Disadvantages of Law Reform Bodies A03 Flashcards
What are the 4 disadvantages of law reform bodies
-Media
-Law commission
-Judicial reports & enquiries
-Pressure groups
-P1: media can sensationalise issues causing public outrage
pressure on the govt → rushed legislation with errors
-DP1: Dangerous Dogs Act
rushed and filled with errors, makes statutory interpretation more difficult
+WDP1: media influences which issues receive priority
can increase public interest = more attention → quicker reforms
-P2: law commission lack parliamentary time, political interest and resources
unsuccessful reforms, old laws with issues still actively being applied
-DP2: no obligation for the govt to abide by the final report (example)
rejection of the Offences Against the Persons bill in 2015, antiquated 1861 bill still applied
+WDP1: utilises expertise in various areas of law
can help modernise the law and bring it up to date with societal change
-P3: doesn’t uphold SoP theory
judges role is to apply the law not make it = arguably undemocratic
-DP3: very time consuming and expensive
leads to laws the need reform not happening - reduces public confidence
+WDP3: expert knowledge on interests and causes
bring light to issues politicians may be unaware of = increased efficiency
-P4: may not present a balanced argument
instead favour their own interest
-DP4: can use undesirable tactics e.g:
animal rights activists using violence and intimidation - reduces fairness
+WDP4: pressure groups are able to raise awareness of matters affecting their interest
gives the public a voice in the reform process