Discuss how a sense of subjective well-being might affect cognition and behavior. Describe the brain mechanisms that may support these changes (B -2016) Flashcards
How would you structure an essay on well-being?
- Structure
- Define what we mean by SWB
- Introduce 4 constituents of wellbeing and examine how they might affect cognition and behaviour and examine the brain mechanisms that might support these changes
- Conclusion
What are the 4 constituents of well-being?
- Sustained positive emotion
- Robust recovery following negative events (Resilience)
- Empathy, altruism, and well-being
- mind wandering, mindfulness and affective stickiness
Western research on wellbeing broadly follows two philosophical perspectives from Ancient Greece - what are they? Who first described the?
Hedonia first described by Aristippus of Cyrene, and Eudaimonia first described by Aristotle
(Ryan and Deci, 2001)
Of what is hedonia comprised?
Pleasure, gratification, or momentary well-being
Of what is eudaimonia comprised?
meaningful engagement and the fulfilment of potential
Originally, the term ‘subjective well-being’ was chosen by Diener (1984) to….; whil ‘psychological well-being’ was the term chosen by Carol Ryff (1989) to operationalise…
hedonic well-being in his Tripartite Model of Subjective Well-Being
Eudaimonic well-being
Originally, the term ‘subjective well-being’ was chosen by Diener (1984) to operationalize hedonic well-being in his Tripartite Model of Subjective Well-Being; while ‘psychological well-being’ was the term chosen by Carol Ryff (1989) to operationalize eudaimonic well-being. However, … [include citations!]
more recent models (e.g., Keyes, 2002; Seligman, 2011) and research (e.g., Davidson & Schuyler, 2015) tend to combine the two perspectives (hedonic and eudaimonic) into a more general formulation of well-being
Who has conducted more recent research combing the hedonic and eudaimonic perspective?
Davidson and Schuyler, 2015
Who has created models combining the hedonic and eudaimonic philosophies?
Keyes, 2002
Seligman, 2011
However, more recent models (e.g., Keyes, 2002; Seligman, 2011) and research (e.g., Davidson & Schuyler, 2015) tend to combine the two perspectives (hedonic and eudaimonic) into a more general formulation of well-being – considering this trend in the research seems to hold for much of the research on the brain mechanisms underlying well-being (see. Davidson & Schuyler, 2015), …
, in this essay we too will combine the two in our conceptualization of well-being.
in this essay we too will combine the two in our conceptualization of well-being. As such, well-being can be defined as… and is comprised of… [citation!]
well-being can be defined as feeling good and functioning effectively (Huppert, 2005, 2011)
- sustained positive emotion;
- recovery from negative emotion;
- prosocial behavior and
- generosity; and mind-wandering, mindfulness and “affective stickiness” or emotion-captured attention (Davidson & Schuyler, 2015)
We are now going to examine each of these four constituents of well-being, and how they might affect X and Y.
cognition
behavior
Sustained Positive Emotion
In a recent study involving a large community sample derived from the MIDUS study, Davidson and Schuyler (2015) experimentally examined what?
relations between individual differences in sustained activation in the ventral striatum and well-being
With what is the ventral striatum associated? Says who?
It is an area associated with positive emotion
Heller et al., 2009
In their experiment, Davidson and Schuyler (2015)used a large community sample derived from what?
the MIDUS study
In their study examining the relationship between individual differences in sustained activation in the ventral striatum and well-being, what did Davidson and Schuyler (2015) find?
4 points
That individuals with higher levels of sustained activation across trials in the ventral striatum in response to positive pictures reported higher levels of psychological well-being on Ryff’s (1989) composite measure of well-being.
Further, they found a similar pattern in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a region often involved in working memory and attention, but also active when a person is regulating his or her emotion
as well as at the relationship between activity in these brain regions and an individual’s cortisol output over the course of the day
Participants with greater sustained activation in both the ventral striatum and the dorsolateral prefrontal region had lower levels of cortisol output, which suggests less activation of the body’s stress response
In their study, Davidson and Schuyler (2015) found that individuals with higher levels of sustained activation across trials in the ventral striatum in response to positive pictures reported higher levels of psychological well-being on Ryff’s (1989) composite measure of well-being. Further, they found a similar pattern in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a region often involved in working memory and attention, but also active when a person is regulating his or her emotion; as well as at the relationship between activity in these brain regions and an individual’s cortisol output over the course of the day. Participants with greater sustained activation in both the ventral striatum and the dorsolateral prefrontal region had lower levels of cortisol output, which suggests less activation of the body’s stress response.
What did the authors argue their findings indicated?
The authors argued that their findings indicate that activation across time in response to positive incentives in the ventral striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts well-being; a form of sustained happiness that may not depend directly upon external circumstances.
This is arguably a feedback loop with greater levels of well-being then leading to an increase in sustained positive emotion (in the form of sustained activation of the ventral striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)
Davidson and Schuyler (2015) argued that their findings indicate that activation across time in response to positive incentives in the ventral striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts well-being; a form of sustained happiness that may not depend directly upon external circumstances. This is arguably what?
a feedback loop with greater levels of well-being then leading to an increase in sustained positive emotion (in the form of sustained activation of the ventral striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)
Robust Recovery Following Negative Events (Resilience)
Arguably a key constituent of high levels of resilience is what?
high levels of well-being
Arguably a key constituent of high levels of resilience is high levels of well-being; indeed, the …
maintenance of high levels of well-being in the face of adversity seems to be a common theme among the differing definitions.
What seems to be a common theme among the differing definitions of resilience?
the maintenance of high levels of well-being in the face of adversity
One key way in which high levels of well-being being can be sustained in the face of adversity is what?
through effective recovery from negative events
One key way in which high levels of well-being being can be sustained in the face of adversity is through effective recovery from negative events (here we are conceptualizing recovery as what?)
as automatic in the sense that it does not require effortful control; rather there are large individual differences in the naturally occurring rate at which we recover from negative events
Who conducted a study looking at whether recovery following negative events is connected with well-being?
Schaefer et al (2013)
What did Schaefer et al explore in their 2013 study?
Whether recovery following negative events is connected with well-being
Describe the sample in Schaefer’s et als (2013) study looking at whether recovery following negative events is connected with well-being?
331 participants from the MIDUS study between the ages of 34-84 years old/