Economic Growth vs. sustainable development Flashcards
Key interrelated factors for global growth
- A sharp downturn in car production and sales
- Weak business confidence amid growing tensions between the United States and China on trade and technology
- A slowdown in demand in China, driven by needed regulatory efforts to rein in debt and exacerbated by the macroeconomic consequences of increased trade tensions
Global value chains (GVCs)
powered the surge of international trade after 1990 and now account for almost half of all trade.
- This shift enabled an unprecedented economic convergence: poor countries grew rapidly and began to catch up with richer countries.
Since the 2008 global financial crisis
the growth of trade has been sluggish and the expansion of GVCs has stalled.
- Meanwhile, serious threats have emerged to the model of trade-led growth. - New technologies could draw production closer to the consumer and reduce the demand for labor. - And conflicts among large countries could lead to a retrenchment or a segmentation of GVCs.
Is Globalisation good for growth?
○ Efficiency gains from market forces
○ Comparative advantage and gains from trade
○ Transfer of technology
○ Strong economic growth and rising living standards:
§ in “first era” of globalisation, 1870-1914
§ in post-war globalisation era
Globalisation and inequality
○ Access to global markets provides developing and emerging market economies with opportunity for rapid economic development
○ However, domestic economic policies also need to be supportive of growth and development through:
§ Stable macro policies
§ Investment in infrastructure and education
§ Business climate favourable to enterprise
○ Many Asian countries have followed this model
○ Potential for globalisation to adversely affect lower skilled workers in advanced and developing economies
○ Evidence is mixed (IMF study)
○ Domestic policies can help counter this by:
§ promoting labour and business flexibility
§ targeted policies to raise skill levels among disadvantaged groups
Globalisation and the environment
○ Rising living standards generally associated with local environmental improvement
○ Corporate reputation and responsibility also a countervailing pressure against a “race to the bottom”
○ But global environmental problems present bigger and more complex challenges, especially the issue of climate change
Globalisation has put upward pressure on emissions growth
○ But it has also created greater economic interdependency between nations
○ Recognition of this interdependence can potentially create a political climate of greater international co-operation on major global issues
○ However, national strategies will need to reflect differences in economic development
○ Economic theory and practical experience suggest that globalisation is not inherently in conflict with sustainable development
○ However, the pressures exerted by globalisation have so far been adverse for global emissions growth
○ Significant policy and business actions will therefore be necessary to reconcile a highly integrated global economic system with the transition to a Low Carbon Economy
An aging population reduces growth in developed economies
• Globally, the fastest growing segment of the population will be those aged over 60.
• We are already starting to see this demographic change in emerging markets too.
• The old-age dependency ratio of the E7 has been largely flat over the last 20 years, but it is now starting to rise and is projected by the UN to increase from around 0.1 today to around 0.3 by 2050.
• Longer lives are good news, but an ageing population could impede economic growth.
○ As the working-age proportion of the population falls, the workforce will eventually shrink unless people work for longer, reducing output and productivity.
○ Further, a greater proportion of dependents will put a strain on healthcare services and government resources, as tax revenues fall and pension pay-outs swell.
• In our model, a lower average annual growth rate over the period 2016-2050 is associated with ageing populations.
○ Italy and Japan are projected to have an old-age dependency ratio of around 0.7 by 2050, contributing to them being projected to be two of the slowest growing economies over the next 34 years.
Rising income inequality creates tensions and economic drag
• In both G7 and E7 economies, levels of income inequality – as measured by the Gini coefficient - have risen since 1980.
• For the E7,
○ inequality has risen (particularly in China) but might moderate in future as these countries develop stronger institutions to provide education, healthcare and social security, and as workers are engaged in more valuable employment and gain more bargaining power
§ (as happened in the US and Europe in the period from the 1920s through to the 1970s with the rise of organised labour movements and associated political parties).
○ Inequality is not just a matter of social justice, but can also act as a drag on economic growth.
• Recent research by the IMF (G7) has found that, on average,
○ a one percentage point increase in the income share of the top 20 percent lowers GDP growth by 0.08 percentage point in the following five years.
§ These findings contradict previous thinking that the benefits of growth will trickle down to those at the bottom.
§ In fact, the findings show that a more equal society could increase economic growth, with a one percentage point increase in the bottom 20%’s income share being associated with a 0.38 percentage point increase in growth over the following five years.
§ This may occur through greater standards of living boosting productivity or equality generating the right incentives for individuals and businesses to invest in education and innovation.
§ Greater economic inequality may also lead to social friction and potentially undesirable political outcomes.
Critical policy challenges
- Slow growth of workers’ incomes
- Perceptions of lower social mobility
- Inadequate policy responses to structural economic change
- More meager gains primarily for the relatively well-off
- Lack of fiscal reforms
- Sustainable public finances (budgets and national debt)
- Exposure to critical industries (“too big/important to fail”)
- Need for regulation/deregulation
- Monetary policies
- Self-sufficiency vs. multi-lateralism
Reflection
• With your neighbour(s), discuss the economic patterns, policies and challenges in your respective home countries:
○ How has your country been doing economically in recent years?
○ Are you/people satisfied with the national economic situation? Why?
○ Are you aware of significant policy initiatives to stimulate growth?
○ What do people see as the key economic issues?
○ How is this reflected in public debates and politics?
○ What do you/people think about the role of trade?
○ What do you think will happen to economic growth in your country in the coming years?
Policy makers face a wicked conundrum or the “paradox of growth”
- “No country has ever ended human deprivation without a growing economy. And no country has ever ended ecological degradation with one. Raworth, 2017: 245.
- So how do we end both social deprivation and environmental degradation?
- And what are the implications for economic growth?
Is “eternal” global economic growth possible? And (why) should we care?
• Limits and critiques of solely relying on GDP
○ ‘Quality of life’, ‘utilitarianism’, ‘happiness’
○ No account of depletion and depreciation
○ No account of the distribution of economic welfare across society
• ‘Triple Bottom Line’ (John Elkington)
○ ‘Three Pillars’ of economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity
• ‘Prosperity without Growth’ (Tim Jackson)
○ building a sustainable macro-economy
○ protecting capabilities for flourishing
○ respecting ecological limits
Are there alternative measures of development?
• UNDP - United Nations Development Programme
○ One of the more important achievements of the human development approach, as embodied in successive HDRs, has been to ensure a growing acceptance of the fact that monetary measures, such as GDP per capita, are inadequate proxies of development.
○ The first Human Development Report introduced theHuman Development Index (HDI)as a measure of achievement in the basic dimensions of human development across countries.
“From wealth to wellbeing”
• Using indicators from publicly available sources, we assess country performance for each dimension. The assessment relies on a total of 40 indicators based on the most recently available data.
• “The wealth to well-being coefficient
○ compares a country’s SEDA score for its current level of well-being with the score that would be expected given the country’s GDP per capita
§ and the average relationship between that measure and the worldwide current-level scores of well-being.
§ The coefficient thus provides a relative indicator of how well a country has converted its wealth into the well-being of its population.
§ Countries that have a coefficient greater than 1.0 deliver higher levels of well-being than would be expected given their GDP levels, while those below 1.0 deliver lower levels of well-being than would be expected.”