Defining Parents Flashcards
R v HFEA ex parte Blood 1997
law and morality - medical treatment for a woman and a man together could not occur after the man had died
S v S 1972
a test set out - whether to make a direction for a fatherhood test is not to order it when it’s in the best interests of the child, but rather only to refuse it where it would be against the child’s best interests to do so
Re H (A Minor) (PR) 1998
a test established for applications under s4(1): degree of commitment, degree of attachment, reasons for applying for the order
Re H and A (Children) (Paternity: Blood Tests) 2002
couple married, affair, the right to know one’s parentage and identity is a fundamental part of private life
Leeds Teaching Hospital v A 2003
donor the biological and legal father
D v L (Surrogacy) 2012
PO in surrogacy, permission to pay more as children’s welfare
Re A (A Child: Joint Residence) (PR) 2008
a relationship recognised without any biological connection between a father and a child
Re G (Children) 2006
CW/CG dispute, welfare principle emphasised, Lady Hale: genetic parent not automatically better than non-genetic, social and psychological parenthood
Re G (Children) 2014
try to work things out yourself basically
Re G (A Minor), Re Z (A Minor) 2013
the aim of the lesbian sections in HFEA is to make them real families, therefore donors not parents
parliaments emphasis put on alternative families
H v S (Surrogacy Agreement) 2015
a gay couple had a surrogacy agreement with their friend, but the mother wanted to keep the baby; court put it with the couple because she was treating it badly; still surrogacy agreements not enforceable in English law
M v F and H 2013
sexual intercourse between the mother and the donor, he held to be the legal parent
Re D (Paternity) 2006
the child who lied with grandma refused to have a DNA test, the court ordered taking samples without any time limit, knowing the father in the child’s long term interest
T v B 2010
the word parent in Schedule 1 means legal parent, not psychological parent as in Re G
Re S (PR) 1995
M and F unmarried, separated, F sought PR, M opposed as he was convicted for having paedophilic lit, he got PR because he had shown sufficient commitment, it’s a way of showing the child that someone cares about it