whoop +/- posttussive vomiting x 1-
10 weeks
- Convalescence stage: Gradual recovery
- Incubation period: 9-10 days (range, 6-42 days)
- Infectious period: Infectious until day 5 of appropriate abx
- Testing: NPS for PCR
- Case management: Abx therapy + education about respiratory etiquette; avoid contact
with high-risk groups until 5 days of abx have been completed
- Contact management: Chemoprophylaxis (macrolide) for household contacts or high-risk contacts
(may protect contact, but does not change outbreak course); immunoprophylaxis is
recommended for susceptible adults and children, and all pregnant women > 26 weeks GA
- Vaccine:
- Recommended for routine immunization of infants, children, and adolescents;
also recommended for susceptible adults
- Vaccination in pregnancy: Vaccination in pregnancy provides passive immunity in
newborns
- ACIP recommendations: Tdap in every pregnancy
- NACI recommendations: Tdap in pregnancy as of 2018
- Acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness declines rapidly over time and is likely
not effective 7 years post-vaccination
- Individuals who were primed with whole-cell vaccine receive better protection
from acellular product
- Vaccine may be less protective against protectin-deficient strains of pertussis
Timeline of pertussis vaccine in Ontario:
- 1943: Whole cell fluid vaccine
- 1984: Absorbed whole cell vaccine (caused large local reactions; Canadian whole call
vaccine product had a lower effectiveness than products used in other countries)
- 1997: Acellular vaccine
- 2003: Adolescent Tdap booster program introduced (14-16 years)
- 2011: Adult Tdap booster program introduced (1 dose any time as an adult)
List 5 potential components of a vaccine.
Discuss concerns around thimerosal, aluminium and formaldehyde in vaccines.
Antigens: Components derived from a disease-causing organism that trigger an immune response
Stabilizers: Components that maintain vaccine stability (e.g., maintain the correct pH, prevent protein or carbohydrate aggregation, or prevent hydrolysis) (e.g., MgS04)
Adjuvants: Components that stimulate the production of antibodies; improve immune response; most commonly used in inactivated vaccines; “adjuvants are a highly heterogeneous group of compounds with only one thing in common: their ability to
enhance the immune response” (e.g., aluminum hydroxide); usually the cause of localized reactions
- Vaccines containing adjuvants should be injected IM to reduce localized side effects
Antibiotics: Used in the manufacturing process to prevent bacterial contamination of culture cells; usually only trace amounts end up in vaccines (e.g., neomycin)
- *Preservatives**: Added to multidose vaccine vials to prevent bacterial and fungal growth (not required for individual-dose vaccines, although used in some countries to reduce storage costs); added in response to deaths secondary to pyogenic bacteria (e.g., thimerosal, formaldehyde)
- Thimerosal: Ethyl-mercury compound; multi-dose influenza vaccine and Hep B are the only Canadian products that still contains thimerosal
Formaldehyde (preservative)
Formaldehyde is used in some vaccines, such as the hepatitis A vaccine. It’s used during the vaccine development process to kill or disable the viruses or bacteria.
The human body naturally produces formaldehyde. For instance, an infant’s body contains about 10 times the amount of formaldehyde found in 1 dose of a vaccine. The tiny traces that may be found in the vaccine are safe.
Thimerosal (preservative)
Sometimes many doses of vaccine can be taken from the same vial. Thimerosal stops harmful bacteria and fungi from growing inside these multi-dose vaccine vials. Even though each new dose uses a new needle and syringe, thimerosal adds another layer of protection. It prevents the vaccine from becoming accidentally contaminated, which could cause serious infections in the people getting the vaccine.
Thimerosal isn’t used in single dose vaccine vials. Routine vaccines in Canada come in single dose vials and are therefore thimerosal free.
Thimerosal breaks down into ethylmercury in the body and quickly leaves the body in the feces. It doesn’t build up in the body and doesn’t cause health concerns.
Many well-conducted studies have explored Thimerosal. During its long history of use in preventing contamination of vaccines, thimerosal has never been found to cause any harm.
Aluminum (adjuvant)
Some vaccines include aluminum salts to strengthen the body’s immune response to the antigens. This is known as an adjuvant.
Aluminum is one of the most common metals found in nature and is present in:
air
food
water
T_here’s less aluminum in vaccines than the amount found in breast milk or infant formula_.
What is public health advocacy
and what are examples of public health advocacy activities?
Policy advocacy
Public health advocacy: “Advocacy is a critical population health strategy that emphasizes
collective action to effect systemic change. It focuses on changing upstream factors related to
the social determinants of health, and explicitly recognizes the importance of engaging in
political processes to effect desired policy changes at organizational and system levels.”
(NCCDH)
- “As the most political of public health strategies, advocacy is risky to both practitioners
and agencies. Many government-funded public health workers see advocacy as strictly
off-limits since influencing government policy is often the object of advocacy.” (NCCDH)
- *Advocacy roles for public health:**
1. Framing the issue
2. Gathering and disseminating data
3. Working in collaboration and developing alliances
4. Using the legal and regulatory system - *Essential elements of effective advocacy:**
- Clear, specific goals
- Solid research and science base
- Values linked to fairness, equity, and social justice
- Broad-based support through coalitions
- Mass media used to set public agenda and frame issues
- Use of political and legislative processes for change
Types of advocacy:
1. Community activism: Enable communities to address the causes of poor health at a
policy level
2. Social policy reform: Champion legislative reform that redresses health inequities
3. Community development: Enable individuals to identify and address their own needs
4. Representational/client advocacy: Representing the rights and interests of those
unable to represent themselves
Describe basic facts about arsenic
Arsenic (*)
Testing: Assess levels in humans with speciated urinary arsenic; inorganic As bad; organic As less bad
Common sources:
_Contaminated food (esp seafood and rice_) Contaminated water (uncommon in Canada, more common in SE Asia, Mexico) Other uses: Wood preservative, agriculture, medicines (African trypanosomiasis tx), incineration
Short-term effects: N/V, abdo pain, muscle cramps, paresthesia, cardiotoxicity
Long-term effects:
Cancer: Lung, bladder, SCC (organic As is IARC 2B; inorganic As is IARC 1)
Arsenicosis: Colour changes and thickening of skin due to long-term exposures to high levels of arsenic in drinking water
Describe what a business case is and when it should be used.
Business case
Definition: Structured argument as to why a particular project should or should not proceed;
- *Steps:**
- Assess: Assess strengths and limitations of the project across six elements,
Project design (logic model),
Evidence base,
Implementation roles (RASCI; see below),
Resources and budget,
Work plan
Stakeholder roles and expectations
-
Analyze: Based on the strengths identified in the previous step, list the potential benefits of the project. Based on the limitations identified in the previous step, list the potential risks of the project. Identify the areas that will be impacted by these benefits and risks
(e. g., population health, access to services). Describe how likely and how significant each risk and benefit is. Consider strategies that will maximize benefits and minimize risks. - Advise: Examine the overall patterns of strengths, limitations, risks and benefits in the context of your minimization and maximization strategies. Rate each of the six project elements. Draw conclusions about the overall project.
Examples of decisions that requires business cases: rent vs. buy, build software vs. buy software, provide services in-house vs. contract out services
How are social network analyses used in public health?
Social network analysis
Definition: A structural approach to examining the linkages between actors, using mathematical
and computational models
Data analysis
- Network visualization: Visual representation of the social network
- Descriptive analyses: Description of the role of individual actors in the network (e.g.,
highly connected individuals, bridge individuals), description of subgroups, and
description of the type of network (e.g., hierarchical, dense)
- Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics (e.g., distance, density) and inferential
statistics (usually using stochastic or longitudinal models)
- Distance: The length of the shortest path between actors
-
Density = Total number of relational ties divided by the total possible number of
relational ties - *Uses in public health**
- Disease transmission networks
- Outbreak investigation
- Disease modelling
- Information transmission networks (e.g., who should we target with our messaging?)
- Social support networks (e.g., how does social capital flow?)
- Organizational networks (e.g., how are health organizations related to one another?)
What are 3 biases associated with screening?
What are necessary criteria to establishing a screening program?
In summary, screening program criteria:
-
Condition (4):
1) burden, 2) latent state, 3) natural history, 4) accepted treatment -
Test (2):
1) suitable, 2) acceptable -
Program (4):
1) who pts are, 2) economically balanced for society, 3) continuous process, 4) facilities for dx+tx
Disease screening
Definitions
- Screening: S_ystematic process to identify individuals with a disease still in the asymptomatic phase_
- Universal screening: Screening program is offered to an entire population (where that population is defined by demographics, e.g., age and sex)
- Systematic screening: Systematic recall of patients to participate in a
universal screening program
- Opportunistic screening: Offering an opportunity to participate in a
universal screening program when the patient is present for another
reason
- Case-finding: “Screening” program offered to a specific population based on risk factors other than demographics (e.g., screening offered to family members of a patients with cancer); note that public health people get in long and heated arguments as to whether
case-finding is screening or not
- *Biases associated with screening**
- Selection bias: Healthy people who are more likely to have better outcomes are more likely to get screened
- Lead-time bias: Apparent improvement in length of survival in screened populations, due to earlier diagnosis rather than more effective follow-up
- Length bias: Apparent improvement in length of survival in screened populations, because screening is more likely to detect slowly progressing disease
- Overdiagnosis bias: “Screen-detected cases include non-progressive or slowlyprogressive disease that would not present clinically before death due to other causes” (i.e., not truly cases)
Screening program criteria
Emily’s alphabetic acronym:
- Acceptable screening test (safe, simple, low opportunity cost)
- Better outcomes with intervention in pre-symptomatic phase (natural history of disease
understood)
- Characteristics of screening test: PPV, NPV, cost
- Defined target population
- Equitable
- EFfective intervention
- Good evidence supporting screening program
- Harms of participation (e.g., overdiagnosis, overtreatment, false positives, false
reassurance) are outweighed by benefits (e.g., early diagnosis, more effective treatment)
- Important health problem (frequency or severity)
John’s 3-bucket approach
- *Condition (4)**
1. The condition should be an important health problem.
2. There should be a recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage.
3. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease should be adequately understood.
4. There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognised disease. - *Test (2)**
5. There should be a suitable test or examination.
6. The test should be acceptable to the population. - *Screening Program (4)**
7. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients.
8. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available.
9. The cost of case-findings (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole.
10. Case-findings should be a continuing process and not a ‘once and for all’ project.
Describe basic facts about Haemophilus influenzae
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Haemophilus influenzae (Hib is reportable)
- Organism: Haemophilus influenzae (gram-negative coccobacillus)
- Typable: Encapsulated, designated a-f; serotype b (Hib) is the most pathogenic
- Non-typable: Not encapsulated
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Respiratory droplets
- Epidemiology:
- Hib causes 95% of H. influenzae invasive disease
- In Canada, Hib incidence is highest in: 1. Infants < 1 year and 2. Children
between 1-4 years of age - Hib case-fatality rate = 5%
- Before the introduction of the Hib vaccine, Hib was the most common cause of
bacterial meningitis and epiglottitis in children - Non-b H. influenzae now the most common cause of invasive H. influenzae
disease in Canada -
Presentation: Bacterial meningitis, epiglottitis, cellulitis, septic arthritis, bacteremia, otitis
media, pneumonia; sequelae include permanent neurological impairment (10-15% of
survivors) and deafness (15-20% of survivors) - Incubation period: 2-4 days
- Infectious period: Up to 24-48 h post-abx
-
Case management: Droplet precautions x 24 h post-abx; antibiotic treatment and
supportive care; if cefotaxime or ceftriaxone were not used for treatment, provide a dose
of rifampin chemoprophylaxis prior to discharge to eliminate carriage + vaccine if
unvaccinated -
Contact management: Chemoprophylaxis (rifampin) for all unimmunized or incompletely
immunized household and child care contacts + vaccination at age-appropriate intervals - Vaccine:
- Recommended for: All children < 5 years of age and anyone > 5 years of age
who also has a primary immunodeficiency, malignant hematologic disorder, HIV,
asplenia (including sickle cell disease), transplant, or cochlear implant - Primary series at 2, 4, and 6 months + additional dose at or after 12 months (the
latter is necessary for sustained protection) -
Hib conjugate vaccines uses tetanus protein carriers; this does not immunize
against tetanus
Describe the behavior change model: Health belief model
Health belief model
- Whether or not an individual’s behaviour will change is based on:
- The threat posed by a health problem;
- The benefits of avoiding the threat; and
- Factors influencing the decision to act
- Perceived susceptibility: Belief that a behaviour, exposure, or event is a threat
-
Perceived severity: Beliefs about the seriousness of a condition and its
consequences - Perceived benefits: Beliefs about the effectiveness of taking action
- Perceived barriers: Beliefs about the costs of taking action
- Cues to action: Factors that activate “readiness to change”
- Self-efficacy: Confidence in one’s ability to take action and overcome barriers
- Most effective at explaining simple behaviours (e.g., uptake of screening, immunization)
than complex behaviours (diet, smoking)
What is the Erickson De Wals framework?
In summary, Erickson De Wals vaccine program criteria:
Appropriate disease (1) - burden of disease
Good vaccine (5) - safety, immunogenicity, effectiveness, cost-effective, ease of administration
Good program (10) - feasible, acceptable, delivery strategy, sufficiently researched implementation, can be evaluated, comparable to others, legal/political/ethical/equity considerations
The final framework includes 53 items, grouped into 13 categories/questions. The 13 questions
(paraphrased) include:
1. Disease characteristics and burden Does the burden of disease justify a control program?
2. Vaccine characteristics Is the vaccine safe and effective?
3. Immunization strategies What is the goal of the program? What is the delivery strategy (e.g., schools vs. public clinics)? Will the delivery strategy achieve the goal of the program?
4. Social and economic costs and benefits Is the program cost-effective?
5. Acceptability Is the program acceptable to the public? Is there public demand for the program?
6. Feasability the program feasible given existing resources?
7. Ability to evaluate Can the program be evaluated?
8. Research questions Have important research questions affecting implementation of the program been adequately addressed?
9. Equity Is the program equitable?
10. Ethical considerations Are there ethical concerns?
11. Legal considerations Are there legal concerns (i.e., off-label use)?
12. Similarity to other programs Is the program the same as those planned or implemented elsewhere?
13. Political considerations Will the proposed program be free of controversy and/or produce some immediate political benefits?
Dr. Gemmill proposes that the most important characteristics to consider when introducing a
new vaccine are:
Immunogenicity, cost, safety, ease of administration, and effectiveness
What are the principles of the Canada Health Act (1984)?
Canada Health Act (1984)
- Description: Federal law passed by Pierre Trudeau’s Liberal government to ensure that
all residents of Canada have access to necessary hospital and physician services
without regard to their ability to pay
- Principles (UPPAC) that the P/Ts must meet to be eligible for federal transfer payments
(Canada Health and Social Transfer):
(acronym = UPPAC)
- Universality: All eligible residents are entitled to uniform health insurance coverage
- Public administration: Health insurance plan must be administered by a nonprofit,
public authority
- Portability: Coverage for insured services must be maintained when an insured
person moves within Canada
- Accessibility: Insured persons must have reasonable access to necessary
hospital and physician services and may not be impeded by financial or other
barriers
- Comprehensiveness: All medically necessary services provided by hospitals and
doctors must be insured
- The CHA also forbids extra billing (billing for insured services) and user charges (out-ofpocket
payments from insured individuals)
How to choose which parametric statistical test to use?
In the epidemiologic triangle, what are relevant characteristics of the agent for disease transmission?
- Infectiousness (I): Ability of an organism to establish itself in a susceptible host; I = infected / exposed
- Attack rate: number of new cases / number of persons at risk
- Secondary attack rate = Number of secondary cases / number of primary contacts
- Pathogenicity: Probability of an organism to cause disease (e.g., TB is not very pathogenic)
- Virulence: Severity of disease caused by organism (e.g., Zika is low-virulence; TB is highly virulent)
- Basic reproductive number: Theoretical number; the mean number of individuals directly infected by an infectious case through the total infectious period, when introduced to a susceptible population
- R = p x c x d (probability of transmission/contact x duration of infectiousness x contacts/time) - R < 1 → Infection will disappear; R = 1 → Infection is endemic; R > 1 → Infection can become an epidemic
What are historically important adverse events following immunization?
Historically important AEFIs and specific AEFI syndromes
- Whole-cell pertussis vaccine (no longer used in Canada): Reversible encephalopathy;
hypotonic-hyporesponsive events
- Rubella component of MMR vaccine: Arthropathy (usually occurs in post-pubertal
women who are not yet immune)
- Measles component of MMR vaccine: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (1
case/40,000 vaccinated children)
- Live-attenuated oral polio vaccine: Polio
- MMR vaccine: Severe allergic reactions to porcine gelatin
- Influenza vaccine: Oculo-respiratory syndrome (red eyes, cough, wheeze, chest
tightness, sore throat, facial swelling); occurs within 2-24 h of vaccination and resolves
within 48 hours
- Monovalent, adjuvanted 2009 H1N1 vaccine (used in some European countries only):
Narcolepsy
- MMR-V: Febrile seizures (4/10,000 12-23 month-olds will have febrile seizures when the
vaccines are given separately; 8/10,000 12-23 month-olds will have febrile seizures with
MMR-V)
- BCG: Osteitis
- RotaShield (never used in Canada; licensed in the US for <1 yr in 1998):
Intussusception
What interventions could lower the burden of preventable cancer?
Preventable cancer burden
Epidemiology
At least 1 in 3 cancers are preventable
- Tobacco: 22% of cancer deaths worldwide are attributable to tobacco
-
Infections: 22% of cancer deaths in LMICs and 6% of cancer deaths in HICs are
attributable to infections (hep B and C, HPV, H. pylori, schistosomiasis, liver fluke);
worldwide, 15 percent of all human cancers may attributed to viruses:
○ DNA viruses: Epstein-Barr virus, human papilloma virus, hepatitis B virus, and
human herpesvirus-8
○ RNA viruses: Human T lymphotropic virus type 1 and hepatitis C -
Environmental pollution: 1-4% of cancers worldwide are attributable to environmental
pollutants (e.g., arsenic, aflatoxins, dioxins, indoor air pollution) -
Occupational exposures: 10% of cancers in workers worldwide are attributable to
occupational exposures
Interventions to reduce the preventable cancer burden
- Avoid smoking: Tobacco is the greatest avoidable risk factor for cancer
- Healthy lifestyle: Healthy eating + physical activity + maintenance of a healthy body
weight can prevent 1 in 3 of the 12 major cancers worldwide
- Healthy eating: Increase consumption of vegetables, fruits, and fibres; reduce
consumption of red and processed meats
- Reduce alcohol consumption
- Reduce UV exposure
- Avoid carcinogens: E.g., by receiving the HPV or hep B vaccine, by reducing radon
exposure, by wearing PPE when exposed to occupational carcinogens
What are population level interventions that promote mental health?
What are CTFPHC recs for depression (2013)?
What are protective factors against suicide?
- *Population-level interventions** (categorized by Ottawa Charter actions; insufficient evidence available regarding outcomes with the exception of screening)
- Build health public policy: Trauma-informed policy, peace, social justice, human rights
- Create supportive environments: Safe environment, good housing, early childhood attachment, good prenatal care, economic participation, r_educe access to tobacco and alcohol_, good childhood nutrition
- Strengthen community actions: Reduce stigma and discrimination; strengthen sense of community
- Develop personal skills: Positive educational experiences, ability to manage conflict, physical activity
- Reorient health services: Improve capacity amongst health professionals to promote mental health
- Screening: The CTFPHC recommends against screening for depression in adults (no demonstrated benefit, potential for harm), both in those at average risk of depression and those at increased risk of depression (including post-partum)
Definitions
- Positive mental health (PHAC): The capacity to feel, think, and act in ways that enhance the ability to enjoy life and deal with challenges
- Mental health promotion (WHO): Creating conditions that support mental health and allow people to adopt and maintain healthy lifestyles
- Mental illness: Alterations in thinking, mood, or behaviour resulting in distress and impaired functioning
- *Epidemiology of mental illness**
- In any given year, 1 in 5 Canadians have a mental illness or addiction
- Addiction is more common in men than in women
- By age 40, 1 in 2 Canadians are experiencing or have experienced mental illness
- 1 in 7 Canadians access health services for mental illness
- Mental illness is the most common cause of short- and long-term disability in Canada
- *Suicide**
- Men are 4 times more likely to complete suicide than women, but women are 4 times more likely to attempt suicide than men
- Suicide in 5-6x more common in First Nations youth and 11x more common in Inuit youth than in non-Indigenous youth
- Protective factors: Socio-economic situation › Loving parent-child relationship › Having reasons for living › Social connectedness › Sense of belonging › Religion
- Suicide rate 11/100,000 in gen pop, 30/100,000 in first nations, >100/100,000 among Inuit.
