ECHO- Mitral Regurgitation Flashcards
Differentiate Primary vs Secondary Mitral Valve disease
see pic
Carpentier Classification for Mitral Regurgitation
Type I - normal leaflet motion and position
- Primary: Leaflet perforation, cleft
- Secondary: Atrial MR, Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Type II - excessive leaflet motion - MVP
Type IIIa - restricted leaflet motion in systole and diastole - RHD, mitral annular calcification,, Drug induced MR
Type IIIb - Restricted leaflet motion in systole - Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Examples of type I MR
- annular dilatation, perforation and cleft/indentation of a leaflet.
- endocarditis and iatrogenic MR
two classic subtypes of Type II MR?
MVP and leaflet flail with ruptured chordae.
example of Carpentier type I MR
Primary: leaflet perforation
Secondary: function- annular dilatation
Example of Carpentier type II MR
Prolapse /flail
- Barlow’s Syndrome - multi scallop prolapse
- fibroelastic deficiency - posterior MV leaflet prolapse
What is SAM-mediated MR
- mid to late-systolic timing (matches obstruction
- typically posteriorly directed
- Dynamic: varies with outflow obstruction
Valve hemodynamics for severe MR
- Central jet MR >40% LA or holosystolic eccentric jet MR
- vena contracta ≥ 0.7cm
- Regurgitant volume ≥60ml
- Regurgitant fraction ≥50%
- effective regurgitant orifice ≥ 0.4cm2
angiographic grade 3-4+
in Staging of MR, stage is asymptomatic severe MR. what is the difference between C1 and C2 (in PRIMARY MR)
C1 - LVEF >60% and LVESD <40
C2 - LVEF ≤ 60% and LVSED ≥40
Why classifying MR (Carpentier) is important?
guide for management
Class I Indication for surgery for PRIMARY MR? (AHA and ESC)
- symptomatic severe MR regardless of LV systolic function
- mitral valve repair is preferred over replacement when the anatomic cause of MR is degenerative, if a successful and durable repair is possible
- for asymptomatic severe MR with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤60%, LVSED ≥40mm - Stage C2)
***for stage C1 - Class 2a
***repair of MV for RHD with severe MR - class 2b only
Specific Criteria for CHRONIC severe MR
- Flail leaflet
- Vena contracta of 0.7cm
- PISA radius ≥ 1.0cm at nyquist 30-40 cm/s
- Central large jet > 50% of LA area
- Pulmonary Vein Systolic flow reversal
- Enlarged LV with normal function
***≥4 criteria definitely severe
Specific Criteria for CHRONIC Mild MR
- Small, narrow central jet
- Vena contracta ≤0.3cm
-PISA radius ≤0.3 cm at nyquist 30-40 cm/s - Mitral A wave dominant inflow
- soft or incomplete jet by CWD
- Normal LV and LA size
***≥4 criteria definitely mild
for chronic severe MR, what is the expected mitral inflow pattern?
E wave >1.2 m/s (high E/A ratio) suggests severe MR or restrictive filling
*** A dominant pattern is suggestive of MILD MR
Echo integrative approach for assessment for MR
see pic
for chronic severe MR, what is the expected pulmonary vein doppler findings?
PV systolic reversal
for chronic severe MR, what is the expected CWD?
see pic
*** mid to late systolic MR in MVP or early systolic in secondary MR are considered as non-severe
(in short, NON-HOLOSYSTOLIC JET suggests less severe MR)
Formula for Effective regurgitant orifice
see pic
***use peak velocity
***measure PISA in mid-late systole, close to the peak of T wave
Quantitative doppler in MR: regurgitant volume
see pic
mitral flow/stroke volume
= mitral VTI x mitral annulus area
Aortic flow/stroke volume
= LVOT VTI x aortic annulus area
Quantitative doppler in MR: regurgitant volume
see pic
mitral flow/stroke volume
= mitral VTI x mitral annulus area
Aortic flow/stroke volume
= LVOT VTI x aortic annulus area
Quantitative doppler in MR: Effective orifice orifice
see pic
Class 2a indication for Chronic Secondary MR
- severe MR ( C and D) undergoing CABG
- chronic severe secondary MR related to LVEF <50% who have persistent symptoms while on optimal GDMT for HF (stage D), TEER is reasonable with favorable anatomy (LVEF 20-50%, LVESD ≤70mm and PASP ≤70mmHg)
***if with unfavorable mitral anatomy, MV surgery is Class 2b
hemodynamics with ACUTE severe MR
- reduction of forward SV
- slight reduction in ESV
- increase in EDV
- normal or reduced LA compliance