Dishonestly Taking or Using a Document Flashcards
Dishonestly taking or using a document
Section and Penalty
Crimes Act 1961; Section 228(1)(a); 228(1)(b)
7 years imprisonment
Elements - 228(1)(a)
- With intent to obtain any
- Property OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR valuable consideration
- Dishonestly
- And without claim of right
- Takes OR obtains
- Any document;
Elements - 228(1)(b)
- With intent to obtain any
- Property OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR valuable consideration
- Dishonestly
- And without claim of right
- Uses OR attempts to use
- Any document;
Intent / Intent to Obtain
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly an intention to get a specific result.
R v Collister;
The defendant must intend to obtain, and he or she must intend to obtain by the deception.
Obtain
CA61; S217
Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person
Property
CA61; S2
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, (electricity, money, debt), and any thing in action, and any other right or interest.
Service
R v Cara -
“Service is limited to financial or economic value and excludes privileges or benefits”
Pecuniary Advantage
Hayes v R
A pecuniary advantage is “anything that enhances the accused’s financial position. It is that enhancement which constitutes the element of advantage.”
Valuable Consideration
Hayes v R:
“Anything capable of being a valuable consideration, whether of a monetary kind or of any other kind; in short, money or money’s worth.”
What are some examples of a valuable consideration?
- Monetary payment in return for goods or services
- Goods given in return for services provided
- Issuing a false invoice to receive payment for goods never supplied
Dishonestly
CA61; S217
Acting without a belief that there was express or implied consent from a person entitled to give such consent or authority.
Hayes v R:
The question is whether the belief is actually held, not whether that belief is reasonable. However, reasonableness may be relevant as evidence on the issue of whether the belief was actually held.
Hayes v R (dishonestly)
Hayes v R:
The question is whether the belief is actually held, not whether that belief is reasonable. However, reasonableness may be relevant as evidence on the issue of whether the belief was actually held.
Claim of Right
CA61; S2
In relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
Claim of right - nature of belief required
- The belief must be in a proprietary or possessory right in property.
- The belief must be about rights to the “property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed”.
- The belief must be held at the time of the conduct alleged to constitute the offence.
- The belief must be actually held by the defendant.
Takes
CA61; S219(4)
For tangible property, theft is committed by a taking when the offender moves the property or causes it to be moved.