Duress Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Can duress of threats be used as a defence to murder or attempted murder?

A

No.

R v. Howe - murder | R v. Gotts - attempted murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the test for duress and which case does it originate?

A

R v. Graham - would a sober man of reasonable firmness have done the same? (also has objective element)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can threats be made towards property or revealing sexuality?

A

No as seen in R v. Valderrama - Vega.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did R v. Ortiz establish?

A

Threats can be towards family and friends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did R v. Wright add to the decision in R v. Ortiz?

A

Threats can be made to partners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the factors to be considered in the Graham test.

A
  • Time to call the police? (R v. Gill)
  • Self-induced (R v. Hasan)
  • D. can make a mistake (R v. Cairns)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What will the objective part of the Graham test consider? What will it definitely not consider?

A

Will consider:
Physical and mental characteristics.

Won’t consider:

  • Low IQ (R v. Bowen)
  • Drug addiction (R v. Flatt)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does R v. Pommell show?

A

Duress of circumstances does not always regard traffic offences. (In this case, possession of a firearm).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the burden and standard for duress?

A

On the prosecution to prove, beyond all reasonable doubt, the defence does not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly