discharge by frustration Flashcards
doctrine of absolute contracts (parties must perform the full contract)
Paradine v Jane
impossible to perform:
destruction or unavailability of something essential for the contracts performance
Taylor v Caldwell
personal performance
Robinson v Davidson
illegal to perform
Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barfour
radically different
(purpose no longer tangible)
Krell v Henry
radically different
(purpose of the contract was not voided)
Herne Bay Steam Boat v Hutton
time of frustrating event
Taylor v Caldwell
not very specific force majeure clauses
Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr
force majeure clauses causing issues with interpretation
RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping
contracts becoming more onerous or expensive
Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC
self-induced frustration
Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd
(s.1(2) Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
money owed ceases to be payable
(s.1(2) Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
money already paid can be recovered subject to deduction of expenses incurred
(s.1(3) Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
if one party has received a valuable benefit because of something done by the other in performance of the contract, the party receiving the benefit can be ordered to pay a just sum in return for it
frustration & common mistake overlapping
Griffith v Brymer