Duress Of Circumstance Flashcards

1
Q

What would any other pressure on someone fall under

A

Defence of necessity which is rarely used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where has duress of circumstance developed from

A

A blurred distinction between duress and necessity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the defence like

A

A limited Duress of threats and operates like it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case facts of r v willer

A

Convicted of reckless driving when a group of youths surrounded his car and threatened to kill him, he mounted the pavement to drive away he was charged with reckless driving at first instance as not allowed defence of necessity but on appeal it was decided he could have a defence of duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In r v willer what was decided

A

The use of duress of circumstance although it was not named as this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case facts of r v Conway

A

Convicted of reckless driving because he mistakenly believed two men who approached his car were going to kill his passenger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was decided from Conway

A

Followed willer and named the defence as duress of circumstance
It decided that the threat could be to a third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Conway how does the court see the defence

A

A form of necessity but threat was from a human rather than starvation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is the defence available

A

If from an objective view d was acting as he did to avoid a threat of death or serious injury to himself or another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

D of c is a from of necessity but it can be argued that it is

A

Excusatory rather than justificatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did r v Martin indicate

A

That the graham test should be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is d of c available to murder

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Facts of DPP v bell

A

Driving under the influence of alcohol because he feared harm from those chasing him
Allowed defence as proved that it was a real threat and it was reasonable
He had driven a short was and stopped rather than driving the full way home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Facts of DPP v pittaway

A

He feared he would be beaten up at a party so drove home under the influence when she had not been pursued
There was no longer any immediate threat so no defence was allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case facts of r v pommell

A

D found in bed with a loaded shot gun when police found he he claimed he had gotten e he was going to use it to hand it over, he intended to hand it into the police the next day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Legal principle from pommell

A

Allowed defence because delay was minimal and the explanation was plausible so the delay in reporting to the police was not fatal to the offence

17
Q

What else did pommell indicate

A

The defence is available for all offence not just driving offences

18
Q

Until recently what was required for duress

A

Threat of death or serious injury from another person