Duty of care (tort) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the basic principle of tort of negligence

A

These are civil wrongs that are caused by careless behaviour, that demand damages and compensation to be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the first definition of the neighbour principle

A

The principle was set up in Donoghue v Stevenson it stated that you must avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably foresee will cause harm to your neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is you neighbour

A

Anyone who you can reasonably foresee will be affected by your actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why was a new three part test developed and what case did it originate from

A

It originated from the case of Caparo v Dickman and it is known as the Caparo three part test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The three part test is used to establish what?

A

To establish a duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three parts of this test

A
  1. Was the damage reasonably foreseeable
  2. Was there sufficient proximity
  3. Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State and explain and example of where damage is reasonably foreseeable

A

In the case of Jolly v Sutton borough council it was easily foreseeable that boys would try and fix an old boat and be damaged by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean by sufficient proximity

A

This is when the claimant is sufficiently close to defendant in terms or relationship or proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain why it might be fair just and reasonable to impose a duty

A

This is to do with the social utility of the claim, sometimes it wouldn’t be beneficial for society to impost a duty of care. This was seen in the case of Alcock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly