Earth Processes: Tectonic Plates Flashcards
What did Alfred Wegener theorize in 1912?
In 1912, Alfred Wegener theorized that all of the continents had been apart of one big supercontinent, which he called Pangaea
What did Wegener observe in fossils of the same species and mountain chains that supported his theory of Pangaea?
As Wegener did his research, he remembered reading about fossils of the same species being found on different continents. In his mind, the only way this would make since was if the continents were once connected. Wegener also observed similar land formations found across different continents. For example, mountain chains seemed to line up as if the continents were once together
How was Wegener’s theory of Pangaea viewed around 1950? Despite this, which of his ideas was not accepted?
Around 1950, Wegener’s theory of Pangaea was widely accepted, but his explanation on how the continents moved was not. The study of the magnetic properties of different-aged rock, or paleomagnetism, showed a changing north-south orientation. Since this was true of rock from the ocean floor, it suggests that the continents alone were not in motion. A new theory suggested that the continents were part of larger crustal plates. Plate tectonics is the idea that Earth’s outer shell is divided into many plates that glide, or float, over the mantle. Convection in Earth’s mantle causes the plates to move slowly. The plates are pushing and spreading apart in some places, while pulling and moving downward in other places. Thus, the theory of plate tectonics evolved from the theory of Continental drift
What was Wegener’s Theory of Continental Drift? How was it accepted?
Wegener believed the continents slowly drifted apart, or slid across the ocean floor, due to the rotation of the Earth over millions of years. He called this theory, the “Theory of Continental Drift”. Wegener’s ideas were controversial, and not everyone supported him. Many scientists objected to Wegener’s explanation that the continents moved apart.
What were the four pieces of evidence for Wegener’s theory of Continental Drift?
Jigsaw fit, geological fit, glacial deposits, and fossil evidence
How did Wegener’s evidence of a Jigsaw Fit support his theory? What is it?
The eastern coastline of South America and the western coastline of Africa showed the best fit. If matched at a depth of 1,000 meters below sea level, they fit even better. Still, gaps and overlaps existed, which scientists explained as changes that had happened since the split of Pangaea by: • coastal erosion • coastal deposition • rises in sea level • changes in land level
How did Wegener’s evidence of Geological Fit support his theory? What was it?
Wegener found evidence that geological features, such as cratons, were continuous between continents. A craton is the stable interior portion of Earth’s crust that forms the nuclear mass of a continent. Other features, such as rocks, were also continuous across continents. For example, a belt of ancient rocks in Brazil matches a belt of ancient rocks in West Africa.
How did Wegener’s evidence of Glacial Deposits support his theory? What was it?
A few hundred million years ago, glaciers were found across the southern continents. Wegener believed that Antarctica, southern South America, and southern Africa, India, and Australia were all joined around the south polar region. Glacial deposits found on these continents supported this idea.
How did Wegener’s Fossil Evidence support his theory? What was it?
Fossils of the same species have been found on different continents. This was more evidence for Wegener’s theory. He believed the animals could not have found their way from one continent to another over water.
Theory of Continental Drift Definition
The slow drift of continents apart from each other
What had Wegener thought moved the continents? How was this disproven?
Wegener thought that the rotation of Earth created a centrifugal force that caused Pangaea to break apart and move away from the poles. Scientists, however, did some calculations, and most agreed that this centrifugal force would not be enough to move continents
What other proposal did Wegener make to support his theory that the continents drifted across the ocean floor, after being disproven? How was he disproven again? What were some other theories scientists had to explain the evidence for Continental drift?
Wegener also proposed that the gravitational pull of the moon could cause the continents to move. This, too, was shown by scientists to be impossible. Scientists also had other ideas about how to explain some of the evidence for continental drift. Some suggested that animals had moved from one continent to another by land bridges that had since disappeared
What are some examples of new evidence supporting Continental drift?
