DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY Flashcards
Rules
o R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
o R.1.8(b) CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS: SPECIFIC RULES
o R.4.1(b) TRUTHFULNESS IN STATEMENTS TO OTHERS
o FRE.Proposed Rule 503 LAWYER-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
o FRCP.26(b)(3) DUTY TO DISCLOSE; GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY // DISCOVERY SCOPE AND LIMITS: TRIAL PREPARATION MATERIALS
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION – rule
Precludes an attorney from
- voluntarily disclosing information OR
- using information to client’s detriment
- RELATING TO THE REPRESENTATION OF THE CLIENT
- Regardless of its source
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION – key takeaways
- (almost always) not required to reveal confidence under this rule
- language of the rule = “may” = permissive
(= MAY reveal info TO THE EXTENT the lawyer REASONABLY believes NECESSARY) - no greater than lawyer reasonably believes necessary to accomplish purpose (CMT 16)
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
2 exemptions + 7 exceptions to R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
- can always reveal if
1. informed consent
2. impliedly authorized in the course of representation - even if not consented/authorized, lawyer may reveal confidence IF
1. prevent reasonably certain death/substantial bodily harm
2. prevent client from committing crime/fraud reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to financial interests/property of another AND in furtherance of which the client has used/is using the lawyer’s services
3. to prevent/mitigate/rectify substantial injury to financial interests or property/another reasonably certain to result/has resulted from the client’s commission of a crime/fraud in furtherance of which the client has used the lawyer’s services
4. secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with these Rules
5. to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client, to establish a defense to a criminal charge or civil claim against the lawyer based upon conduct in which the client was involved, or to respond to allegations in any proceeding concerning the lawyer’s representation of the client;
6. to comply with other law or a court order; or
7. to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from the lawyer’s change of employment or from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, but only if the revealed information would not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice the client.
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Establishing claim/defense/response exception – 3 scenarios
- to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client
- to establish a defense to a criminal charge or civil claim against the lawyer based upon conduct in which the client was involved
- to respond to allegations (even before a suit is filed) in any proceeding concerning the lawyer’s representation of the client (only to the extent necessary to prosecute or defend)
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Establishing claim/defense/response exception – 5 examples
- client sues lawyer for malpractice
- lawyer sues client for fees
- third party sues lawyer for committing fraud with client
- disciplinary proceeding against lawyer
- lawyer charged with crime arising out of representation
CMT 10, R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Obligation to reveal R.1.6 information
Never obligated to reveal R.1.6 information
EXCEPT to remedy perjury/fraud on the court
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Compliance with court order/law exception – analysis
- first issue is whether other law supersede (CMT 12)
(but that issue = question of law beyond scope of Rules) - should appeal/object to court order as much as possible
Effect of termination of lawyer-client information on duty of confidentiality
Duty continues after representation terminates
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Effect of death of client on duty of confidentiality
Duty continues after client dies
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Prevention of reasonably certain death/substantial bodily harm exception – “reasonably certain to occur”
=
- if it will be suffered imminently OR
- if there is a present and substantial threat that a person will suffer such harm at a later date if the lawyer fails to take action necessary to eliminate the threat
EXAMPLE = Thus, a lawyer who knows that a client has accidentally discharged toxic waste into a town’s water supply may reveal this information to the authorities if there is a present and substantial risk that a person who drinks the water will contract a life-threatening or debilitating disease and the lawyer’s disclosure is necessary to eliminate the threat or reduce the number of victims.
CMT 6, R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Prevention of reasonably certain death/substantial bodily harm exception – does there need to be a crime?
NO
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Securing legal advice about compliance exception – 2 key factors
2 key factors to determine proper scope of disclosure:
- Only disclose to extent necessary to obtain advice(no greater detail than you have to)
- Form of hypothetical whenever possible
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
impliedly authorized disclosure – example
lawyer admits a fact in open court that is beyond dispute or the lawyer makes a statement of fact in settlement negotiations
R.1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Attorney-client privilege – rule
evidentiary rule prevents compelled disclosure by an attorney of confidential communications with a client for the purpose of seeking legal advice