Due diligence Flashcards
“caveat emptor”?
let the buyer beware”
How does caveat emptor apply to private acquisitions?
Yes It is the buyer’s responsibility to ensure that it obtains sufficiently detailed information relating to the company or business that it is going to purchase before completion. This process of gathering information is called due diligence.
· The key purposes of due diligence include the following:
to ascertain whether the proposed acquisition is a good commercial investment;
to identify potential risks which may affect the structure of the transaction (for example, the discovery of unexpected large-scale liabilities may make an asset sale the only viable option);
to provide the buyer with knowledge that will assist it in negotiations, in particular with regard to the price;
to help the buyer identify where it may require contractual protections such as warranties and indemnities;
to establish whether shareholder consents/ contractual consents/ approvals from regulatory authorities are required before the acquisition can proceed; and
to assist the buyer to understand the target’s business which will help the buyer to integrate the target within its existing activities post-completion.
What will due diligence extend to depending on the sale?
· On a share sale, the buyer will acquire the target company with all its assets and liabilities. Extensive investigation will therefore usually be required in relation to all aspects of the target company.
· On an asset sale, the due diligence can be limited to those specific assets and liabilities that the buyer will be acquiring.
· A complete due diligence exercise covers 3 main aspects:
Legal due diligence
Financial due diligence
Commercial due diligence
Due diligence process in a Bilateral sale:
· Seller will prepare due diligence materials for review which will often be placed in a data room. This is sometimes, but not always, in response to a due diligence questionnaire prepared by the Buyer’s solicitors.
· Buyer’s solicitors will submit requests for further information (through the Q&A function in a virtual data room if there is one) as it learns more about the target.
· Buyer’s solicitors will review the information supplied and produce a due diligence report for their client.
Buyer needs this to see whether they want to proceed with the purchase.
Due diligence process in an auction sale:
· Seller sets up a data room of information about the target.
· Selected bidders will then be permitted to review the information.
· Buyer’s solicitors will review the information supplied and produce a due diligence report for their client.
What does legal due diligence focus on?
· Legal due diligence focuses on establishing the key legal issues affecting the target, including the legal obligations and liabilities which the buyer will be acquiring.
· A data room has several benefits:
- it ensures that equal access to information is given to all potential buyers;
- the distribution of information is centralised and more easily controlled;
- it limits the potential buyers’ access to the target’s management team.
Most common type of data room?
· Virtual data rooms are the most common option. Virtual data rooms may be accessed remotely or on site and are often provided on a separate platform. A seller can opt for a physical data room, which would normally be located at the offices of either the seller’s accountants’ or the seller’s solicitors , but this is unusual in practice.
· Data rooms will often be segregated to ensure that only “clean teams” review competitively sensitive information and only HR professionals review employee data (which will be anonymised for data protection reasons).
How can a due diligence report be presented?
· How the due diligence report is presented will depend on the buyer’s needs.
* A ‘full form’ report sets out detailed information about all aspects of the target and its business. It will also include an executive summary which sets out the key findings of the due diligence review. Most expensive report.
- E.g. a standard form report on all contracts.
* An ‘exceptions only’ or ‘red flag’ report is a shorter, more targeted report focusing only on matters material to the transaction.
- Level of work may be not less than a ‘full form’ report because you still need to review all the docs.
* An oral report takes the form of a presentation to the buyer’s board.
- In addition to a written report.
* Should be proactive to give solutions in the due diligence report.
Outcome of due diligence report?
The due diligence report should help the buyer to make an informed assessment of the potential risks and rewards of the proposed acquisition.
Buyer options after due diligence report?
- Proceed with the transaction on the terms that have been negotiated;
- Seek contractual protections from the seller, such as warranties, indemnities (compensation if an identified risk arises in practice) and conditions precedent.
- Seeking a reduction in the price (not worth as much as the buyer thought)
- Try to (1) renegotiate the terms of the acquisition or (2) restructure the acquisition to reflect any issues or liabilities identified during the due diligence process;
- Restructuring the deal
- Withdraw from the transaction.
- Transitional services agreement?
· Group companies often rely on each other for services. There might, for example, be ‘group’ IT support or payroll services. One of the problems that can come to light during the due diligence process is what the target company will do post-completion – in other words, when the target will no longer be part of the seller’s group.
· The issue is usually resolved by a transitional services agreement. This is an agreement between the relevant parties to provide services for a specified period following completion to facilitate the handover and to provide the target company with sufficient time to put alternative arrangements in place.
Key issues to be covered in transactional agreement?
the nature of the services to be provided;
the required standard of the services;
the level of fees; and termination provisions.
* This agreement is entered into at the same time as the acquisition agreement.
· Notwithstanding the above: If there is an intra-group supply of goods or services to the target which is key to the target’s business - and which the buyer would like to continue post-completion - a separate supply or services agreement will be negotiated.
Note that it may be necessary to deal with services provided by the target to the retained seller group in addition to or instead of services provided to the target
What is Vendor due diligence?
· This is where the seller provides a due diligence report to the bidders and the potential bidders’ aim is to rely on this report, in addition to carrying out their own due diligence (they will usually still have access to the data room).
Benefits of vendor due diligence?
· One of the main benefits of using vendor due diligence is that it can speed up the process by giving the bidders’ advisers an idea of where to focus their investigation of the target. Vendor due diligence is also useful as it enables the seller to identify issues that may need to be resolved prior to the sale.
- Legal due diligence covers a number of key areas including general corporate areas as well as more specialist areas including:
- Insolvency checks;
- Compliance;
- Issues in past transactions;
- Material contracts;
- Litigation.
- The level of due diligence and the areas included in the due diligence will depend on a number of factors such as:
- The buyer’s approach to risk;
- The deal structure; and
- The type of company, business or assets being acquired.
- Key corporate areas typically addressed in legal due diligence:
· Constitution of the target
* Title to shares and/or assets
* Companies House filings and wider corporate governance
* Acquisitions and Disposals
* Separation Issues
* Insolvency Searches
* Regulatory/General Compliance
* Material contacts e.g. supplier contracts; customer contracts
* Material Litigation
The buyer will need to check the constitution of the target for a range of reasons. Examples include:
- Checking the target is validly incorporated.
- Checking for any restrictions on the directors’ powers (e.g. restricted objects) or other unusual governance arrangements which could impact the validity of past transactions.
- Establishing whether there are any restrictions (for example, pre emption rights) on or consents required for the proposed acquisition.
· The buyer may want to check other areas, examples of which are below, however any problematic provisions can usually be removed or amended post completion. The target company will often adopt new articles to remove problematic provisions or to bring them in line with other buyer group companies. - Considering the different classes of shares and their associated rights.
- Considering whether there are any restrictions in the target’s constitution which would affect the buyer’s plans for the target company.
· The buyer will want to ensure that the seller has good title to:
- the shares in the target company, (on a share purchase). For example have all previous share transfers been properly registered in the statutory books of the target company and have any company buy backs or other changes to the share capital been carried out properly?; and
- the assets being acquired (on an asset sale). For example is the seller the registered owner of any real estate or registered IP being transferred?
· The buyer will also want to check if there are any charges over the shares or assets being acquired.
What will the buyer want to check at Companies House?
- As well as searching public filings at Companies House to understand more about the target, for example who the PSCs are and details of its share capital, a buyer will want to check that required filings have been made and records are up to date.
- Depending on the transaction, the buyer’s advisers may want to look at previous board or shareholder resolutions to ensure that key historic transactions have been validly entered into.
- A buyer would also want to know if there is a pattern of smaller issues. For example repeated late or poor filings which may indicate wider issues with processes.
· In relation to any acquisitions or disposals, the buyer would want to check whether the target has any ongoing obligations or liabilities under contracts pursuant to which it acquired or disposed of subsidiary companies and/or businesses. Typical examples of points to look out for are:
- outstanding warranty or indemnity periods (including for tax);
- non-compete and other restrictive covenants;
- any conditions still to be satisfied;
- other “live” obligations such as deferred or additional consideration;
- confidentiality obligations; and
- any post-closing undertakings (e.g. to provide services/products or support after completion) which are still live.
· In the event that the target or any subsidiary is not a wholly owned subsidiary, the buyer will want to investigate the shareholder dynamics and rights including the terms of any shareholders’ agreement.
· The buyer will need to investigate the relationship between the target group/business and the seller’s group. It will also want to ensure that the assets subject to the transaction sit in the right place at completion such that the target group/business can cleanly detach from the seller’s group. Examples of key point to look out for include:
- Assets that are not owned by the target group;
- Contractual relationships or operational dependence on the seller’s group. If the target group/business is reliant on services or supplies provided by the seller’s group, for example, the buyer will need to consider if it can replicate or replace these post completion; and
- Guarantees given by the target group in respect of seller group obligations.
Why would a buyer carry out insolvency searches?
· A buyer would want to ensure that neither the target company nor any seller is subject to any kind of insolvency proceedings. Necessary searches would therefore need to be carried out to ensure that the seller, in the case of an individual hasn’t been declared bankrupt and, in the case of a company, hasn’t been put into administration for example or that there are no pending petitions. Obviously, a buyer doesn’t want to acquire a target that is in this position but neither would it want to transact with a seller in this situation: In some cases a transaction entered into with such a seller could be considered void.
What would a buyer want to check regulatory and general compliance?
· A buyer will want to ensure that the target or seller has adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with their regulatory obligations. Key areas include data protection, anti-bribery and corruption and modern slavery.
· There will be a number of key issues that a buyer’s advisers will look for in their review of material contracts. Examples include:
- Are there any contractual restrictions on transfer, for example, change of control provisions (in the case of a share sale) or assignment provisions (in the case of an asset sale).
- Under what circumstances are the parties entitled to terminate the contract?
- When are the contracts due to expire and does any party have renewal rights?
- Are there any negotiations in relation to those contracts that are currently in progress?
- Are there any particularly unusual or onerous terms?
- What are the payment obligations under the contract, are there penalties for late payment or any price review provisions?
- Are there any non-compete/exclusive dealing obligations?
- Have key contracts been documented/properly documented and executed and what is the governing law?
· The input of a commercial lawyer may be required in relation to any material contracts that are identified.
Why would the buyer want to check if there is material litigation?
· In the case of a share sale, the buyer will want to know whether the target is affected by any material existing or threatened litigation and if so the relevant details, the most obvious being details of the litigation itself along with the amounts involved.
· The input of a litigation lawyer may be required in relation to any material litigation that is identified.
When does data protection apply?
· Where the transfer of information or data as part of a due diligence exercise is made by a UK entity, and where it includes personal data relating to a data subject, it will amount to processing by a controller and will be subject to the legislative framework which protects the rights of that data subject.
· Giving personal data to prospective buyers during due diligence will amount to ‘processing’ as ‘controllers’ by both:
- (1) the seller processing the information by providing it as due diligence; and
- (2) the prospective buyer(s) who receive such information and use it to carry out their due diligence investigation.
Lawful and fair processing principle?
· Both seller and each prospective buyer(s) involved in a share or business sale need to be aware of the principles relating to processing of personal data (Art. 5 UK GDPR), as they will be directly responsible for their own compliance with these principles.
· Principle 1 is that personal data must be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner.
In order to process data lawfully, it must satisfy one of the legal processing grounds in Art. 6 UK GDPR.
These grounds include:
- (i) where the data subject has given consent to the processing (Arts. 6(1)(a)); and
- (ii) where the processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller (Arts. 6(1)(f)).
· In considering which of these grounds they might rely on to share personal data during due diligence on a corporate transaction, the parties need to consider the following:
Obtaining consent from all employees/individual customers before completion of a confidential commercial transaction is impractical. The GDPR sets strict rules on what will constitute valid consent, including the need to show that consent has been freely given. This may also be difficult to show – particularly where there is an imbalance of power, as there will be in an employment relationship. It might be practicable in relation to senior employees/directors.
The legitimate interest condition allows for disclosures which are in the legitimate interest of a controller or third party, providing that such interests are not overridden by the interests and fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which would require protection of that personal data. This is the ground that is usually relied on in a corporate transaction – but the parties must actually carry out and document an assessment of (i) the purpose and necessity of the disclosure, and (ii) the balance of this against the individuals’ interests (ICO Guidance) - so it cannot just be assumed.
· The second principle of processing data is the ‘purpose limitation’ principle (Art 5(b) UK GDPR). What does this require?
This requires that data must be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes. The parties must therefore consider if the sharing of data during due diligence is incompatible with the purpose for which it was collected: if the seller uses a well drafted privacy notice for employees/customers, this should refer to processing in respect of a potential sale.
· The third principle of processing data is the ‘data minimisation’ principle (Art 5(c) UK GDPR). What does this include?
This requires that the minimum of personal data necessary for the purpose should be shared. For example, during due diligence, it is generally not necessary to share employee data in such a way that individuals (other than senior individuals) can be identified.
· The sixth principle of processing data is the ‘integrity and confidentiality’ principle (Art 5(f) UK GDPR). What does this require?
This requires that data must be processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data. So due diligence information should be shared in a secure manner, and the seller should place obligations on the buyer(s) as to its security and confidentiality.
- Anonymisation?
· If data is amended so that all personal identifying details are removed and the recipient cannot re-identify the data subjects from what they are given (for example, this would include deleting office location and/or department if there are fewer than 5 employees who would fall into that category), then the ICO’s current position is that this information is anonymous in the buyer’s hands – so it would no longer be personal data and would fall outside the provisions of UK GDPR – SO the principles considered above would cease to be directly relevant.