DUTIES OF EXPRESS TRUSTEES Flashcards
three categories of duties at the common law
- duties of obedience to trsut instrument
- duties of prudent management
- fiducirary duties
explain the duty obedience to trust instrument in the trusts act
s23 - know terms
s24- act in accordance with terms
s27 - excercise powers for propser purpose
explain the duty of prudnet management
s29 - general duty of care
s30 - invest prudently
for the duties that arise from the duty of presnte managemnet consider
- any speical knowldge or experinec the trustee holds out as having
- if the perosn acts as a trustee in the course of a buisness or profession consider what is reasomable of that profession
what are the sectiosn under s30 invest prudnetly
Section 128: The court can look into whether the trustees had an investment strategy or diversified their risks.
Section 129: The court can offset any losses against gains made from investments.
s133
trutees may apply to teh court for discretions as to how they can best excercise powers
re mulligan
m died, left trust to wife and nephew for life iiterest , wife and pgg trustees, sold prop and invested mtg w hig interest rates no capital growth, nephew sued PGG for breach of trust
was a breach as the value of trust prop depreciated overtime so not prudent
fiduciary duties MANDATORY
s25- honetsly and good faith
s26- act for benefit of beneficarys in accordance w trust
fiduciary duties DEFAULT
s34 - avoid conflict between truste and beneficiarys interests
s31- not to use power for own benefit
s36 - not to profit
s37 -Act selflessly
thompson v allen
trsut prop was yatcht buisness, a the trustee tries to open a competing yatcht buiness, and was landlord
putting up rent and making a competitor buiness is breach os s34 - not to be in conflcit
patchett v williams
p and L appointed as trsutees to adminster farm that was leased to P.
settlor wished for p to buy farm at price set by valuer
p offered a mid vlaue and BENEFICIARIES were unhappy so trustees issued a court order to buy the farm
trutsees cannot buy trust prop as it is a breach of duty s26 to act to benefict the beneicaries should have offered high val or stepped down before the puchase
phillips v boardman
p had trust shares in company taht wasnt performing well, b was the solictor to the trustees and he was to help the trust, b and a friend bought majority shares in the same comany for themsleves and the cpmany since benefitted but so did b and friend
brwach as even though they were acting honestly and in best interest they still creates conflict