Completion Flashcards
What happens after the transaction docs have been negotiated and finalised?
- Once the transactional documents have been negotiated and finalised, then the next step is for the parties to sign and date the acquisition agreement (and usually the disclosure letter). This is the point at which the parties formally agree to enter into the transaction through the method of signing. At signing the parties are legally bound to proceed with the deal provided the conditions for completion are fulfilled.
What is completion?
- The transaction is then concluded by a process called completion. This process usually takes place at a formal meeting attended by all the parties and their legal advisors (although increasingly this process is being dealt with remotely). Completion is when all the necessary formalities to close the transaction take place, such as the seller(s) signing the stock transfer form(s) and the buyer paying the purchase price.
Are signing and completion carried out at the same time?
- Signing and completion is often carried out at the same time, although sometimes a delay between the two stages may be necessary for legal or practical reasons. This is referred to as a ‘split’ signing and completion.
- Advantages of a simultaneous signing and completion
- A simultaneous signing and completion provides certainty and eliminates the risk of an adverse event occurring between signing and completion.
- The drafting of the acquisition agreement will be relatively straightforward as there is no need for the parties to agree and document the allocation of risk in the period between signing and completion.
- However, it may not always be possible for signing and completion to take place at the same time. For example, completion may be conditional upon certain conditions being satisfied such as regulatory or shareholder consents. In these circumstances, the parties have two options, which we will now examine.
- The parties’ options when completion is subject to conditions
- The parties can delay signing until all the completion conditions have been met. This means signing and completion can take place simultaneously. It also reduces the need for the parties to agree and document what will happen in the intervening period.
- However, this can also lead to uncertainty as the parties are not committed to proceeding with the transaction until all the requirements have been met.
- The parties may decide to proceed to signing and to document the requirements for completion as conditions precedent to completion in the acquisition agreement. Both parties are then committed to proceeding with the transaction if the conditions precedent are fulfilled. Although this means that the parties can be certain completion will occur on satisfaction of the conditions, it also means the parties will have to reach an agreement on a number of complex issues such as:
· How the business will be managed in the intervening period; and
· What will happen if the conditions are not satisfied within the time limits.
- Where the parties have opted to proceed with a ‘split’ signing and completion, there will be an added layer of complexity both from a commercial and legal point of view. The parties will have to agree and document several key issues in the acquisition agreement including:
· The extent of the conditions precedent and the timescales;
· Who is responsible for ensuring satisfaction of the conditions precedent;
· What happens if the conditions precedent are not satisfied;
· How the target’s business should be run in the period between signing and completion;
· Who should bear the risk of any adverse event(s) that may occur between signing and completion; and
· Whether the seller will give the warranties in the acquisition agreement at signing only or whether these will be repeated at completion.
- The buyer’s position where there is a split signing and completion
- The buyer’s solicitors will have to consider what events might occur to the target in the interim period between signing and completion which could mean that the buyer is no longer buying what it thought it was buying when it signed the acquisition agreement.
- Once the acquisition agreement has been signed, the buyer will be committed to the purchase so it will not want the value of the target to be reduced or its business or reputation to be damaged in any way during the period leading up to the date of completion.
- The buyer is also likely to want to be able to terminate the acquisition agreement and pull out of the transaction altogether, if anything does occur before completion which might materially and adversely affect the value of the target. As the buyer has little control over the target until completion, the buyer’s solicitors will want to negotiate the appropriate protections in the acquisition agreement.
- The buyer will want to negotiate three main provisions in the acquisition agreement to protect its position in the event of a split signing and completion as follows:
· Dealing with any conditions precedent to completion
· Agreeing how the target should be run in the interim
· Ensuring the warranties are still true on completion
- There will have been a reason why simultaneous signing and completion has not been possible. The acquisition agreement will need to include a clause dealing with
· the conditions precedent to completion;
· setting out what the conditions precedent are;
· setting a final date by which they must be satisfied; and
· setting out which party is responsible for satisfying the conditions precedent and where appropriate, mutual obligations on the part of the buyer and the seller to co-operate in order to do all things that may be necessary in order to ensure that the conditions precedent are satisfied.
