Durkheims Theory On Crime Flashcards

1
Q

What does Durkheim argue?

A

Due to industrialisation has led to urbanisation and secularisation its become more prone to what Durkheim calls anomie which is the disappearance of norms and values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Durkheim identify?

A

He identified that crime in inevitable as people are now socialised differently and that it helps perform important social functions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are Durkheim’s positive functions of crime?

A
  • boundary maintenance
  • adaption and change
  • Warning device
  • safety valve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is boundary maintenance? AO2

A

Crime produces a reaction from society in which unifies society in punishing the wrongdoer
Which allows to reinforce/reaffirm shared Norms + values

A02: 2011 riots
2024 riots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is adaption and change? A02

A

Durkheim argued that without crime we would be stuck with no change, suggesting that crime helps facilitates social change
In the sense that if people never deviated from society’s norms or values then society never changes

A02: - suffragettes - used violence to campaign
- Nelson mandala - got arrested as a terrorist, then became the president of South Africa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is warning device?

A

When crime occurs it sends a message to us that society’s social order is breaking down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a safety valve?

A

Deviance acts as a ‘safety valve’ releasing stress in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strengths for durkheims view?

A

His claim that both crime and punishment can be functional is plausible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weaknesses to Durkheim’s theory?

A

PM: argue that Durkheim assumes we live in a value consensus and that we do not so boundary maintenance wouldn’t work
Some would say that Durkheim justifies crime, by making out it to be a positive thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly