Dignitary Torts Flashcards
Appropriation & False Light
Appropriation - Use of P’s name or likeness for commercial purposes without P’s consent.
- Newsworthiness exception - no liability for use of P’s name or likeness for the purpose of reporting news
False light - widespread dissemination (Publication) of a material misrepresentation or falsehood about P that would be objectionable to a reasonable person.
- Includes mischaracterization of P’s views or conduct
-
Matters of public concern - D must have actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth of the matter publicized
- Note - this is the same as the constitutional considerations for defamation
- No newsworthiness exception
Intrustion upon seclusion
Intrusion upon seclusion - Intrusion upon P’s private affairs in a manner that would be objectionable to a reasonable person
- P must have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place
- Often arises in the context of peeping, eavesdropping or using hidden cameras on P’s Private property
- No newsworthiness exception
*
Disclosure
Disclosure of P’s confidential or private information
-
Requirements - disclosure must be:
1. Objectionalbe to a reasonable person - Public activities are not objectionable
- IE D discloses that the mayor secretly goes to gay clubs - mayor cannot recover for disclosure b/c his acts occur in public places
- Publicized to at least some small extent
Newsworthiness exception - no liability if private facts are newsworthy
Defamation
A statement concerning P, made by D to a third person, that is harmful to P’s reputation
- If the statement involves a matter of public concern or a public figure official, falsity and fault may be required.
Elements:
-
Defamatory statement - adversely affects P’s reputation
- Must be based on specific facts: name-calling is insufficient
- Concerning P - it must be reasonably understood that the statement concerns a living P or a very small group of P’s
- Publication - the statement must be intentionally or negligently made to a third person
- Harmful to P’s reputation
- Falsity & fault - only required if the statement involves a matter of public concern or a public figure official
Liability for republication - the republisher of a defamatory statement is liable to the same extent as the original publisher
Damages - P’s burden in proving damages depends on whether the defamatory statement was libel or slander
Defamation:
Constitutional Considerations
1st Ammend considerations arise when defamation involves a public figure, public official and/or a matter of public concern.
Public figures, public officials, and matters of public concern
- Public figure - one who has pervasive fame or notoriety or voluntarily assumes a central role in a particular public matter
- Public official - public office holder
- Matter of public concern - statement relates to a community interest or concern (includes national interests and concerns)
**Additional elements **- if defamation involves a public figure, official, and/or public concern, P must prove:
- Falsity - P must prove the statement was false
-
Fault - P must prove D was at fault; standards differ for public vs. private pigures:
- Public official or figure - actual malice standard (knowledge of the statement’s falsity or reckless disregard to whether it was false)
- Private figure - negligence of the statement’s veracity
Damages
- Public figures or officials - compensatory damages are presumed; puntivtive damages are available
- Private figures - damages for actual injury only; P must prove actual malic for compensatory or punitive damages
note: for private figures and private matters, there is no fault standard at common law
Defamation:
Damages Considerations
Damages depend on thether the defamatory statement constitutes libel, slander or slander per se
Libel - P does not have to prove damages
- Libel - a written defamatory statement
- Note - TV and radio broadcasts are considered libel
Slander - P must prove special damages unless the statement constitutes slander per se
- Slander - a spoken defamatory statement
- Special damages - a specific economic loss resulting from the slander, beyond damage to P’s reputation or emotional injury
- Slander per se - A slanderous statement that either:
- Concerns and adversely reflects on P’s business or preofessional reputation
- Claims that P has a loathsome disease
- Claims that P committed a crime of moral turpitude
- Imputes a woman’s chastity
Defamation:
Defenses
Consent, truth, and privilege may be valid defenses to defamation
Consent
- IE P may consent to an organization investigating her and sharing it’s findings with potential employers
Truth
- Truth is a complete defense to a defamation claim
Privilege
- **Absolute privilege ** - Protects statements by gov officials in their official capacity
-
Qualified privilege - D’s liability for defamatory statements is limited if the purpose of the speech is to promote truthfulness
- IE credit report, letter of recommendation, employment reference
Wrongful Legal Proceedings:
Malicious Prosecution & Abuse of Process
Malicious Prosecution
- Arises when D brings a completely frivolous charge or claim against P with an improper purpose
-
Elements:
-
D commenced a prior criminal or civil legal proceeding against P
- Prosecutors are immune
- The proceeding terminated in P’s favor
- No probable cause for the original proceeding
- D knew P was not gulity (criminal) or liable (civil) or had insufficient facts to reasonably believe in P’s guilt or fault
4. D had an improper purpose in initiating the proceeding
5. Damages
-
D commenced a prior criminal or civil legal proceeding against P
Abuse of Process
- Arises when D uses the legal system as an ulterior purpose to threaten or act against P
- Elements:
- Wrongful use of process for an ulterior purpose
- Definite act or threat against P to accomplish an ulterior purpose
- Damages