Education, work and labour relations 1960-79 Flashcards
What were some point for comprehensive education?
- The grammar schools had 3 times the resources of a secondary modern school.
- Many secondary modern schools were already shut down by the 1960’s.
- Pupils who failed the ‘eleven plus’ exam had a life with fewer opportunities. Only 2% who failed it stayed in school until 17.
- Very few pupils from working-class families failed, only favouring middle-class.
- The majority of the public didn’t like the ‘eleven plus’ exam.
What were some points against comprehensive education?
- Many grammar schools produced highly successful students.
- Grammar schools were a precious opportunity for poor families for social advancement.
- In 1975 the, the government forced direct grant grammar schools to go comprehensive. Many went independent but this resulted in high fees and poor families being unable to afford them.
- There was less social equality due to rise of private schools instead of grammar schools.
- The majority of the public wanted to keep grammar schools.
How many students went comprehensive from 1970-1979?
1970 = 33% 1974 = 62% 1979 = 90%
What type of people would support comprehensive schooling?
Middle-class parents and teachers’ unions
What did James Callaghan do in 1976?
He emphasised free and comprehensive schooling for all and the government had passed he Education act. This shows how education should be based on selection by the ‘eleven plus’ exam.
How many grammar schools were left in 1979?
150
Many students went to university in 1970 compared to 1960?
1960 = 5% 1970 = 9%
What did the Education act in 1972 do?
Raise the leaving age from 15 to 16.
What was introduced in 1965?
CSE, which was seen as a second-class qualification.
How many students took O-levels before 1965’s CSE was introduced?
20%
What is the difference between ‘blue-collar’ work and ‘white-collar’ work?
‘Blue-collar’ work was jobs in industry and manufacturing (this decreased in the 1960’s), whilst ‘white-collar’ work was jobs in offices or in the service sector (this increased in the 1960’s).
Why did ‘blue-collar’ work decrease?
- Britain industrialised (no need for men to do the dirty jobs).
- There were more foreign competition for British manufacturers due to the loss of the empire (1947-1963).
- Britain had large and powerful Trade-Unions, which meant the prices were higher, making products uncompetitive.
- Britain preferred to preserve jobs and they had made full employment their top priority in their economic policies.
Why did ‘white-collar’ work increase?
- High disposable incomes fuelled the demand for goods and services, which had previously been unaffordable, creating more jobs.
- There were a lot more public sector jobs as governments increased spendings on services like health and education.
- It was far more difficult to mechanise ‘white-collar’ jobs than ‘blue-collar’ jobs.
What percentage of the people of England and Wales were employed in services between 1951-1981?
1951 = 45.8% 1961 = 48.8% 1971 = 52.4% 1981 = 60.5%
What percentage of the people of England and Wales were employed in manufacturing between 1951-1981?
1951 = 36.3% 1961 = 36.3% 1971 = 31.7% 1981 = 23.1%
What was the equal pay act?
In 1970, it called for ‘equal pay for equal work’. In remained voluntary until 1975, but 80% of businesses accepted this.
What was the sex discrimination act?
In 1975, this made it illegal to treat other genders less favourable than yours.
What was the employment protection act?
In 1975, this made it illegal to sack women because they were pregnant; it gave them the right to go back to work after birth.
What were some acts that tried to improve relations between employers and employees but failed?
The Industrial Relations act (1971 and 1974), the Trade Union act (1974) and the Employment Protection act (1975).
What was the first successful act that improved working conditions?
The Health and Safety at Work act, in 1974.
What was the ‘thee-day week’?
Between 1971 and 1973, five states of emergency were declared. In February 1972, businesses were forced to use electricity only 3 times per week. This resulted in 800,000 workers being sent home.
What did the government want that may have led to the ‘three-day week’?
- Keep unemployment and inflation low
- Keep spendings on imports lower than profits of exports.
- Maintain law and order.
What did the NUM (National Union of Miners) want that may have led to the ‘three-day week’?
To ensure that their workers’ wages kept up (or exceeded) inflation. They argued that mining is a dirty and dangerous job and should be well-paid.
What could the NUM do to ensure its goals?
- Limit the work they did.
- Go on strike (official or unofficial - forming picket lines to prevent anyone coming in)
- Stop working