Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease Flashcards

1
Q

Lecture Outcomes

A

1) describe the basic features of the two broad categories of disorders affecting the
human cardiovascular system.
2) describe the main symptoms and pathobiological basis of angina.
3) describe the key historical events and circumstances surrounding the development
of nitroglycerin as an effective but flawed angina remedy.
4) describe the mechanisms underlying the anti-angina properties of nitroglycerin
5) explain the rationale for and clinical trial outcomes of mass prescription of
polypills containing multiple cardiovascular drugs in low and moderate income
countries.
6) explain the role of genetics in variable patient responses to cardiovascular
medicines and the potential clinical implications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aims of Lecture

A

1) To explore how discovering the
antianginal properties of nitroglycerin
inspired the development of many
drugs for cardiovascular disease.
2) To explore the role of genetics in
variable responses to cardiovascular
drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

A
  1. CVDs due to atherosclerosis:
     Ischaemic heart disease or coronary artery disease
    (i.e., basis for “heart attacks”)
     Cerebrovascular disease (i.e., basis for strokes)
     Diseases of the aorta and arteries, including
    hypertension and peripheral vascular disease.
  2. Other CVDs

    Congenital heart disease
     Rheumatic heart disease
     Cardiomyopathies
     Cardiac arrhythmias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CVD in Australia – 2022 Snapshot (ABS Data)

A

 5.2% or 1.3 million people had heart, stroke and vascular disease
 ↑ from 4.1% in 2001 but similar to 2007–08 (5.3%)
 CVD slightly more common in males than females (5.9% c.f. 4.6%).
 Prevalence strongly ↑ with age
 Heaviest toll in low socioeconomic and regional populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Angina – What is it?

A

Spasmodic bouts of intense discomfort in
upper chest
Pain often radiates to left arm
Sense of suffocation and impending death
Can be stable (predictable frequency,
provoked by exercise, excitement, etc) or
unstable (unpredictable without
provocation)
Can precede heart attack (“preinfarction’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Causes of Angina: Myocardial
Oxygen (O
2) Deprivation

A

 Angina occurs when low blood flow (myocardial
ischemia) limits O2 delivery to heart muscle during
exertion
 Atherosclerotic narrowing of coronary artery is main
cause (i.e. block in blood vessels which supply heart
muscle)
 Involves fatty deposits (“plaques”) in blood vessel
(“atherosclerosis”)
 Angina can reflect other causes (e.g. anaemia (low
haemoglobin), hypotension (low BP), endothelial
damage, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1847: Ascanio Sobrero - Inventor of Nitroglycerin

A

Chemistry Professor in Turino, Italy
Face badly scarred in lab explosion
Invented nitroglycerin using glycerol and
mineral acids (needed to chill the reaction!)
Considered it too dangerous to be of
practical use
(“When I think of all the victims killed… I am
almost ashamed to admit to be its
discoverer.”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Alfred Nobel Tames the Monster

A

1864, Nobel family company began selling
nitroglycerin to mining companies
‘64, explosion at Stockholm plant killed
Alfred’s brother (5 in total)
’66-’68, nitroglycerin kills scores of people
around the world

Alfred finds nitroglycerin is stable if
blended with porous silica gel
(“Dynamite” putty)
 Invented patented detonator
which made him a massive
fortune

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Monday Disease” Afflicted 19th C Workers in TNT
Munitions Plants

A

Munitions factory workers exposed to large
quantities of nitroglycerin
Strong headaches & facial flushing on return
to work after weekend break
i.e., persistent vasodilatation during working week
Some workers solved situation by wearing
work clothes on weekend
Suggested that nitroglycerin residues in the
worker’s overalls were producing chronic
vasodilatation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1879 - Murrell’s First Human Trials

A

Tested nitroglycerin on 35 healthy
individuals
Considerable variability in response
“From a consideration of the
physiological action of the drug… I
concluded that it would probably prove
of service in the treatment of angina
pectoris, and I am happy to say this
expectation has been realised.”
Used early BP monitoring device to confirm
beneficial effects in 3 angina patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

William Murrell – 19th C Pioneer in Angina Treatment

A

Noted English doctor born in London in 1853
 Trained in medicine alongside Sydney Ringer (notable
early pharmacologist)
1877, Physician at Westminster Hospital, London
Aware of conflicting literature reports concerning
nitroglycerin & headaches
Aware of use of amyl nitrate in angina by Lauder
Brunton
Wondered if nitroglycerin would be of value in angina
patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Murrell’s Famous Self-Experiment

A

“I obtained some 1% solution. One afternoon, whilst
seeing out-patients, I remembered that I had a little
bottle in my pocket. Wishing to taste it, I applied the
moistened cork to my tongue, and a moment after, a
patient coming in, I had forgotten all about it.

“I had not asked my patient half a dozen questions before I felt a violent
pulsation in my head. The pulsation rapidly increased, and soon became
so severe that each beat of the heart seemed to shake my whole body.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nitroglycerin in Modern Medicine

A

Widely used to relieve angina pain in vulnerable
patients
Acts by dilating veins in periphery
“Preloading” decreases amount of blood
returned to heart
Peripheral “pooling” reduces effort needed by
ventricles to pump blood into circulation
Reduces workload on heart muscle (less severe
angina pain)
Other organic nitrates also used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nitroglycerin is Taken Via Non-Oral Routes

A

Nonoral means pills are not swallowed (drug breaks down in stomach acid)
Used via various topical routes (oral cavity in acute attack)

Other routes: sticking patches (for skin application), oral sprays, oral pastes,
intradermal implants
Tablet, patches removed once pain subsides (avoid headaches)

Sublingual (under tongue)
Buccal (against cheek)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How Does Nitroglycerin Work?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ongoing Challenges - 1: The Global Problem & Promise of Polypills

A

 ≈80% of global CVD in LMICs (Low + Middle Income Countries)
 Low-income: <$1,005 GNI per capita
 Lower-middle-income: $1,006 to $3,955 GNI
 Less resources for public health
 Growing interest in using polypills
 Polypill = Fixed dose combinations of well tolerated (modest)
doses of several CV drugs, e.g.:
 Statins to lower cholesterol
 β-Blockers to reduce strength of heart beats
 ACE Inhibitors to increase blood vessel diameters
 Aspirin to lower risk of blood clotting
 Given to everyone in population (e.g., > 55’s, etc) in hope of
↓ strokes & heart attacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The PolyIran Study – Evidence for Polypill Effectiveness

A

 Roshandel et al., 2019, first results from large population
polypill “cardioprotection” study
 Randomised trial in NE Iran (Golestan Province)
 6838 participants selected on basis of age (50–75 yrs)
 Almost 90% had no previous CVD
 Equal mix of male/females
 The 4-drug polypill used contained:
 2 half-dose blood pressure-lowering drugs
 A moderate-intensity dose of a statin
 Low-dose aspirin
 Findings: ↓ ↓ in major CVD events over 5 yr
 Adjusted hazard ratio [HR] was 0·66, 95% CI 0·55–0·80
 Only 13% of participants discontinued the polypill
 Suggests polypill approach is safe & effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ongoing Challenges – 2: Variability in Patient Response

A

Any two patients rarely respond identically to the same dose of a drug
 This variability is obvious with cardiovascular drugs
 i.e., “Mean” responses in populations can be misleading
 Some patients gain little benefit, while others show exaggerated responses or toxicity
Holds true across many drug classes (e.g., statins, diuretics, anticoagulants)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
A
18
Q
A
19
Q
A
20
Q

Conclusion: Can “Personalised Medicine” Improve CV Disease
Treatment Outcomes – Hope or Hype?

