Duty or Standard of Care (Cont.) - Special and Limited Duties Flashcards

1
Q

Duty of Physicians:

Good Samaritan statutes:

A

Exempt doctors and nurses for ordinary negligence, but not gross negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty of Physicians:
What is the standard of care?
And how must the standard of care be proven to be breached?

A

That which is accepted and practiced by the relevant medical community.
Must be proven through expert testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Duty of Physicians:

What is the exceptions to the requirement to prove breach by expert testimony?

A

Gross negligence, common knowledge or res ipsa, treatises, drug instructions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty of Physicians:
What standard are specialists held to?
How must it be proved?

A

Specialists are held to a standard of those in the same specialty. Also must be proved by expert testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duty of Physicians:

What is Res Ipsa and how can it be proved?

A

Res Ipsa is that injury would not occur without negligence.
May be proved by:
1) common knowledge
2) expert testimony
There also cannot be any other causes of the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duty of Medical professionals:

Duty to disclose (Majority and minority standards)

A

Majority: only need to disclose the information that the relevant medical community would disclose - Requires expert testimony to prove
Minority: Must disclose all information material to the reasonable decision of the patient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duty of nurses is held to what standard?

A

A reasonable nurse under the circumstances. Requires expert testimony to prove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-medical practitioner duty standard.

A

Reasonable practitioner under the circumstances - requires expert testimony to prove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty of Hospitals and personnel:

Vicarious Liability under Respondeat Superior:

A

Employers liable for employees torts if act that caused harm was within the scope of employment. The tortuous conduct must be a foreseeable consequence of the employees work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duty of Hospitals and personnel:

What can hospitals be liable for outside of vicarious liability?

A

1) Providing and maintaining safe and adequate facilities and equipment
2) Supervising medical care
3) the selection of medical staff
4) Formulating, adopting, and enforcing adequate procedures that govern its medical staff and nonphysical personnel to ensure quality of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Duty of Hospitals and personnel:

How can P’s prove negligence?

A

Using licensing or accreditation standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duty of non-medical practitioners

A

Reasonable practitioner under the circumstances and must be proved using expert testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Duty of Architects, engineers, accountants, and lawyers

A

Reasonable professional and requires expert testimony to prove. Unless it falls under the common knowledge exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duty of educators

A

Very difficult to sue educators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duty of clergy

A

Can’t hold the church vicariously liable for clergy misconduct. Abuse is not within scope of employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly