Attempts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Which statute governs criminal attempts?

A

The Criminal Attempts Act 1981.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does s.1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 state.

A

An attempt will be criminal if the act is more than merely preparatory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does R v. Gullefer establish?

A

The principle of embarking on the crime proper. Gullefer had not yet reclaimed his money thus hadn’t embarked on the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does R v. Jones demonstrate?

A

Even though the gun’s safety catch hadn’t been removed, the act was still more than preparatory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case demonstrates that inspecting a lock is more than merely preparatory in the commission of burglary?

A

R v. Tosti.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the mens rea of attempted crimes and give the case that established that?

A

A desire to bring about the full offence. R v. Mohan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the mens rea for attempted murder and give a case?

A

Intention to kill only. R v. Whybrow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What other types of mens rea are accepted for attempted crimes and give an example of a case to support this?

A

Oblique intent - R v. Hayle and Walker.

Conditional intent - Attorney General’s Reference No 1 and 2 of 1979.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does s.1(2) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 state?

A

An attempt can still occur even if the facts are such that the commission of a crime is impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened in R v. Shivpuri?

A

Smuggling cabbage leaves was enough to be convicted of attempting to be knowingly concerned with the supply of drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in R v. Taafe?

A

Importing money was not enough to warrant conviction as there was no full offence for smuggling money from abroad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly