Divorce Flashcards
Changing in the patterns of divorce
Since 1960s there has been a great increase in the number of divorces in the UK AND has continue doubling
-40% of all marriages will end in divorce
-65% of divorces come from women
-There were 118,000 in 2012
-There can be less divorces bc more people want to cohabit
Reasons to why the number of divorces are increasing(Changes in law)
-Divorce was hard to get, now it’s easy
-Equality of the sexes in divorce in 1923-this was followed by a large number of divorce petitions from women
-Its cheaper now because of legal aid for divorce in 1949
Other ways to solve an unhappy marriage
-Desertion: One partner leaves but are still married
-Legal separation: the courts separate them but are still married
-Empty shell marriage: They live together but don’t love each other and stay married
-But people don’t do these much, divorce is easier
-these solutions are less popular
Explanations for the decrease in divorce- Declining stigma and changing attitudes
-Before the church condemned divorced and didn’t want anything to do with it
-Divorce is more acceptable so people are likely to do it, it is normalized as stigma has declined
-Rather than being seen as shameful, today it is more likely to be regarded simply as a misfortune.
Stigma
Refers to the negative label, social disapproval or shame attached to a person action or relationship
Stigma-Mitchell and Goody
For example, churches tended to condemn divorce and often refused to conduct marriage services involving divorcees.
Mitchell and Goody (1997) note that an important change since the 1960s has been the rapid decline in the stigma attached to divorce.
Secularation
refers to the decline in the influence of religion in society.
-Many sociologists argue that religious institutions and ideas are losing their influence and society is becoming more secular.
For example, church attendance rates continue to decline.
As a result of secularisation
traditional opposition of churches to divorce now had less influence in society and therefore they were not as influenced by religious teachings and now made their own decisions about personal matters such as whether or not to file for divorce.
-many churches have also begun to soften their views on divorces and divorcees because they fear losing credibility with large sections of the public and with their own members.
Rising expectations of marriage-Fletcher (functionalist)
argue the high expectations people place on marriage today are a major cause of rising divorce rates.
bc they make couples less willing to tolerate an unhappy marriage.
-This is linked to the ideology of romantic love - the belief that marriage should be based only on love and that the right person for everyone exists
-if love dies, there is no justification for remaining married and reason to divorce=to search for your actual soulmate.
-In the past, individuals had little choice who they married, and at a time when the family was also a unit of production
-Marriages were contracted for economic reasons or out of duty to one’s family.
-Individuals had low expectations about marriage as a romantic union=bc they entered marriage with lower expectations, they were less likely to be dissatisfied by the absence of romance and intimacy.
Today marriage is increasingly viewed not as a binding contract, but as a relationship in which individuals seek personal fulfilment
This encourages couples to divorce if they do not find it.
Evaluation-Rising expectations of marriage-Fletcher
takes an optimistic view.
Feminist critics argue that the oppression of women within the family is the main cause of divorce but functionalists ignore this.
Functionalists offer an explanation of rising rates, they fail to explain why it is mainly women rather than men who seek divorce.
Women’s increased financial independence
-Women’s increased willingness to seek divorce is improvements in their economic position-have them less financially dependent on their husband and therefore freer to end an unsatisfactory marriage as they dont tolerate conflict or the absence of love
-Girls’ greater success in education now helps them achieve better-paid jobs than previous generation.
-Women today are much more likely to be in paid work-The proportion of women working rose from 53% in 1971 to 67% in 2013.
-Although women generally still earn less than men-Equal pay and anti-discrimination laws have helped to narrow the pay gap.
-The availability of welfare benefits means that women no longer have to remain financially dependent on their husbands.
Women’s increased financial independence-Allah and Crow put forward a similar view.
They argue that “marriage is less embedded within the economic system” now.There are fewer family firms and the family is no longer unit a production, so spouses are not so dependent on each other economically.
Feminists explanations
argue that married women today bear a dual burden- paid work+domestic labour.
has created a new source of conflict between husbands and wives-leads to higher divorce rate than in the past.
