domestic measures of HR Flashcards
what system does australia follow
dualist system : a legal system that does not deem treaties enforceable domestically until and unless they are incorporated into domestic law, usually by-passing similar legislation.
- Since Australia follows a dualist system, the rights and obligations of the treaty need to be incorporated into Australian law in some way. Parliament usually passes legislation that echoes the words of the treaty or amends existing laws.
what is A v Australia about
The amount of application international law has open domestic measures of HR
-Mr A arrived on a boat from Cambodia1989 seeking refugee status in Australia. He was detained for four years while his status as a refugee was being determined. Mr A complained that his rights to liberty and security of person were violated by the Australian federal government. The UNHRC agreed that Mr A’s rights were violated under Article 9 of the ICCPR. However, Australia rejected the finding and argued that the UNHRC was wrong. UNHRC could not do anything about it
what is the role of the constituion and how is it separated
The Constitution is a set of rules by which a country or state is run. they are often separated into 3 powers : exclusive, residual and concurrent
what is the difference between exclusive, residual and concurrent
exclusive : powers held by fed gov
Residual : powers held by state gov
Concurrent : power shared
the federal government/exclusive sector has powers over..
international affairs and the have the power to ratify HR agreements themselves to enact legislation
the aus federal gov has agreed to uphold HR stds set out in treaties/declarations. they have obliged to :
ICCPR
ICESCR
CROC
CEDAWW
CRPD
what is the separation of powers
refers to the division of powers in government into three institutions. - legislature, executive, judiciary
why is the separation of powers important
it maintains basic civil & political rights are protected & that no arm can hold too much power (protecting rule of law)
australia’s constitution covers..
implied rights rather than expressed as seen thro bill of rights.. a referendum needed to change law, being both a pro/con
what is common law and how is it created
The common law in Australia is the body of law made by judgments of the courts.
what is the disadvantage behind common law
the common law does not offer absolute protection of human rights, because common law **rights are not fixed **
the common law can be removed by any Act of parliament, because any legislation that conflicts with the common law position overrides that common law position.
The common law cannot be relied upon to develop new rights, as judgments will only define those rights on a case-by-case basis, and when a relevant matter is brought before a court.-
Establishment of precedent (creating legal definition of any human right within Australia) makes it easier for all future human rights cases to be complied with as existing legislation did not cover definition of slavery. (compliance, enforcement)
what are 4 cases exhibit the extent of common law
dietrich v the queen, mabo case, toonen case, abdulrahman v Toll ptyltd
what occurs in the dietrich v the queen case
In McInnes v The Queen (1979), it was found that there was no right to legal representation in Australia despite the fact that those with representation have a much greater chance of being acquitted. However, in the case of Dietrich v The Queen (1992), it was decided that, in a serious matter, a case could be delayed indefinitely until an accused person acquired legal aid.
what is the mabo case
The Mabo case of 1992 is an important case in the recognition of human rights in Australia. This case established for the first time that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have rights to some lands in Australia.
what is the toonen case
Nicholas Toonen complained to the UNHRC about Tasmania’s criminal laws which made homosexuality illegal. Toonen claimed the laws interfered with his right to privacy and non-discrimination. The UNHRC agreed with Toonen. The federal parliament responded to the UNHRC’s findings by passing the Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Act 1994 (Cth) in an attempt to override Tasmania’s laws.