The decision to recommend against screening was based on the lack of evidence on the benefits and harms of routinely screening asymptomatic adults. Despite the lack of evidence, the CTFPHC had concerns about the potential harms of screening (e.g. false positive, unnecessary treatment, labelling and stigma) and appropriate use of limited resources.
In the absence of a demonstrated benefit of screening, and considering potential harms, the CTFPHC recommends not routinely screening asymptomatic adults from average- and increased-risk groups.
Physicians who believe their patients, or a subset of their patients, place a high value on the potential benefits and are less concerned with potential harms would likely implement screening for these
patients.
Describe different types of indoor air pollutants
What are the symptoms, possible cause and risk factor for sick building syndrome?
In summary:
Biological: allergens, endotoxin, mold
Chemical: combustion (cigs, indoor fuel, CO), off-gassing (VOC, formaldehyde), outdoor air pollution
Physical: radon, asbestos
- We spend almost 90% of our time indoors, so exposure to airborne pollutants is more common in indoor air than outdoor air
-
Tight seals and air conditioners reduce the concentration of outdoor air pollutants indoors → lower income individuals are less likely to live in high-quality housing and therefore more likely to be exposed to outdoor air pollutants indoors (in addition to living
closer to roadways and industry) - Sick building syndrome: Symptoms (headaches, dizziness, rhinitis, nausea, lethargy) that improve when individual leaves the building, but no cause can be identified.
Possible causes are: air pollutants, poor ventilation, noise, vibration, poor lighting.
Risk factors include: female, atopy, overcrowding, job stress
- Building-related illness: Signs and symptoms that are attributable to an identifiable, building-related cause (e.g., Legionnaire’s disease, occupational asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis)
Biological contaminants
- *Allergens**:
- Sources: Pets, dust mites, cockroaches, fungus
- Health effects: Exacerbation of pre-existing asthma, increased risk of allergy, decreased risk of allergy (unclear which it is)
- *Endotoxins**:
- Sources: Lipopolysaccharide components of outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria; associated with contaminated humidifiers, food waste, lower ventilation rates, farms
- Health effects: Exacerbation of pre-existing asthma, decreased risk of future allergies and asthma
- *Mold**:
- Sources: Leaks in building structure or plumbing, condensation, and household mould (e.g., hidden food spills, defrost pans)
- Health effects: May result in upper respiratory symptoms (via exacerbation of environmental allergies or asthma), but symptoms may also be explained by dampness (uncommon health effects of mould include mycotic infections and, in low-income countries, hepatocellular carcinoma from aflatoxin exposure)
Combustion-related contaminants
- *Second-hand smoke**
- Sources: Cigarettes
- Health impacts: Upper respiratory symptoms, respiratory illness requring hospital admission, sudden infant death syndrome
- *Indoor fuel smoke**
- Sources: Biomass burning for cooking or heating (common in LMICs), results in CO, NO2, SOx, PMs, PAHs, Pb, chromium
- Health impacts: Lung cancer, childhood asthma, 2.7% of global DALYs (2 million deaths/year)
- *Carbon monoxide**:
- Sources: Attached garages, gas stoves, furnaces, woodstoves, fireplaces, cigarettes
- Health effects: Headache, nausea, fatigue, death
Contaminants from off-gassing
See also: Volatile organic compounds
Formaldehyde
- Sources: Paint, varnish, new furniture (esp pressed wood)
- Health effects: Increased bronchial responsiveness, respiratory tract irritations; IARC, group 1 (nasopharyngeal CA, leukemia)
How should public health officials investigate and respond to infection control breaches?
Infection control lapse: Deviation from infection and prevention standards of care; has or may
result in infectious disease transmission to the premises’ clients, attendees, or staff
-
Identification of an infection control lapse (in Ontario, an initial and final report must be
posted online) - Institute corrective action ASAP
-
Gather data
a. What is the type of premise?
b. What was the procedure, device, or practice that resulted in the lapse?
c. What was the degree of the breach (e.g., was reprocessing omitted or just
performed improperly?)
d. What body fluids, tissues, or other biologic substances may patients have been
exposed to?
e. Which body surfaces or spaces (e.g., mucous membranes, solid organs, skin)
were exposed?
f. Lapse time frame (e.g., ongoing, one-time)
g. Staff involved and their dates of employment
h. Number of patients exposed (and individual-level BBI status, if available)
i. Conduct literature review and consult experts -
Involve key stakeholders: IPAC professionals, appropriate public health agencies,
affected healthcare providers, licensing agencies - Risk assessment
- Develop communications and logistics plans
-
Patient notification and testing
a. High-risk breach (high probability of blood exposure): Notify and test all exposed
patients
b. Low-risk breach (lower probability of blood exposure): Decide whether
notification and testing is warranted based on risk, public concern, and balance
of duty to warn with harm of notification
What are measures of central tendency (3) and central dispersion (3).
What is skew and kurtosis?
Descriptive statistics
Measures of central tendency
- Mean: Most commonly used measure of central tendency
- Median: The value in the middle of a distribution; less sensitive to extreme scores, more robust and may be more informative for skewed data
- Mode: The most commonly observed value in a distribution; meaning is obvious, but
greatly subject to sample fluctuations
Measures of dispersion
- Range: The difference between the largest and smallest values; simplest measure; very
sensitive to extreme values
- Variance: Average squared difference between the mean and each value
- Standard deviation: Square root of the variance; the usual difference between
observations and mean; most intuitively appealing
- Standard error: The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic;
estimate of the variability between the sample mean you measured and the sample
means you might’ve measured from other samples of the population
Measures of symmetry
- Skew: Measure of the lack of symmetry of a distribution around its mean; can be
symmetrical, right-skewed (tail to the right), or left-skewed (tail to the left),
Measures of tailedness
- Kurtosis: Measure of how “heavy” the “tail” of the distribution is; i.e., data sets with high
kurtosis have a lot of outliers; data sets with low kurtosis don’t have a lot of outliers
- *Depicting data**
- Frequency tables: Lists categories along with how often each occurred, numbers: frequency/cumulative frequency (#), relative frequency/cumulative relative frequency (%).
-
Histogram: Graphical summary of a univariate data set; the data range is split into bins
listed along the x-axis and then the frequency counts for each bin are listed along the yaxis -
Stem-and-leaf plot: Data are sorted in ascending order, stems (e.g., tens places) are
listed in one column, then the leaves (e.g., ones places) are listed beside the appropriate
tens place -
Box-and-whisker plot: A variety of ways to draw these plots; commonly, the end of the
whiskers represent the upper and lower extremes, the box represents the upper and
lower quartile, and the line within the box represents the median
What are basic facts about trichomoniasis?
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation time, infectious time
Epidemiology
Presentation, testing
Case management
Contact management
Trichomoniasis
- Organism: Trichomonas vaginalis (protozoa)
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Direct contact (sexually transmitted; note that other common
infectious causes of vaginal discharge–bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis-
-are not usually considered sexually transmitted)
- Epidemiology: Not well-characterized, but thought to be one of the most common nonviral
STIs; associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition and transmission in
women; associated with PROM, preterm birth, and low birth weight (unclear if tx
improves outcomes)
- Presentation: 10-50% of women are asymptomatic; if symptomatic, vaginal discharge,
itch, dysuria, “strawberry cervix”; most men are asymptomatic
- Incubation period: 3-28 days (mean: 7 days)
- Testing: On wet mount, motile flagellated protozoa; on Gram stain, PMNs and
trichomonads; vaginal d/c culture (most sensitive)
- Case management: Metronidazole (single dose or 1-week course po); do not treat
asymptomatic pregnant women
- Contact management: Metronidazole for current partners (single dose or 1-week course
po) (no testing required)
*Abstain from etoh x 24 hours post-tx (metronidazole causes Antabuse reaction)
What are the benefits of a no fault system following adverse events following immunizations?
No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccinations
- “Regardless of proper design, manufacture, and delivery, adverse events occur following vaccination…. At the population level, it is considered that these small risks are balanced by the benefits of widespread population immunization. However, this means
that an individual occasionally bears a significant burden for the benefit provided to the rest of the population.”
- Traditional legal mechanisms of compensation usually require evidence of negligence; most vaccine-related adverse events do not occur during negligence
Benefits:
For the people injured:
1) No-fault compensation programs provide a mechanism for individuals who bear the harms of vaccination to receive compensation without the requiring proof of negligence;
2) it also removes the negative equity impacts of using the tort liability system on injured parties (litigation is expensive and inaccessible to many people)
For the companies and vaccine programs:
1) No-fault compensation programs also protect vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, which reduces vaccine prices and vaccine shortages, and increases vaccine research.
2) No-fault compensation programs reduce negative media coverage of vaccine manufacturers
Applicable ethical principles:
- Fairness (helps equalize the cost borne by the injured and uninjured)
- Equity (removes economic barriers to receiving compensation)
- Solidarity (no member of the community bears the risk of vaccination alone)
- Within Canada, only Quebec has no-fault compensation program
What is the rationale for newborn screening tests?
What are some diseases that are screened at birth?
Rationale for newborn screening:
- Disease usually inapparent at birth
- Treatment prevents severe, costly, often irreversible sequelae (e.g., mental retardation,
seizures, failure to thrive, death)
- In most cases, treatment must be implemented soon after birth
- Collectively, prevalence of any one of these conditions at birth is 1 in 800 (200 affected
infants/year in Ontario)
Describe basic facts about rotavirus
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Rotavirus
- Organism: Rotavirus (Reoviridae family); numerous strains
- Reservoir: Humans
- Mode of transmission: Fecal-oral (some evidence that it can also be transmitted through
the respiratory route); stable in the environment
- Epidemiology:
- Rotavirus accounts for 10-40% of all childhood gastroenteritis; 1/62-1/312
children < 5 years require hospitalization with rotavirus
- Small infectious dose
- Most unimmunized children are infected by 5 years of age, but infection does not
usually lead to permanent immunity
- Higher rates of disease in Indigenous children
- Serotype G1P[8] is the most common serotype in HICs
- Disease is more severe in children 3 to 24 mos than < 3 mos, probably due to
passive immunization through maternal antibodies
- Presentation: Spectrum from asymptomatic, to mild disease, to severe dehydration, to
death; typically acute onset of fever and vomiting +/- diarrhea x 5-7 days
- Incubation period: 18h to 3 days
- Infectious period: A few days prior to symptoms up to 21 days afterwards
- Case management: Supportive care, esp hydration; exclude from childcare until diarrhea
has resolved
- Contact management: None
- Vaccine: Monovalent Rot-1 (Rotarix) requires 2 doses; pentavalent Rot-5 (RotaTeq)
requires 3 doses
- Recommended for all immunocompetent infants without a pmhx of
intussusception starting at 6 weeks of age
- Intussusception: Small increase in the risk of intussusception in the 7 days
following vaccination with RotaTeq and RotaShield (no evidence of risk with
Rotarix); RotaShield was never used in Canada and was licensed in the US for
<1 yr in 1998
- 10/13 P/Ts have publicly-funded rotavirus vaccine
- Incredibly effective vaccine (both in terms of hospitalization rates and cost);
vaccinating kids also creates a herd effect (prevents illness in the elderly);
introduction of the vaccine reduces infant and child rotavirus-specific ED visits
and hospitalization by 85%
What are 3 types of source water
What are basic principles of well water maintenance?
What are 3 water disinfection techniques and pros/cons?
Source water types:
- Ground water, surface water, ground water under the direct influence of surface water (GUDI)
- *Well water treatment**
- Groundwater is usually filtered by soil and so is safe for consumption
- Well maintenance: Ensure well cap is watertight, surface water does not collect near the well, and well is upstream of any source of pollution
- New wells should be disinfected before use to ensure any bacteria introduced during drilling are removed
- If an existing well becomes contaminated, it can be disinfected (“shocked”) with household bleach
- If shocking does not eliminate the source of contamination, a disinfection device must be installed
- Household drinking water disinfection devices:
Filtration (removes particulate matter and parasites, but cannot remove some bacteria and viruses)
Chlorination (does not kill parasites, does note remove particulate, leaves residual)
Distillation (can remove chemicals)
Boiling (does not remove particulate)
UV (can remove chemicals)
Ozonation (can remove chemicals)
Ceramic candle filter (does not kill viruses)
Activated charcoal (can remove chemicals)
reverse osmosis (can remove chemicals)
- *Water treatment for individual backcountry and travel use**
- Boiling x 1 min (x 3 min at altitudes > 2000 m)
- Filtration (preferably with a chemical disinfectant matrix, because this will also remove some viruses)
- Disinfection: Iodine, chlorine, oxidants; not appropriate for long-term use due to potential effects of excess iodine or chlorine by-products
What is the public health importance of giant hogweed?
Wild parsnip and giant hogweed: Phototoxic; produce furocoumarins, which, when exposed to
sun, produce a phyto-photodermatitis; sap absorbed by skin + light exposure → furocoumarin
energized → burn
Heracleum mantegazzianum, commonly known as giant hogweed, is a monocarpic perennial herbaceous flowering plant in the carrot family Apiaceae. H. mantegazzianum is also known as cartwheel-flower, giant cow parsley, giant cow parsnip, or hogsbane.
Also in the same family, Apiaceae – the carrot family, is wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa), another invasive species to avoid.
What are short-term and long-term health effects of air pollution?
Short-term effects
- Primary effect: Exacerbations of preexisting conditions; risk greatest in vulnerable
groups (elderly, children, individuals with cardiac or respiratory disease)
- Outcomes: MI, CVA, CHF/COPD/asthma exacerbation, adverse birth outcomes (IUGR, pre-term labour)
- *Long-term effects**
- Primary effect: Incident cases of chronic disease; risk proportionate to exposure
- Outcomes: Chronic lung conditions (asthma, COPD), impaired lung development, increased susceptibility to infection, l_ung cancer_, dementia
Describe basic facts about CADmium
Cadmium (*)
Common sources:
- Fertilizer production;
- Agricultural soil → food;
- Smoking
Short-term effects:
- Toxic pneumonitis;
- Itai-itai disease (ouch-ouch in Japanese), severe joint/spine pain
Long-term effects:
- Progressive palmar fibrosis;
- Kidney dysfunction → decreased vit D → osteoporosis;
- Lung cancer (IARC 1)
What can be done to improve recruitment and retention of health professionals?
in human resources, what is succession planning?
What are terms of reference?
Human resources
Improving recruitment and retention of health professionals
1. Offer educational opportunities: CPD, research, training, and job growth opportunities
2. Expand scope: Allow health practitioners to take the most extended roles possible (most applicable to nursing)
3. Professional and personal support: Enact specific measures that support employees with young children and older employees (e.g., child care); implement activities, along with protected time to participate, that support physical and emotional wellbeing
Note that financial incentives are rarely sufficient on their own.
Measures of retention include: employment status, staff stability index, staff turnover rates, job vacancy rates, and job satisfaction levels
- *Succession planning** (APIE model):
1. Assess: Identify critical roles within your organization
2. Plan: Identify key competencies required to perform the critical roles and choose workforce development strategies that will develop these key competencies
3. Implement: Implement the planned workforce development strategies
4. Evaluate: Monitor, evaluate, and adjust the succession plan
Hiring:
- Hire the person best suited for the job (i.e., “Don’t hire the ‘best’ person for the job”; in
competitive job markets, it is easy to hire over-qualified individuals who will become
bored and frustrated, leading to poor morale, turnover, and absenteeism); minimizing
formal educational qualifications expands the talent pool
- Behaviour is generally predictable; interview questions should focus on past behaviours;
ask questions that can get concrete responses
- Panel should include a variety of individuals (e.g., different personalities who would
appreciate different features of the interviewee)
Promotion:
- Peter principle: Individuals are continually promoted within an organization until the
reach a level at which they are no longer competent (i.e., people “rise to their level of
incompetence”)
- Being too slow to promote can lead to the best talent leaving the organization
- Do not assume all employees wish to advance within the organization
Terms of reference
- Terms of reference: Clear description of the roles and functions of a position or
committee that the individual or group agrees to accept; standard by which performance
will be judged
- Considerations:
- TOR should be re-visited regularly, especially when the project has changed
substantially
- Maintain document control (e.g., version number, sign-off dates)
- To include:
- Background: Context in which the individual or committee will work
- Function of the committee/position: Describe the responsibilities
- Role of the committee/position: List the tasks that the committee or individual will
complete
- (Role of individual committee members)
- (General: For committees, describe the membership, the chair, agenda process,
minute process, frequency of meetings, whether or not delegation is permitted,
quorum requirements)
- General: Timetable, dispute resolution
Name 7 health behavior change models
Health behaviour change models
Health belief model
Social cognitive theory
Transtheoretical/Stages of Change model
Theory of reasoned action and planned behaviour
Precaution-adoption process model
Diffusion of innovation theory
Community development
COM-B /behavior change wheel
Health Belief Model
Perceived susceptibility
Perceived severity
Perceived benefits
Perceived barriers
Cues to action
Self-efficacy
Stages of Change
Precontemplation
Contemplation
Preparation
Action
Maintenance
Relapse
Social cognitive theory
Reciprocal determinism
Behavioral capability
Expectations
Self-efficacy
Observational learning/modelling
Reinforcement
Planned behavior and Reasoned action
Behavioral intention/behavior depend on: (mnemonic PAS)
- *- Perceived behavioral control**
- Attitude toward the behaviour
- Subjective norms
- *Precaution-adoption**
1. Unaware of issue
2. Unengaged by issue
3. Deciding whether or not to act
4. Acting
5. Maintenance
COM-B / Behavior change
Capability
Opportunity
Motivation
Describe a Gantt chart.
Gantt charts
- Definition: Chart used to track project or program schedules; visually depicts how tasks
relate to one another, how far each task has progressed, and who is responsible for
each task
How would the inhalation of intentionally-released Francisella tularensis present
and what could be done about it?
Tularemia
- Francisella tularensis is a gram-negative bacillus that is transmitted from contaminated
animals or through tick bites; could be deliberately released, resulting in pneumonic
tularemia
- Incubation period: 3-5 days
- Presentation:
- Ulceroglandular tularemia: Skin ulcer + regional lymphadenopathy
- Pneumonic tularemia: Initially presents like nonspecific pneumonia, but can
progress to septic shock, ARDS, and respiratory failure (no pathognomonic
signs) - Other presentations: Glandular (no ulcers), oropharyngeal (pharyngitis with
ulcers and cervical lymphadenopathy), conjunctivitis, typhoidal tularemia (no
localizing symptoms) - Treatment: Gentamicin or streptomycin x 10 days
- PEP: Doxy or cipro x 7 days
What are the pros and cons of culture-independent diagnostic tests
Pros and cons of culture-independent diagnostic tests
Pros
- Faster results
- Can rule in or out multiple pathogens at once
- Usually more sensitive than culture
Cons
- Dead microbes still produce positive results
- Single test can identify multiple microbes and not all may be causing illness
- Does not characterize antimicrobial susceptibility, cannot establish link between source and case
Solution: Reflexive testing with culture if CIDP positive
Describe the steps of a cancer cluster investigation and challenges with this type of investigation.
What sources of data can help assign outcome and exposure status in a cluster investigation study?
