Education: Gender and educational achievement Boys’ underachievement Flashcards
Boys in education vs girls
Boys ARE achieving in school – but at a much slower rate to girls
At age 6 – boys are behind girls in reading and writing
Boys are behind girls at GCSE
Boys are more likely to be excluded from school than girls
Reasons why boys underachieve in education
- Poor literacy skills
- Decline in traditional men’s jobs (manufacturing industry)
- Feminisation of education
- Lack of positive male role models
- ‘Laddish’ counter-school subcultures
- Expectations of boys
- Leisure
Poor literacy skills
Boys have poorer literacy and language skills than girls.
Studies show that most of the reading to children at home is done by mothers so the activity becomes associated with femininity. Thus boys reject it. Also, parents spend less time reading to their sons.
C: Dads and sons campaign, National literacy strategy, Reading champions
Decline in traditional men’s jobs (manufacturing industry)
Mitsos and Browne
- Mitsos and Browne claim this has led to a crisis of masculinity – men are unsure of what it is to ‘be a man’.
- Lack of traditional male jobs makes boys believe they will not be able to get a job which leads to a lack of motivation so they give up on trying to get qualifications.
C: Still existence of male dominated jobs which require qualifications
Feminisation of education
Sewell argues that schools do not encourage masculine characteristics such as competitiveness and leadership, instead they encourage traits associated with femininity such as methodical work and attentiveness.
He argues that coursework is a major reason for boys’ underachievement as they tend to lack organisational skills.
C: schools does promote ‘masc’ characteristics by doing competitive activities
Lack of positive male role models
Read for criticism
There is a lack of positive male role models both at home – large numbers of boys are being brought up in the 1.5 million female-headed lone parent families in the UK.
At school, only 16% of primary school teachers are male.
Therefore, boys have no male role models to look up to and whose example they can follow.
Criticism – Read studied primary schools and the way in which both female and male teachers discipline both female and male students. She found that both female and male teachers use the masculine, disciplinarian discourse (explicit discipline, e.g. raised voice) to ensure students behave. This shows that schools have not become feminised. It also shows that both female and male teachers can be authority figures in relation to students
‘Laddish’ counter-school subcultures
Epstien, Francis
Epstein – high achieving working class boys are labelled as ‘swots’ by their peers and tend to be harassed and subjected to homophobic abuse. Francis – boys try to avoid being labelled as ‘swots’ because educational achievement is seen as feminine so they do little or no schoolwork and mess about in lessons.
Expectations of boys
Myhill and Jones
- Teachers are less strict with the boys, they more tolerant of their disruptive behaviour, expect less from them, etc.
At the same time, boys are more disruptive so get sent out of lessons and miss out on learning. - Myhill and Jones – carried out semi-structured interviews with 144 students (in Year 1 – 10) about their perceptions of whether teachers treat boys and girls differently. They found that boys are treated more negatively than girls.
Leisure
Boys’ leisure pursuits such as football and console games do not contribute to developing literacy skills.
On the other hand, girls have a bedroom culture – staying in and talking to friends. This develops communication skills – listening and speaking