Seafloor spreading, hotspots, transform faults, and mantle convection
Seafloor Spreading Definition
The formation of new oceanic crust at mid-ocean ridges through the upwelling of magma
Hotspot Definition
A place on Earth’s surface which is fed by underlying mantle that is hotter than surrounding mantle
Transform Fault Definition
A tectonic plate boundary where plates slip past each other
Mantle Convection Definition
Movement in the mantle in which cooler parts move down and warmer parts move up
What is the evidence of Seafloor spreading and how does it support the theory of Continental Drift?
In the early 1960s, Harry Hammond Hess proposed the theory of seafloor spreading to explain how the continents moved. Sonar allowed the ocean floor to be mapped. Undersea mountain ranges called mid- ocean ridges were discovered. Some are as tall as 1.5 km above the seafloor.
Instead of continents floating on Earth’s surface, Hess thought that the continents were part of different tectonic plates and that the plates moved. At the mid-ocean ridges, two tectonic plates move apart. Magma moves up through the mid-ocean ridges and flows out, creating new crust. Old crust is destroyed at the same time new crust is made. The old crust sinks into ocean trenches and melts.
What is the evidence of hotspots, and how does it support the theory of Continental drift?
There were still some unanswered questions about plate tectonics. One major question was why volcanoes could be found far away from plate boundaries. Geophysicist John Tuzo-Wilson proposed the idea of hotspots to explain this in 1963. Hotspots are fixed spots in Earth’s mantle that the tectonic plates move over. These hotspots can form volcanic island chains, such as the Hawaiian Islands.
What is the evidence of transform faults, and how does it support the theory of Continental drift?
Tuzo-Wilson discovered a new type of plate boundary in 1965. Transform faults are also called conservative plate boundaries. At these boundaries, plates slip past each other. These faults connect oceanic ridges to ocean trenches and allow plates to move without oceanic crust being created or destroyed.
What is the evidence of mantle convection, and how does it support the theory of Continental drift?
The most widely accepted cause of plate movement is mantle convection. The mantle is the layer of mostly solid Earth that lies between its inner core and its outer layer, the crust. Movement of heat and material in the mantle is what scientists believe drives the movement of plates. Convection is movement in a gas or liquid in which the cooler parts move down and the warmer parts move up, like how hot magma moves up through mid-ocean ridges. Convection in the mantle is similar to convection of hot water in a teakettle.
What are the three types of plate boundaries and the interactions that occur at them?
- Plates move past each other at transform boundaries
- Plates move away from each other at divergent boundaries
- Plates push against each other at convergent boundaries
What does the theory of plate tectonics describe?
The theory of plate tectonics provides an explanation for the movement of continents and how mountains and volcanoes form. It also explains earthquakes, which happen at transform boundaries, and describes how Earth’s surface has changed over time. This theory developed mostly in the 1900s, as new technologies allowed scientists to collect data that supported many of the parts of the theory of continental drift which led to the theory of plate tectonics
What did Alfred Wegener do in 1915?
In 1915, Alfred Wegener wrote a book about his theory of continental drift
Fossil Definition
Traces or remains of past plant and animals life
What are the different types of fossils?
Mold—An impression in rock created when an organism leaves its shape in mud or other soft material, which then hardens
Cast—The three-dimensional shape of an organism that forms when a mold fills with minerals that later harden
Body Fossil—A part of the organism—bones, teeth, skin—left behind and preserved Petrification—The transformation of an organism into stone when minerals infiltrate and eventually replace its organic material
Amber Encasement—Preservation of a living organism, such as an insect, when it is trapped inside a substance such as tree resin, which later hardens
Carbonization—A thin, dark carbon impression of an organism, such as a leaf, left behind when it is trapped and squeezed between layers of rock
Trace—Preservation of something the animal left behind, such as a footprint or tooth mark
How did fossil evidence from the Mesosaurus fossils support Wegener’s theory?
Mesosaurus was a small reptile that lived in fresh water. Mesosaurus fossils were found in two places—Southern Africa and eastern South America. Because Mesosaurus is a freshwater animal, it does not have the ability to swim across a large body of salt water such as the Atlantic Ocean. Wegener believed the location of the Mesosaurus fossils proved that Africa and South America were once joined. His theory was strengthened by the coastlines of the two continents, which seem to fit together. If that were true, the continents must have moved to their present positions—an ocean apart
Why do the coastlines of Africa and South America not fit exactly?
The coastlines of Africa and South America do not fit exactly. The forces of costal weathering and erosion over millions of years could be part of the cause. The shape of Continental shelves could also affect the way the two continents fit together
How do Continental shelves support Wegener’s theory?
Continental shelves are the areas around continents where the sea is fairly shallow compared to the depths of the open ocean. The edges of Continental shelves extend beyond the coastline. Where the coastline does not fit exactly, the Continental shelves actually fit well, further supporting Wegener’s ideas
How does the fossil evidence from Cynognathus fossils supporting Wegener’s theory?
Like Mesosaurus, fossils of the Cynognathus were also found in South America and Africa. The Cynognathus was a land reptile about three feet in length that lived during the Triassic Period. The areas where fossils of this reptile are found are now separated by miles of ocean
How did fossil evidence from Lystrosaurus fossils support Wegener’s theory?
The Lystrosaurus was another land reptile common during the Triassic period. Fossils from this extinct animal have been found in India, Africa, and even in Antarctica. Aside from being separated by vast oceans today, these areas have very different climates . Wegener reasoned that it is unlikely that Lystrosaurus could live in such different climate zones
How did the fossils of the Svalbard islands, north of Norway, support Wegener’s theory?
Wegener studied fossils found on the Svalbard islands North of mainland Norway. The islands have a harsh, cold climate during much of the year. Interestingly, the fossils Wegener located were of plants native to a much warmer climate. How could fossils of such plants be found North of the Arctic Circle? Wegener’s answer: the Svalbard islands have not always been in their current polar positions. Rather, they were once located where the climate was warmer
How did the fossils of Glossopteris support Wegener’s theory?
The Glossopteris was a fern that grew in subarctic climates.inverstiagtaions show that the fossil left behind by the plant during the Paleozoic era were found in what are now Africa, Australia, India, and South America. Later, an expedition to the South Pole returned with Glossopteris fossils found in Antarctica. The areas where the fossil ferns were found have diverse climates today—not all them hospitable for the plant. Wegener therefore believed these lands were grouped in a common climate region in the distant past
What do the ages of rock along mid-oceanic ridges reveal? What is magnetic normal? What is magnetic reverse? How do the magnetic fields of rock compare?
The ages of rock along mid-oceanic ridges reveal that the sea floor spreads outward from the ridge. As scientists investigated more rocks from the ocean floor, they identified another important source of evidence. The rocks could be placed into categories according to their magnetic field direction. Some rocks had a north-south direction, similar to Earth’s current magnetic field (magnetic normal). Other rocks had magnetic fields oriented in the opposite direction (magnetic reverse). They also discovered magnetic patterns in lava rock found on land
What element in rocks determine their magnetic alignment? How does this work?
As tectonic plates move apart, lava spews out. The iron in lava is magnetic, so its molecules align with Earth’s magnetic field. Over millions of years, layers have been forming as plates diverge, lava disperses, and the lava cools.
How did the differences in the polarity of lava support the theory of plate tectonics?
Through paleomagnetism, the study of ancient magnetic fields, scientists discovered a uniqueness in the polarity of lava. They found that the molecules of newer lava were aligned with the current North and South Poles, while molecules in older layers of lava were skewed. This finding left scientists with two hypotheses to test. Have Earth’s poles drifted? Or have the continents shifted? The hypothesis of Earth’s poles drifting was proven inaccurate because same-age lava found on different continents was not magnetically aligned in the same ways. Through this same finding, scientists determined that the hypothesis that the continents have drifted was accurate. The older layers of lava that appeared skewed were at one time aligned with Earth’s magnetic field. These findings about paleomagnetism are the basis for our understanding of plate tectonics.
What does the magnetic direction of rock depend on?
