dysplasia and oral cancer Flashcards

1
Q

what is used to define oral cancer

classification

A

International Classification of Disease for Oncology
ICD-O

Many different sites
* Makes comparison difficult
* Makes epidemiology difficult
* Makes treatment planning difficult

Congregated into
* OC – oral cavity cancer
* OP – oropharyngeal cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

epidemiology of oral cancer

A

BDJ Ref Vol 225 No. 9 (November 9 2018) - useful

2 distinct disease patterns
* Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)
* Oro-Pharyngeal Cancer (OPC)

each have Different populations, outcomes, risks

Female: Male divide
Country divide
Change over time – male predominency reduce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INHANCE

A

The International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium (INHANCE)

Collaboration of research groups of large epidemiological (case-control) studies

Investigating the risk factors for head and neck cancer including (separately) oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer subsites
* 35 studies – 25,000 patients, 37,000 controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

oral cavity cancer

prevalance

A

2.5 per 100,000 pop (2012)

Almost HALF (48.7%) in south central Asia

Male 2:1 Female

Incidence not increasing worldwide
* Decreasing in men, increasing in women
* Linked to reduction in tobacco use (falling in men, rising in women)

Scottish Cancer Registry
* 10% increase 2001-2012
* Unclear why

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

common/high risk sites for oral cavity cancer

6

A

Floor of the mouth
Lateral border of the tongue
Retromolar regions
Soft and hard palate
Gingivae
Buccal mucosa
tongue and tonsillar area

It is well known that there are geographic and regional differences in the intraoral distribution of oral cancer
red highlighted area represents ~20% of the mouth, but ~70% of oral cancers are found here
3 specific sites are more predisposed to developing SSC in drinkers and smokers - FOM, lateral border of the tongue, soft palate
Don’t ignore others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

oral cancer sites division

A

red highlighted area represents ~20% of the mouth, but ~70% of oral cancers are found here

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

oro-phayngeal cancer

prevalance

A

1.4 per 100,000 pop

Most in North America and south central Asia

Male 4.8:1 Female
More males than females, significant difference

Rates rapidly rising, especially in High Income areas (North America)
* Linked to rising HPV epidemic

Scottish Cancer Registry
* 85% increase 2001-2012 – highest increase for any cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

OCC and OPC trends

A

OCC slowly increase (red dash line)
OPC biggest rise over last period (Red line)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5 key risk factors for oral cancer

A

smoking
drinking alcohol
both smoking and drinking
betel quid (paan)
socieoeconomic status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

smokers who don’t drink oral cancer risk

A

Smokers who don’t drink x2 risk (compared to nonsmokers who don’t drink)
* Increases with quantity, duration and frequency of tobacco use
* Fewer cigarettes for longer duration worse than high number, short term
* Smoking risks were generally greater for larynx cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

drinking alcohol oral cancer risk

A

Drinkers (3-4 drinks/day) x2 risk (same as smokers who don’t drink)
* Never smoked population
* Frequency more important than duration – more drinks each day key
* alcohol drinking for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

smoking and drinking alcohol oral cancer risk

A

Smoke and Drink x5 risk
* Increases with frequency and duration of smoking and alcohol consumption
* No safe lower limit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

betel quid (paan) use oral cancer risk

A

x3 risk

mixture of substances including areca nut with or without tobacco wrapped in a betel leaf and placed in the mouth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

socioeconomic statis oral cancer risk

A

x2 risk (SIMD 4/5)
* Even without other risk factors
* Key factor in many other diseases
* Same risk as smoking
* More likely to smoke and/or drink too- compound
* Low educational attainment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 things that may impact oral cancer risk - but not yet certain currently

A

Family History
* 1st degree relative with H&N cancer may be important

Oral Health
* Early data suggests poor oral health may be associated with an increased cancer risk – small effect

Sexual Activity
* a slight increased risk for oropharyngeal cancer with:
* six or more lifetime sexual partners
* four or more lifetime oral sex partners
* early age (<18 years) of sexual debut (INHANCE)
* Probably link to HPV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

benefits of stopping smoking and alcohol

INHANCE

A

Demonstrable benefits of quitting smoking were identified within one to four years after stopping smoking
* Quicker
* Smoker prevention more important when time limit on social health intervention (compared to drink)

risks reduced and reached a similar level to those who had never smoked after 20 years of quitting.

In contrast, the risk effects associated with quitting heavy alcohol consumption take 20 years to begin to emerge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

SE status compared to smoking/alcohol oral cancer risk

A

SE status is on a par with smoking and alcohol in terms of magnitude (two-fold increased risk)
* specifically low educational attainment and low income.

These risks were not fully explained by smoking and alcohol consumption (‘the cause of the cause’)
* have a more direct effect associated with socioeconomic circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

diet and oral cancer risk

A

There is limited new evidence in relation to dietary factors beyond confirming that a high intake of fresh fruits and vegetables were associated with reducing by half the oral cancer risk

obesity was not associated with an increased oral cancer risk
* young people (aged 30-years or less) oral cancer was more likely in those who self-reported a low body mass index (BMI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

potentially malignant disorders examples

4

A

White lesions (leukoplakia)

Red lesions (erythroplakia)

Lichen planus
* Candidal Leukoplakia
* Chronic Hyperplastic Candidiasis

Oral Submucous Fibrosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

leukoplakia

A

white pathc that cannot be rubbed off and not attributable to any other disease

PMD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

erythroplakia

A

red patch that is not attributable to any other disease

(more commonly attributed to malignancy - could indicated vascular change)

PMD

22
Q

what are eryth- and leuko- and erytholeuko- plakia

A

clincial descriptions

23
Q

oral cancer in white lesions

A

incidence 0.2 - 4%
* wide variation in different populations
* Reliability of data not clear

malignant change
* varied reports, most under 4%
* period prevalence

3.2.5% in 10 years, 4% in 20 years

biopsy where possible to assess dysplasia

24
Q

do oral carcinomas occur from normal or abnormal mucosa?

A

most oral caricnoms in the UK arise arise in initially clinically normal mucosa

Most cancer in high incidence areas (e.g. India) from potentially malignant lesions

Worldwide leukoplakia is 50 to 100 times more likely to progress to cancer than clinically normal mucosa
* Consider whole mouth not just area of white lesion

biopsy where possible to assess dysplasia

25
Q

oral cancer in red lesions

A

much less frequent than leukoplakia

much higher risk of cancer

greater dysplasia risk
* Up to 50% already be carcinoma

no good follow-up studies available

26
Q

dysplasia based on

2

A

cellular atypia
epithelial architectural organisation

27
Q

categorisation for dysplasia

A

Mild, moderate, severe, carcinoma-in-situ

New categorisation
* Low grade, high grade, carcinoma-in-situ
* Clearer definitions – better guidance on tx needed

CHECK

27
Q

categorisation for dysplasia

A

Mild, moderate, severe, carcinoma-in-situ

New categorisation
* Low grade, high grade, carcinoma-in-situ
* Clearer definitions – better guidance on tx needed

CHECK

28
Q

grading of oral mucosa dysplasia

A

histologically

based on cytological and architectural changes
* not all features needed for dysplasia to be occuring
* more features present, the higher the grade of dysplasia reported

29
Q

possible cytological changes to indicate dysplasia

8

A

changes in indivdual cells reflecting abnormal DNA content in the nucleus, failure to mature and keratinise correctly and inc proliferation

  • abnormal variation in nuclear size
  • abnormal variation in nuclear shape
  • abnormal variation in cell shape
  • abnormal variation in cell size
  • inc/altered nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio
  • atypical mitosis figures
  • inc number and size of nucleoli (prominent nucleoli)
  • nuclear hyperchormoatism
30
Q

possible architectural changes to indicate dysplasia

8

A

changes in the organisation of maturation and normal layering of the epithelium

  • irregular epithelial stratification
  • loss/disturbed of polarity of basal cells
  • drop-shaped rete ridges
  • inc and abnormal mitoses
  • premature keratinisation in single cells
  • abnormal keratinisation
  • keratin pearls within rete ridges
  • loss of epithelial cell cohesion and adhesion
31
Q

low grade dysplasia

A
  • Easy to identify that the tumour originates from squamous epithelium
  • Architectural change into lower third
  • Cytological atypia or dysplasia may not be prominent
  • Shows a considerable amount of keratin production
  • Evidence of stratification
  • Well formed basal cell layer surrounding the tumour islands
  • Tumour islands are usually well defined and are often continuous with the surface epithelium
  • Invasion pattern with intact large branching rete pegs ‘pushing’ into underlying CT

(Where there is architectural change into middle third, depending on the level of cytological atypia will be classified into low grade or high grade)

32
Q

high grade dysplasia

A
  • Show little resemblance to a normal squamous epithelium
  • Architectural change upper third
  • Usually show considerable atypia
  • Invade in a non-cohesive pattern with fine cords, small islands and single cells infiltrating widely through the CT
  • Mitotic figures are prominent and many may be abnormal

Degree of differentiation is widely used to predict prognosis and shows a significant correlation to survival.

(Where there is architectural change into middle third, depending on the level of cytological atypia will be classified into low grade or high grade)

33
Q

carcinoma-in-situ

A

Theoretical concept

Cytologically malignant but not invading through basement membrane

Abnormal architecture
* Full thickness (or almost full)
* Severe cytological atypia

Mitotic abnormalities frequent

34
Q

4 histological prognostic factors

A

Pattern of Invasion

Depth of Invasion

Perineural Invasion

Invasion of Vessels

35
Q

pattern of invasion

histological prognostic factor

A

Bulbous rete pegs infiltrating at same level is considered of a better prognosis than widely infiltrating small islands and single cells

36
Q

depth of invasion

histological prognostic factor

A

risk of metastases for a tumours greater than 4mm was 4x greater than for a tumour less than 4mmm

37
Q

perineural invasion

histological prognositc factor

A

seen in up to 60% of OSCCs but is most significant when a tumour is seen within a large nerve at a site some distance from the main tumour mass

38
Q

invasion of vessels

histological prognositc factor

A

widely thought to be associated with lymph node metastaes and a poor prognosis

39
Q

multi stage promotion

from normal to PMD to OCC

A

process takes time
can happen at different stages at different parts of mouth depening on what environmental stimuli playing a role

40
Q

field cancerisation concept

A

Multiple primaries possible over time
up to 15 to 20 in some patients

Concept of “field cancerisation”
high cancer risk in 5cm radius of original primary - that’s most of the mouth/pharynx

synchronous or metachronous lesions
* Can occur at the same time as the primary or at later times

Need to follow up for rest of life as at risk of another oral cancer

41
Q

oral cancer staging

A

clinical

mutliple variable for clinical staging

site
size (T)
spread (N&M)

42
Q

TNM

A

oral cancer staging
Tumour
Nodes
Metasis

43
Q

oral cancer prognosis

A

1/3 patients present at stage I/II
* Stage I - 80% cure rate early lesion
* Stage II – 65% cure rate

stage 4 is much more advanced condition
* 5 year survival <50%, cure <30%

If untreated, with metastases, survival is about 4 months

dysplasia lesion detection is best – excision just before malignant good chance of success

44
Q

tx options for oral cancer

A

Surgery, Radiotherapy and Chemo/Immunotherapy all used
* Choice will depend on patient choice and health/prognosis
* Tumour location, size and nutitional status all important

For resectable tumours, primary surgery offers the best outcome
* Post surgical radiotherapy or chemotherapy

45
Q

lip cancer
location
aetiology
behaviour and prognosis

A

Lower lip
* non-healing ulcer or swelling

Aetiology
* Sunlight UV-B
* smoking

Behaviour
* slow growth
* local invasion
* rarely metastasise to nodes

Good prognosis as early detection

46
Q

oral cancer detection/screening

5 options currently

A

HPV16 screening

Toluidene blue
* false positive in inflammatory lesions
* ? 50 % false negatives (highlights area of trauma and infection too)
* good for invasive disease, but usually clinically evident

VELscope
* Autofluorescence of tissues with blue light
* Loss of fluorescence equates to ‘change’
* Change may be cancer but can be other changes
* Causes for loss of fluorescence isn’t clear
* Published work ‘thin’
May well work, but evidence not yet adequate

Photodynamic Diagnosis (PDD)
* UV light attracted to area of change

The most cost effective and reliable screening tool is the experienced dental practitioner.

47
Q

current debate/ethical qs around oral cancer screening

A

Benefits vs Harm
Undetected lesions vs False positive
Cost of Screening vs Cost of disease
Cost of Screening vs Disability from disease

48
Q

oral cancer in primary care

A

Dentist has opportunity for PRIMARY PREVENTION in patients attending for regular oral care

Dentist must be familiar with and competent in:
* Smoking cessation advice
* Alcohol reduction advice
* Healthy diet promotion

Part of General CPD requirement now
There is a GDC expectation that a dentist will do this as part of ‘good patient care’ rather than any particular remuneration

49
Q

summary of oral cancer management as GPD

A

Can present at ANY age in ANY patient

Dentist has to make decision about their referral threshold for potentially malignant lesions

Monitor with photographs and education
* Remove local factors where ulcer may be due to trauma, then review

2 WEEK RULE for referral to clinic for the hospital
* Patient must be initially seen within this time
* 62 day referral to treatment time for cancer patients