A

Hope:
 Rising availability of genetic screening technology (e.g., PCR, Next-Gen
sequencing) will see  adoption in medicine
 Knowing a person’s SNVs may guide choice of CV drugs that work
better or are safer in that patient
Hype:
 Who pays for the testing or research to validate disease associations?
 Individual, health insurer?
 Is it worth the effort? (likely depends on disease context – nature of CV
disease)
 Doctors often switch to drugs with less “pharmacogenetic issues”
 Which profession will steward the knowledge required to
implement pharmacogenomic knowledge?
 Doctors, pharmacists, scientists?

20
Q

Statins – A lifesaving drug! - Lecture overview

A
  • What are statins used for and what did we do before we had statins?
  • How were statins developed?
  • How do statins work?
  • What are the benefits and risks of taking a statin?
  • Where are we going with statin therapy now?
20
Q

Lecture learning outcomes

A
  • describe cardiovascular disease and its causes
  • describe the normal role of cholesterol in human body and the production
    and source of cholesterol
  • relate the lipid hypothesis to the role of cholesterol in cardiovascular
    disease and the development of statins
  • describe the lipid-lowering action of statins and additional benefits of statin
    therapy
  • list statin-related side effects
  • describe the action of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors as alternative lipidlowering therapies
20
Q

Cardiovascular disease

A
  • Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death & disability in the world.
  • Refers to conditions that effect the structure and function of the heart &
    vessels and includes:
  • Coronary heart disease (CHD)
  • Coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • Heart failure
  • Valve disease
  • Arrhythmias
  • Peripheral artery disease (PAD)
  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Has both lifestyle and genetic components
  • Can lead to lifelong chronic health problems
21
Q

Causes of CVD

A
  • Cardio and vascular diseases share common risk factors
  • Genetic risk factors:
  • Defects in receptors that clear cholesterol
  • Defects in genes that regulate fluid control/salt balance
  • Defects in genes that sense pressure changes in vessels
  • Lifestyle risk factors:
  • Age
  • Male gender (risk is similar after menopause)
  • Family history
  • High blood pressure
  • High cholesterol
  • Overweight/obese
  • Physically inactive
  • Smoking
  • Poor diet
  • Excessive alcohol consumption
  • Glucose intolerance/insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome/type 2 diabetes
22
Q

History of cholesterol & CVD – “The Lipid Hypothesis”

A
  • > 100 years ago - German pathologist Virchow observed artery walls of patients dying from occlusive vascular disease were thick and irregular and
    contained a yellowish fatty substance (atheroma = Greek for porridge).
  • 1913 – Anitschkow & Chalatow showed that feeding cholesterol to rabbits
    produced atheromas.
  • Physicians remain skeptical because patients with CVD had cholesterol levels
    similar to the general population.
  • 1950s – Framingham study: confirmed link between high cholesterol and increased risk of CVD.
  • Confirmed in many other studies & populations.
  • Later studies confirmed it was predominately due to LDL-c levels.
  • Lipid Hypothesis: Elevated LDL-c is causally related to coronary artery disease
    & reducing it will reduce the risk of myocardial infarction & other coronary
    events
23
Q

How can we reduce LDL – early attempts & Cholesterol Controversy Phase 1

A
  • Lipid Hypothesis remained controversial due to lack of studies demonstrating
    benefits with reduction in cholesterol/LDL.
  • Early dietary & lifestyle studies demonstrated some benefits, which were
    compelling when viewed together, but less so individually.
  • Dietary changes in Western countries are difficult to maintain – small reductions.
  • Why…cholesterol is also made by the body – what happens when it makes too much?
  • Other drugs – bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, niacin & probucol – limited efficacy &/or tolerability.
  • Drugs targeting the biosynthesis of cholesterol were investigated & developed.
23
Q

What is cholesterol?

