Duties to Clients Flashcards
Mandatory Rejection/Withdrawal
- Representation will result in violation of rules
- lawyer’s condition substantially impairs ability
- lawyer discharged by client
- (CA) client is acting without probable cause and for purpose of harassing
Permissive Withdrawal
Permitted if it can be accomplished (1) without material adverse effect on client’s interest or (2) where there is good cause.
- Lawyer may withdraw if client fails substantially to fulfill obligation to lawyer (e.g., payment) and has been given reasonable warning that lawyer will withdraw unless obligation is fulfilled.
When Client has Final Decision
- settlement offers
- pleas
- jury trial waiver (criminal)
- testifying (criminal)
Assisting Client in Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct
Lawyer must not. However, they may advise client of legal consequences. If they insist on pursuing, lawyer must withdraw.
Limiting Scope of Representation
Lawyer may limit scope if (1) reasonable and (2) client gives informed consent
Representing Organizations
Lawyer owes duty to organization, not people. Lawyer must explain this whenever org’s interests are adverse to persons.
- Lawyer must clearly identify who their client is
If lawyer learns person associated with org has violated duty in way that may be imputed to org, lawyer must reasonably protect interests, including reporting to highest authority.
- Lawyer may report outside if highest authority fails to act and its necessary to prevent substantial injury. (not in CA)
Duty of Competence
Acting competently means acting with legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary.
If not competent, they must decline unless they can
1. learn it without undue expense/delay, OR
2. consult with competent lawyer
Duty of Diligence
Lawyer must control workload and act with dedication (and see matter through to completion unless withdrawal is permitted.
CA: lawyer must not intentionally/recklessly fail to perform without reasonable competence/diligence
Duty of Communication
Must
1. explain matter to client so they can make informed decisions
2. keep client informed of status (all significant developments)
3. promptly comply with all reasonable requests for info from client
Duty of Confidentiality
Lawyer must not reveal any info relating to representation
- Regardless of whether client requests it be confidential
- exists even after client dies
Exceptions to Duty of Confidentiality
Where exception applies, lawyer may disclose cleint’s confidential info only to extent reasonably necessary to meet exception. (permitted but not required)
1. Consent/implied authority
2. Prevent Death/substantial bodily harm
3. Prevent substantial financial loss (CA does not recognize)
4. Defend self or establish claim against client
5. Obtain legal ethics (CA does not recognize)
6. Adress conflict resulting from organizational change (CA does not recognize)
7. Comply with Court Order or Law
Attorney-Client Privilege
Applies only to comms that pertain to legal services.
- When client is corp, comms with employees are generally privileged if authorized and concern duties
Distinguished from Confidentiality:
1. privilege is exclusionary rule of evidence law, prevents being compelled to testify (confidentiality is inside and outside court)
2. Privilege only covers confidential comms between lawyer and client (and agents)
Duty of Loyalty - COI
A lawyer owes a duty to their client, and must avoid or properly address any COIs.
- Some conflicts are non-consentable, others can be resolved with consent.
Lawyer must not represent client when client will be directly adverse to another client (whether in same or separate matter) OR
there is significant risk that representation will be materially limited by lawyer’s own interest or responsibilities to third person.
COI Imputation
Generally when a lawyer can’t take on a matter, firm is imputed.
Exceptions:
- conflict is uniquely personal to the disqualified lawyer AND would not materially limit representation of client by other lawyers in firm
- When conflict is based on lawyer’s prior work, and lawyer is properly screened AND affected persons give notice
Note: Imputation can be waived by affected clients.
ET: if more than one lawyer in facts, check for shared conflicts
Resolving Current-Client Conflict
If there is a conflict with a current client, lawyer may undertake representation if:
1. lawyer reasonably believes they can competently/diligently represent client despite conflict
2. representation is not prohibited by law
3. lawyer is not on both sides of the same litigation
4. each affect client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing
CA: required informed written consent (both disclosure and consent in writing)