Effect of Misrepresentation Flashcards

1
Q

Long v Lloyd

A

Lorry was sold on the premise that it was in excellent condition, it was not, seller offered to pay half of the repair costs, buyer accepted affirming the contract. When the lorry later broke down he could not then rescind the contract, election of affirmation is irrevocable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Clarke v Dickson

A

Shares in a mine, contract could not be rescinded as once mined, the materials could not be put back into the earth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Leaf v International Galleries

A

Rescission can be barred due to lapse of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phillips v Brooks

A

Rogue buyer cases - if rights to property have passed on to third party the property cannot be recovered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Derry v Peek

A

Defendants honestly believed statement, no fraudulent mishap.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Doyle v Olby

A

Damages in contract are limited to those that are reasonably foreseeable, tort is not so limited, defendant should make reparation for all actual damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hedley Byrne v Heller

A

Damages can be granted for negligent misstatement where (1) representor owed duty of care, (2) the duty was negligently breached, and (3) the breach caused foreseeable loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Howard Marine and Dredging v Ogden and Sons

A

2 documents made different claims about capacity of barge, owner was liable for misrepresentation for stating the capacity listed in one document as he had no reasonable grounds for believing it as opposed to the second document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Royscott Trust v Rogerson

A

Court held that under s2(1) damages are calculated like damages in tort, not damages in contract law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

William Sindall v Cambridge County Council

A

Obiter Dicta said that they would have awarded damages under s2(2) instead of rescission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Car and Universal Finance v Caldwell

A

C sold his car to a rogue, cheque used to pay bounced. He contacted the police and the AA in an effort to recover the car. The rogue sold the car on but C had done all he could to communicate rescission before this sale, so it was not valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly