Duress Of Threats Flashcards

1
Q

What does AG v whelan define a threat as

A

Threats of immediate death or serious personal violence are so great as to overbear the ordinary powers of human resistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must the nature of the threat be

A

Death or serious injury as in r v Singh where less threats will not be sufficient
Psychological threats are not sufficient baker and Wilkins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are lesser threats to destroy property sufficent

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are threats to expose sexual immorality sufficent

A

No as shown in valderrama vega

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What else does valderrama vega show and case facts

A

There can be a string of threats to include death or serious injury
Imported cocaine as death threats made and threatened to expose sexuality
Convicted at first instance but conviction quashed on appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who can the threats be to

A

Yourself of family as stated in Martin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case law has developed the use of the defence to who

A

Wife, girlfriend, mother or friends as decided willer and Conway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who did Wright suggest the defence could be used for

A

Anyone who’s safety d reasonably regarded himself as responsible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does r v Cole indicate and facts

A

D must be told what crime to commit

Moneylenders pressured d for money and threatened girlfriend and children he went and robbed 2 building societies
He was not told to rob so does not have a defence of duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For d of t d must have been forced to commit a crime under threat of

A

Death or serious injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If d voluntarily commits an offence to escape the consequence of threat is duress available

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

There has to be a sufficient what between threat issues and crime

A

Nexus (connection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What offences is duress not available for

A

Murder
Attempted murder
Possible treason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is the burden of proof with

A

Prosecution although d must raise evidence of duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the test for duress

A

A two stage test laid down in r v graham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case confirmed r v graham

A

Howe and bannister

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Case facts of r v graham

A

Homosexual living with wife and boyfriend, boyfriend told d to hold end of rope to strangle wife

18
Q

What is section 1a of Graham’s test

A

D must fear death or serious injury and have good cause to do so (subjective)

19
Q

What is part 1b of graham test

A

The belief must be reasonable and genuine (hasan) and the jury must believe that death or serious injury was likely

20
Q

What is part 2 of graham test

A

Would a similar, person sharing certain characteristics of d, sober person or reasonable firmness fear death or serious injury (objective)

21
Q

Must must there be evidence to suggest

A

That d believed the duressor

22
Q

What can the reasonable person be given when considering graham test

A

Certain characteristics of d if it made him more susceptiable to pressure

23
Q

What do the certain characteristics include

A
Age
Sex 
Pregnancy 
Serious physical disability 
Mental impairment 
Post traumatic stress disorder
24
Q

Which case indicated post traumatic stress disorder could be considered

A

Bowen

25
Q

A personality disorder can not be taken into consideration or any other recognised mental illnesses as decided in

A

Hegarty

26
Q

Excessive vulnerability or timidity can not be taken into consideration which case

A

Bowen h

27
Q

Why can timidity not be used

A

Because the reasonable person must have reasonable fortitude

28
Q

Low IQ can not be considered which case and why

A

Bowen

Because it doesn’t make d less courageous or less able to withstand threats

29
Q

Which case said intoxication can not be used

A

R v flatt

30
Q

What did the draft criminal code want to do with the graham test

A

Put it on a fully subjective

31
Q

Which case indicated that there must be no safe way out

A

R v Gill

D was told to steal lorry but he was left alone where he could have had time to raise an alarm

32
Q

Which case stated d must seek police protection as soon as possible

A

R v pommels

33
Q

Which case said it is not acceptable for d to choose not to seek police protection because they feel it is inadequate

A

R v hasan

34
Q

Under old law any threat had to be imminent if not immediate which case

A

Hudson v Taylor

35
Q

What time scale does current law allow

A

Immediate or almost immediate in r v hasan

36
Q

Which case indicated that if d voluntarily becomes involved in a gang knowing the crimes may be committed and then wants to rely on duress he will not be able to

A

R v sharp

37
Q

What will the situation likely to be when d can not rely on duress when part of a gang

A

If he voluntarily became involved in the gang
He knew the nature of the gang
And realised that the other gang member might pressure him into committing an offence

38
Q

If d joins in all innocence may he have access to the defence

A

Yes as indicated in r v Shepard

39
Q

What did r v Ali indicate

A

Extended the principles from r v sharp to include a person of violent nature

40
Q

In r v hasan what did the law lords indicate regarding gangs

A

Duress in not available when d could have foreseen that she or he might be forced to commit an offence by being subjected to threats from a gang or individual

41
Q

Which case decided that in murder duress is not available regardless of whether d was the killer of the secondary party to murder

A

R v Howe

42
Q

Which case said duress had been a defence for accessories to murder

A

Lynch v dpp