Easements Flashcards
Three types of express easements
Statute, express grant, express reservation
Five types of implied easements
Common intention, necessity, quasi-easement, estoppel, prescription
Four qualities of an easement (authority)
(Ellenborough Park)
- Must be dominant and subservient land
- Dominant must benefit
- Must be different owners
- except Land Registration Act s 61 - Right must be capable of being granted
Consequences of breaching an easement (+authority)
(Malden Farms - beach path)
- when the subservient owner restricts an easement = nuisnace
- when the dominant owner stretches an easement = trespass
Implied grant of necessity (description + authority)
(Wise - water access)
- when an owner partitions property and neglects to retain a right for themselves
- NS test is ‘practical necessity’
Implied quasi-easement (description + authority)
(Israel - sewage pipes)
- when the seller partitions their property and tries to deny the new owner a right the seller previously enjoyed
Easement by estoppel (description + authority)
(Crab)
- when there is reliance + a broken promise
Easement by prescription (description + authority)
(Armour) - very similar to adverse possession - four requirements (COVC) C - Continuous O - Open V - w/o Violence C - w/o Consent
Statutory provision governing prescriptive easements
Real Property Limitations Act
s 32 - 20 year rule
Land Registration Act
s 74(1) - 20 year requirement
s 74(2) - 10 year recording window
s 75(1) - Can still operate on registered land if adjacent + 20%
s 73 - carries with land even if unrecorded
Full Ellenborough Park test
- Dominant and Servient lands
- Dominant benefits
a. requires proximity but not adjacency
b. utility more than ‘mere enjoyment’ - Dominant and Servient owners different
- Right capable of being grants
a. Grant is not too vague or wide
b. Grant doesn’t amount to full ownership
c. Grantor legally able to do so
Malden Farms
Beach path case: consequences for breach of easement
- Dominant lands stretching = trespass
- Servient lands restricting = nuisance
Wise
Water access case: implied easement of necessity is when a seller forgets to reserve a right for themselves.
- test in NS is ‘practical necessity’
Israel
Sewage partition case: implied quasi-easement is when a seller neglects to grant a right to a buyer which they previously enjoyed.
Crab
Easement by estoppel case
- when there reliance + a broken promise
Armour
Easement by prescription - very similar to adverse possession - Four requirements (COVC) C - Continuous O - Open V - w/o Violence C - w/o Consent