The magnetic direction of the rocks depend on the direction of Earth’s magnetic field when the rocks formed. Magnetic iron pieces within lava align with the Earth’s magnetic field when the lava cools to form solid rock
How do scientists use the magnetic direction of ancient rocks to explain that the continents have moved over time?
Layers within lava rock have slightly skewed magnetic directions. Scientists conclude that the directions are skewed because the plate on which each rock layer formed was moving relative to Earth’s magnetic field, which remains relatively stable for long time periods. If the plates move, the continents atop them move, too
Remember: Rocks on the ocean floor that record large reversals in Earth’s magnetic field also provide valuable paleomagnetic evidence that supports the tectonic plate theory
Rocks on the ocean floor that record large reversals in Earth’s magnetic field also provide valuable paleomagnetic evidence that supports the tectonic plate theory
Paleomagnetism Definition
The study of ancient magnetic fields
How do maps of the magnetic direction of rocks found at different distances from mid-oceanic ridges help scientists draw conclusions?
When scientists construct maps showing the magnetic direction of rocks found at different distances from mid-oceanic ridges, they find patterns of irregular, alternating magnetic stripes. The stripes are mirror images on either side of the ridge. Scientists use the pattern to determine how fast new rock is forming at the ridge, as well as how fast landforms supported by the plate move along Earth’s surface
What is the difference between the magnetic North Pole and the geographic North Pole?
The geographic North Pole and the magnetic North Pole are not in the same place. The geographic North Pole is a fixed location on the planet. The magnetic North Pole is the place where a compass points towards north. Recently, the magnetic North Pole has been moving rapidly toward Siberia at a rate of more than 48 km (30 mi) a year. Scientists keep track of the location in the World Magnet Model which is used to correct GPS systems used by navigators
How can scientists use each magnetic stripe along the ocean floor to measure time?
Magnetic stripping patterns help scientists measure the rate of tectonic plate growth and motion. The approximate dates when Earth’s magnetic poles reversed can be determined by using other geologic evidence. As a result, scientists can use each magnetic stripe along the floor as a measure of time
Approximately, how much time passed between the last pole reversal and the one before it. What does the time required to form the magnetic stripes that correspond to these pole reversals equate to?
Scientists know that the last pole reversal was approximately 780,000 years ago. They also know that 120,000 years passed between that pole reversal and the one before. The tie. Required to form the magnetic stripes that corresponded to these polereversals equals approximately 900,000 years
What tools are needed to analyze magnetic striping patterns?
Analysis of magnetic striping patterns on the ocean floor can reveal the direction plates move and how fast, as well as record large- scale geologic events that took place in the past. The tools needed to analyze magnetic striping patterns are a geomagnetic time scale and a geomagnetic map.
What is a geomagnetic time scale? What is a geomagnetic map? How do they relate? What do they show?
A geomagnetic time scale is a record of the Earth’s magnetic polarity through time. It begins with the current period of magnetic normal, then shows alternating time periods of magnetic reverse (white bands) and magnetic normal (dark bands) that took place in the past. Ages on the scale shown are in millions of years (Ma). A geomagnetic time scale can be used to interpret a geomagnetic map, which is a map that shows the magnetic striping patterns on a particular region of Earth’s surface.
What does paleomagnetic evidence show about the Juan de Fuca plate?
The Juan de Fula plate is located off the western coast of North America. As it moves northeast at 4 cm per year, it subducts below the North American plate. Paleomagnetic evidence reveals some of the history of the Juan de Fula plate. The broke alignment of the magnetic stripes indicates that the plate fractured along a transform fault during a large-scale seismic event that likely involved a series of earthquakes. Scientists can use the striping pattern to deter,Jen approximately when the earthquakes took place
Where do plate interactions leave their traces?
Plate interactions leave their traces in the rock record. Geologists study this rock record to piece together Earth’s history
Why is part of the rock record erased in some areas?
As tectonic plates gradually move, they cause mountains to form and erode. In the process, they deposit layers upon layers of sediment. Over time, crustal material is often uplifted and exposed to long periods of erosion. Part of the rock record is, thus, erased in some areas