Diminished Responsibility Flashcards

1
Q

s.2 Homicide Act 1957

A

Defined in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s.52 Coroners and Justice Act 2009

A

Amended by

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A person who kills may be convicted of manslaughter>murder if he or she was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which -

A

(a) arose from a recognised medical condition
(b) substantially impaired D’s ability to
(i) understand the nature
of his conduct
(ii) to form a rational
judgement
(iii) to exercise self-control
(c) provides an explanation for D’s acts and omissions in killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Abnormality of mental functioning

A

‘a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary human beings that a reasonable person would term it abnormal’
-Byrne 1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Recognised medical condition

A

Psychological and physical conditions according to established medical classifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Psychotic condition

A

Golds 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Post-natal depression

A

Boots 2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mental disorder

A

Brennan 2014

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Alcohol Dependency Syndrome

A

Wood 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Depressive Illness

A

Dietschmann 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Asperger’s syndrome

A

Jama 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Battered Spouses’ Syndrome

A

Hobson 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dowds 2012

A

Excludes voluntary intoxication and immaturity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s.52(1A)(a)

A

To understand the nature of his conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

s.52(1A)(b)

A

To form a rational judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

s.52(1A)(c)

A

To exercise self-control

17
Q

What amounts to ‘substantial’?

A

The impairment must be more than merely trivial, but D’s mental functioning need not be totally impaired

18
Q

s.52(1)(c)

A

D has to prove that the abnormality of mental functioning provided an explanation for his acts (or omissions)
-causes D’s conduct, or is a significant contributory factor

19
Q

Intoxication alone

A

cannot support a defence
-Dowds 2012

20
Q

Wood

A

ADS may support a defence, if excessive alcohol consumption has caused actual brain damage

21
Q

Dietschmann

A

D is drunk and suffering from a pre-existing AMF, jury must ignore voluntary drinking