Duress Flashcards

1
Q

Skeate v Beale [1840]

duress of goods does not count as duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Barton v Armstrong [1976]

threats to kill, duress to the person

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Occidental Worldwide Investment Corporation v Skibs A/S Avanti (The Siboen and The Sibotre) [1976]

economic threats can be duress, not on facts

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pao on v Lau Yiu Long [1980]

‘coercion of the will’

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v ITWF (The Universe Sentinel) [1983]

economic duress; key question is illegitimacy of threat

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dimskal Shipping Co SA v ITWF (The Evia Luck) (No 2) [1992]

strike threat: illegitimacy and threat must be a ‘significant cause’

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

B&S Contracts and Designs Ltd v Victor Green Publications Ltd [1984]

threat to breach (strike) was economic duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Atlas Express v Kafco Ltd [1989]

threat to breach (deliveries) was economic duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999]

causation in economic duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Port Caledonia and The Anna [1903]

admiralty law treats threat of lawful act (not to save ship) as duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CTN Cash and Carry v Gallaher [1994]

threat not to contract in future not duress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021]

UKSC recognises possibility of lawful act duress; different tests proposed

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly