Diminished responsibility. Flashcards

1
Q

under the act…

A

s.52 coroners and justice act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

type of defence, applicable to what

A

specific , partial defence applicable to murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

if successful…

A

voluntary manslaughter charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

first requirment

A

abnormality of mental functioning define as a state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal (byrne)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

second requirement

A

the abnormality of mental functioning arises from a medically recognised condition suffered at the time of the murder (gomez)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

medically recognised conditions

A

depression, gittens
paranoia, simcox
schizophrenia moyle
medical evidence will be needed in support of the d (sutcliffe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the burden of proof (1st paragraph)

A

is on the d to prove they satisfy the defence requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2nd requirement,medical conditions- alcohol

A

alcohol dependence syndrome would also qualify (r v woods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

third requirement- substantially impaired

A

must be proven that d’s ability to meet 1 or more of the subsections set out in 1(A) of s52 CJA 2009 was substantially impaired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does substantially impaired mean

A

does not mean totally impaired, but more than trivial (lloyd)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the three requirements

A

a) understanding nature of d’s conduct
b) forming a rational judgement
c) exercising self control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

finally the abnormality must…

A

provide an explanation for the d killing v
must be casual connection between d’s abnormality of mental functioning (must be a significant contributory factor but need not be the only reason for doing so, golds) & the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

only include if intoxication present (after establishing medical conditions)

A

however this is different when d suffers from medically recognised condition and kills while intoxicated
judge should direct jury to ignore intox effects
& to consider whether the medical condition alone would amount to abnormality of mental functioning
r v dietchsmann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly