Deception Flashcards
Deception legislation
CA61; S240(2):
(a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and—
(i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or
(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular; or
(b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it; or
(c) a fraudulent device, trick, or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person.
Representation
Simester and Brookbanks:
“It must be capable of being false so it must contain a proposition of fact”.
False representation
The representation must be false and the defendant must know or believe that it is false in a material particular, or be reckless whether it is false. Absolute certainty is not required and wilful blindness as to falsity of the statement will suffice.
Deception - what is required to be proved?
You must prove:
- That there was an intent to deceive
- That there was a representation by the defendant
- That the representation was false
- That the defendant either:
- knew that it was false in a material particular OR was reckless whether it was false in a material particular.
Intention to deceive
There must be an intent to deceive.
- *R v Morley:**
- *An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practised in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception.**
The recklessness mentioned in 240(2)(a) relates only to whether a representation is false in a material particular.
Recklessness - Cameron and Tipple
R v Morley
Intent to Deceive
- *R v Morley:**
- *An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practised in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception.**
Intent
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.
R v Collister
Examples of false representations
Orally: Verbally claiming to own goods that are in fact subject to a hire purchase agreement.
Documentary: Presenting a false certificate of qualification.
By conduct: Representing oneself to be a collector for charity by appearing to be carrying an official collection bag.
A representation by the defendant - R v Morley
It is possible to look beyond the literal meaning of express words used by the defendant and consider whether a particular meaning can be implied from his or her conduct.
It is necessary to analyse what meaning was conveyed to the party that now complains of a false representation:
- *R v Morley:**
- *Representations must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement of future intention**
Deception - Silence
As a general rule, silence or non-disclosure will not be regarded as a representation, but there are exceptions to this such as where an incorrect understanding is implied from a course of dealing and the defendant has failed to negate that incorrect understanding.
Deception - Continuing effect
In many cases a representation by words or conduct may have a continuing effect. For example, entering a restaurant and ordering dinner represents that the diner will follow the normal practice and pay for the meal. If they leave without paying, the continuing representation will become false, and the obtaining of the food will come within S240.
List some ways that knowledge of a false representation can be established.
S&B - Knowledge.
Knowledge can be established by:
- An admission
- Implication from the circumstances surrounding the event
- Propensity evidence
False in a material particular
(R v Mallett)
The prosecution must establish either that the defendant knows or believes his representation is false in a material particular or is reckless as to whether it is false.
Material particular: an important, essential or relevant detail or item;
R v Mallett: “A matter will be a ‘material particular’ if it is something important or something that matters.”
Deception - Omission
An omission is inaction, i.e. not acting. It can either be a conscious decision not to do something or not giving thought to the matter at all.
Deception - Duty to disclose
240(2)(b) requires you to show that there was some material particular that was not disclosed, that the defendant was under a duty to disclose and that the defendant failed to perform that duty.