DISCONSIDER (too long) Flashcards
common features of organizations
- membership
- specified member roles
- formalized rules
- clear objectives
Economic foundations of business administration
- Role of markets
- Role of the entrepreneur and the purpose of the firm
- The firm in classical economics
- Basic variables
Efficiency
using as little resources as possible to attain a certain goal
How to design organizations so that they can fulfill a certain task?
- modern technologies enable large scale production
- large organizations enable specialization
- large organizations require coordination efforts
Classical organization theories
- Weber
- Taylor
- Fayol
Weber
Individuals follow authority if they regard it as legitimate
- different forms of authority in society.
- traditionally charismatic authority: makes them leaders.
- Traditional authority (kings).
Charismatic and traditional get replaced or complemented by legal authority.
Legal authority: future of modern society. Bureaucracy is legal authority
bureaucracy characteristics
- rules
- specified competencies
- hierarchy
- technical training
- neutrality
- written recording of rules and decisions
follow these and you’ll organize in the most efficient way. least resources. It’s reliable. Things don’t change unless changed formally. Work as precise as a machine
Critique and re-assessment to bureaucracy
- efficient, reliable, stable, and precise form of organization, but it might produce “one-dimensional” individuals, because there’s no space for freedom, creativity or emotion
- Analogy of machines is problematic
- oftentimes criticizes as the symbol for inefficiency.
Why is bureaucracy a symbol for ineffiency nowadays?
- blind rule following: employees lose sight of the organizational goals and instead follow the rules in an unreflected manner (rule following becomes the main objective)
- limited sustainability of rules to cover relevant tasks. Cannot cover everything in rules, so many things are beyond rules. Also need to rely on common sense in every organizational level
- inability of (per definition stable) rules to keep pace with dynamics in the organizational environment. Not flexible.
Taylor’s scientific management
- focus on the optimization of the labour process
- organization management based on scientific rules
basic ideas:
- separation of planning/control and execution of work
- managers concentrate on planning and control
- division of labour enables specialization and measurability
- time studies as a way to measure average time required for specific tasks. Leads to formulation of expected performance levels.
specialization and efficiency
- specialization leads to efficiency and optimal social welfare
because:
- learning effects: the most often a task is accomplished, the less effort is required
- economies of scale: cost per produced unit decreases with increasing quantities
- synergies: accomplishing similar tasks reduces overall effort
critique for Taylor’s scientific management
motivation exclusively through money
increased breakdown of work tasks into smaller subtasks leads to several negative things:
- monotony
- increased speed of work
- alienation: no worker understands the product to which they contribute
- increased surveillance: performance can be measured by the second. might be efficient, but humanly-speaking, simply not nice
- loss of self-determination
Fayol’s administrative approach
- critical insights from managerial practice as an instruction for successful organization and management
- within an optimal organization, a manager should focus mainly organizing, planning, and delegating: their only job is to make the organization optimal
- focus on the management process as a whole
- organizing as the design and implementation of an optimal organizational structure
“functions of management” by Fayol
- planning
- Organizing
- Command
- Coordination
- Control
Critique for Fayol’s administrative approach
Management principles as generally valid recipes for designing efficient organizations, but his principles are rather abstract. There is no empirical proof, so can the principles really be proved?
assumptions about the individual
- people are unreliable. There is a need for control and continuous supervision.
- individuals are unable to understand the organization and take responsibility. Managers understand what’s going on, and they’re in the position to tell the others what’s happening.
- individuals need to follow rules
- individuals are exclusively motivated by money.
assumption about the organization
- coordination need to come from the top of the organization
- all that matters is efficiency, no place for emotions
- the future can be foreseen - planning is possible
- division of labour always increases efficiency
- hierarchy as the only way to manage efficiently
assumptions about theory
- it’s able to produce generally applicable rules
- should aim at increasing organizational efficiency