Domestic Violence

Question 1

C v C (Non-Molestation Order: Jurisdiction) 1977

Answer 1

no molestation to prevent W from publishing a story about a relationship

Question 2

G v F (Non-Molestation Order: Jurisdicton) 2000

Answer 2

if not sure whether a relationship amounts to associated person, it does

Question 3

Bramley v Bramley 2007

Answer 3

home for the purpose of occupation orders may extend to the area around home

Question 4

B v B (Occupation Order) 1999

Answer 4

NE former cohabitants, BoH used and wife and son would be rehoused

Question 5

Banks v Banks 1999

Answer 5

NE former cohabitatnts, exclusion of wife would harm her more because of mental health issues

Question 6

Dolan v Corby 2011

Answer 6

R had psychiatric condition, A more likely to find another accommodation

Question 7

Grubb v Grubb 2009

Answer 7

seriousness of order is greatest when there’s no alternative accommodation, and the wife only wanted to stay there until divorce so the issue of time wholly unreal

Question 8

G v G 2000

Answer 8

the harm caused (whether under s33(6) or 33(7)) need not be deliberately caused but a lack of intent may be a relevant consideration

Question 9

R v Hils 2001

Answer 9

PFHA, there must be a linkage between the events complained of to justify a course of conduct

Question 10

Hipgrave v Jones 2005

Answer 10

harassment is alarming a person or causing personal distress