Disaster Planning Flashcards

1
Q

Mayell, 2002

A

There are 457 volcanoes with cities that house 1 million people or more within 100km of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What have we entered into an age of?

A

Mega-disasters in general, with many more people killed and affected (e.g. the 2004 South Asia Tsunami, which killed between 230-280 thousand people, and caused $19.9bn worth of damage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are deaths from disasters increasing?

A

Population increase, increased urbanisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Oppenheimer, 2011

A

Nearly 500 volcanic events in the 20th century impacted people, with up to 6 million people evacuated or left homeless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sparks, 2003

A

It is not always possible to predict volcanic eruptions because they can become critical systems that move from one state to another with only very minor internal or external triggers
Complex and chaotic systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two examples where volcanic systems switched very quickly:

A

1) Lascar in Chile - benign lava effusions suddenly changed to hazardous explosive activity after many years of eruption (Mathews, 1997)
2) Mt St Helens - magma had been slowly intruding however eruption was actually triggered by an external magnitude 5 earthquake, and thus eruption timings could have been very different without this trigger (Lipman, 1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline what happened at Nevado del Ruiz (except why it ended up being a disaster)

A

Voight, 1996
1985, 23,000 killed due to Lahars (20,000 in just Armero)
This disaster was “exclusively caused by cumulative human error”
Town of Armero
Volcano provided ample warming (seismic activity, fumaroles activity, phreatic eruption) - it was being continuously monitored
An accurate hazard zonation map was available, explicitly demarcating Armero as squarely in the zone of highest hazard (the town was built on old Lahars)
Safety on higher ground was within walking distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why did Nevado del Ruiz end up being a disaster? (3)

A

BUT

1) Many simply did not understand the advance warning and the risk to them - the hazard map had been poorly distributed
2) An evacuation was ordered the day of the eruption, but then retracted when ash stopped being emitted - people were told to stay inside, and that the intermittent ash was nothing to worry about - one survivor reports going to the fire station and being told that the ash was “nothing”
3) When a final evacuation was called, very close to the time, it was difficult to distribute the message due to electrical problems caused by a storm - the storms heavy rain and constant thunder overpowered the noise of the volcano, and with no systematic warning efforts, the residents of Armero were completely unaware of the continuing activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fiske, 1984

A

The Tale of Two Volcanoes
Soufriere Hills volcano on Guadeloupe - 1975
People were angered because scientists made the “wrong” call - called for an evacuation of 74,000 people but an eruption never occurred
This caused significant and long-term impact not he economic prosperity of the island
The situation was caused by a number of things, including the fact that people were very anxious in the shadow of Mt Pelee, and over media involvement pitting two teams of scientists against each other

In contrast to St Vincents eruption 1979 - one team of scientists, long-term monitoring allowed for understanding of patterns - information given to media only after scientific agreement, and only presented facts of what had happened, no speculation - evacuated 22,000 citizens before eruption occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline examples of why forecasting is not always clear:

A

1) Mt St Helens (1980) - the volcano erupted during an apparent lull in activity - it was later shown that this can be a sign of pressurisation prior to a volcanic explosion
2) Mt Pinatubo - even though the eruption was predicted, the main impact wasn’t - rainfall added to ash loading and led to roof collapse that killed >300 people - the combination of the volcano with Typhoon Tanya contributed to this loading, exemplifying how it is important to think about cross-over between hazards (Newhall and Punongbayan, 1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is forecasting often expressed in probabilities?

A

In order to account for uncertainty
Volcanic eruptions involve the interactions between highly non-linear and complex kinetic and dynamic processes - this leads to a rich range of possible behaviour
This complexity makes forecasting inherently difficult, and thus probabilistic modelling can help to constrain this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline the use of geologic reconnaissance at Pinatubo

A

1991
Newhall et al., 1996; Punongbayan et al., 1996
Geologic reconnaissance in the weeks leading up to the eruption revealed expensive pyroclastic flow deposits
With radiocarbon age determinations, scientists were quickly able to prepare an accurate hazard zonation map recognising the volcano’s propensity for highly explosive activity - this led to the evacuation in a 40km radius of 85,000 people
This effort, in combination with extensive monitoring of the volcano and a good evacuation plan, was estimated to have saved 5000-20,000 lives, and prevent at least US$2540 million of property damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Auippa et al., 2007

A

Used a quantitative saturation model to relate observed pre-eruptive increases in the ratio of CO2/SO2 to the refilling of Mt Etna’s shallow conduits with CO2 rich deep-reservoir magmas, leading to pressurisation and the triggering of an eruption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case study Soufriere Hills, Montserrat

