Educational Policy and Inequality Flashcards
What act brought in the Tripartite system ?
The 1944 education act brought in the Tripartite system
What is the Tripartite system ?
The tripartite system was where children were selected and allocated to one of the three different types of secondary schools , according to their abilities which were defined by the 11+ exam.
What were the 3 types of schools in the Tripartite system ?
Grammar schools - offered an academic curriculum and access to non manual jobs and higher education . they were for pupils with academic ability who passed the 11+ exam and were mostly middle class.
Secondary modern schools - offered a non academic , practical curriculum and access to manual work for pupils who failed their 11 + exam . These pupils were mainly working class.
-Technical schools - They were intended to focus on ‘technical’ subjects such as mechanics and engineering, and prepare students to work in related trades. However, while grammar schools and secondary moderns were rolled out nationwide, there were significantly fewer technical schools.
How did the tripartite system fail its aim of promoting meritocracy ?
Thus , rather than promoting meritocracy , the tripartite system and 11+ reproduced class inequality by channeling the 2 social classes into 2 different types of schools that offered unequal opportunities.
How did the tripartite system reproduce gender inequality ?
The tripartite system also reproduced gender inequality by requiring girls to gain higher marks than boys in the 11+ exam to obtain a grammar school place.
When was the comprehensive school system introduced ?
The comprehensive school system was introduced in 1965.
What was the aim of the 1965 comprehensive school system ?
The 1965 comprehensive school system aimed to overcome the class divide of the tripartite system and make education more meritocratic
What did the 1965 comprehensive school system do to meet their aims of overcoming the class divide of the tripartite system and make education more meritocratic ?
The 1965 comprehensive school system abolished the 11+ exam , along with grammars and secondary modern schools , which were replaced with comprehensive schools that all pupils within the area could attend.
What is a comprehensive school ?
A comprehensive school is a school that all pupils within that area could attend regardless of their ability.
Why do grammar and secondary modern schools still exist in some areas ?
It was left to the local education authority to decide whether to go comprehensive and not all did so. As a result , grammar and secondary modern schools still exist in many areas.
Why do Functionalists like comprehensive schools ?
Functionalists like comprehensive schools because they promote social integration by bringing children of different social classes together in one school.
How does Ford criticize the functionalist view that comprehensive schools promote social integration by bringing children of different social classes together ?
Ford found little social mixing between working and middle class pupils in a comprehensive school and this was largely because of streaming.
How do Functionalists see the comprehensive school system as more meritocratic compared to tripartite systems ?
Functionalists see the comprehensive system as more meritocratic because it gives pupils a longer period in which to develop and show their abilities ,unlike the tripartite system which sought to select most able pupils at the age of 11.
How do Marxists argue that comprehensive schools are not meritocratic ?
Marxists argue that comprehensive schools are not meritocratic . Rather they reproduce class inequality from one generation to the next through the continuation of the practice of streaming and labelling which continue to deny working class children equal opportunity.
How can the myth of meritocracy be applied to comprehensive schools according to marxists ?
Yet by not selecting children at 11 , comprehensives may appear to offer equal chances to all but this is the myth of meritocracy because it justifies class inequality by making unequal achievement seem fair and just because failure is the fault of the individual rather than the education system as have had more chance to show their ability
What is meant by the term marketisation ?
Marketisation refers to the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition between suppliers into areas run by the state such as education. . Marketisation has created an education market
What are the 2 ways that marketisation has created an education market ?
-Reducing direct state control over education
-increasing both competition between schools and parental choice of schools.
Why do New right favour marketisation ?
New right favour marketisation because they argue that marketisation means that schools have to attract customers (parents) by competing with each other in the market. Schools that provide customers with what they want such as success in exams will thrive but those that don’t will go out of business.
What are some policies that help to promote marketisation ?
-Publication of league tables and Ofsted inspections reports that rank each school according to its exam performance and gives parents the information that they need to chose the right school
-Business sponsorship of schools
-Open enrolment , allowing successful schools to recruit more pupils
-specialist schools , specialising in IT, languages etc which widens parental choice
-Formula funding , where schools receive the same amount of funding for each pupil
-Schools being allowed to opt out of local authority control eg to become academies
-Schools having to compete to attract pupils
-Introduction of tuition fees for higher education.
-Allowing parents and others to set up free schools
What does David see marketised education as , how does this benefit the education system ?
David describes marketised education as a parentocracy (rule by parents ) because power is shifted away from the teachers and schools and to the consumers - the parents . They claim this encourages diversity among schools , gives parents more choice and raises standards
How do Ball and Whitty criticise marketisation of education ?
Ball and Whitty despite the claimed benefits of marketisation argue that it has increased inequalities . For example , ball and Whitty Note how marketisation policies such as exam league tables and the funding formula reproduce class inequalities by creating in equalities between schools
What are 2 things that Bartlett argues publication of good league tables leads to ?
-cream skimming - good schools can be more selective , chose their own customers and recruit high achieving , mainly middle class pupils and as a result these pupils gain an advantage
-Silt shifting — good schools can avoid taking less able pupils who are likely to get poor results and damage the schools league table position.