Defenses to Intentional Torts Flashcards
Consent
A defense to all intentional torts
- D must demonstrate that P consented to D’s Otherwise tortious conduct
Express consent - P gives D verbal or written consent
- nullified by duress, fraud or mistake
Implied consent - D can reasonably infer P’s consent based on custom or P’s observable conduct
- Often arises if P Participates in an activity or goes to a place where minor torts are common (ie tackle football, P has given implied consent to certain forms of battery)
- Facts must indicate that based on P’s objective conduct, D was reasonable in interpreting P’s consent
Scope of consent
- D can be held liable for conduct that exceeds the scope of P’s valid consent (express or implied)
*
Self Defense
Defense of Others
Defense of Property
Self-defense, defense of others, and defense of property are protective privilege defenses
Requirements for all protective privilege defenses:
- Reasonable belief - D must reasonably believe that a tort is being or about to be committed
- Proper timing - the harm defended against must be in progress or imminent; if it is already completed, no defense
-
Reasonable force - D’s force must be proportionate to the harm threatened
- Deadly force - only allowed if D reasonable believes a life is in danger (never permitted to protect property alone)
Self Defense
- No duty to retreat
- Reasonble mistake by D is okay
- Only available to the initial aggressor if D responds with disproportionate force
Defense of others - D steps into the shoes of the intended targed.
- D may not use greater force than the inteded target could have reasonable used
Defense of property
- Unavailable if the initial actor had a privilege to enter the land (ie recapturing chattel)
- Reasonable mistake is only allowed as to whether the intrusion occured, not as to whether a privilege existed.
Necessity
A defense to torts against property (trespass to land, trespass to chattel, conversion) in which D damages P’s property in an effort to avoid a greater danger.
Requirements:
- D’s interference with P’s property must be reasonably necessary to avoid immediate threatened injury
- Threatened inury must be more serious than the interference undertaken to avert it
Public necessity - absolute defense
- D’s invasion of P’s property must be reasonably necessary to protect the community or a large group of people
- absolute defense P cannot recover any damagers
Private necessity - limited defense
- D invades P’s property to protect himself or his property
- limited defense P can recover actual damages, but not punitive or nominal damages
Recapture of chattels
Recapture of chattels is a defense to trespass: D may use peaceful means to recover possession of chattel taken unlawfully.
Limitations & Requirements:
- D - owner must make a timely demand for return of chattel
- Exception - not required if doing so is futile or dangerous
- D - owner may recapture from the original wrongdoer or a third person who obtained the chattel
- Privelege to enter depends on who possesses property:
-
Wrongdoer’s property - reasonable time and manner
- D-owner may enter at a reasonable time to reclaim chattel in a reasonable manner
-
Innocent person’s property - notice required
- D - owner must first give notice to landowner
- If landowner refuses to allow entry, D may enter at a reasonable time and in a peaceful manner
- D does not have a privilege to enter another’s land if his chattel is on the perperty through his own fault
- D - owner must first give notice to landowner
-
Wrongdoer’s property - reasonable time and manner