Cancer cluster = a greater than expected number of cancer cases that occurs within a group ofpeople in a geographic area over a defined period of time
- Comparator = Incidence of cancer cases normally seen in the community or a similar community
- Cancers should be the same type, with the exception of different types of cancer that share the same, known risk factor (i.e., case definitions that include different cancers are usually not useful)
- Choose the geographic area and time period carefully so that a cluster is not created or obscured
In addition to shared etiology, cancer clusters may occur because:
- Cancer is common; communities may perceive the normal frequency of cancer to be a cluster
- Statistically significant excesses of cancer can occur due to chance
**Most cancer cluster investigations do not find a cause**
Challenges to cancer cluster investigation:
- Small number of cases resulting in lack of statistical power to detect an association even if one exists
- Large number of cases (cancer is common!) resulting in spurious association
- Long latency periods, coupled with mobility, limit ability to identify past environmental exposures
Steps: Stop at any step if there is no evidence to proceed to the next step
1. Initial contact and response: Is there evidence that the situation presented f_its the definition of a cluster_ and is it biologically plausible that the cancers share a common etiology? Use risk communication tools to communicate the response to the community member, who may be distressed
- Assessment: Determine whether the suspected cancer cluster is a statistically significant excess; c_alculating the standardized incidence ratio is recommended (observed/expected)_; develop a communications plan
- Determine the feasibility of conducting an epidemiologic study:
Identify hypotheses; involve partners; consider whether an expert advisory panel is required; if a study is feasible, propose a study design; continue the communications plan
- Conduct an epidemiologic study to assess the association between cancers and environmental causes: Correlation does not imply causation; determination of causation should also rely on clinical and laboratory studies
What are data sources for outcome and exposure determinations in cluster investigations?
Outcomes
- Cancer registry
- Death registry
- Hospitalisation database
- Physicians claims database
Exposure
- Housing records
- Employment records
- Municipal land development/business records
Describe the canadian Foodborne Illness Outbreak Response Protocol and the role of its different actors
What are FIORP process steps?
Canada FIORP (Foodborne Illness Outbreak Response Protocol):
- Protocol developed by PHAC (Public Health Agency of Canada), HC (Health Canada), and CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) to enhance collaboration in the response to
multi-jurisdictional foodborne illness outbreaks
- Outbreak Investigation Coordination Committee (OICC): Forum for information sharing and interpretation, establishing response priorities, and developing communication strategies
- Local/regional health units: Investigate outbreaks occurring within their boundaries; report outbreaks to P/T officials
- P/Ts: Investigate outbreaks that involve >1 local/regional health units and outbreaks that occur in First Nation communities north of 60 degrees; conduct provincial surveillance for enteric illnesses
- PHAC:
1) Coordinate outbreak investigations that involve >1 P/Ts;
2) conduct national surveillance for enteric illnesses;
3) provide consultation through the NML (National Microbiology Laboratory) and CFEP; (Canadian Field Epidemiology Program)
4) notify the WHO if the outbreak is a PHEIC
- Health Canada:
1) Regulate safety and nutritional quality of food, regulate pesticides, and evaluate the safety of veterinary drugs;
2) investigate outbreaks that occur in FN communities south of 60 degrees or on cruise ships (north of 60 = territorial governments), airplanes, and trains;
3) Other roles: risk assessment, communication, consultation
- CFIA (canadian food inspection agency):
1) Inspect food, seed, livestock feed, fertilizers, plants, and animals;
2) trace food item through the food distribution system;
3) food safety investigation;
4) food recall
- RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police): Investigate potential criminal activity (e.g., tampering, terrorism)
STEPS
Identification of Hazards
Notification of Partners
Review Information
OICC Assessment Call - may go back to step 1
OICC Activation
Epi, food, lab Investigations
Central Integrated Analysis
Health Risk Assessment
Public Health and Food Safety Actions
Communication with Public
OICC Deactivation
Post Outbreak Debrief
ON-FIORP: (Ontario)
- Similar structure to Canada’s FIORP; key difference = OICC can be created when a food-related hazard has been identified, even without any reported illness
- LPHAs (local public health agencies): Investigate outbreaks occurring within their boundaries; conduct food safety investigations at retail premises
- MOHLTC (Ontario MoH and Lont term care): Investigate outbreaks that involve >1 health units
- OMAFRA (Ontario Mo Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs): Conduct food safety investigations in provincially licensed plants
- CFIA: Conduct food safety investigations in federally registered establishments; food recall (even if outbreak is within a single health unit)
Provide examples of health inequities for indigenous peoples in Canada
What are the pros and cons of an infant vs adolescent hepatitis B immunization program?
Infant program
- 90% of infants who are infected with HBV go on to develop cirrhosis
(compared to only 1-5% of adults)
- Despite targeted immunization for infants born to HBV+ mothers, some
infants are missed and acquire HBV; a universal infant program would
prevent these cases
- Most effective at reducing the number of chronic carriers
Adolescent program
- Most reported acute HBV infections occur in adolescents and adults; there
is a rapid drop in antibodies following immunization, so individuals have
maximum protection at time of greatest risk (caveat: 90% of 18-year-olds
will mount an anamnestic response after a primary infant series)
- Most effective at reducing the number of acute infections
What are 4 factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy?
Vaccine hesitancy: “Delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccination services” (WHO definition)
Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy (4Cs *Extra C)
- *Complacency**
- Lack of experience with vaccine-preventable diseases (see graph below)
- *Convenience**
- Geographic barriers
- Cost barriers
- *Confidence**
- Fear of being injected with a substance derived from disease-causing organisms
- Past adverse experiences
- Feeling intimidated
- Perceived risk/benefit
- Actual risk/benefit (technical concerns over probability of side effects)
- *Culture**
- Religious beliefs (see below)
- Social context and media personalities
- Distrust of the medical system or pharmaceutical industry
- Distrust in government
Describe 6 types of viral encephalitis, their reservoirs and vectors
Viral encephalitides (aka arboviral encephalitides) (reportable)
In general,
S/S = meningitis, encephalitis, or myelitis (acute flaccid paralysis) with fever, headache, neck
stiffness, altered mental status; up to 50% of survivors may have permanent neuro or
neuropsych defects
Diagnosis = CSF IgM (preferred); serum or CSF PCR (false-negatives common)
-
West Nile: Reservoir = birds; transmitted by culex mosquitoes; 80% of cases are
asymptomatic; symptomatic cases may have flu-like symptoms +/- rash +/-
meningoencephalitis +/- flaccid paralysis; infection usually leads to lifelong immunity -
Eastern Equine: Reservoir = birds; transmitted by multiple mosquito spp.; cases of EE
in Canada occur in the spring, related to bird migration from the US; CFR = 50-75% -
Western Equine: Reservoir = birds; transmitted by multiple mosquito spp.; affects
Western Canada; CFR = 3-7% -
La Crosse: Reservoir = small mammals; transmitted by Ae. triseriatus and albopictus;
no cases reported in Canada yet, but could occur here if Aedes range expands due to
climate change; CFR < 1% -
Powassan: Reservoir = medium-sized mammals; transmitted by Ixodes ticks; CFR =
0.3-60% -
Japanese encephalitis: Reservoir = water birds; transmitted by Culex spp. and Aedes
spp.; occurs in Western Pacific, East Asia, and parts of Southeast Asia; CFR 5-40%
Other arboviral encephalitides present (but rare) in Canada: Snowshoe hare virus, Jamestown
Canyon virus, California virus, Cache Valley virus
Name 3 species of ticks and examples of diseases they carry
Ixodes species (deer ticks)
- Lyme disease (Asia, Europe, US, and parts of Canada)
- Tick-borne encephalitis (Europe and northeast Asia)
- Anaplasmosis, babesiosis, Powassan fever
Dermacentor variabilis (dog tick)
- Tularemia (also transmitted by deer flies, lone star tick and wood tick)
- Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Amblyomma americanum (Lone Star tick)
- Ehrlichiosis, tularemia
Describe basic facts about giardiasis
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Giardiasis (reportable)
- Organism: Giardia lamblia (aka Giardia intestinalis or Giardia duodenalis; three names
for the same thing), protozoan parasite
- Trophozoite: Motile, vegetative form that causes symptoms
- Cyst: Infectious form; can survive for months in cold water; <10 cysts required for
infection
- Reservoir: Humans, other mammals (cats, dogs, cattle, beaver)
- Mode of transmission: Fecal-oral (drinking water, swimming, contaminated food,
institutions, daycare centres), anal intercourse
- Epidemiology:
- Worldwide occurrence
- In temperate climates, incidence peaks in the late summer and fall
- Prevalence in temperate countries = 2-10% in adults and 25% in children
- Risk factors: Daycare attendance, hiking, anal sex, immunocompromise
- Presentation: Usually asymptomatic; if symptomatic, most commonly acute, self-limited
diarrhea x 2-4 weeks; may be followed by chronic infection with diarrhea, steatorrhea,
malabsorption, and weight loss x months
- Incubation period: Median 7-10 days (range 3-25+ days)
- Infectious period: Duration of infection
- Testing: Stool for O&P x 3 (Giardia dx’ed via identification of cysts or trophozoites in
feces)
- Case management: Education, re: hand hygiene, safer sex, feces disposal, swimming;
drug tx with metronidazole, tinidazole, or nitazoxanide can be used to reduce the
duration of symptoms
- Contact management: None
- Other: Can be transmitted via recreational waters; concentrations of chlorine used in
pools do not routinely kill Giardia
What are interventions that can decrease vaccine hesitancy?
Enhancing access to vaccination:
- *Improve the offer of vaccination (convenience and access)**
- Geographical: Home visits, vaccination programs in schools and childcare centres
- Cost: Reduce client out-of-pocket costs
- *Increasing community demand for vaccinations**
- Engagement of religious or other influential leaders to promote vaccination in the community
- Social mobilisation and mass media:
- “Play the issue, not the opponent”; adversarial approaches to anti-vax advocates can create the false impression that vaccination is a contested intervention
- Employing patient reminder and follow-up (recall systems)
- Non-financial incentives
- Mandating vaccinations / sanctions for non-vaccination
- 2 Canadian provinces (Ontario, New Brunswick) and all US states require children to be vaccinated prior to attending school, but allow for medical, religious, and philosophical exemptions
- Some other provinces (e.g., Alberta) do not require immunization, but will exclude a child from school if there is a VPD outbreak
- WHO has no official stance on mandatory immunization
- Other approaches: Vaccination is not mandatory in Australia, but it provides nontaxable payments to parents for each child who meets immunization requirements between 18-24 months and again between 4-5 years of age; immunization is mandatory in Latvia, and philosophical or religious exemptions are not permitted
- *Enhancing provision of vaccines:**
- Reducing pain associated with vaccination (3P approach)
- Pharmacologic:Use least-painful brand when possible; topical anesthetics
- Physical: Breastfeeding or providing sweet-tasting solution during vaccination for infants < 12 mos; do not vaccinate children in the supine position; do not aspirate; inject the most painful vaccine last; provide tactile distraction at the time of injection (e.g., Buzzy Helps, Shotblocker)
- Psychological: Distraction techniques, deep breathing
Provider admin measures:
- Electronic immunization records
- Standing orders
- Provider reminders
- HCW communications training: Focus on building a trusting relationship; “overselling” vaccines increases hesitance; aim to increase patient knowledge and awareness about vaccination
What are the federal food safety legislations?
Food safety legislation
- *Federal:**
- Food and Drugs Act: Sets standards (e.g., alteration, colouring, bacterial counts, manufacturing) for all foods produced and stored in Canada
- Food-specific acts (e.g., Health of Animals Act, Safe Foods for Canadians Act)
- The Safe Food for Canadians Act replaced the Canada Agricultural Products Act, Fish Inspection Act, Meat Inspection Act, and Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act in 2012
- The SFCA was developed in response to the 2009 Weatherill Report
(investigation into the 2008 Maple Leaf Foods listeriosis outbreak that resulted in 22 deaths) to improve food safety - Enforced by the CFIA, which is made up of food inspectors from Health Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
1) Increase safety oversight
2) increase legislative authority
3) increase international marketing
- *Provincial (Ontario)**:
- HPPA: Mandate for regulations, programs, and protocols that govern food premises
- Enforced by the LPHAs (specifically, either the MOH or PHIs)
- *Municipalities within Ontario:**
- Bylaws may address issues around garbage, sewage, and zoning that are not covered by federal or provincial laws
- Enforced by municipal bylaw officers
Contrast target population, study population and sample.
Contrast study design error, sampling error and measurement error.
In the context of inferential statistics, contrast a parameter and a statistic.
Inferential statistics
Definitions
- Target population (theoretical): The population about whom we wish to draw
conclusions
- Study population: The accessible population that we can identify and contact; access
this population through the sampling frame; if this is systematically different than the
target population, this introduces bias
- Sample: The subset of the study population from whom we actually get data from; if this
is again systematically different than the target population, this introduces bias
- Parameter: Characteristic of interest in the target population
- Statistic: Numerical estimate of the parameter
- Study design error/bias: Systematic difference between sample and population of interest due to study design; can be reduced by random sampling
-
Sampling error: Differences between sample and population of interest introduced by sampling;
due to “noise”/sampling variability; can be reduced by increasing sample size
Describe basic facts about Q fever
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Q Fever (reportable)
- Organism: Coxiella burnetii (obligate intracellular coccobacillus)
- Reservoir: Farm animals (cattle, goats, sheep), pets (cats, rabbits, dogs), wild animals
(mice, birds, coyotes)
- Mode of transmission: Exposure to biological fluids (amniotic fluid, urine, feces, milk)
and placenta of infected animals via direct contact or aerosolization of contaminated
dust; bite of infected ticks (rare)
- Airborne particles may be carried downwind up to 1km, so lack of contact with
animals or ticks does not exclude Q fever
- Can survive on fomites for years (soil, contaminated animal bedding)
- Epidemiology:
- Worldwide occurrence
- CFR (untreated) = <1% (except Q fever endocarditis, which is fatal if untreated)
- Risk factors for acquisition: Veterinarians, farmers, abattoir workers, butchers
- Risk factors for chronic infection: Valvular heart disease, pregnancy, immunocompromise
- Presentation: Wide range of presentations (the lupus of infectious disease? The syphilis
of non-STI infectious disease? The next Lyme disease?)
- Asymptomatic in 60% of cases;
- Acute Q fever: Fever, flu-like symptoms, nonspecific pneumonitis/atypical
pneumonia; usually self-limiting
- Pneumonia (due to aerosol inhalation)
- Hepatitis: Abnormal liver function +/- granulomatous hepatitis
- Chronic Q fever: Endocarditis, neurological syndromes (incl stroke), chronic
hepatitis, vasculitis, pulmonary amyloidosis, and a bunch of other weird stuff
- Post-Q fever fatigue syndrome
- Incubation period: 3-30 days (depends on infectious dose)
- Testing: Serology, PCR
- Case management: Doxycycline (+ hydroxychloroquine for chronic Q fever); TMP-SMX
in kids
- Contact management: Disinfection, PPE, adequate animal disposal, milk pasteurization
- Other: Q-vax vaccine available only in Australia for high-risk individuals
What failure rates of different contraception methods?
What are the 8 core competencies for governmental public health?
Core competencies for public health
- In business, a core competency is the collective learning of an organization delineating
how to organize work to deliver value; what the organization is good at (e.g., H&M’s core
competency is delivery cheap, fast fashion)
- In public health, a core competency is a skill an individual should have to do a particular
job; what an individual should be good at
In 2009, the MOH Competencies Working Group of the Public Health Physicians of Canada
defined the 51 minimum competencies for MOHs in Canada, clustered into 8 domains
(verbatim):
- Foundational Clinical Competencies: MOHs need to draw upon their clinical
knowledge, skills and experience to assess issues and communicate decisions affecting
the health of the public.
- Monitoring and Assessing the Health of the Public: MOHs play a central role in
assessing the health of the public to inform priority setting, program planning, delivery
and evaluation.
- Public Health Consultant: MOHs must exhibit sound evidence-based decision-making
and analytical abilities based on the health needs of the public as a whole, and be able
to make decisions in critical situations in the absence of complete information.
- Investigating and Mitigating Immediate Risks to Human Health: MOHs are
responsible for assessing potential risks to the health of the public and taking whatever
possible steps are necessary to reduce or eliminate that risk.
- Policy, Planning and Program Development: MOHs develop, recommend and
implement public policies in support of improved health, including contributing to the
planning and delivery of public health programs and services.
- Communication, Collaboration and Advocacy for the Public’s Health: MOHs are a
primary source of information on public health matters to a range of audiences and
utilize their knowledge of communities to develop and shape strategies with partners to
mobilize action to identify inequities in health and build healthy public policy to reduce
them.
- Leadership and Management: MOHs champion action to improve and protect the
health of the public in inter-sectoral and organizational settings. Internally, the MOH
promotes a shared vision and purpose to drive action and is able to link today’s work
with long range plans.
- Professional Practice: MOHs fulfill a number of professional roles including educator,
the development and translation of public health knowledge, the maintenance and
improvement of their own expertise in public health practice, and ethical conduct.
The CPSO requires non-PH physicians who are transitioning to a public health role to meet the
PHPC minimum competencies; the Joint Task Group on Public Health Human Resources
highlights MOHs without public health training as a risk to public health
Name 2 consensus-forming techniques.
Making decisions
Steps in group decision-making: Discuss, Debate, Decide, Do:
- Discuss: Propose options
- Debate: Identify preferred options and evaluate them
- Decide: Choose one option
- Do: Implement the option (note: implementation prevents those who oppose the plan
from circling back to “discuss”)
Participation models (from least to most participatory):
- Team leader decides and informs the team
- Team leader gathers input from team and then decides
- Consensus with fallback (team leader chooses a course of action that is pursued if the
team is unable to make a decision)
- Consensus; formal consensus techniques include:
- Nominal group technique:
1. Generate ideas: Moderator defines the problem. Participants
independently write down their proposed solutions.
2. Record ideas: Participants read their proposed solutions and moderator
records them.
3. Discuss ideas: One by one, each proposed solution is discussed.
4. Vote: Moderator establishes criteria for determining which solution is
preferred. Each participant votes for a solution via rank-order ballot.
- Delphi method: Repeated rounds of anonymous questionnaires sent to a panel
of experts; anonymous results of the previous questionnaire are provided to the
panel between each round; individuals can change their answers in light of this
new information
- Team leader delegates decision to team members
Four frame model: Describes the frames through which different people view the organization;
understanding how other people view problems/solutions allows for more productive decisionmaking
- Structural: The organization is a machine governed by policies (e.g., people use
evidence to determine what the best solution is); conflict is resolved by authority
- Human resources: The organization is a family governed by relationships (e.g., people
use the best outcomes for employees to determine what the best solution is); conflict
resolved through relationships
- Political: The organization is a cut-throat environment governed by power struggles
(e.g., people use the best outcomes for their ascension up the organizational hierarchy
to determine what the best solution is); conflict resolved through bargaining or
manipulation
- Symbolic: The organization is a theatre governed by rituals (e.g., people use what will
best fit the narrative of the organization to determine what the best solution is); conflict
resolved by negotiating shared meanings
Define community engagement.
What are levels of public engagement?
What are principles of public engagement?
What are steps in the process of public engagement?
Definition: Process of developing relationship between a community and an organization to identify a shared vision; wide spectrum of community engagement, but the goal is to collaboratively develop solutions acceptable to the community for community-identified needs
Planned two-way discussions with individuals, organizations, or groups, external to the Government of Canada, designed to:
- gather input,
- clarify information and
- foster understanding among those interested and affected by an issue, decision or action and to
- better inform HC and PHAC’s decision-making.
Levels of community engagement:
- Information giving (INFORM)
- Community consultation (LISTEN)
- Community involvement (DISCUSS)
- Devolved responsibility (DIALOGUE)
Principles of public engagement: mnemonic OI-TT-RR
- Open and Inclusive
- Timely and Transparent
- Relevant and Responsive
Steps:
Step 1 Planning
Step 2 Developing Products
Step 3 Implementing
Step 4 Analysis & Reporting
Step 5 Evaluating
Define critical theory and constructivism.
Name 3 qualitative analytic approaches.
What are some qualitative sampling strategies (6)?
What are some qualitative data collection strategies (4)?
What are criteria on which to appraise qualitative methods (4)?
Qualitative methods
Philosophical paradigms
- Critical theory: “Multiple truths exist, and they are influenced by power relations among people”
- Constructivism: “Multiple truths are constructed by and between people”
(Some) analytical approaches
Phenomenology
- Origins: European philosophy
- Truth: Subjective, knowable only through experience
- Central question: How do people make meaning of their lived experience?