* This clause should also state what will happen if the conditions precedent are not satisfied by the given date. Usually, one or both of the parties will have a right to terminate the acquisition agreement by giving written notice of termination to the other and if that is done, the clause will go on to provide for certain key provisions in the acquisition agreement to survive termination.
- The acquisition agreement will need to include provisions relating to the conduct of the business of the target between the date of the acquisition agreement and completion. The target may be prohibited from taking certain actions in the interim period without the consent of the buyer. These restrictions may relate to the following activities:
· capital expenditure;
· the disposal of material assets;
· additional borrowing;
· hiring and firing of key employees;
· entry into new material contracts;
· changing existing or terminating material contracts;
· issuing of new shares or options to acquire shares;
· changes in the constitution of any of the companies in the target group; and
· the declaration of dividends or other distributions.
- The seller may be required to give undertakings to the buyer concerning the conduct of the target’s business in the interim period such as undertakings to:
· procure that the target group conducts its business(es) in the ordinary and usual course;
· use its best/reasonable endeavours to maintain the trade connections of the target group;
· Inform the buyer if there are any material changes to the business or the financial position of the target group; and
· ensure that adequate insurance policies are maintained covering the assets of the target group.
* As with the repetition of warranties a buyer may want to include termination rights in relation to breach by the seller of the pre-completion undertaking but this will be strongly resisted by the seller.
- In requesting consents and undertakings in the interim period the buyer is guarding against a loss in the value of the target prior to completion. However, there are a number of reasons it may be appropriate to limit the extent of control the buyer has in the interim period including:
· under certain competition regimes (including the EU) if the buyer is seen to have taken control or the parties have started to implement integration before the appropriate clearance or consent they risk incurring penalties. This is known as ‘gun-jumping’;
· in the UK the CMA has the power to impose an interim enforcement order (‘IEO’ also known as a hold separate order) to prevent pre-emptive actions in certain mergers. Breach of an IEO can result in a fine of up to 5% of turnover;
· the seller and/or target may be subject to regulatory regimes (e.g FCA and SRA regulated businesses and FA regulated football clubs) which impose limits on the control of the buyer; or
· the seller may want to protect the value of the target in the event the transaction does not complete. For example, the seller may want to limit the sharing of confidential information.
- The seller will give the warranties and representations at signing when the acquisition agreement is executed. This might cause concern for the buyer, as those warranties and representations may become out of date by the time of completion or, worse, an intervening event may occur which would otherwise put the seller in breach of warranty. Accordingly, the buyer will want:
· the warranties and representations to be given again at completion; and
· the right to rescind if there is any breach of warranty in the interim period.
- Getting the seller to repeat the warranties and representations at completion is an example of risk allocation whereby risk is pushed back to the seller. This is because:
· The buyer wants to know that the warranties and representations are still true on completion; and
· The buyer is protected from events occurring between signing and completion which give rise to a breach of warranty.
* In practice it is often only specific categories of ‘fundamental’ warranties that would be repeated on completion, e.g. title and capacity warranties.
- Repeating warranties and representations
- The seller may also be obliged in the acquisition agreement to notify the buyer if any of the warranties and/or representations are breached between signing and completion. The buyer’s solicitors should also consider what rights the buyer should have if there is a breach of warranty during the period between signing and completion. Often, the buyer’s solicitors would advise the buyer to seek a contractual right to withdraw from the agreement, if the seller is in breach of any of the warranties before completion, possibly in addition to the right to claim damages for any breach.
- However, whilst it is usual for a buyer to try to negotiate the right to withdraw from the agreement, it is commercially rare to see this right actually exercised because buyers will be very conscious of wasted costs and time already invested in the deal. A more practical approach is that the buyer will seek to revise the purchase price to reflect the impact the breach has on the target. The buyer’s right to withdraw improves its bargaining position in relation to the seller when seeking a reduction in the purchase price.