A

Began 1995 - still ongoing (intermittent)
Evacuated in 1995
19 people killed in a surge on the 25th of June, 1997 - they returned to the exclusion zone against official advice, due to apparent in activity
Posed a big problem because evacuation needed to be at least 25km away, but the island is only 9km long - fortunately the mountains provided a barrier between an evacuated population and the volcano - 2/3 are an exclusion zone - this highlights the importance of not just maths, but expert judgement
Expert elicitation method was developed here (Aspinall and Cooke, 1998) - which calibrates expert judgement in times of uncertainty
Also used event trees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Martí et al., 2008

A

Use of event trees at Tenerife to model possible hazards in life of an eruption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Background of Merapi

A

October-November 2010

367 killed

17
Q

Outline the events of Merapi

A

The 2010 eruption was preceded by approximately 6 weeks of precursors activity (Budi-Santoso et al., 2013)
Rates of seismicity and SO2 during this time were comparable to or higher than the highest rates observed during previous, smaller eruptions
One day prior to the explosive eruption 400,000 people were evacuated from a 10km radius of the volcano (Salvage et al., 2017) - the only reason could get out so quickly was because everyone had a motorbike, and mobile phones - this evacuation was estimated to have saved 10-20 thousand lives (Jousset et al., 2013)
However activity increased very quickly, and >200 people were killed by PDCs at 15.5km from the summit

18
Q

Talk about the UV DOAS signal at Merapi

A

UV DOAS data was used to monitor activity, in collaboration with other measurements
Head of Division for research and technology development on geological hazards in Indonesia said “we needed a decisive parameter to “justify” the evacuation, and I found this in the UV DOAS monitoring” - this highlighting the importance of chemical measurements

19
Q

What makes emergency planning at Vesuvius so difficult?

A

1) Since the last eruption in 1944 there has been massive urbanisation with 700,000 people living near the volcano (Scaillet et al., 2008)
2) There is only a single motorway that can be used within the city to evacuate people if it were needed - evacuation would likely require moving 400,000 people, which is could take a week - this is too long as often volcanic eruptions can escalate within 24 hours - after careful consideration this was reduced to 3 days, but arguably this is still not enough time
UNLESS THE POPULATION IS REDUCED OVER TIME, THEN THERE IS AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION SHOULD IT ERUPT

20
Q

What eruption is most likely at Vesuvius and what hazard does this pose?

A

Not Plinian! A violent Strombolian eruption (what happened in 1944 and 1906)
The hazard is ash loading, which caused roof collapse and significant death and injury in 1906
If you put props into the houses to strengthen the roofs this could reduce the hazard

21
Q

Scaillet et al., 2008

A

Undertook petrological study to understand migration of magma chamber as a parameter controlling eruption style at Vesuvius and has seen gradual surface directed migration of the chamber over time

22
Q

Shea et al., 2011

A

Studied collapse and growth of Plinian column during AD79 eruption, as exemplified by tephra deposits

23
Q

Outline PDC modelling at Vesuvius

A

Dobran et al., 1994 and Neri et al., 2007
Models of Vesuvius PDC
Dobran was the first one, but since then much more sophisticated
Neri was a 3D model incorporating probability modelling and spatial patterns

24
Q

Outline the importance of communicating risk

A

Language and modes of expressing risk and hazard have crucial impacts on risk perception
Implies from scientist to scientist, scientist to authorities, and to the public

25
Q

How can communicating risk be improved?

A

1) When a single crisis management centre forms the hub for information retrieval and dissemination - this team must be multidisciplinary e.g. scientists, government, emergency services, civilians
2) Opinions should be settled before disseminating information - this is not to stifle opinion among scientists but this debate must happen behind closed doors
3) Understanding that you will never have perfect information
THIS WAS OUTLINED IN FISKE 1984

26
Q

Outline community preparedness

A

There is no point having a good monitoring or a good plan in place if the community are not aware of what to do in an emergency
This infrequency of volcanic hazards induces poor hazard awareness e.g. a study from Santorini revealed relatively poor understanding of volcanic hazards and risk and no emergency exit plan - Dominey-Howes and Minos-Minopoulos, 2004

27
Q

How can you raise community preparedness?

A

Therefore need programs to raise awareness! E.g. Ecuador - public education programmes including field trips and evacuation exercises help educate the 3mn people at risk

28
Q

What can volcanologists learn from Katrina?

A

About evacuation
New Orleans mayor, Ray Nagin, failed to make a decision in time and cost thousands of lives (Brinkley, 2006)
“As a real-life exercise in natural hazard disaster risk management, Hurricane Katrina provides important lessons for volcanologists” Woo, 2007

29
Q

What is one way to address uncertainty to evacuate?

A

Cost-benefit analysis e.g. as that done at Pinatubo (Newhall, 2000)