- Product: A description of themes of experiences of the phenomenon of interest
- Prostate cancer screening example: How do primary care providers experience
uncertainty in clinical decision-making related to prostate cancer screening within the
larger context of the doctor-patient relationship?
Discourse analysis
- Origins: Linguistics
- Truth: Structured by shared language
- Central question: How is language used to achieve particular personal, social, or political
ends?
- Product: Description of how language is used to shape and negotiate identities and
relationships
- Prostate cancer screening example: How are primary care providers roles constructed
and negotiated in interactions with patients regarding prostate cancer screening?
Grounded theory
- Origin: Sociology
- Truth: Negotiated through social interactions
- Central question: How can we explain a particular social process?
- Product: An explanatory theory* that captures the range of participant experiences of a
phenomenon
- Prostate cancer screening example: What circumstances lead to prostate cancer
screening discussions in primary care settings?
Thematic analysis
Content analysis
Ethnography
- *Qualitative sampling strategies**
- “Typical case” sampling: Sampling the usual cases of a phenomenon
- “Deviant case” sampling: Sampling the most extreme cases of a phenomenon
- Critical case sampling: Sampling cases that are predicted to be particularly illuminating, based on theory or previous research
- Maximum-variation sampling: Sampling as wide a range of perspectives as possible to capture the broadest set of experiences
- Confirming-disconfirming sampling: Sampling cases whose perspectives are likely to confirm or challenge the researcher’s understanding of the phenomenon
- Theoretical sampling: Sampling cases whom the researchers predict would add new perspectives to those already represented in the sample
- Snowballing, convenience
- *Data collection strategies**
- Individual interviews: Structured, unstructured, semi-structured, in-depth
- Group interviews: Focus groups, consensus panel, natural group, community interview
- Observation: Participant observation, non-participant observation
- Documents: Text (media articles, research articles, diaries, etc.), photographs, videos
Describe basic facts about tetanus
Organism, Reservoir, Mode of transmission
Incubation period, infectious period
Epidemiology
Presentation, Testing
Case management, Contact management
+/- Immunization
Tetanus (reportable)
- Organism: Clostridium tetani spore neurotoxins
- Reservoir: Soil
- Mode of transmission: Wound contaminated with soil, feces, or dust; *noncommunicable
- Epidemiology:
- Exists worldwide in soil and animal intestinal tracts
- Case-fatality rate = 10-80% (highest in the elderly and infants)
- Maternal and neonatal tetanus still occurs in 18 countries; eliminated in Canada
- Approximately 4 cases/year of tetanus in Canada
- Presentation: Muscle spasms, usually beginning in the jaw and then descending
- Pathophys: Spores → wound → germination (requires an anaerobic environment,
like a necrotic wound) → neurotoxin production
- Maternal tetanus: Tetanus occurring during pregnancy or within 6 weeks of the
end of pregnancy
- Neonatal tetanus: Tetanus occurring within the first 28 days of life
- Incubation period: 3-21 days
- Testing: Clinical diagnosis
- Case management: IM injections of TIg (neutralizes circulating toxin but has no effect on
toxin already fixed to nerves), aggressive wound care, antibiotics, antispasmodics,
tetanus vaccination
- Contact management (wound PEP):
- For clean, minor wounds: Vaccine for unimmunized, underimmunized, unknown
immunization status, or last booster > 10 years age (no vaccine if fully immunized
and last vaccine < 10 years ago)
- For other wounds: Vaccine + TIg for unimmunized, underimmunized, unknown
immunization status; vaccine alone if last booster > 5 years ago (no vaccine if
fully immunized and last vaccine < 5 years ago)
- Vaccine: Childhood series (4 doses) + adult boosters q 10 years
What entities make the decision to implement vaccination programs in Canada?
Decision to implement a program: Made by P/T health ministries,
Describe 10 Canadian data sources for surveillance or population health assessments.
Examples of data sources for surveillance or population health assessment:
-
Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS): National cross-sectional survey of 3-79
year olds that collects information through household interview and physical health
measures (e.g., spirometry, audiometry, height, weight, muscle strength, blood and urine
testing) in a mobile clinic (similar to NHANES) - Excludes the territories, persons living on reserves, full-time Canadian Forces
members, institutionalized persons, and persons in some remote areas - Questionnaire administered via computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI)
-
Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS): National cross-sectional survey of those
12 years and older that collects self-reported health status, healthcare utilization, and
health determinants data - Excludes persons living on reserves, full-time Canadian Forces members,
institutionalized persons, and persons living in certain Quebec health regions - Questionnaire administered via computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI)
- Core questions remain stable, but each cycle has a different Rapid Response
module that is developed to answer specific questions about an emerging issues;
provinces and territories may also choose to add content collected only in their
region - Easier and cheaper to administer than the CHMS, but tends to underestimate
prevalence of obesity -
Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Survey (CTADS): National cross-sectional
survey of 15-24 year-olds that collects self-reported data on tobacco, alcohol, and drug
use and related behaviours and harms - Excludes the territories and institutionalized persons
- Questionnaire administered via computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI)
- CTADS replaced the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS) and
Canadian Alcohol and Drug Use Monitoring Survey (CADUMS) in 2013 - Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Survey: Survey of students in grade
6-12 (grades 6 to secondary V in Quebec) about tobacco, alcohol, and drug use - Previously called the Youth Smoking Survey
-
Census: Mandatory collection of demographic data from all Canadian households once
every five years (with the disappointing exception of 2011, when the voluntary National
Household Survey replaced the Long-form Census for a single data collection period) -
Discharge Abstract Database (DAD): CIHI database containing administrative, clinical,
and demographic information on individuals discharged from all acute care hospitals in
Canada, excluding Quebec (deaths, sign-outs, and transfers; excludes stillbirths and
cadaveric donors) - Hospital Morbidity Database (HMDB): DAD + data received by CIHI (Canadian Institute for Health Information) from the Quebec ministere de la santé et des services sociaux
-
First Nations Regional Health Survey (RHS): Administered by First Nations
Information Governance Centre; survey of First Nations persons on reserve and in
northern regions -
National Ambulatory Care Reporting System: CIHI database containing presenting
complaint and discharge diagnosis information on day surgery, outpatient, and
emergency department visits from participating hospitals (data collected varies
depending on facility) -
Vital statistics: Administrative survey that collects all birth, stillbirth, death information
once per year from all P/T registries; the Canadian Vital Statistics system operates
under an agreement between that Government of Canada and the P/Ts - Other health-related Statistics Canada surveys:
Canadian Cancer Registry,
Canadian Coroner and Medical Examiner Database,
Community Noise and Health Study,
Canadian Survey on Disability,
Longitudinal and International Study of Adults.
Describe the epidemiology of chicken-associated illnesses in Canada and available public health interventions
Chicken and egg (and general bird) hygiene
What?
- Salmonella and Campylobacter are commensal bacteria in chickens
- Salmonella enteritidis can infect chicken’s ovaries, leading to yolk contamination (i.e.,
not all eggs have sterile yolks)
- Cooking eggs until the yolk is firm destroys bacteria
Epidemiology
- National prevalence of Salmonella in broiler chickens in Canada = 25.6% (most common
in Ontario)
- National prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler chickens in Canada = 24.1% (most
common in BC)
- National prevalence of Salmonella in fecal and eggbelt samples of commercial eggproducing
chickens in Canada = 52.9%
Interventions
- Vaccinate laying flocks against Salmonella; this approach is used in most of Europe; if
applied in Canada, it would reduce egg-associated illnesses to 4% of baseline
- Test flocks for Salmonella and divert eggs from contaminated flocks
- Use pasteurized egg products (the US CSC recommends that pasteurized egg products
be used for allrecipes requiring raw or lightly cooked eggs, like hollandaise sauce,
Caesar salad dressing, tiramisu, and egg nog)
- Wash egg shells (this is what Canada, the US, Japan, Australia, and the Scandinavian
countries do now, unlike the rest of the world) → this reduces egg shell contamination,
but washing removes a natural egg coating, making the egg shell more porous, requiring
continuous refrigeration for its entire shelf life (unwashed eggs can be stored at room
temperature)
- But don’t wash your chicken
- Cook unpasteurized eggs until the egg white and yolk are both firm (public health ruins
everyone’s fun)
How to choose which non-parametric statitistical tests to use?
Describe key food preparation and storage instructions to prevent foodborne illnesses
Food preparation and storage
- 4 elements of safe food handling: cook, chill, separate, clean
- “Danger zone” = 4 C to 60 C
- Keep foods out of the danger zone while preparing dishes by preparing food in small batches, using pre-chilled ingredients, or putting ice packs on food
-
Cool cooked foods to less than 20 C within 2 hours and to less than 4 C within 4 hours
- Cooling food too slowly is one of the leading causes of foodborne illness - Frozen = - Refrigerator and cold holding = <4 C (slows most microbial growth, although refrigeration provides the optimum growth temperature for L. monocytogenes and Y. enterocolitica)
- Cooked = > 74 C (lower for whole cuts of red meat and fish)
- _Hot holding = > 60 C (room temperature holding is acceptable if displayed for < 2h)
- *Cannot re-heat food in a hot holding unit_
- Food preservation methods: dehydration, temperatures, preservatives, canning, fermantation, irradiation
Blanching: Heats food prior to preservation to reduce microbial population on the surface of the food
- Canning: Seal in a container after sterilization; preservation to prevent microbial growth
- Water bath vs. high pressure canning
- Unlike most pathogenic bacteria, C. botulinum grows best in higher pHs, so highly acidic foods (e.g., tomatoes) are preferred for canning
- Drying, low acidity, high sugar, nitrates, high sodium can reduce microbial growth (consider risk vs. benefit, e.g., nitrates reduce botulism but is a carcinogen; sodium reduces listeria growth but increases hypertension)
- Most pathogenic bacteria reproduce best in a pH between 2 to 7 (most foods fall in that range)
- Bacteria cannot grow in dry foods, but they can survive (sodium, freezing, dehydrating, sugar reduce the amount of water available to bacteria)
- High-protein foods (e.g., meat, dairy) are highly nutritious for bacteria and support high levels of growth
- Irradiation: Application of ionizing radiation to food to prevent microbial growth; low doses do not affect taste or texture (currently only applied to onions, potatoes, wheat, flour, spices, dehydrated seasonings in Canada)
- Sanitization:
- Always clean before sanitizing
- Triple sink: Wash, rinse, sanitize
- Double sink: Wash and rinse, sanitize (only acceptable in establishments that prepare small amounts of food or usually use a mechanical dishwasher)
- Mechanical dishwasher
- Sanitize food contact surfaces with hot water (>77 C), quaternary ammonia, iodophors, or chlorine for at least 45 s - Other considerations:
- Hand hygiene - Garbage disposal
- Pest control (e.g., cockroaches, flies, rodents)
- Ventilation
- Water source
- Food storage
Describe steps in the development of a health public policy?