A
  • Cholesterol is a fat-like substance that is essential for the normal
    functioning of the body.
  • It is required to make some hormones and vitamin D, maintain normal
    cellular structure & function, and to assist in digesting food.
  • The body produces cholesterol naturally, but we also get it from food.
  • Cholesterol (and other lipids) are transported around body via
    lipoproteins:
  • Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – “bad” cholesterol – ~70% of cholesterol
  • High density lipoprotein (HDL) – “good” cholesterol
  • Triglycerides - fat
  • Lipoprotein (a) – an LDL-like particle
  • Many others – VLDL, IDL, etc etc
24
Q

Different classes of statins

A
24
Q
A
24
Q

Cholesterol biosynthesis

A
  • Most mammalian cells produce cholesterol.
  • Complex process involving >30 enzymes.
  • Synthesis pathway was discovered 1950s/60s
  • Earliest drug to target this pathway was triparanol – which acts late in the pathway – withdrawn due to
    development of cataracts, thought to be due to
    accumulation of desmosterol.
  • HMG-CoA reductase was then targeted:
  • First & rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis.
  • Its precursor HMG-CoA is water soluble and has other
    breakdown pathways.
  • It’s inhibition limits build up of potentially toxic
    precursors.
25
Q

Lovastatin enters clinical use

A
  • Physicians started prescribing the drug from 1987 onwards
  • At its maximal dose of 80mg/day was shown to reduce LDL
    levels by up to 40% with minimal adverse effects.
  • Went on to achieve peak annual sales of US $1 billion
  • Many more followed:
  • 1988 – simvastatin (semi-synthetic derivative of lovastatin)
  • 1991 – pravastatin (derived from biotransformation of compactin)
  • 1994 – fluvastatin (synthetic)
  • 1997 – atorvastatin (synthetic)
  • 1998 – cerivastatin (synthetic)
  • 2003 – rosuvastatin (synthetic)
25
Q

Different classes of statins

A
  • Active component is a modified 3,5-dihydroxy-glutaric acid moiety
    (structurally similar to HMG-CoA).
  • Statin must have a 3R,5R configuration to competitively bind to HMG-CoA
    reductase.
  • Molecular & clinical differences arise due to the side ring.
  • Substituents on the side ring define the solubility and pharmacological
    properties
  • Pharmacokinetic properties arise from solubility & form administered in
    (inactive lactone v active acid form)
26
Q

Drugs targeting HMG-CoA reductase

A
  • 1970s
  • ML236B or compactin (mevastatin) was identified by Japanese microbiologist Akira Endo in a fermentation broth of Penicillium citrinum.
  • Demonstrated to lower plasma cholesterol in rabbit, monkey & dog (but not rat)
  • Developed by Sankyo and shown to be highly effective at lowering TC and LDL in patients with FH
  • 1978
  • Albert & Chen at Merck Research Labs discovered mevinolin (lovastatin) in fermentation broth of Aspergillus terreus.
  • 1980
  • In April, after animal safety studies, trials of lovastatin in healthy humans began and were shown to lower LDL.
  • In September, mevastatin was withdrawn from the market & trials stopped by Sankyo – reasons never made public – speculated to be related to serious animal toxicity
  • Due to close structural similarity with lovastatin, Merck stopped all their human trials and went back to animals
  • 1982
  • Small studies in humans with severe FH restarted with lovastatin (outside Merck) and showed clear reductions in LDL with
    very few adverse effects
  • 1983
  • With additional animal safety studies confirming no toxicity, Merck restarted human trials of lovastatin
  • 1984
  • Multiple studies in different populations demonstrated benefits of lovastatin with very few adverse effects
  • 1986
  • Merck applies for regulatory approval for lovastatin, which after considerable review by the FDA was granted in August
    1987
27
Q

Cholesterol Controversy Phase 2

A
  • Late 80s/early 90s – movement of treating hypercholesterolaemia came under fire again.
  • Largely because clinical trial evidence was limited to middle-aged men – did it also apply to women & the elderly?
  • 1990 & 1992 review of pre-statin trials suggested while CHD events were reduced, survival was not improved… off- set by increase in non-cardiac mortality (specifically cancer & violence-related)..?
  • Expert panels in Europe & USA continued to recommend cholesterol-lowering drugs, but other countries (Britain & Scandinavia) rejected.
27
Q
A
27
Q

So how do statins actually work?

A
28
Q

Other benefits of statin therapy

A
  • Statins now thought to have a range of non-lipid
    related pleiotropic effects, including
  • Improving vascular function
  • Stabilising atherosclerotic plaques
  • Anti-inflammatory effects
  • Immunomodulatory effects
  • Ant-thrombotic effects
  • Effects on bone metabolism
  • Reduced risk of dementia
  • These additional benefits are thought to be due
    to inhibition of isoprenoid intermediates of the
    mevalonate pathway
  • Should we put statins in the drinking water?
29
Q

Statins & Heart Disease – where we stand now?

A
  • Now overwhelming evidence to support causal link between elevated LDL and CVD outcomes &
    mortality
  • Statins are the most widely prescribed & evidence-based lipid-lowering drug in the world for
    lowering LDL and reducing cardiovascular morbidity & mortality
  • For every 1 mmol/L reduction in plasma LDL – associated with a 22% reduction in major coronary and vascular events
  • Studies support both the early & prolonged use of statins in a range of patient populations and in
    both primary & secondary prevention
  • WOSCOPS study
  • 4S Study
  • Heart Protection Study
  • Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration
  • Jupiter Study
  • In addition to lifestyle modification, statins are the bedrock of all international guidelines on lipid
    management.
30
Q

Statins therapy – are there any risks?

A
  • All drugs – even “natural therapies” come with a risk of side effects!
  • Most common statin-related side effect (~70% of reported) is muscle related – statin associated muscle symptoms or SAMS
  • Other side effects include:
  • New on-set type 2 diabetes
  • Neurological & neurocognitive effects
  • Hepatotoxicity
  • Renal toxicity
  • Other conditions
  • True prevalence of statin intolerance is widely debated & currently no universal
    definition – especially with respect to SAMS
  • Number of underlying causes that may contribute to statin toxicity/side effects.
30
Q
A
31
Q

Risk factors associated with SAMS

A
31
Q

Prevalence of statin intolerance & its risk factors

A
31
Q

Other causes of statin intolerance

A
31
Q

ABC Catalyst Oct 2013 – Heart of the matter

A
  • On 24 and 31 October 2013, ABC aired a two-part special edition of Catalyst, title Heart of the matter that
    was critical of statins.
  • Program questioned the link between high cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease and suggested the
    benefits of statins had been overstated and the harms downplayed.
  • Nearly 1.5 million Australians are estimated to have viewed each part of the program
  • Program advised its content should not be taken as medical advice – still widely criticized & ultimate retracted.
  • In the weeks following the program
  • 2.6% reduction in statin dispensing = 14,005 fewer dispensing Australia wide EVERY week (higher in people not taking
    other CVD medication)
  • 28.8% increase in the discontinuation of statin use
  • At 30 June 2014 (8 months later) - >60,000 people affected and no sign that this had abated
  • This could represent 1522 and 2900 preventable and potentially fatal major vascular events
  • Remember in Australia – 1 person has a cardiovascular event every 12 minutes!
32
Q

Statin-associated muscle symptoms - SAMS

A
  • Accounts for 70% of all reported statin side
    effects
  • SAMs usually presents as bilateral condition of
    the large proximal muscles, particularly of lower
    extremities.
  • Symptoms can occur at rest or shortly after
    exercise, usually within 1 month of treatment
    initiation or increase in dose
  • Can occur with and without increases in serum
    creatine kinase
  • Can be classed as toxic or immune related
    (HMG-CoA reductase antibodies)
  • Resolves with cessation of statin therapy
32
Q

Mechanisms of statin toxicity

A
32
Q

How common is statin intolerance?

A
  • RCTs suggest a low
    incidence <5%
  • Observational studies
    suggest 10-15%
  • Clinic data puts it as
    high as 30%
33
Q

Other causes of statin intolerance

A
34
Q

Assessing Statin Intolerance - SAMS

A
35
Q
A
36
Q
A
36
Q
A
36
Q
A