DSL Fish Profile Notes Flashcards
Do fish have positional awareness?
Specifically, do fish change amount the bluff on river with mid-pair and lower going from BTN to EP?
No correlation (hovers betwen 25% and 35%)
Can eliminate position when thinking about fish stats.
Do regs have positional awareness?
Specifically, do regs change amount the bluff on river with mid-pair and lower going from BTN to EP?
Yes, they bluff less in earlier positions (falls from 31 to 21 from BTN to EP) (from tightening of preflop ranges with less blufs)
Is a fish’s range composition dramatically affected by bet size?
Yes.
Are overbets and size ups between 0.8-1.0pot from fish underbluffed, balance, or overbluffed in a B-B-B line?
Underbluffed and rare.
Are 0.6-0.8pot from fish bets overbluffed, balanced, or underbluffed in a B-B-B line?
Overbluffed. Call with any mid pair.
Are 0.4-0.6pot from fish overbluffed, balanced, or underbluffed in a B-B-B line?
Balanced. Profitably call with any top pair.
Do fish lack texture/range awareness?
Do they call more or fold more on:
a) highly interactive textures
b) non-interacting textures
They do not have range awareness to recognize bad runouts or “scare cards” for preflop caller.
Only look at basic texture interactivity
a) fish fold slightly more on highly interactive textures
b) fish fold slightly more on non-interactive textures.
Overall, calling requirements consistent across textures.
Are Stop-and-Go lines (e.g. villain goes B-X-B, or XC-X-B) overbluffed or underbluffed by fish?
Fish dramatically overbluff the B-X-B line for all sizings except overbet which remains balanced.
Fish dramatically overbluff the XC-X-B line for all sizings except overbet which is underbluffed.
In many cases we should have profitable CALL WITH ANY PAIR
(texture shows little correlation to river range composition)
Is B-X-B from fish villain overbluffed or underbluffed?
Overbluffed dramatically except balanced overbet.
CALL w/ ANY PAIR
Is XC-X-B from fish villain overbluffed or underbluffed?
Overbluffed dramatically.
Especially on Low runouts (massively overbluffed)
CALL w/ ANY PAIR
fish bluff even more more after 1/3 cbet, so keep in mind in close decisions against XC-X-B line.
Flop check raise from fish, which sizes are overbluffed or underbluffed?
0.4-0.6pot is overbluffed, but is balanced or underbluffed for all other sizings.
Call w/ ANY TOP PAIR against this1/2pot sizing,
Increase calling requirements to strong top pair or two pair vs other sizes.
Note: This is exception to rule that 0.6-0.8 sizings are most heavily bluffed.
3-street agression lines where fish is OOP where fish is OOP, smaller sizings tend to be bluffed more.
Fish turn check raise followed by river bet is underbluffed or overbluffed?
Do we call with top pair?
Fish turn check raise followed by river bet is significantly underbluffed by fish.
CONFIDENTLY FOLD ALL TOP PAIR in almost all cases when facing a bet on the river. begin calling with medium strength two pairs
fish bluff w/ significantly fewer missed draws in both flop and turn XR lines compared to regs (who overbluff).
Do fish bluff w/ significantly more or fewer missed draws in flop and turn XR lines?
fish bluff w/ significantly fewer missed draws in both flop and turn XR lines compared to regs (who overbluff).
CONFIDENTLY FOLD ALL TOP PAIR in almost all cases when facing a bet on the river. begin calling with medium strength two pairs
Fish river check raise: underbluffed or overbluffed?
What is bottom of calling range against it?
SEVERELY underbluffed. 23% underbluffed for overall, 17% for minraise.
Call strong two pair or better.
Counterintuitively, min raise sizing even more underbluffed than other sizings. TRIPS AND SETS bottom of calling range against minraise
Fish river min-checkraise: underbluffed or overbluffed?
What is bottom of calling range against it?
SEVERELY UNDERBLUFFED. 23% underbluffed for overall, 17% for minraise.
Counterintuitively, min raise sizing even more underbluffed than other sizings. TRIPS AND SETS bottom of calling range against minraise.