Policy development
PHO rational health public policy development model similar to the APIE model for program development.
ASSESS
1. Describe the problem: Cause, impact, perception (who else thinks this is a problem?),
possible solutions
2. Assess readiness for policy development: Community and organization
PLAN
3. Develop goals, objectives, and policy options (putting forward multiple policy options
demonstrates flexibility to stakeholders)
4. Identify decision-makers and influencers
5. Build support for the policy: Strategies might include negotiation, information sharing,
public briefs, letter-writing
6. Draft and/or revise the policy
IMPLEMENT
7. Implement the policy
EVALUATE
8. Evaluate and monitor the policy
Name 2 subcutaneous vaccines
Measles
YF
Can 2 live vaccines be given at the same time?
- Timing/interference: Live vaccines and TB skin tests must be given at the same time or
at least 28 days apart
What is EVALI or VALI?
What has been associated with the recent US outbreak of EVALI?
What are the risk communication messages related to vaping?
Vaping-associated lung illness
The Government of Canada continues to investigate vaping-associated lung illness, also known as severe pulmonary illness associated with vaping. Vaping is the act of inhaling and exhaling an aerosol produced by a vaping product, such as an electronic cigarette.
Vaping does have risks and the potential long-term health effects of vaping remain unknown.
Evidence from the recent US outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, associated lung injury (EVALI) suggests a strong association with vitamin E acetate, which is used as a cutting agent in illegal and unregulated THC-containing vaping products. In Canada, most cases of vaping associated lung illness do not appear to have been associated with the use of THC-containing products. The cause or causes of cases in Canada is still under investigation.
Canadians concerned about the health risks related to vaping should consider refraining from using vaping products. Youth, persons who are pregnant, and those who do not currently vape should not vape.
Vaping products may contain dozens of chemicals. Most vaping substances available for sale are flavoured and contain nicotine. Canadians should not use vaping products obtained illegally, including any vaping products that contain cannabis.
Risk comm messages:
If you do not vape, do not start.
Non-smokers, people who are pregnant, and youth should not vape.
If you do vape, do not:
use vaping products that have been obtained from illegal or unregulated sources, including any products that contain cannabis, as they are not subject to any control or oversight and may pose additional risks to your health and safety
modify vaping products or add substances to products that are not intended by the manufacturer
return to smoking cigarettes if you are vaping nicotine-containing products as a means of quitting cigarette smoking
Situation in Canada:
In Canada, as of August 14, 2020, 20 cases of vaping-associated lung illness have been reported to the Public Health Agency of Canada from Alberta (1), British Columbia (5), New Brunswick (2), Newfoundland and Labrador (1), Ontario (5), and Quebec (6). No deaths have been reported.
Case definition:
To be considered a case of vaping-associated lung illness, the following criteria must be met:
symptoms such as shortness of breath, cough, chest pain, with or without diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, or fever
negative results on tests for a lung infection or, if a lung infection cannot be ruled out, a determination by the patient’s physician/clinical team that the lung infection is not the sole cause of the patient’s symptoms
abnormalities on x-ray or other imaging technology compatible with vaping-associated lung illness
a history of vaping or dabbing in the 90 days prior to symptom onset
no evidence in medical records of alternative plausible diagnoses
The difference between a confirmed case and a probable case is:
in a confirmed case, lung infection has been ruled out
in a probable case, a lung infection could not be ruled out but the physician/clinical team caring for the patient believes it is not the sole cause of the illness
What is the difference between vaccine efficacy and vaccine effectiveness?
- Vaccine efficacy: Percent reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group
compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions - Vaccine effectiveness: Ability of vaccine to prevent outcomes of interest in the real
world
What is the life expectancy at birth in Canada?
Life expectancy:
- Canada, overall (2015-17) = 82.1 years
- Canada, men (2015-17) = 80.0 years
- Canada, women (2015-17) = 84.1 years
- First nations, men 73, female 78
- Inuit, men 64, female 73
- World, overall (2019) = 73.3 years
- World, men (2019) = 70.8 years
- World, women (2019) = 75.9 years
What are public health interventions to reduce the risk of pool-associated infections?
Public health interventions - **Pool hygiene education**: Don’t swim when you have diarrhea, wash your hands after using the toilet or changing diapers, check children's’ swim diapers every 30-60 min, don’t swallow pool water, rinse in the shower before entering the pool - **Pool operator education and regulation**: Maintain proper disinfection level and pH; recognize and manage fecal incidents - **Testing**: If pH, chlorine residual, and maintenance are within normal limits, lab testing is not required (and may be misleading, as E. coli is very chlorine-sensitive and will not usually be detected even if there is a problem; Pseudomonas is a better indicator of pool health); biological testing is only required in outbreak situations
What are biases and mitigation strategies related to pre-post evaluation designs?
Potential sources of bias: selection/assignment, natural history, regression to the mean, test–retest, maturation, observer, retrospective, Hawthorne, measurement, attrition, and reporting/publication bias.
Mitigating strategies: using a control group, blinding, matching before and after cohorts, minimizing the time lag between cohorts, using prospective data collection with consistent measuring/ reporting criteria, time series data collection, and/or alternative study designs, when possible
Define OneHealth
OneHealth
- OneHealth: Approach that addresses the health of humans, animals, and the
environment simultaneously, acknowledging that the health of one impacts on the health
of the others (e.g., 60% of infectious diseases in humans are zoonoses)
- Zooeyia: Benefits of animals on health (the inverse of zoonosis)
Name study reporting standards (3).
Name study critical appraisal tools (4).
Name biases associated with the publication process (5).
What are funnel plots and forrest plots?
Publication reporting requirements
- STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE):
Instrument to standardize the reporting of observational studies (cohort, case-control,
and cross-over)
- Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND):
Instrument to standardize the reporting of nonrandomized controlled trials (similar to
CONSORT)
- Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Evidence-based instrument to
standardize the reporting of randomized trials
Biases associated with the publishing process
- Publication bias: Papers with significant positive results are more likely to be submitted
and accepted for publication
- Tower of Babel bias: Papers with significant positive results are more likely to be
published in a major journal written in English
- Database bias: Papers with significant positive results are more likely to be published
in a journal indexed in a literature database, especially in low- and middle-income
countries
- Citation bias: Papers with significant positive results are more likely to be cited by other
authors
- Multiple publication bias: Papers with significant positive results are more likely to be
published multiple times
- *Critical appraisal:** The systematic evaluation of a study in order to determine if:
1. The study addresses a clearly defined question;
2. The study uses valid methods to address the question;
3. The study results are important; and
4. The study results are applicable to a particular population of interest
Critical appraisal tools
- A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR): Instrument for
assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP): Instruments to assess the methodological
quality of systematic reviews, qualitative studies, RCTs, case-control studies, cohort
studies, economic evaluations, and clinical prediction tools
- Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II (AGREE II): Instrument for
assessing the methodological quality of guideline development
- Jadad scale: Instrument to assess the methodological quality of a clinical trial
Systematic review and meta-analysis
- Narrative review: Descriptive summary of an author’s knowledge of a topic, usually
supported by a non-systematic literature search
- Scoping review: Multiple definitions; often refers to a systematic identification and
summary of research on a topic, without extensive critical appraisal; used for broader
questions than systematic reviews for which multiple study designs are helpful to
consider
-
Systematic review: Systematic identification and critical appraisal of all research on a
specific topic; to avoid bias, systematic reviews must state objectives, materials, and
methods; and follow an explicit and reproducible methodology (however, systematic
reviews are vulnerable to publication bias) -
Funnel plot: Scatter plot of each of the estimated effects for the trials identified
by a systematic review horizontal axis against the standard error of the estimated
effect on the vertical axis (inverted axis, with 0 at the top); if there is no reporting
bias, the funnel plot should be symmetrical around the total overall estimated
effect (formal statistical test to detect asymmetry is called Egger’s test) -
Meta-analysis: Quantitative summary of multiple studies; most commonly, systematic
review is used to identify the studies included in a meta-analysis -
Forest plot (aka blobbogram): Graphical display of the results of a metaanalysis;
shows the point estimates and confidence intervals of each included
study as well as the whole meta-analysis
What HIV test is available for point of care testing in Canada?
Point-of-care testing (POCT) (hot topic): HIV testing for which results are available in
the same visit; tests for antibodies to HIV, rather than the presence of the virus itself
(INSTI HIV-1/HIV-2 Antibody Test is the only POCT approved in Canada); generally
preferred to traditional testing by individuals wishing to be tested and increases uptake
of testing; reduces barrier in traditional testing that individuals must return 1-2 weeks
later for results
- Window period: Period of up to 3 months during which a person can be HIV+
without detectable antibodies to HIV (POCT will be falsely negative during this
time); if individual is in the window period and the test is negative, recommend
confirmatory testing
- POCT is a screening, rather than a diagnostic, test; positive tests require
confirmatory testing
- INSTI HIV-1/HIV-2 Antibody Test sensitivity = 99.6%; specificity = 99.3
Define cognitive bias and give examples.
A cognitive bias is a systematic error in thinking that occurs when people are processing and interpreting information in the world around them and affects the decisions and judgments that they make.
- Anchoring: Failing to change your first impression when new evidence is presented
- Status quo: Failing to consider options other than the status quo
- Sunk cost: Pursuing a less-desirable option because it’s already been paid for
- Confirming evidence: Seeking out evidence that supports a preferred option
- Excessive prudence: Acting in an overly-cautious manner
- Overconfidence: Assuming that you understand all the possible options/scenarios
- Recallability/salience: Assuming that the current scenario is the same as the last worst case