-Big improvements in women’s position in employment, education,politics etc
-argue marriage remains patriarchal, with men benefitting from their wives’ “triple shift” (paid work, domestic work and emotion work)
Hochschild (1997) argues that for many women, the homes are less preferable then work
-At work, women feel valued.
At home, men not doing any housework is a source of frustration and makes marriage less stable.
-both partners now go out to work=leaves less time and energy for the emotion work
these factors may contribute to a higher divorce rate.
Rushton
Mothers who have a dual burden are more likely to divorce than non-working mothers in marriages with a traditional division of labour
But where the husband of a working wife is actively in housework, the divorce rate is the same as for couples with a traditional division of labour.
Cooke and Gash
found no evidence that working women are more likely to divorce.They argue that this is because working has now become the accepted norm for married women.
Radical feminists such as Bernard (1976)
observe that many women feel dissatisfied with a patriarchal marriage.
She sees the rising divorce rate and the fact that most petitions come from women, as evidence of their growing acceptance of feminist ideas, women are becoming conscious of patriarchal oppression and more confident rejecting it.
Modernity and individualism
-Beck and Giddens (1992) argue that in modern society
traditional norms such as the duty to remain with the same partner for life, lose their hold over individuals.Each individuals become free to pursue their own self interest.This view has become known as the INDIVIDUALISATION THESIS
-Relationships are more fragile,bc individuals become less willing to remain with a partner if the relationship fails to delivery personal fulfilment.
Instead they seek what Giddens call the “pure relationship”
One that exists only to satisfy each partner’s needs and not out of a sense of duty, tradition or for the sake of the children.
This results in higher divorce rates.
-The rising divorce rate “normalises” divorce and strengthens the belief that marriage exists to provide personal fulfilment.
-Modern society encourages individualism in other ways.
eg-women as well as men are now expected to work and are encouraged to pursue their own individual career ambitions.
This can cause conflicts of interest between spouses and contribute to marital breakdown.
This pursuit of self-interest is likely to pull spouse apart.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-The new right dislike divorce
undesirable because it undermines marriage and the traditional nuclear family, which they regard as vital to social stability.
-In their view, a high divorce rate creates a growing underclass of welfare dependent female lone parents who are a burden on the state,it leaves boys without the adult male role model they need.They believe it also results in poorer health and educational outcomes for children.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-Feminists see a high divorce rate as desirable
shows that women are breaking free from the oppression of the patriarchal nuclear family.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-Postmodernists and the individualisation thesis see divorce as freedom to chose by individuals
to end a relationship when it no longer meets their needs.
They see it as a major cause of greater family diversity.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-Functionalists argue that a high divorce rate is not necessarily a threat to marriage as a social institution.
It is simply the result of people’s higher expectations of marriage today.
The high rate of re-marriage shows people’s continuing commitment to the idea of marriage.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-Interactionists aim to understand what divorce means to the individual.
Morgan (1996) argues that we cannot generalise about the meaning of divorce
every individual’s interpretation of it is different.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-The personal life perspective accepts that divorce can cause problems
such as financial difficulties (especially for women) and lack of daily contact between children and non-resident parents.
The meaning of high divorce rate
-Smart (2011) argue that divorce has become “normalised” and that family life can adapt to it without disintegrating.
Rather than seeing divorce as a major social problem, we should see it as just “one transition amongst others in the life course”
Partnerships
-Marriages-number of changes in the pattern of marriage
-Fewer people are marrying,marriage rates are at their lowest since the 1920s.
In 2012, there were 175,000 first marriages for both partners less than half the number for 1970.
-There are also more re-marriages (marriages where one or both partners have been married before)
-In 2012, one third of all marriages were re-marriages for one or both partners.
For many people, this is leading to “serial monogamy”
A pattern of marriage then divorce then re-marriage.
-People are marrying later
The average age of first marriage rose by seven years between 1971 and 2012, when it stood at 32 years for men and 30 for women.
-Couples are less likely to marry in church.
In 1981, 60% of weddings were conducted with religious ceremonies but by 2012 this had fallen to 30%.